REPORT on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 96/53/EC of 25 July 1996 laying down for certain road vehicles circulating within the Community the maximum authorised dimensions in national and international traffic and the maximum authorised weights in international traffic
27.3.2014 - (COM(2013)0195 – C7‑0102/2013 – 2013/0105(COD)) - ***I
Committee on Transport and Tourism
Rapporteur: Jörg Leichtfried
DRAFT EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION
on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 96/53/EC of 25 July 1996 laying down for certain road vehicles circulating within the Community the maximum authorised dimensions in national and international traffic and the maximum authorised weights in international traffic
(COM(2013)0195 – C7‑0102/2013 – 2013/0105(COD))
(Ordinary legislative procedure: first reading)
The European Parliament,
– having regard to the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council (COM(2013)0195),
– having regard to Article 294(2) and Article 91 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament (C7‑0102/2013),
– having regard to Article 294(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
– having regard to the opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee of 11 July 2013[1],
– after consulting the Committee of the Regions,
– having regard to Rule 55 of its Rules of Procedure,
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Transport and Tourism (A7-0256/2014),
1. Adopts its position at first reading hereinafter set out;
2. Calls on the Commission to refer the matter to Parliament again if it intends to amend its proposal substantially or replace it with another text;
3. Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the national parliaments.
Amendment 1 Proposal for a directive Recital 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(1) The White Paper ‘Roadmap to a Single European Transport Area – Towards a competitive and resource efficient transport system’ published in 20116 emphasised the need to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, particularly carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions, by 60% in comparison with 1990 levels by 2050. |
(1) The White Paper ‘Roadmap to a Single European Transport Area – Towards a competitive and resource efficient transport system’ published in 20116 emphasised the need to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, particularly carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions, by 60% in comparison with 1990 levels by 2050, as well as by 20% by 2020. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
__________________ |
__________________ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
6 COM (2011) 0144 |
6 COM (2011) 0144 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 2 Proposal for a directive Recital 1 a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
(1a) As there are currently no policies in place to deal with the rising CO2 emissions from trucks, the Commission should assess the introduction of fuel efficiency standards for trucks, further extending its legislative approach in respect of cars and vans. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 3 Proposal for a directive Recital 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(3) Technological developments include the possibility of attaching retractable or foldable aerodynamic devices to the rear of vehicles, mainly trailers or semi-trailers, but which then exceed the maximum lengths allowed under Directive 96/53/EC. This equipment may be installed as soon as this Directive enters into force, as the products are available on the market and already used in other continents. |
(3) Technological developments include the possibility of attaching retractable or foldable aerodynamic devices to the rear of vehicles, mainly trailers or semi-trailers, but which then exceed the maximum lengths allowed under Directive 96/53/EC. This equipment may be installed as soon as this Directive enters into force, as the products are available on the market and already used in other continents. The same applies to energy-absorbing aerodynamic cowls and underrun protective devices affixed in the area of the wheels on the sides and at the rear under the trailers, semi-trailers and vehicles. These can significantly improve the energy efficiency of the vehicle while also significantly reducing the risk of injury to other road users. This Directive should also encourage and facilitate innovation in vehicle and transport unit design. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 4 Proposal for a directive Recital 3 a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
(3a) The Commission should develop an approach aimed at reducing empty runs in road freight transport within the framework of measures concerning ‘weights and dimensions’, as well as minimum harmonisation rules for road cabotage, in order to avoid dumping practices. Furthermore, the review of Directive 1999/62/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council1a ("the Eurovignette Directive") should also be used to reflect progress in estimating the external costs, and to mandate the internalisation of external costs, for heavy goods vehicles. The Commission should present, before 1 January 2015, a proposal to amend the Eurovignette Directive. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
____________________ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
1a Directive 1999/62/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 June 1999 on the charging of heavy goods vehicles for the use of certain infrastructures (OJ L 187, 20.7.1999, p. 42). | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 5 Proposal for a directive Recital 4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(4) The improved aerodynamics of the cabs of motor vehicles would also allow significant gains on the energy performance of vehicles, in conjunction with the devices mentioned in recital 3 above. However, this improvement is impossible under the current maximum lengths set by Directive 96/53/EC without reducing the vehicle load capacity and threatening the economic equilibrium of the sector. Therefore a derogation from this maximum length is required. |
(4) Heavy-good vehicles are responsible for about 26 % of road transport CO2 emissions in Europe while their fuel efficiency has hardly improved over the last 20 years. The improved aerodynamics of the cabs of motor vehicles would allow significant gains in the energy performance of vehicles, in conjunction with the devices mentioned in recital 3 above, and are urgently needed in order for the road freight sector to significantly reduce vehicle emissions. However, this improvement is impossible under the current maximum lengths set by Directive 96/53/EC without reducing the vehicle load capacity and threatening the economic equilibrium of the sector. Therefore a derogation from this maximum length is required. Any such derogation should not be used to increase the payload of the vehicle. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 6 Proposal for a directive Recital 5 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(5) In its policy orientations on road safety 2011-20207, the Commission set out measures to make vehicles safer and better protect vulnerable road users. The importance of visibility for vehicle drivers was also underlined in the Commission’s report to the European Parliament and the Council on the implementation of Directive 2007/38/EC on the retrofitting of mirrors to heavy goods vehicles registered in the Community8. A new cab profile will also contribute to improving road safety by reducing the blind spot in the driver’s vision, including under the windscreen, which should help save the lives of many vulnerable road users such as pedestrians or cyclists. This new profile could also incorporate energy absorption structures in the event of a collision. The potential gain in the volume of the cab would also improve the driver’s comfort and safety. |
(5) In its policy orientations on road safety 2011-20207, the Commission set out measures to make vehicles safer and better protect vulnerable road users. The importance of visibility for vehicle drivers was also underlined in the Commission’s report to the European Parliament and the Council on the implementation of Directive 2007/38/EC on the retrofitting of mirrors to heavy goods vehicles registered in the Community8. A new cab profile will also contribute to improving road safety by reducing the blind spot in the driver’s vision, including under the windscreen and to the side of the vehicle, which should help save the lives of many vulnerable road users such as pedestrians or cyclists. The new cab profile should therefore, after an appropriate transitional period, become mandatory. This new profile should also incorporate energy absorption structures in the event of a collision. The potential gain in the volume of the cab would also improve the driver’s comfort and safety. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
__________________ |
__________________ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
7 COM(2010) 389 |
7 COM(2010) 389 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
8 COM (2012) 258 |
8 COM (2012) 258 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 7 Proposal for a directive Recital 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(6) Aerodynamic devices and their installation in vehicles must be tested before being put on the market. To this end, Member States are to issue certificates that will be recognised by other Member States. |
(6) Aerodynamic devices and their installation in vehicles must be tested, in accordance with the test procedure for the measurement of aerodynamic performance which is being developed by the Commission, before being put on the market. To this end, Member States are to issue certificates that will be recognised by other Member States. The Commission should develop detailed technical guidelines on the application and requirements for certificates. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 8 Proposal for a directive Recital 6 a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
(6a) The 2011 White Paper on Transport provides that 30 % of road freight carried over distances of more than 300 km should shift to other modes, such as rail or waterborne transport, by 2030, and more than 50 % by 2050, facilitated by efficient and green freight corridors. In order to meet this goal, appropriate infrastructure will need to be developed. This goal was approved by the European Parliament in its resolution of 15 December 2011 on the Roadmap to a Single European Transport Area – Towards a competitive and resource efficient transport system1a. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
_________________ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
1a OJ C 168 E, 14.6.2013, p. 72. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 9 Proposal for a directive Recital 6 b (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
(6b) In order to meet the objectives of the 2011 White Paper on Transport, the revision of Directive 96/53/EC will present an opportunity to improve the safety and comfort of drivers, taking into account the requirements laid down in Council Directive 89/391/EEC1a ("the Occupational Health and Safety Framework Directive"). | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
____________________ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
1a Council Directive 89/391/EEC of 12 June 1989 on the introduction of measures to encourage improvements in the safety and health of workers at work (OJ L 183, 26.9.1989, p. 1). | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 10 Proposal for a directive Recital 7 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(7) Longer vehicles may be used in cross-border transport if the two Member States concerned already allow it and if the conditions for derogation under Article 4(3), (4) or (5) of the Directive are met. The European Commission has already provided guidance on the application of Article 4 of the Directive. The transport operations referred to in Article 4(4) do not have a significant impact on international competition if the cross-border use remains limited to two Member States where the existing infrastructure and the road safety requirements allow it. This balances the Member States' right under the principle of subsidiarity to decide on transport solutions suited to their specific circumstances with the need to prevent such policies from distorting the internal market. The provisions of Article 4 (4) are clarified in this respect. |
deleted | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 11 Proposal for a directive Recital 8 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(8) Using alternative engines that no longer rely only on fossil fuels and are therefore non-polluting or less polluting, such as electric or hybrid engines for heavy-duty vehicles or buses (mainly in urban or suburban environments) generates extra weight which should not be counted at the expense of the effective load of the vehicle so that the road transport sector is not penalised in economic terms. |
(8) Using alternative engines that no longer rely only on fossil fuels and are therefore non-polluting or less polluting, such as electric or hybrid engines for heavy-duty vehicles or buses (mainly in urban or suburban environments) generates extra weight which should not be counted at the expense of the effective load of the vehicle so that the road transport sector is not penalised in economic terms. Vehicles equipped with low-carbon technologies should be permitted to exceed the maximum weight by up to one tonne, depending on the weight required for the technology. However, the extra weight should not increase the load capacity of the vehicle. The principle of technological neutrality should be maintained. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 12 Proposal for a directive Recital 9 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(9) The White Paper on Transport also stresses the need to monitor developments in intermodal transport, particularly in the area of containerisation, where 45-foot containers are increasingly used. They are transported by rail or inland waterways. But the road components of intermodal journeys can only be undertaken today if both the Member States and the transporters follow cumbersome administrative procedures or if these containers have patented chamfered corners, the cost of which is prohibitive. Increasing the length of the vehicles transporting them by 15 cm could eliminate these administrative procedures for transporters and facilitate intermodal transport, without risk or prejudice to the infrastructure or other road users. The small increase that this 15 cm represents in relation to the length of an articulated truck (16.50 m) does not constitute an additional risk to road safety. In the policy orientation of the White Paper on Transport, this increase is however authorised only for intermodal transport, for which the road component does not exceed 300 km for operations involving a rail, river or sea component. This distance appeared sufficient to link an industrial or commercial site with a freight terminal or a river port. To link a seaport and support the development of motorways of the sea, a longer distance is possible for a short intra-European maritime transport operation. |
(9) The White Paper on Transport also stresses the need to monitor developments in intermodal transport, particularly in the area of containerisation, where 45-foot containers are increasingly used. They are transported by rail or inland waterways. But the road components of intermodal journeys can only be undertaken today if both the Member States and the transporters follow cumbersome administrative procedures or if these containers have patented chamfered corners, the cost of which is prohibitive. Increasing the length of the vehicles transporting them by 15 cm could eliminate these administrative procedures for transporters and facilitate intermodal transport, without risk or prejudice to the infrastructure or other road users. The small increase that this 15 cm represents in relation to the length of an articulated truck (16.50 m) does not constitute an additional risk to road safety. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 13 Proposal for a directive Recital 12 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(12) The authorities responsible for enforcing road transport-related requirements note a high number of infringements, sometimes serious, particularly in relation to the weight of transport vehicles. This situation stems from the insufficient number of checks conducted under Directive 96/53/EC, or from their inefficiency. Furthermore, the procedures and rules for checks differ between Member States, creating legal uncertainty for drivers of vehicles operating in several Member States of the Union. Furthermore, transporters that do not comply with the relevant rules enjoy a significant competitive advantage over competitors that do comply with the rules, and over other modes of transport. This situation constitutes an obstacle to the proper functioning of the internal market. It is therefore important that Member States increase the pace of checks carried out, both the manual checks and the pre-selections for manual checks. |
(12) The authorities responsible for enforcing road transport-related requirements note a high number of infringements, sometimes serious, particularly in relation to the weight of transport vehicles. This situation stems from the insufficient number of checks conducted under Directive 96/53/EC, or from their inefficiency. Furthermore, the procedures and rules for checks differ between Member States, creating legal uncertainty for drivers of vehicles operating in several Member States of the Union. Furthermore, transporters that do not comply with the relevant rules enjoy a significant competitive advantage over competitors that do comply with the rules, and over other modes of transport. This situation constitutes an obstacle to the proper functioning of the internal market and a risk to road safety. It is therefore important that Member States increase the pace and efficiency of checks carried out, both the manual checks and the pre-selections for manual checks, based on a risk-rating system. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 14 Proposal for a directive Recital 14 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(14) The observation of a high number of infringements of the provisions of Directive 96/53/EC is to a large extent due to the non-deterrent level of penalties prescribed by Member States’ legislation for violations of these rules, or even the absence of any such penalties. This weak point is further compounded by the wide variety in the levels of administrative penalties applicable in the different Member States. To remedy these weak points, the levels and categories of administrative penalties for infringements of Directive 96/53/EC should be approximated at Union level. These administrative penalties should be effective, proportionate and dissuasive. |
(14) The observation of a high number of infringements of the provisions of Directive 96/53/EC is to a large extent due to the non-deterrent level of penalties prescribed by Member States’ legislation for violations of these rules, or even the absence of any such penalties. This weak point is further compounded by the wide variety in the levels of administrative penalties applicable in the different Member States. To remedy these weak points, the levels and categories of administrative penalties for infringements of Directive 96/53/EC should be approximated at Union level. These administrative penalties should be effective, proportionate, dissuasive and non-discriminatory. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 15 Proposal for a directive Recital 16 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(16) The European Parliament and the Council should be regularly informed of the checks on road traffic carried out by the Member States. This information, provided by the Member States, will enable the Commission to ensure compliance with this Directive by hauliers and to define whether or not additional coercive measures should be developed. |
(16) The European Parliament and the Council should be regularly informed of the checks on road traffic carried out by the Member States. This information, provided by the Member States through their respective contact points, will enable the Commission to ensure compliance with this Directive by hauliers and to define whether or not additional coercive measures should be developed. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 16 Proposal for a directive Recital 16 a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
(16a) The Commission should review Annex I to Directive 96/53/EC and report on its implementation, taking into account, inter alia, impacts on international competition, modal split, costs of infrastructure adaption and the environmental and safety objectives of the European Union as set in the 2011 White Paper on Transport. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 17 Proposal for a directive Recital 17 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(17) The Commission should be empowered to adopt delegated acts, in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, to define the requirements imposed on new aerodynamic devices placed in the rear of the vehicle or the design of new motor vehicles, as well as the technical specifications to ensure full interoperability of onboard weighing devices, and guidelines on the procedures for checking the weight of vehicles in circulation. It is particularly important that the Commission carry out appropriate consultations during its preparatory work, including at expert level. The Commission, when preparing and drawing-up delegated acts, shall ensure a simultaneous, timely and appropriate transmission of relevant documents to the European Parliament and Council. |
(17) The Commission should be empowered to adopt delegated acts, in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, to define the requirements imposed on new aerodynamic and underrun protective devices placed at the sides and in the rear of the vehicle or the design of new motor vehicles, with a view to reviewing European type-approval procedures as referred to in Directive 2007/46/EC within the framework of UNECE regulations, as well as the technical specifications to ensure full interoperability of onboard weighing devices, and guidelines on the procedures for checking the weight of vehicles in circulation. It is particularly important that the Commission carry out appropriate consultations during its preparatory work, including at expert level. The consultations should include the interested parties such as manufacturers, drivers, road safety associations, traffic authorities, and training centres. The Commission shall publish a report on the results of the consultation. The interested parties should be left sufficient time to comply with these requirements. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 18 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 1 Directive 96/53/EC Article 2 – subparagraph 1 – indent 15 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 19 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 1 Directive 96/53/EC Article 2 – paragraph 1 – indent 14 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 20 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 1 Directive 96/53/EC Article 2 – subparagraph 1 – indent 16 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 21 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 2 – point a Directive 96/53/EC Article 4 – paragraph 1 – points (a) and (b) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 22 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 2 – point b Directive 96/53/EC Article 4 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2 – first sentence | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 23 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – – point 6 Directive 96/53/EC Article 8 – paragraph 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 24 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 6 Directive 96/53/EC Article 8 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – indent 2 – point i | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 25 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 6 Directive 96/53/EC Article 8 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – indent 2 – point ii | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 26 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – – point 6 Directive 96/53/EC Article 8 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – indent 2 – point iv a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 27 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 6 Directive 96/53/EC Article 8 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – indent 3 – point iii | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 28 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 6 Directive 95/53/EC Article 8 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 29 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 6 Directive 96/53/EC Article 8 – paragraph 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 30 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 6 Directive 96/53/EC Article 8 – paragraph 4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 31 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 6 Directive 96/53/EC Article 8 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 32 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 6 Directive 96/53/EC Article 8 – paragraph 5 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 33 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 7 Directive 96/53/EC Article 9 – paragraph 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 34 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 7 Directive 95/53/EC Article 9 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – indent 2 – point i | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 35 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 7 Directive 95/53/EC Article 9 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – indent 2 – point ii | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 36 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 7 Directive 95/53/EC Article 9 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – indent 2 – point ii a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 37 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 7 Directive 96/53/EC Article 9 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – indent 4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 38 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 7 Directive 96/53/EC Article 9 – paragraph 2 a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 39 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 7 Directive 95/53/EC Article 9 – paragraph 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 40 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 7 Directive 96/53/EC Article 9 – paragraph 3 a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 41 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 7 Directive 96/53/EC Article 9 – paragraph 4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 42 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 9 Directive 96/53/EC Article 10a – paragraph 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 43 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 9 Directive 96/53/EC Article 10a – paragraph 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 44 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 10 Directive 95/53/EC Article 11 – paragraph 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 45 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 10 Directive 95/53/EC Article 11 – paragraph 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 46 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 11 Directive 96/53/EC Article 12 – paragraph 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 47 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 11 Directive 96/53/EC Article 12 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 48 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 11 Directive 96/53/EC Article 12 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 49 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – – point 11 Directive 96/53/EC Article 12 – paragraph 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 50 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 11 Directive 95/53/EC Article 12 – paragraph 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 51 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 11 Directive 96/53/EC Article 12 – paragraph 7 – indent 2 a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 52 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 11 Directive 96/53/EC Article 12 – paragraph 7 a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 53 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 12 Directive 96/53/EC Article 13 – paragraph 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 54 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 12 Directive 96/53/EC Article 13 – paragraph 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 55 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 12 Directive 96/53/EC Article 13 – paragraph 4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 56 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 12 Directive 96/53/EC Article 13 – paragraph 5 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 57 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 12 Directive 96/53/EC Article 13 – paragraph 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 58 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 12 Directive 96/53/EC Article 13 – paragraph 7 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 59 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 12 Directive 96/53/EC Article 13 – paragraph 8 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 60 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 13 Directive 95/53/EC Article 14 – paragraph 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 61 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 13 Directive 95/53/EC Article 14 – paragraph 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 62 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 15 Directive 96/53/EC Article 16 – paragraph 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 63 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 15 a (new) Directive 96/53/EC Article 16 a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 64 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 15 b (new) Directive 96/53/EC Article 16 b (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 65 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 16 – point -a (new) Directive 96/53/EC Annex I – point 1.1 – indent 8 a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 66 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 16 – point a a (new) Directive 96/53/EC Annex I – point 1.4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 67 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 16 – point c Directive 96/53/EC Annex I – point 2.3.1 – indent 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 68 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 16 – point c Directive 96/53/EC Annex I – point 2.3.1 – indent 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 69 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 16 – point c a (new) Directive 96/53/EC Annex I – point 2.3.4 (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
- [1] OJ C 327, 12.11.2013, p. 133.
PROCEDURE
|
Title |
Maximum authorised dimensions in national and international traffic and the maximum authorised weights in international traffic for certain road vehicles circulating within the Community |
||||
|
References |
COM(2013)0195 – C7-0102/2013 – 2013/0105(COD) |
||||
|
Date submitted to Parliament |
15.4.2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
Committee responsible Date announced in plenary |
TRAN 18.4.2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
Committee(s) asked for opinion(s) Date announced in plenary |
ENVI 18.4.2013 |
ITRE 18.4.2013 |
IMCO 18.4.2013 |
|
|
|
Not delivering opinions Date of decision |
ENVI 7.5.2013 |
ITRE 24.4.2013 |
IMCO 29.5.2013 |
|
|
|
Rapporteur(s) Date appointed |
Jörg Leichtfried 14.5.2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
Discussed in committee |
17.9.2013 |
5.11.2013 |
21.1.2014 |
|
|
|
Date adopted |
18.3.2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
Result of final vote |
+: –: 0: |
35 4 2 |
|||
|
Members present for the final vote |
Magdi Cristiano Allam, Georges Bach, Izaskun Bilbao Barandica, Philip Bradbourn, Antonio Cancian, Michael Cramer, Joseph Cuschieri, Philippe De Backer, Luis de Grandes Pascual, Saïd El Khadraoui, Ismail Ertug, Knut Fleckenstein, Jacqueline Foster, Mathieu Grosch, Dieter-Lebrecht Koch, Werner Kuhn, Jörg Leichtfried, Eva Lichtenberger, Marian-Jean Marinescu, Gesine Meissner, Mike Nattrass, Hubert Pirker, Dominique Riquet, Petri Sarvamaa, Vilja Savisaar-Toomast, Olga Sehnalová, Brian Simpson, Keith Taylor, Silvia-Adriana Ţicău, Peter van Dalen, Patricia van der Kammen, Roberts Zīle |
||||
|
Substitute(s) present for the final vote |
Phil Bennion, Spyros Danellis, Bogdan Kazimierz Marcinkiewicz, Anna Rosbach, Bernadette Vergnaud, Sabine Wils, Corien Wortmann-Kool, Janusz Władysław Zemke |
||||
|
Substitute(s) under Rule 187(2) present for the final vote |
Marita Ulvskog |
||||
|
Date tabled |
27.3.2014 |
||||