REPORT on the draft Council implementing decision approving the conclusion by Eurojust of the Agreement on Cooperation between Eurojust and Montenegro

19.1.2016 - (11596/2015 – C8‑0299/2015 – 2015/0812(CNS) - *

Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
Rapporteur: Nathalie Griesbeck

DRAFT EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION

on the draft Council implementing decision approving the conclusion by Eurojust of the Agreement on Cooperation between Eurojust and Montenegro

(11596/2015 – C8‑0299/2015 – 2015/0812(CNS))

(Consultation)

The European Parliament,

–  having regard to the Council draft (11596/2015),

–  having regard to Article 39(1) of the Treaty on European Union, as amended by the Treaty of Amsterdam, and Article 9 of Protocol No 36 on transitional provisions, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C8‑0299/2015);

–  having regard to Council Decision 2002/187/JHA of 28 February 2002 setting up Eurojust with a view to reinforcing the fight against serious crime[1], in particular Article 26a(2) thereof,

-  having regard to Rule 59 of its Rules of Procedure,

–  having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (A8-0008/2016),

1.  Approves the Council draft;

2.  Calls on the Council to notify Parliament if it intends to depart from the text approved by Parliament;

3.  Asks the Council to consult Parliament again if it intends to substantially amend the text approved by Parliament;

4.  Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and Eurojust.

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

This proposal concerns the proposed approval of a cooperation agreement between Eurojust

and Montenegro with the aim to enhancing judicial cooperation in the fight against serious crime in particular organised crime and terrorism. This draft agreement contains provisions concerning the operational cooperation between Eurojust and Montenegro, such as the secondment of a liaison Prosecutor by Montenegro to Eurojust and the exchange of information including personal data.

In accordance with article 26a (2) of the Eurojust Decision, the Joint Supervisory Body of Eurojust (JSB) has approved the draft agreement ; its opinion is attached to the draft agreement. The JSB has noted, in particular, that all Eurojust amendments to the draft agreement have been taking into account and that Montenegro is Party to the Council of Europe Convention of 28 January 1981 for the Protection of Individuals with regard to Automatic Processing of Personal Data and its protocol regarding supervisory authorities and transborder data.

The JSB has concluded that the provisions on the exchange of personal data contained in the draft agreement were adequate.

In order to reinforce the fight against transnational crime and to enhance judicial co-operation in Europe, there is a clear operational need for Eurojust to cooperate with Montenegro.

Pursuant to Article 26a(2) of the Council Decision of 28 February 2002 setting up Eurojust, as last amended by Council Decision 2009/426/JHA of 16 December 2008, it is for the Council to approve, by qualified majority, the agreements conclude by Eurojust with third countries or international organisations.

Pursuant to article 39(1) of the ex-Treaty on European Union which the Court of Justice has ruled on 16 April 2015 to be still applicable, in accordance with article 9 of protocol 36, the Council is required to consult the Parliament when adopting implementing measures on the basis of the third pillar acquis and may lay down a time limit for the Parliament to deliver its opinion (CJEU C-317/13 et C-679/13, 15 April 2015)

The rapporteur supports the conclusion of this cooperation agreement with Montenegro, since it would aid and reinforce the fight against serious crime and would contribute to enhancing judicial co-operation in particular in the field of organised crime and terrorism.

PROCEDURE – COMMITTEE RESPONSIBLE

Title	Agreement on Cooperation between Eurojust and Montenegro
References	11596/2015 – C8-0299/2015 – 2015/0812(CNS)
Date of consulting Parliament	8.10.2015
Committee responsible        Date announced in plenary	LIBE 14.10.2015
Committees asked for opinions        Date announced in plenary	AFET 14.10.2015	JURI 14.10.2015
Not delivering opinions        Date of decision	AFET 13.10.2015	JURI 26.11.2015
Rapporteurs        Date appointed	Nathalie Griesbeck 19.11.2015
Date adopted	14.1.2016
Result of final vote	+: –: 0:	39 1 10
Members present for the final vote	Jan Philipp Albrecht, Malin Björk, Michał Boni, Caterina Chinnici, Ignazio Corrao, Rachida Dati, Frank Engel, Cornelia Ernst, Laura Ferrara, Monika Flašíková Beňová, Lorenzo Fontana, Mariya Gabriel, Kinga Gál, Ana Gomes, Nathalie Griesbeck, Sylvie Guillaume, Jussi Halla-aho, Filiz Hyusmenova, Sophia in ‘t Veld, Iliana Iotova, Sylvia-Yvonne Kaufmann, Timothy Kirkhope, Barbara Kudrycka, Kashetu Kyenge, Marju Lauristin, Juan Fernando López Aguilar, Monica Macovei, Vicky Maeijer, Barbara Matera, Claude Moraes, József Nagy, Judith Sargentini, Csaba Sógor, Traian Ungureanu, Bodil Valero, Marie-Christine Vergiat, Udo Voigt, Josef Weidenholzer, Kristina Winberg, Tomáš Zdechovský
Substitutes present for the final vote	Gérard Deprez, Anna Hedh, Teresa Jiménez-Becerril Barrio, Ska Keller, Andrejs Mamikins, Angelika Mlinar, Christine Revault D’Allonnes Bonnefoy, Barbara Spinelli, Jaromír Štětina
Substitutes under Rule 200(2) present for the final vote	Petri Sarvamaa
Date tabled	19.1.2016

• [1]    OJ L 63, 6.3.2002, p. 1.