IZVJEŠĆE o prijedlogu Uredbe Vijeća o apoenima i tehničkim parametrima kovanica eura namijenjenih za stavljanje u optjecaj (izmijenjena verzija)

20.12.2013 - (COM(2013)0184 – C7‑0132/2013 – 2013/0096(NLE)) - *

Odbor za ekonomsku i monetarnu politiku
Izvjestitelj: Jean-Paul Gauzès
(Izmjena – članak 87. Poslovnika)

Amandmani

• 001-002 (PDF - 84 KB)
• 001-002 (DOC - 42 KB)

NACRT ZAKONODAVNE REZOLUCIJE EUROPSKOG PARLAMENTA

o nacrtu Uredbe Vijeća o apoenima i tehničkim parametrima kovanica eura namijenjenih za stavljanje u optjecaj (izmijenjena verzija)

(COM(2013)0184 – C7‑0132/2013 – 2013/0096(NLE))

(Savjetovanje)

Europski parlament,

–   uzimajući u obzir prijedlog Komisije upućen Vijeću (COM(2013)0184),

–   uzimajući u obzir članak 128. stavak 2. Ugovora o funkcioniranju Europske unije, na temelju kojeg se Vijeće savjetovalo s Parlamentom (C7‑0132/2013),

–   uzimajući u obzir Međuinstitucionalni sporazum od 28. studenog 2001. o sustavnijoj metodi preinaka pravnih akata[1],

–   uzimajući u obzir dopis Odbora za pravna pitanja upućen Odboru za ekonomsku i monetarnu politiku od 17. lipnja 2013. sukladno članku 87. stavku 3. Poslovnika,

–   uzimajući u obzir članke 87. i 55. Poslovnika,

–   uzimajući u obzir izvješće Odbora za ekonomsku i monetarnu politiku (A7-0479/2013),

A. budući da ovaj prijedlog, prema mišljenju savjetodavne skupine pravnih službi Europskog parlamenta, Vijeća i Komisije, ne sadrži nikakve značajnije promjene, osim promjena koje su u prijedlogu prepoznate kao takve, i budući da se prijedlog glede kodifikacije neizmijenjenih odredbi iz ranijih akata ovim promjenama svodi na jednostavnu kodifikaciju postojećih akata bez izmjene njihova sadržaja;

1.  odobrava prijedlog Komisije s izmjenama;

2.  poziva Komisiju da sukladno tome izmijeni svoj prijedlog u skladu s člankom 293. stavkom 2. Ugovora o funkcioniranju Europske unije;

3.  poziva Vijeće da obavijesti Parlament ako namjerava odstupiti od teksta koji je Parlament odobrio;

4.  traži od Vijeća da se ponovo savjetuje s Parlamentom ako namjerava bitno izmijeniti svoj prijedlog;

5.  nalaže svojem predsjedniku da stajalište Parlamenta proslijedi Vijeću i Komisiji.

Amandman  1 Prijedlog Uredbe Vijeća Uvodna izjava 4.
Tekst koji je predložila Komisija	Izmjena
(4) Jedinstvenim sustavom kovanica Unije trebalo bi se pridobiti povjerenje javnosti i uvesti tehnološke inovacije kojima se jamči njegova sigurnost, pouzdanost i učinkovitost.	(4) Jedinstvenim sustavom kovanica Unije trebalo bi se pridobiti povjerenje javnosti i uvesti tehnološke inovacije kojima se jamči njegova sigurnost, pouzdanost i učinkovitost. Sustav bi također trebao pomoći u sprječavanju krivotvorenja.
Amandman  2 Prijedlog Uredbe Vijeća Članak 10. – stavak 8.
Tekst koji je predložila Komisija	Izmjena
8. Komisija sve relevantne informacije u vezi s novim nacionalnim motivima na kovanicama namijenjenim za stavljanje u opticaj objavljuje u Službenom listu Europske unije.	8. Komisija sve relevantne informacije u vezi s novim nacionalnim motivima na kovanicama namijenjenim za stavljanje u opticaj objavljuje u Službenom listu Europske unije.
	Komisija obavještava Parlament o mogućim prigovorima u skladu sa stavkom 5.

• [1]               SL C 77, 28.3.2002., str. 1.

ANNEX 1: LETTER FROM THE COMMITTEE ON LEGAL AFFAIRS

Ref.: D(2013)65094

Mrs Sharon Bowles

Chair of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs

ASP 10G201

Brussels

Subject:     Proposal for a Council Regulation on denominations and technical specifications of euro coins intended for circulation (recast)

                  (COM(2013)0184 – C7-0132/2013 – 2013/0096(NLE))

Dear Chair,

The Committee on Legal Affairs, which I am honoured to chair, has examined the proposal referred to above, pursuant to Rule 87 on recasting, as introduced into the Parliament's Rules of Procedure.

Paragraph 3 of that Rule reads as follows:

"If the committee responsible for legal affairs considers that the proposal does not entail any substantive changes other than those identified as such in the proposal, it shall inform the committee responsible.

In such a case, over and above the conditions laid down in Rules 156 and 157, amendments shall be admissible within the committee responsible only if they concern those parts of the proposal which contain changes.

However, if in accordance with point 8 of the Interinstitutional Agreement, the committee responsible intends also to submit amendments to the codified parts of the proposal, it shall immediately notify its intention to the Council and to the Commission, and the latter should inform the committee, prior to the vote pursuant to Rule 54, of its position on the amendments and whether or not it intends to withdraw the recast proposal."

Following the opinion of the Legal Service, whose representatives participated in the meetings of the Consultative Working Party examining the recast proposal, and in keeping with the recommendations of the draftsperson, the Committee on Legal Affairs considers that the proposal in question does not include any substantive changes other than those identified as such in the proposal and that, as regards the codification of the unchanged provisions of the earlier acts with those changes, the proposal contains a straightforward codification of the existing texts, without any change in their substance.

Furthermore, pursuant to Rules 86(2) and 86(3), the Committee on Legal Affairs considered that the technical adaptations suggested in the opinion of the abovementioned Working Party were necessary in order to ensure that the proposal complied with the recasting rules.

In conclusion, after discussing it at its meeting of 16 December 2013, the Committee on Legal Affairs, unanimously[1], recommends that the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs, as the committee responsible, proceed to examine the above proposal in accordance with Rule 87.

Yours faithfully,

Klaus-Heiner LEHNE

Encl.: Opinion of the Consultative Working Party.

• [1]  The following Members were present: Françoise Castex (Vice-Chair), Christian Engström, Marielle Gallo, Giuseppe Gargani, Klaus-Heiner Lehne (Chair), Bernhard Rapkay, Evelyn Regner (Vice-Chair), Francesco Enrico Speroni, Dimitar Stoyanov, Rebecca Taylor, Alexandra Thein, Tadeusz Zwiefka.

ANNEX 2: OPINION OF THE CONSULTATIVE WORKING PARTY OF THE LEGAL SERVICES OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE COUNCIL AND THE COMMISSION

	GROUPE CONSULTATIF DES SERVICES JURIDIQUES

                     Brussels, 4 June 2013

OPINION

FOR THE ATTENTION OF           THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

                                                       THE COUNCIL

                                                       THE COMMISSION

Proposal for a Council Regulation on denominations and technical specifications of euro coins intended for circulation

COM(2013) 184 final of 11.4.2013 - 2013/0096 (NLE)

Having regard to the Inter-institutional Agreement of 28 November 2001 on a more structured use of the recasting technique for legal acts, and in particular to point 9 thereof, the Consultative Working Party consisting of the respective legal services of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission met on 23 April 2013 for the purpose of examining, among others, the aforementioned proposal submitted by the Commission.

At that meeting[1], an examination of the proposal for a Council Regulation recasting Council Regulation (EC) No 975/98 of 3 May 1998 on denominations and technical specifications of euro coins intended for circulation resulted in the Consultative Working Party’s establishing, by common accord, that in recital 9 of the draft recast text, which corresponds to recital 11 of Regulation (EC) No 975/98, the word "limits" should be adapted so as to read "limited". Moreover, with regard to that same recital, the Working Party also acknowledged that the quoted Directive 76/769/EEC on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States relating to restrictions on the marketing and use of certain dangerous substances and preparations has been repealed by Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH), establishing a European Chemicals Agency, amending Directive 1999/45/EC and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 793/93 and Commission Regulation (EC) No 1488/94 as well as Council Directive 76/769/EEC and Commission Directives 91/155/EEC, 93/67/EEC, 93/105/EC and 2000/21/EC.

In consequence, examination of the proposal has enabled the Consultative Working Party to conclude, without dissent, that the proposal does not comprise any substantive amendments other than those identified as such. The Working Party also concluded, as regards the codification of the unchanged provisions of the earlier act with those substantive amendments, that the proposal contains a straightforward codification of the existing legal text, without any change in its substance.

C. PENNERA                       H. LEGAL                            L. ROMERO REQUENA

Jurisconsult                            Jurisconsult                            Director General

• [1]  The Consultative Working Party had at its disposal the English, French and German language versions of the proposal and worked on the basis of the English version, being the master-copy language version of the text under discussion.

REZULTAT KONAČNOG GLASOVANJA U ODBORU

Datum usvajanja	17.12.2013
Rezultat konačnog glasovanja	+: –: 0:	42 0 2
Zastupnici nazočni na konačnom glasovanju	Marino Baldini, Burkhard Balz, Elena Băsescu, Sharon Bowles, Udo Bullmann, Nikolaos Chountis, George Sabin Cutaş, Leonardo Domenici, Derk Jan Eppink, Diogo Feio, Elisa Ferreira, Ildikó Gáll-Pelcz, Jean-Paul Gauzès, Sven Giegold, Sylvie Goulard, Liem Hoang Ngoc, Gunnar Hökmark, Othmar Karas, Wolf Klinz, Jürgen Klute, Philippe Lamberts, Werner Langen, Astrid Lulling, Ivana Maletić, Arlene McCarthy, Marlene Mizzi, Ivari Padar, Antolín Sánchez Presedo, Olle Schmidt, Peter Simon, Peter Skinner, Theodor Dumitru Stolojan, Ivo Strejček, Kay Swinburne, Sampo Terho, Marianne Thyssen, Ramon Tremosa i Balcells, Corien Wortmann-Kool, Pablo Zalba Bidegain
Zamjenici nazočni na konačnom glasovanju	Fabrizio Bertot, Zdravka Bušić, Herbert Dorfmann, Bas Eickhout, Vicky Ford, Krišjānis Kariņš
Zamjenici nazočni na konačnom glasovanju prema čl. 187. st. 2.	Wim van de Camp