REPORT on the proposal for a Council decision on the declaration of acceptance by the Member States, in the interest of the European Union, of the accession of Armenia to the 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction
22.1.2015 - (COM(2011)0917 – C8‑0269/2014 – 2011/0452(NLE)) - *
Committee on Legal Affairs
Rapporteur: Heidi Hautala
DRAFT EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION
on the proposal for a Council decision on the declaration of acceptance by the Member States, in the interest of the European Union, of the accession of Armenia to the 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction
(COM(2011)0917 – C8‑0269/2014 – 2011/0452(NLE))
(Consultation)
The European Parliament,
– having regard to the proposal for a Council decision (COM(2011)0917),
– having regard to Article 38, fourth paragraph, of the 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction,
– having regard to Article 81(3) and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (b), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C8‑0269/2014),
– having regard to the opinion of the Court of Justice of 14 October 2014,
– having regard to Rules 59 and 108(7) of its Rules of Procedure,
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs (A8-0009/2015),
1. Approves the proposal for a Council decision and approves the acceptance of the accession;
2. Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of Armenia.
EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
The Hague Convention of 25 October 1980 on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction is a vitally important instrument. It has been ratified by all the EU Member States.
The Convention introduces a system of cooperation between the contracting states aimed at settling cases of international child abduction.
In many instances, these problems arise when a couple has separated. If the mother and father are from different states, there is a temptation to exploit the lack of cooperation between those states in order to secure custody of the child. The press is full of reports on cases of international child abduction following a separation or a divorce.
The biggest problem in such cases is the national bias of the legal systems of individual states. It may often be that the courts in both of the states concerned declare themselves competent, with each of them awarding custody of the child to the parent who is a national of their state.
The purpose of the Convention is to resolve such situations at an international level, by establishing that the competent courts and applicable laws are those of the state of residence of the child. The Convention also introduces a system which ensures the immediate return of children who have been abducted.
The EU now has exclusive external competence in this field as confirmed by the Court of Justice in Opinion 1/13. The Member States therefore no longer act on their own account. The problem is that the Convention does not provide for autonomous action by international organisations.
This has rendered necessary a Council Decision calling on Member States to accept – each in respect of their own territory – the accession of Armenia to the Convention, and hence the effective entry into force of the Convention in cases involving the EU and that country.
The accession of Armenia to the Convention is to be welcomed. Your rapporteur fully supports this, especially as many EU citizens are of Armenian origin. Children with links to the Armenian community will thus be safeguarded against abduction.
Your rapporteur therefore proposes that Parliament approve the proposal without amendment, in order to ensure that EU‑wide protection is afforded to the children in question.
RESULT OF FINAL VOTE IN COMMITTEE
Date adopted |
20.1.2015 |
|
|
|
|
Result of final vote |
+: –: 0: |
21 2 0 |
|||
Members present for the final vote |
Max Andersson, Joëlle Bergeron, Marie-Christine Boutonnet, Jean-Marie Cavada, Kostas Chrysogonos, Therese Comodini Cachia, Mady Delvaux, Andrzej Duda, Rosa Estaràs Ferragut, Laura Ferrara, Lidia Joanna Geringer de Oedenberg, Mary Honeyball, Dietmar Köster, Gilles Lebreton, António Marinho e Pinto, Jiří Maštálka, Emil Radev, Julia Reda, Pavel Svoboda, Axel Voss, Tadeusz Zwiefka |
||||
Substitutes present for the final vote |
Daniel Buda, Sergio Gaetano Cofferati, Luis de Grandes Pascual, Pascal Durand, Angel Dzhambazki, Heidi Hautala, Sylvia-Yvonne Kaufmann, Angelika Niebler, Virginie Rozière, Viktor Uspaskich, Cecilia Wikström |
||||