REPORT on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities, as regards the European External Action Service
4.10.2010 - (COM(2010)0085 – C7‑0086/2010 – 2010/0054(COD)) - ***I
Committee on BudgetsCommittee on Budgetary Control
Rapporteurs: Ingeborg Gräßle, Crescenzio Rivellini
(Rule 51 – Joint committee meetings)
DRAFT EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION
on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities, as regards the European External Action Service
(COM(2010)0085 – C7‑0086/2010 – 2010/0054(COD))
(Ordinary legislative procedure: first reading)
The European Parliament,
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council (COM(2010)0085),
– having regard to Article 294(2) and Article 322 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union as well as Article 106a of the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament (C7‑0086/2010),
– having regard to Article 294(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
– having regard to Rule 55 of its Rules of Procedure,
– having regard to the joint deliberations of the Committee on Budgets and of the Committee on Budgetary Control pursuant to Rule 51 of its Rules of Procedure,
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgets and of the Committee on Budgetary Control and the opinions of the Committee on Foreign Affairs, Committee on Development, Committee on International Trade and of the Committee on Constitutional Affairs (A7-0263/2010),
1. Adopts its position at first reading hereinafter set out;
2. Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the national parliaments.
Amendment 1 Proposal for a regulation – amending act Recital 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(1) Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 of 25 June 2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities (hereinafter the Financial Regulation), lays down the budgetary principles and financial rules which should be respected in all legislative acts. It is necessary to amend certain provisions of the Financial Regulation in order to take account of the amendments introduced by the Treaty of Lisbon. |
(1) Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 of 25 June 2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities (hereinafter the Financial Regulation), lays down the budgetary principles and financial rules which should be respected in all legislative acts. It is necessary to amend certain provisions of the Financial Regulation in order to take account of the amendments introduced by the Treaty of Lisbon and of the establishment of the European External Action Service, pursuant to Council Decision 2010/427/EU of 26 July 2010 establishing the organisation and functioning of the European External Action Service1. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1 OJ L 201, 3.8.2010, p.30. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 2 Proposal for a regulation – amending act Recital 2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(2) The Treaty of Lisbon establishes a European External Action Service (hereinafter “EEAS”). According to the conclusions of the European Council of 29 and 30 October 2009, the EEAS is a service of a sui generis nature and should be treated as an institution for the purposes of the Financial Regulation. |
(2) The Treaty of Lisbon establishes a European External Action Service (hereinafter “EEAS”). According to Council Decision 2010/427/EU of 26 July 2010 establishing the organisation and functioning of the European External Action Service, the EEAS is a service of a sui generis nature and should be treated as an institution for the purposes of the Financial Regulation. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 3 Proposal for a regulation – amending act Recital 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(3) Given that the EEAS should be treated as an institution for the purposes of the Financial Regulation, the European Parliament is to grant discharge to the EEAS for the implementation of the appropriations voted in the EEAS section of the Budget. The European Parliament should also continue to grant discharge to the Commission for the implementation of Commission's section of the Budget, including operational appropriations implemented by Heads of Delegations who are sub-delegated authorising officers of the Commission. |
(3) Given that the EEAS should be treated as an institution for the purposes of the Financial Regulation, the European Parliament is to grant discharge to the EEAS for the implementation of the appropriations voted in the EEAS section of the Budget. In this context, the EEAS shall be fully subject to the procedures provided for in Article 319 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and in Articles 145 to 147 of the Financial Regulation. The EEAS shall fully cooperate with institutions involved in the discharge procedure and provide, as appropriate, the additional necessary information, including through attendance in meetings of the relevant bodies. The European Parliament should also continue to grant discharge to the Commission for the implementation of Commission's section of the Budget, including operational appropriations implemented by Heads of Delegations who are sub-delegated authorising officers of the Commission. Given the novelty of this structure, high-standard provisions on transparency and budgetary and financial accountability need to be applied.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 4 Proposal for a regulation – amending act Recital 3 a (new) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(3a) Within the EEAS, a Director General for budget and administration should be responsible to the High Representative for the administrative and internal budgetary management of the EEAS. He shall work within the existing format and follow the same administrative rules which are applicable to the part of Section III of the EU budget that falls under heading 5 of the Multiannual Financial Framework. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 5 Proposal for a regulation – amending act Recital 3 b (new) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(3b)The Department for Inspections of the EEAS should examine the functioning of the Union Delegations and report directly to the Executive Secretary General. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 6 Proposal for a regulation – amending act Recital 3 c (new) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(3c) The setting up of the EEAS should be guided, as stated in the guidelines laid down by the European Council of 29 and 30 October 2009, by the principle of cost-efficiency aiming towards budget neutrality. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 7 Proposal for a regulation – amending act Recital 4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(4) The Lisbon Treaty foresees that Commission Delegations become part of the EEAS as Union Delegations. In order to ensure their efficient management, all administrative and support expenditure of Union Delegations which finance common costs should be executed by a single support service. To that effect, the Financial Regulation should foresee the possibility for detailed rules, to be agreed with the Commission, in order to facilitate the implementation of the Union Delegations' operating appropriations entered in the EEAS and the Council sections of the Budget. |
(4) The Lisbon Treaty foresees that Commission Delegations become part of the EEAS as Union Delegations. In order to ensure their efficient management, all administrative and support expenditure of Union Delegations which finance common costs should be executed by a single support service. To that effect, the Financial Regulation should foresee the possibility for detailed arrangements, to be agreed with the Commission, in order to facilitate the implementation of the Union Delegations' administrative appropriations. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 8 Proposal for a regulation – amending act Recital 5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(5) It is necessary to ensure the continuity of the functioning of Union Delegations and in particular the continuity and efficiency in the management of external aid by the Delegations. Therefore the Commission should be authorised to subdelegate its powers of budget implementation of operational expenditure to Heads of Union Delegations belonging to EEAS as a separate institution. Furthermore, where the Commission implements the budget under direct centralised management, it should be allowed to do so also through sub-delegation to Heads of Union Delegations. The authorising officers by delegation of the Commission should continue to be responsible for the definition of internal management and control systems, while the Heads of Union Delegations should be responsible for the adequate set up and functioning of internal management and control systems and for the management of the funds and the operations carried out within their Delegations and they should report twice a year to that effect. |
(5) It is necessary to ensure the continuity of the functioning of Union Delegations and in particular the continuity and efficiency in the management of external aid by the Delegations. Therefore the Commission should be authorised to subdelegate its powers of budget implementation of operational expenditure to Heads of Union Delegations belonging to EEAS as a separate institution. Furthermore, where the Commission implements the budget under direct centralised management, it should be allowed to do so also through sub-delegation to Heads of Union Delegations. The authorising officers by delegation of the Commission should continue to be responsible for the definition of internal management and control systems, while the Heads of Union Delegations should be responsible for the adequate set up and functioning of internal management and control systems and for the management of the funds and the operations carried out within their Delegations and they should report twice a year to that effect. Such delegation should be capable of being revoked in accordance with the rules applicable to the Commission. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 9 Proposal for a regulation – amending act Recital 8 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(8) The accounting officer of the Commission remains responsible for the entire Commission section of the Budget, including accounting operations relating to appropriations sub-delegated to Heads of Union Delegations. Therefore, it is necessary to clarify that the responsibilities of the accounting officer of the EEAS should only concern the EEAS section of the budget to avoid any overlapping of responsibilities. |
(8) The accounting officer of the Commission remains responsible for the entire Commission section, as well as the EEAS section, of the Budget. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 10 Proposal for a regulation – amending act Recital 10 a (new) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(10a) In order to ensure democratic scrutiny of the implementation of the European Union's budget, the statements of assurance made by Heads of Union Delegations on the internal management and control systems in their delegation should be annexed to their annual activity reports and then be transmitted in copy also to the European Parliament. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 11 Proposal for a regulation – amending act Recital 10 b (new) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(10b) The term "High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy"should, for the purposes of Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002, be interpreted in accordance with the different functions of the High Representative under Article 18 of the Treaty on European Union. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 12 Proposal for a regulation – amending act Recital 10 c (new) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(10c) The European Development Fund, being the Union’s most important financial instrument for development cooperation with the African, Caribbean and Pacific States, should fall within the ambit of the general budget of the European Union and the general Financial Regulation. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 13 Proposal for a regulation – amending act Article 1 – point 1 Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 Article 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 14 Proposal for a regulation – amending act Article 1 – point 3 Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 Article 30 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 15 Proposal for a regulation – amending act Article 1 – point 4 Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 Article 31 – paragraph 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 16 Proposal for a regulation – amending act Article 1 – point 4 a (new) Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 Article 31 – paragraph 1 a (new) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 17 Proposal for a regulation – amending act Article 1 - point 4 b (new) (new) Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 Article 33 - paragraph 3 (new) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 18 Proposal for a regulation – amending act Article 1 – point 4 c (new) Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 Article 41 – paragraph 1 a (new) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 19 Proposal for a regulation – amending act Article 1 – point 4 d (new) Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 Article 46 – paragraph 1 – point 5 a (new) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 20 Proposal for a regulation – amending act Article 1 - point 5 Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 Article 50 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 21 Proposal for a regulation – amending act Article 1 – point 6 Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 Article 51 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 22 Proposal for a regulation – amending act Article 1 – point 8 Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 Article 59 – paragraph 5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 23 Proposal for a regulation – amending act Article 1 – point 8 a (new) Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 Article 60 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 24 Proposal for a regulation – amending act Article 1 – point 9 Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 Article 60a | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 25 Proposal for a regulation – amending act Article 1 – point 10 Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 Article 61 – paragraph 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 26 Proposal for a regulation – amending act Article 1 – point 11 - point a Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 Article 66 – paragraph 3a | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 27 Proposal for a regulation – amending act Article 1 – point 11 - point b Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 Article 66 – paragraph 5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 28 Proposal for a regulation – amending act Article 1 – point 12 Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 Article 85 - paragraph 1 a (new) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 29 Proposal for a regulation – amending act Article 1 – point 12 a (new) Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 Article 126 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 30 Proposal for a regulation – amending act Article 1 – point 12 b Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 Article 146 – paragraph 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 31 Proposal for a regulation – amending act Article 1 – point 12 c (new) Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 Article 147 a (new) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 32 Proposal for a regulation – amending act Article 1 – point 14 Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 Article 165 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 33 Proposal for a regulation – amending act Article 1 – point 15 Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 Article 185 – paragraph 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
OPINION of the Committee on Foreign Affairs (21.9.2010)
for the Committee on Budgets and Committee on Budgetary Control
on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities, as regards the European External Action Service
(COM(2010)0085 – C7‑0086/2010 – 2010/0054(COD))
Rapporteur: Göran Färm
AMENDMENTS
The Committee on Foreign Affairs calls on the Committee on Budgets and the Committee on Budgetary Control, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following amendments in its report:
Amendment 1 Proposal for a regulation – amending act Recital 1 | |||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||
(1) Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 of 25 June 2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities (hereinafter the Financial Regulation), lays down the budgetary principles and financial rules which should be respected in all legislative acts. It is necessary to amend certain provisions of the Financial Regulation in order to take account of the amendments introduced by the Treaty of Lisbon. |
(1) Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 of 25 June 2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities (hereinafter the Financial Regulation), lays down the budgetary principles and financial rules which should be respected in all legislative acts. It is necessary to amend certain provisions of the Financial Regulation in order to take account of the amendments introduced by the Treaty of Lisbon and of the establishment of the European External Action Service, pursuant to Council Decision 2010/427/EU of 26 July 20101 establishing the organisation and functioning of the European External Action Service. | ||||||||||||||||||
|
1 OJ L 201, 3.8.2010, p.30. | ||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 2 Proposal for a regulation – amending act Recital 2 | |||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||
(2) The Treaty of Lisbon establishes a European External Action Service (hereinafter “EEAS”). According to the conclusions of the European Council of 29 and 30 October 2009, the EEAS is a service of a sui generis nature and should be treated as an institution for the purposes of the Financial Regulation. |
(2) The Treaty of Lisbon establishes a European External Action Service (hereinafter “EEAS”). According to Council Decision 2010/427/EU of 26 July 20101 establishing the organisation and functioning of the European External Action Service, the EEAS is to be treated as an institution for the purposes of the Financial Regulation. | ||||||||||||||||||
|
1 OJ L 201, 3.8.2010, p.30 | ||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 3 Proposal for a regulation – amending act Recital 3 | |||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||
(3) Given that the EEAS should be treated as an institution for the purposes of the Financial Regulation, the European Parliament is to grant discharge to the EEAS for the implementation of the appropriations voted in the EEAS section of the Budget. The European Parliament should also continue to grant discharge to the Commission for the implementation of Commission's section of the Budget, including operational appropriations implemented by Heads of Delegations who are sub-delegated authorising officers of the Commission. |
(3) Given that the EEAS should be treated as an institution for the purposes of the Financial Regulation, the European Parliament is to grant discharge to the EEAS for the implementation of the appropriations voted in the EEAS section of the Budget. In this context, the EEAS should be fully subject to the procedures provided for in Article 319 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and in Articles 145 to 147 of the Financial Regulation. The EEAS should fully cooperate with institutions involved in the discharge procedure and provide, as appropriate, the additional necessary information, including through attendance in meetings of the relevant bodies. The European Parliament should also continue to grant discharge to the Commission for the implementation of Commission's section of the Budget, including operational appropriations implemented by Heads of Delegations who are sub-delegated authorising officers of the Commission. Given the complexity of this structure, high-standard provisions on traceability and budgetary and financial accountability need to be applied. | ||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 4 Proposal for a regulation – amending act Recital 4 | |||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||
(4) The Lisbon Treaty foresees that Commission Delegations become part of the EEAS as Union Delegations. In order to ensure their efficient management, all administrative and support expenditure of Union Delegations which finance common costs should be executed by a single support service. To that effect, the Financial Regulation should foresee the possibility for detailed rules, to be agreed with the Commission, in order to facilitate the implementation of the Union Delegations' operating appropriations entered in the EEAS and the Council sections of the Budget. |
(4) The Lisbon Treaty foresees that Commission Delegations become part of the EEAS as Union Delegations. In order to ensure their efficient management, all administrative and support expenditure of Union Delegations which finance common costs should be executed by a single support service. To that effect, the Financial Regulation should foresee the possibility for detailed rules, to be agreed with the Commission, in order to facilitate the implementation of the Union Delegations' appropriations entered in the EEAS section of the Budget. | ||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 5 Proposal for a regulation – amending act Recital 5 | |||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||
(5) It is necessary to ensure the continuity of the functioning of Union Delegations and in particular the continuity and efficiency in the management of external aid by the Delegations. Therefore the Commission should be authorised to subdelegate its powers of budget implementation of operational expenditure to Heads of Union Delegations belonging to EEAS as a separate institution. Furthermore, where the Commission implements the budget under direct centralised management, it should be allowed to do so also through sub-delegation to Heads of Union Delegations. The authorising officers by delegation of the Commission should continue to be responsible for the definition of internal management and control systems, while the Heads of Union Delegations should be responsible for the adequate set up and functioning of internal management and control systems and for the management of the funds and the operations carried out within their Delegations and they should report twice a year to that effect. |
(5) It is necessary to ensure the continuity of the functioning of Union Delegations and in particular the continuity and efficiency in the management of external aid by the Delegations. Therefore the Commission should be authorised to subdelegate its powers of budget implementation of operational expenditure to Heads of Union Delegations belonging to EEAS as a separate institution. Furthermore, where the Commission implements the budget under direct centralised management, it should be allowed to do so also through sub-delegation to Heads of Union Delegations. The authorising officers by delegation of the Commission should continue to be responsible for the definition of internal management and control systems, while the Heads of Union Delegations should be responsible for the adequate set up and functioning of internal management and control systems and for the management of the funds and the operations carried out within their Delegations and they should report twice a year to that effect. The Commission should have the right to withdraw specific subdelegations in accordance with its own rules. | ||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 6 Proposal for a regulation – amending act Recital 10 a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||
|
(10a) The term "High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy" is to be interpreted, for the purposes of this Regulation, in accordance with the different functions of the High Representative under Article 18 of the Treaty on European Union. | ||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 7 Proposal for a regulation – amending act Article 1 - point 4 a (new) Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 Article 31 - paragraph 1 a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 8 Proposal for a regulation – amending act Article 1 - point 4 b (new) Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 Article 33 - paragraph 2 - point d a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 9 Proposal for a regulation – amending act Article 1 - point 4 c (new) Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 Article 46 - paragraph 1 - point 5 a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 10 Proposal for a regulation – amending act Article 1 - point 5 Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 Article 50 - paragraph 1 | |||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 11 Proposal for a regulation – amending act Article 1 - point 6 Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 Article 51 - paragraph 2 a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 12 Proposal for a regulation – amending act Article 1 - point 8 Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 Article 59 - paragraph 5 | |||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 13 Proposal for a regulation – amending act Article 1 - point 9 Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 Article 60 a - paragraph 4 a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 14 Proposal for a regulation – amending act Article 1 - point 9 Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 Article 60 a - paragraph 2 | |||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 15 Proposal for a regulation – amending act Article 1 - point 11 - point b Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 Article 66 - paragraph 5 - subparagraph 3 a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||
|
PROCEDURE
Title |
Amendment of Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities, as regards the European External Action Service |
|||||||
References |
COM(2010)0085 – C7-0086/2010 – 2010/0054(COD) |
|||||||
Committee responsible |
BUDG |
|||||||
Opinion by Date announced in plenary |
AFET 21.4.2010 |
|
|
|
||||
Rapporteur Date appointed |
Göran Färm 3.5.2010 |
|
|
|||||
Discussed in committee |
2.9.2010 |
20.9.2010 |
|
|
||||
Date adopted |
20.9.2010 |
|
|
|
||||
Result of final vote |
+: –: 0: |
47 1 0 |
||||||
Members present for the final vote |
Gabriele Albertini, Dominique Baudis, Bastiaan Belder, Franziska Katharina Brantner, Elmar Brok, Mário David, Michael Gahler, Ana Gomes, Takis Hadjigeorgiou, Heidi Hautala, Jelko Kacin, Ioannis Kasoulides, Tunne Kelam, Nicole Kiil-Nielsen, Maria Eleni Koppa, Andrey Kovatchev, Wolfgang Kreissl-Dörfler, Eduard Kukan, Alexander Graf Lambsdorff, Vytautas Landsbergis, Ulrike Lunacek, Mario Mauro, Kyriakos Mavronikolas, Francisco José Millán Mon, Raimon Obiols, Bernd Posselt, Cristian Dan Preda, José Ignacio Salafranca Sánchez-Neyra, Marek Siwiec, Ernst Strasser, Hannes Swoboda, Charles Tannock, Zoran Thaler, Inese Vaidere, Kristian Vigenin, Boris Zala |
|||||||
Substitute(s) present for the final vote |
Laima Liucija Andrikienė, Reinhard Bütikofer, Kinga Gál, Roberto Gualtieri, Georgios Koumoutsakos, Doris Pack, Marietje Schaake, György Schöpflin, Indrek Tarand, Dominique Vlasto |
|||||||
Substitute(s) under Rule 187(2) present for the final vote |
Danuta Jazłowiecka, Catherine Soullie |
|||||||
OPINION of the Committee on Development (1.9.2010)
for the Committee on Budgets
on the proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities, as regards the European External Action Service
(COM(2010)0085 – C7‑0086/2010 – 2010/0054(COD))
Rapporteur: Thijs Berman
SHORT JUSTIFICATION
The European External Action Service will manage its own administrative budget and also have responsibility for certain parts of the operational budget falling within its remit.
All categories of EEAS staff will serve in the delegations of the European Union as well as in Headquarters - including staff originating from the European Commission, the Secretariat of the Council and from Member States' diplomatic services. The different backgrounds of the staff members will make the EEAS a melting-pot for a multiplicity of corporate cultures, and it will gradually have to establish a culture of its own.
In establishing the new Service, and particularly in drawing up its financial rules, it is necessary to ensure the maximum safeguards for financial probity from the beginning, in such a way that financial integrity will become ingrained in corporate culture of the Service.
One important way to promote financial probity is to ensure the smooth interaction of the various services responsible for supervision of financial matters, especially in EU delegations. These services must also cooperate with the bodies responsible for investigating and processing cases of financial irregularities.
Your rapporteur therefore proposes amendments requiring the inspectorate, located in the central administration of the EEAS (according to Article 3 of the Council Decision establishing the EEAS) to work closely with the Commission internal auditor, who will also function as the internal auditor of the EEAS. The amendments also oblige staff working in the inspectorate, as soon as they become aware of possible cases of irregularities, to pass the information to the Commission internal auditor and to the bodies responsible for investigating and processing such cases.
By means of strengthening these safeguards, your rapporteur hopes to enhance the confidence of European citizens in their European institutions. The structural improvements proposed in this Opinion are minor in themselves, but aim to impose, at all levels of the new Service, the culture of financial integrity necessary for the trust in the smooth and unquestionable future functioning of the EEAS.
AMENDMENTS
The Committee on Development calls on the Committee on Budgets, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following amendments in its report:
Amendment 1 Proposal for a regulation – amending act Article 1 - point 7 a (new) Regulation (EC) No 1605/2002 Article 56 a (new) | ||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Justification | ||||||||||||||||
Accountability for integrity in financial operations in the Union Delegations is enhanced if the Department for Inspections of the EEAS is directly responsible to the High Representative / Vice-President. The requirement for it to cooperate with the Commission’s internal audit service is intended to improve the effectiveness of both services. | ||||||||||||||||
Amendment 2 Proposal for a regulation – amending act Article 1 – point 9 Regulation (EC) No 1605/2002 Article 60a – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3 | ||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Justification | ||||||||||||||||
It is often the inspectorate which first becomes aware of evidence of financial irregularities. Information should be passed to the relevant authorities at the first indication that such a situation may arise, and all staff members of Union delegations need to share this responsibility. | ||||||||||||||||
Amendment 3 Proposal for a regulation – amending act Article 1 – point 9 Regulation (EC) No 1605/2002 Article 60a – paragraph 2 | ||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Justification | ||||||||||||||||
It is often the inspectorate which first becomes aware of evidence of financial irregularities. Information should be passed to the relevant authorities at the first indication that such a situation may arise, and all staff members of Union delegations need to share this responsibility. | ||||||||||||||||
Amendment 4 Proposal for a regulation – amending act Article 1 – point 12 Regulation (EC) No 1605/2002 Article 85 – paragraphs 1 and 3 | ||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Justification | ||||||||||||||||
It is often the inspectorate which first becomes aware of evidence of financial irregularities. Information should be passed to the relevant authorities at the first indication that such a situation may arise. | ||||||||||||||||
Amendment 5 Proposal for a regulation – amending act Article 1 - point 12 a (new) Regulation (EC) No 1605/2002 Article 95 - paragraph 3 a (new) | ||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Justification | ||||||||||||||||
The World Bank has entered into a cross-debarment agreement with Multilateral Development Banks by which they jointly identify actors whose lack of financial probity does not make them suitable partners in the management of funds. The EEAS should join this initiative or establish a similar system. |
PROCEDURE
Title |
Amendment of Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities, as regards the European External Action Service |
|||||||
References |
COM(2010)0085 – C7-0086/2010 – 2010/0054(COD) |
|||||||
Committee responsible |
BUDG |
|||||||
Opinion by Date announced in plenary |
DEVE 21.4.2010 |
|
|
|
||||
Rapporteur Date appointed |
Thijs Berman 4.5.2010 |
|
|
|||||
Discussed in committee |
12.7.2010 |
|
|
|
||||
Date adopted |
30.8.2010 |
|
|
|
||||
Result of final vote |
+: –: 0: |
23 0 0 |
||||||
Members present for the final vote |
Véronique De Keyser, Leonidas Donskis, Charles Goerens, Catherine Grèze, Enrique Guerrero Salom, András Gyürk, Eva Joly, Filip Kaczmarek, Franziska Keller, Gay Mitchell, Norbert Neuser, Bill Newton Dunn, Maurice Ponga, Michèle Striffler, Alf Svensson, Eleni Theocharous, Patrice Tirolien, Ivo Vajgl, Iva Zanicchi |
|||||||
Substitute(s) present for the final vote |
Kriton Arsenis, Miguel Angel Martínez Martínez, Patrizia Toia |
|||||||
Substitute(s) under Rule 187(2) present for the final vote |
Derek Vaughan |
|||||||
OPINION of the Committee on International Trade (31.8.2010)
for the Committee on Budgets
on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities, as regards the European External Action Service
(COM(2010)0085 – C7‑0086/2010 – 2010/0054(COD))
Rapporteur: Kader Arif
AMENDMENTS
The Committee on International Trade calls on the Committee on Budgets, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following amendments in its report:
Amendment 1 Proposal for a regulation – amending act Article 1 - point 9 Regulation 1605/2002 Article 60a – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3 | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Justification | |||||||||||||
Since the adoption of the Treaty of Lisbon, the Common commercial policy (CCP) is an exclusive competence of the EU. Therefore, it is important to secure that in case of conflict between the Trade Commissioner and the VP/HR regarding the way a Head of Delegation or its staff perform CCP duties, the final decision remains in the hands of the Commission. |
PROCEDURE
Title |
Amendment of Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities, as regards the European External Action Service |
|||||||
References |
COM(2010)0085 – C7-0086/2010 – 2010/0054(COD) |
|||||||
Committee responsible |
BUDG |
|||||||
Opinion by Date announced in plenary |
INTA 21.4.2010 |
|
|
|
||||
Rapporteur Date appointed |
Kader Arif 28.4.2010 |
|
|
|||||
Discussed in committee |
14.7.2010 |
|
|
|
||||
Date adopted |
30.8.2010 |
|
|
|
||||
Result of final vote |
+: –: 0: |
20 1 0 |
||||||
Members present for the final vote |
William (The Earl of) Dartmouth, Kader Arif, Daniel Caspary, Marielle De Sarnez, Christofer Fjellner, Yannick Jadot, Metin Kazak, Bernd Lange, David Martin, Emilio Menéndez del Valle, Vital Moreira, Niccolò Rinaldi, Tokia Saïfi, Helmut Scholz, Robert Sturdy, Keith Taylor, Iuliu Winkler, Pablo Zalba Bidegain |
|||||||
Substitute(s) present for the final vote |
George Sabin Cutaş, Carl Schlyter, Jarosław Leszek Wałęsa |
|||||||
Substitute(s) under Rule 187(2) present for the final vote |
Edit Bauer |
|||||||
OPINION of the Committee on Constitutional Affairs (7.9.2010)
for the Committee on Budgets
on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) n° 1605/2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities, as regards the European External Action Service.
(COM(2010)0085 – C7‑0086/2010 – 2010/0054(COD))
Rapporteur: Guy Verhofstadt
AMENDMENTS
The Committee on Constitutional Affairs calls on the Committee on Budgets, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following amendments in its report:
Amendment 1 Proposal for a regulation – amending act Recital 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
(1) Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 of 25 June 2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities (hereinafter the Financial Regulation), lays down the budgetary principles and financial rules which should be respected in all legislative acts. It is necessary to amend certain provisions of the Financial Regulation in order to take account of the amendments introduced by the Treaty of Lisbon. |
(1) Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 of 25 June 2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities (hereinafter the Financial Regulation), lays down the budgetary principles and financial rules which should be respected in all legislative acts. It is necessary to amend certain provisions of the Financial Regulation in order to take account of the amendments introduced by the Treaty of Lisbon and of the establishment of the European External Action Service. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 2 Proposal for a regulation – amending act Recital 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
(2) The Treaty of Lisbon establishes a European External Action Service (hereinafter “EEAS”). According to the conclusions of the European Council of 29 and 30 October 2009, the EEAS is a service of a sui generis nature and should be treated as an institution for the purposes of the Financial Regulation. |
(2) The Treaty of Lisbon establishes a European External Action Service (hereinafter “EEAS”). According to Council Decision 2010/427/EU of 26 July 2010 establishing the organisation and functioning of the European External Action Service1, the EEAS is a service of a sui generis nature and is to be treated as an institution for the purposes of the Financial Regulation. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
_______________________ 1 OJ L 201, 3.8.2010, p. 30. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 3 Proposal for a regulation – amending act Recital 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
(3) Given that the EEAS should be treated as an institution for the purposes of the Financial Regulation, the European Parliament is to grant discharge to the EEAS for the implementation of the appropriations voted in the EEAS section of the Budget. The European Parliament should also continue to grant discharge to the Commission for the implementation of Commission's section of the Budget, including operational appropriations implemented by Heads of Delegations who are sub-delegated authorising officers of the Commission. |
(3) Given that the EEAS should be treated as an institution for the purposes of the Financial Regulation, the European Parliament is to grant discharge to the EEAS for the implementation of the appropriations voted in the EEAS section of the Budget. In this context, the EEAS must fully respect the procedures provided for in Article 319 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and in Articles 145 to 147 of the Financial Regulation. The European Parliament should also continue to grant discharge to the Commission for the implementation of Commission's section of the Budget, including operational appropriations implemented by Heads of Delegations who are sub-delegated authorising officers of the Commission. Given the complexity of this structure, rigorous provisions on traceability and budgetary and financial accountability need to be applied. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 4 Proposal for a regulation – amending act Recital 4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
(4) The Lisbon Treaty foresees that Commission Delegations become part of the EEAS as Union Delegations. In order to ensure their efficient management, all administrative and support expenditure of Union Delegations which finance common costs should be executed by a single support service. To that effect, the Financial Regulation should foresee the possibility for detailed rules, to be agreed with the Commission, in order to facilitate the implementation of the Union Delegations' operating appropriations entered in the EEAS and the Council sections of the Budget. |
(4) The Lisbon Treaty foresees that Commission Delegations become part of the EEAS as Union Delegations. In order to ensure their efficient management, all administrative and support expenditure of Union Delegations which finance common costs should be executed by a single support service. To that effect, the Financial Regulation should foresee the possibility for detailed rules, to be agreed with the Commission, in order to facilitate the implementation of the Union Delegations' operating appropriations entered in the EEAS section of the Budget. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 5 Proposal for a regulation – amending act Recital 10 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
(10) In order to ensure coherence, efficiency and cost-effectiveness of financial control, the internal auditor of the Commission should act as the internal auditor of the EEAS in respect of the budget implementation of both the Commission and the EEAS sections of the Budget. |
(10) In order to ensure coherence, efficiency and cost-effectiveness of financial control, the internal auditor of the Commission should act as the internal auditor of the EEAS in respect of the budget implementation of both the Commission and the EEAS sections of the Budget. The European Parliament fully supports this and calls on the High Representative/Vice President of the Commission to come forward with a proposal on this issue. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 6 Proposal for a regulation – amending act Recital 10 a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(10a) The term "High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy"should, for the purposes of Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002, be interpreted in accordance with the different functions of the High Representative under Article 18 of the Treaty on European Union. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 7 Proposal for a regulation – amending act Article 1 – point 4 a (new) Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 Article 31 – paragraph 1 a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Justification | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
The text reproduces faithfully the agreement reached in Madrid and voted on in plenary. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 8 Proposal for a regulation – amending act Article 1 – point 4 b (new) Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 Article 41 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Justification | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
The text reproduces faithfully the agreement reached in Madrid and voted on in plenary. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 9 Proposal for a regulation – amending act Article 1 – point 4 c (new) Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 Article 46 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point a – paragraphs 1 a to 1 d (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Justification | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
The text reproduces faithfully the agreement reached in Madrid and voted on in plenary. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 10 Proposal for a regulation – amending act Article 1 – point 5 Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 Article 50 – paragraph 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 11 Proposal for a regulation – amending act Article 1 – point 5 a (new) Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 Article 50 – paragraph 1 a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Justification | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
The text reproduces faithfully the agreement reached in Madrid and voted on in plenary. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 12 Proposal for a regulation – amending act Article 1 – point 9 Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 Article 60 a – paragraph 4 a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 13 Proposal for a regulation – amending act Article 1 – point 11 – point b Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 Article 66 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 3 a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Justification | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
The text reproduces faithfully the agreement reached in Madrid and voted on in plenary. |
PROCEDURE
Title |
Amendment of Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities, as regards the European External Action Service |
|||||||
References |
COM(2010)0085 – C7-0086/2010 – 2010/0054(COD) |
|||||||
Committee responsible |
BUDG |
|||||||
Opinion by Date announced in plenary |
AFCO 21.4.2010 |
|
|
|
||||
Rapporteur Date appointed |
Guy Verhofstadt 3.5.2010 |
|
|
|||||
Discussed in committee |
17.5.2010 |
2.6.2010 |
14.6.2010 |
|
||||
Date adopted |
6.9.2010 |
|
|
|
||||
Result of final vote |
+: –: 0: |
21 0 0 |
||||||
Members present for the final vote |
Carlo Casini, Andrew Duff, Matthias Groote, Roberto Gualtieri, Zita Gurmai, Gerald Häfner, Stanimir Ilchev, Ramón Jáuregui Atondo, Constance Le Grip, David Martin, Paulo Rangel, Algirdas Saudargas, György Schöpflin, József Szájer, Søren Bo Søndergaard, Indrek Tarand, Rafał Trzaskowski, Guy Verhofstadt |
|||||||
Substitute(s) present for the final vote |
Enrique Guerrero Salom, Íñigo Méndez de Vigo, Vital Moreira, Helmut Scholz |
|||||||
PROCEDURE
Title |
Amendment of Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities, as regards the European External Action Service |
|||||||
References |
COM(2010)0085 – C7-0086/2010 – 2010/0054(COD) |
|||||||
Date submitted to Parliament |
11.3.2010 |
|||||||
Committee responsible Date announced in plenary |
BUDG 21.4.2010 |
|||||||
Committee(s) asked for opinion(s) Date announced in plenary |
AFET 21.4.2010 |
DEVE 21.4.2010 |
INTA 21.4.2010 |
CONT 21.4.2010 |
||||
|
ENVI 21.4.2010 |
JURI 21.4.2010 |
AFCO 21.4.2010 |
FEMM 21.4.2010 |
||||
Not delivering opinions Date of decision |
ENVI 27.4.2010 |
JURI 19.4.2010 |
FEMM 29.9.2010 |
|
||||
Rapporteur(s) Date appointed |
Crescenzio Rivellini 23.3.2010 |
Ingeborg Gräßle 23.3.2010 |
|
|||||
Date adopted |
28.9.2010 |
|
|
|
||||
Result of final vote |
+: –: 0: |
59 3 0 |
||||||
Members present for the final vote |
Damien Abad, Jean-Pierre Audy, Francesca Balzani, Zuzana Brzobohatá, Andrea Češková, Jorgo Chatzimarkakis, Giovanni Collino, Andrea Cozzolino, Frédéric Daerden, Jean-Luc Dehaene, Luigi de Magistris, Martin Ehrenhauser, James Elles, Göran Färm, José Manuel Fernandes, Eider Gardiazábal Rubial, Salvador Garriga Polledo, Jens Geier, Gerben-Jan Gerbrandy, Ivars Godmanis, Ingeborg Gräßle, Estelle Grelier, Roberto Gualtieri, Carl Haglund, Lucas Hartong, Jutta Haug, Jiří Havel, Monika Hohlmeier, Cătălin Sorin Ivan, Iliana Ivanova, Sidonia Elżbieta Jędrzejewska, Anne E. Jensen, Sergej Kozlík, Jan Kozłowski, Alain Lamassoure, Giovanni La Via, Monica Luisa Macovei, Barbara Matera, Claudio Morganti, Nadezhda Neynsky, Jan Olbrycht, Aldo Patriciello, Miguel Portas, Dominique Riquet, Christel Schaldemose, Bart Staes, Georgios Stavrakakis, László Surján, Helga Trüpel, Derek Vaughan, Axel Voss |
|||||||
Substitute(s) present for the final vote |
Inés Ayala Sender, Zuzana Brzobohatá, Tamás Deutsch, Martin Ehrenhauser, Christofer Fjellner, Roberto Gualtieri, Monica Luisa Macovei, Jan Olbrycht, Markus Pieper, Christel Schaldemose, Sergio Paolo Francesco Silvestris, Georgios Stavrakakis, Axel Voss, Kerstin Westphal, Joachim Zeller |
|||||||