REPORT on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2003/87/EC to enhance cost-effective emission reductions and low-carbon investments
13.1.2017 - (COM(2015)0337 – C8‑0190/2015 – 2015/0148(COD)) - ***I
Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
Rapporteur: Ian Duncan
Rapporteur for the opinion (*):
Fredrick Federley, Committee on Industry Research and Energy
(*) Associated committee – Rule 54 of the Rules of Procedure
- 001-139 (PDF - 311 KB)
- 001-139 (DOC - 107 KB)
- 140-141/REV1 (PDF - 108 KB)
- 140-141/REV1 (DOC - 53 KB)
- 142-144 (PDF - 291 KB)
- 142-144 (DOC - 55 KB)
- 145-148/REV1 (PDF - 129 KB)
- 145-148/REV1 (DOC - 56 KB)
- 149-149 (PDF - 104 KB)
- 149-149 (DOC - 50 KB)
- 150-150 (PDF - 188 KB)
- 150-150 (DOC - 11 KB)
- 151-156 (PDF - 225 KB)
- 151-156 (DOC - 16 KB)
- 157-162 (PDF - 217 KB)
- 157-162 (DOC - 14 KB)
- 163-164 (PDF - 129 KB)
- 163-164 (DOC - 15 KB)
- 165-165 (PDF - 109 KB)
- 165-165 (DOC - 51 KB)
- 166-166 (PDF - 672 KB)
- 166-166 (DOC - 99 KB)
- 167-167 (PDF - 280 KB)
- 167-167 (DOC - 53 KB)
DRAFT EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION
on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2003/87/EC to enhance cost-effective emission reductions and low-carbon investments
(COM(2015)0337 – C8‑0190/2015 – 2015/0148(COD))
(Ordinary legislative procedure: first reading)
The European Parliament,
– having regard to the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council (COM(2015)0337),
– having regard to Article 294(2) and Article 192(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament (C8‑0190/2015),
– having regard to Article 294(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
– having regard to the opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee of 14 December 2015[1],
– having regard to the opinion of the Committee of the Regions of 7 April 2016[2],
– having regard to Rule 59 of its Rules of Procedure,
– having regard to the report of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety and the opinions of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy and of the Committee on Development (A8-0003/2017),
1. Adopts its position at first reading hereinafter set out;
2. Calls on the Commission to refer the matter to Parliament again if it intends to amend its proposal substantially or replace it with another text;
3. Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the national parliaments.
Amendment 1 Proposal for a directive Recital 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(1) Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council15 established a system for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Union in order to promote reductions of greenhouse gas emissions in a cost-effective and economically efficient manner. |
(1) Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council15 established a system for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Union in order to promote reductions of greenhouse gas emissions in a cost-effective and economically efficient manner as well as the sustainable strengthening of Union industry against the risk of carbon and investment leakage. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
__________________ |
__________________ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15 Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 October 2003 establishing a scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community and amending Council Directive 96/61/EC (OJ L 275, 25.10.2003, p. 32). |
15 Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 October 2003 establishing a scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community and amending Council Directive 96/61/EC (OJ L 275, 25.10.2003, p. 32). | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Justification | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
It should be clarified that the objective of the Directive is to achieve a certain level of emissions reductions in a way that does not lead to carbon and investment leakage. This is essential both from an environmental viewpoint (avoid relocation of emissions) and an economic one (relocation of activities and jobs). Therefore, it should be added to the first article so that it is fully acknowledged as a key objective. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 2 Proposal for a directive Recital 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(2) The European Council of October 2014 made a commitment to reduce the overall greenhouse gas emissions of the Union by at least 40% below 1990 levels by 2030. All sectors of the economy should contribute to achieving these emission reductions and the target will be delivered in the most cost-effective manner through the Union emission trading system (EU ETS) delivering a reduction of 43% below 2005 levels by 2030. This was confirmed in the intended nationally determined reduction commitment of the Union and its Member States submitted to the Secretariat of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change on 6 March 201516 . |
(2) The European Council of October 2014 made a commitment to reduce the overall greenhouse gas emissions of the Union by at least 40% below 1990 levels by 2030. All sectors of the economy should contribute to achieving those emission reductions and the target is to be delivered in the most cost-effective manner through the Union emission trading system (EU ETS) delivering a reduction of 43% below 2005 levels by 2030. This was confirmed in the intended nationally determined reduction commitment of the Union and its Member States submitted to the Secretariat of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) on 6 March 2015 . The effort of emission reductions should be fairly shared between the sectors covered by the EU ETS. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
__________________ |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
16 http://www4.unfccc.int/submissions/indc/Submission%20Pages/submissions.aspx |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 3 Proposal for a directive Recital 2 a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(2a) In order to honour the agreed commitment that all sectors of the economy contribute to the fulfilment of the target of reducing the overall greenhouse gas emissions of the Union by at least 40% below 1990 levels by 2030, it is important that the EU ETS, despite being the Union's primary tool to achieve its long-term climate and energy targets, is complemented by equivalent additional actions taken in other legal acts and instruments dealing with greenhouse gas emissions from sectors not covered by the EU ETS. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Justification | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
EU ETS interaction with additional legal measures, underscores the importance of ensuring ambition both in the ETS as well as in non-ETS sectors, not least in view of the upcoming revision of ESD and LULUCF. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 4 Proposal for a directive Recital 2 b (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(2b) Under the Agreement adopted in Paris at the 21st Conference of the Parties of the UNFCCC of 12 December 2015 (the ‘Paris Agreement’), countries are required to put policies in place to achieve more than 180 Intended Nationally Determined Contributions (INDCs) that cover some 98% of global greenhouse gas emissions. The Paris Agreement is aimed at limiting the increase in the global average temperature to well below 2° C above pre-industrial levels and pursuing efforts to limit the temperature increase to 1,5° C above pre-industrial levels. Many of those policies are expected to involve carbon pricing or similar measures, and therefore a revision clause should be laid down in this Directive to allow the Commission, where appropriate, to propose stricter emissions reductions after the first stocktaking exercise under the Paris Agreement in 2023, an adjustment to the provisions for transitional carbon leakage to reflect the development of carbon pricing mechanisms outside the Union, and additional policy measures and tools to enhance the greenhouse gas reduction commitments of the Union and its Member States. The revision clause should also ensure that a communication is adopted within six months of the facilitative dialogue under the UNFCCC in 2018 assessing the consistency of the Union’s climate change legislation with the Paris Agreement goals. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 5 Proposal for a directive Recital 2 c (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(2c) In accordance with the Paris Agreement and in line with the commitment of the co-legislators expressed in Directive 2009/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council1a and Decision No 406/2009/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council1b , all sectors of the economy are required to contribute to the reduction of carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions. To this end, efforts to limit international maritime emissions through the International Maritime Organisation (IMO) are under way and should be encouraged, with the aim of establishing a clear IMO action plan for climate policy measures to reduce CO2 emissions from shipping at a global level. The adoption of clear targets to reduce international maritime emissions through the IMO has become a matter of great urgency and a prerequisite for the Union to refrain from acting further on the inclusion of the maritime sector within the EU ETS. If, however, any such agreement is not reached by the end of 2021, the sector should be included under the EU ETS and a fund should be established for ship operators' contributions and collective compliance relating to CO2 emissions already covered by the Union system for monitoring, reporting and verification (MRV system) laid down in Regulation (EU) 2015/757 of the European Parliament and of the Council1c (emissions released in Union ports and during voyages to and from such ports). A share of revenues from the auction of allowances to the maritime sector should be used to improve energy efficiency and support investments in innovative technologies for the reduction of CO2 emissions in the maritime sector, including short sea shipping and ports. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
__________________ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1a Directive 2009/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 amending Directive 2003/87/EC so as to improve and extend the greenhouse gas emission allowance trading scheme of the Community (OJ L 140, 5.6.2009, p. 63). | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1b Decision No 406/2009/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 on the effort of Member States to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions to meet the Community's greenhouse gas emission reduction commitments up to 2020 (OJ L 140, 5.6.2009, p. 136). | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1c Regulation (EU) 2015/757 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2015 on the monitoring, reporting and verification of carbon dioxide emissions from maritime transport, and amending Directive 2009/16/EC (OJ L 123, 19.5.2015, p. 55). | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 6 Proposal for a directive Recital 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(3) The European Council confirmed that a well-functioning, reformed EU ETS with an instrument to stabilise the market will be the main European instrument to achieve this target, with an annual reduction factor of 2.2% from 2021 onwards, free allocation not expiring but existing measures continuing after 2020 to prevent the risk of carbon leakage due to climate policy, as long as no comparable efforts are undertaken in other major economies, without reducing the share of allowances to be auctioned. The auction share should be expressed as a percentage figure in the legislation, to enhance planning certainty as regards investment decisions, to increase transparency and to render the overall system simpler and more easily understandable. |
(3) A well-functioning, reformed EU ETS with an enhanced instrument to stabilise the market and the removal of a significant number of surplus allowances from the market will be the main European instruments to achieve this target, with an annual reduction factor of 2,4% from 2021 onwards, free allocation not expiring but measures continuing after 2020 to prevent the risk of carbon leakage due to climate policy, as long as no comparable efforts are undertaken in other major economies. The auction share should be expressed as a percentage figure in the legislation, which should decline on application of a cross-sectoral correction factor to enhance planning certainty as regards investment decisions, to increase transparency, to render the overall system simpler and more easily understandable, and to protect those sectors most at risk of carbon leakage from a cross-sectoral correction factor. Those provisions should be kept under review in line with the Paris Agreement and adjusted accordingly if necessary to fulfil the Union’s climate obligations pursuant to that agreement. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 7 Proposal for a directive Recital 3 a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(3a) Least Developed Countries (LDCs) are particularly vulnerable to the effects of climate change and are responsible only for very low levels of greenhouse gas emissions. Therefore, particular priority should be given to addressing the needs of LDCs through the use of EU ETS allowances to finance climate action, in particular adaptation to the impacts of climate change through the UNFCCC Green Climate Fund. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 8 Proposal for a directive Recital 4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(4) It is a key Union priority to establish a resilient Energy Union to provide secure, sustainable, competitive and affordable energy to its citizens. Achieving this requires continuation of ambitious climate action with the EU ETS as the cornerstone of Europe’s climate policy, and progress on the other aspects of Energy Union17. Implementing the ambition decided in the 2030 framework contributes to delivering a meaningful carbon price and continuing to stimulate cost-efficient greenhouse gas emission reductions. |
(4) It is a key Union priority to establish a resilient Energy Union to provide secure, sustainable, competitive and affordable energy to its citizens and industries. Achieving this requires continuation of ambitious climate action with the EU ETS as the cornerstone of Union’s climate policy, and progress on the other aspects of Energy Union17. The interaction of the EU ETS with other Union and national climate and energy policies that have an impact on the demand for EU ETS allowances needs to be taken into account. Implementing the ambition decided in the 2030 framework and adequately addressing the progress on other aspects of the Energy Union contributes to delivering a meaningful carbon price and to continuing to stimulate cost-efficient greenhouse gas emission reductions. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
__________________ |
__________________ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
17 COM(2015)80, establishing a Framework Strategy for a Resilient Energy Union with a Forward-Looking Climate Change Policy |
17 COM(2015)80, establishing a Framework Strategy for a Resilient Energy Union with a Forward-Looking Climate Change Policy | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 9 Proposal for a directive Recital 4 a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(4a) Increased ambition in energy efficiency compared to the 27% target adopted by the Council should lead to more free allowances for industry at risk of carbon leakage. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Justification | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
President Juncker supported a target of energy efficiency of at least 30%. The majority of the EP would even like to go further. This will of course lead to more emission reductions in the effort sharing. Therefore, the cap for the effort sharing should be reduced and the space should be used for protection of industry at risk of carbon leakage. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 10 Proposal for a directive Recital 5 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(5) Article 191(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union requires that Union policy is based on the principle that the polluter should pay and, on this basis, Directive 2003/87/EC provides for a transition to full auctioning over time. Avoiding carbon leakage is a justification to postpone full transition, and targeted free allocation of allowances to industry is justified in order to address genuine risks of increases in greenhouse gas emissions in third countries where industry is not subject to comparable carbon constraints as long as comparable climate policy measures are not undertaken by other major economies. |
(5) Article 191(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union requires that Union policy is based on the principle that the polluter should pay and, on this basis, Directive 2003/87/EC provides for a transition to full auctioning over time. Avoiding carbon leakage is a justification to temporarily postpone full auctioning, and targeted free allocation of allowances to industry is a justified exception to the principle that the polluter should pay, provided that no over-allocation occurs, in order to address genuine risks of increases in greenhouse gas emissions in third countries where industry is not subject to comparable carbon constraints as long as comparable climate policy measures are not undertaken by other major economies. To that end, allocation of free allowances should be more dynamic in accordance with thresholds provided for in this Directive. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 11 Proposal for a directive Recital 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(6) The auctioning of allowances remains the general rule, with free allocation as the exception. Consequently, and as confirmed by the European Council, the share of allowances to be auctioned, which was 57% over the period 2013-2020, should not be reduced. The Commission's Impact Assessment18 provides details on the auction share and specifies that this 57% share is made up of allowances auctioned on behalf of Member States, including allowances set aside for new entrants but not allocated, allowances for modernising electricity generation in some Member States and allowances which are to be auctioned at a later point in time because of their placement in the Market Stability Reserve established by Decision (EU) 2015/… of the European Parliament and of the Council19 . |
(6) The auctioning of allowances remains the general rule, with free allocation as the exception. Consequently, the share of allowances to be auctioned, which should be 57% over the period 2021-2030, should be reduced by applying the cross-sectoral correction factor in order to protect those sectors most exposed to the risk of carbon leakage. The Commission's Impact Assessment provides details on the auction share and specifies that this 57% auction share is made up of allowances auctioned on behalf of Member States, including allowances set aside to establish a Modernisation Fund aimed at improving energy efficiency and modernising the energy systems of certain Member States, allowances set aside to compensate sectors or sub-sectors which are exposed to a genuine risk of carbon leakage due to significant indirect costs incurred as a result of greenhouse gas emission costs being passed on in electricity prices, allowances set aside to establish a Just Transition Fund to support regions with a high share of workers in carbon-dependent sectors and a GDP per capita well below the Union average, and allowances which are to be auctioned at a later point in time because of their placement in the Market Stability Reserve (MSR) established by Decision (EU) 2015/1814 of the European Parliament and of the Council19. . | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
__________________ |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
18 SEC(2015)XX |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
19 Decision (EU) 2015/… of the European Parliament and of the Council of … concerning the establishment and operation of a market stability reserve for the Union greenhouse gas emission trading scheme and amending Directive 2003/87/EC (OJ L […], […], p. […]). |
19 Decision (EU) 2015/1814 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 October 2015 concerning the establishment and operation of a market stability reserve for the Union greenhouse gas emission trading scheme and amending Directive 2003/87/EC (OJ L 264, 9.10.2015, p. 1). | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 12 Proposal for a directive Recital 7 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(7) To preserve the environmental benefit of emission reductions in the Union while actions by other countries do not provide comparable incentives to industry to reduce emissions, free allocation should continue to installations in sectors and sub-sectors at genuine risk of carbon leakage. Experience gathered during the operation of the EU ETS confirmed that sectors and sub-sectors are at risk of carbon leakage to varying degrees, and that free allocation has prevented carbon leakage. While some sectors and sub-sectors can be deemed at a higher risk of carbon leakage, others are able to pass on a considerable share of the costs of allowances to cover their emissions in product prices without losing market share and only bear the remaining part of the costs so that they are at a low risk of carbon leakage. The Commission should determine and differentiate the relevant sectors based on their trade intensity and their emissions intensity to better identify sectors at a genuine risk of carbon leakage. Where, based on these criteria, a threshold determined by taking into account the respective possibility for sectors and sub-sectors concerned to pass on costs in product prices is exceeded, the sector or sub-sector should be deemed at risk of carbon leakage. Others should be considered at a low risk or at no risk of carbon leakage. Taking into account the possibilities for sectors and sub-sectors outside of electricity generation to pass on costs in product prices should also reduce windfall profits. |
(7) To preserve the environmental benefit of emission reductions in the Union while actions by other countries do not provide comparable incentives to industry to reduce emissions, free allocation should temporarily continue to installations in sectors and sub-sectors at genuine risk of carbon leakage. Experience gathered during the operation of the EU ETS confirmed that sectors and sub-sectors are at risk of carbon leakage to varying degrees, and that free allocation has prevented carbon leakage. While some sectors and sub-sectors can be deemed at a higher risk of carbon leakage, others are able to pass on a considerable share of the costs of allowances to cover their emissions in product prices without losing market share and only bear the remaining part of the costs so that they are at a low risk of carbon leakage. The Commission should determine and differentiate the relevant sectors based on their trade intensity and their emissions intensity to better identify sectors at a genuine risk of carbon leakage. Where, based on these criteria, a threshold determined by taking into account the respective possibility for sectors and sub-sectors concerned to pass on costs in product prices is exceeded, the sector or sub-sector should be deemed at risk of carbon leakage. Others should be considered at a low risk or at no risk of carbon leakage. Taking into account the possibilities for sectors and sub-sectors outside of electricity generation to pass on costs in product prices should also reduce windfall profits. The risk of carbon leakage in sectors and subsectors for which free allocation is calculated on the basis of the benchmark values for aromatics, hydrogen and syngas should also be assessed considering that these products are produced both in chemical plants and refineries. In order to reduce the pressure on the availability of free allowances, an import inclusion scheme, fully compliant with World Trade Organisation (WTO) rules should be established. The scheme should focus on sectors with a low trade intensity and high emissions intensity such as cement and clinker. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 13 Proposal for a directive Recital 8 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(8) In order to reflect technological progress in the sectors concerned and adjust them to the relevant period of allocation, provision should be made for the values of the benchmarks for free allocations to installations, determined on the basis of data from the years 2007-8, to be updated in line with observed average improvement. For reasons of predictability, this should be done through applying a factor that represents the best assessment of progress across sectors, which should then take into account robust, objective and verified data from installations so that sectors whose rate of improvement differs considerably from this factor have a benchmark value closer to their actual rate of improvement. Where the data shows a difference from factor reduction of more than 0,5% of the 2007-8 value higher or lower per year over the relevant period, the related benchmark value shall be adjusted by that percentage. To ensure a level playing field for the production of aromatics, hydrogen and syngas in refineries and chemical plants, the benchmark values for aromatics, hydrogen and syngas should continue to be aligned to the refineries benchmarks. |
(8) In order to reflect technological progress in the sectors concerned and adjust them to the relevant period of allocation, provisions should be made for the values of the benchmarks for free allocations to installations, determined on the basis of data from the years 2007 and 2008, to be updated in line with observed average improvement. For reasons of predictability, this should be done through applying a factor that represents the actual assessment of progress by the 10% most efficient installations in sectors, which should then take into account robust, objective and verified data from installations so that sectors whose rate of improvement differs considerably from this factor have a benchmark value closer to their actual rate of improvement. Where the data shows a difference from factor reduction of more than 1,75% of the value corresponding to the years of 2007 and 2008 (either higher or lower) per year over the relevant period, the related benchmark value should be adjusted by that percentage. Where, however, the data shows an improvement rate of either 0,25 or less over the relevant period, the related benchmark value should be adjusted by that percentage. To ensure a level playing field for the production of aromatics, hydrogen and syngas in refineries and chemical plants, the benchmark values for aromatics, hydrogen and syngas should continue to be aligned to the refineries benchmarks. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 14 Proposal for a directive Recital 9 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(9) Member States should partially compensate, in accordance with state aid rules, certain installations in sectors or sub-sectors which have been determined to be exposed to a significant risk of carbon leakage because of costs related to greenhouse gas emissions passed on in electricity prices. The Protocol and accompanying decisions adopted by the Conference of the Parties in Paris need to provide for the dynamic mobilisation of climate finance, technology transfer and capacity building for eligible Parties, particularly those with least capabilities. Public sector climate finance will continue to play an important role in mobilising resources after 2020. Therefore, auction revenues should also be used for climate financing actions in vulnerable third countries, including adaptation to the impacts of climate. The amount of climate finance to be mobilised will also depend on the ambition and quality of the proposed Intended Nationally Determined Contributions (INDCs), subsequent investment plans and national adaptation planning processes. Member States should also use auction revenues to promote skill formation and reallocation of labour affected by the transition of jobs in a decarbonising economy. |
(9) In pursuing the goal of a level playing field, Member States should partially compensate, through a centralised system at Union level, certain installations in sectors or sub-sectors which have been determined to be exposed to a significant risk of carbon leakage because of costs related to greenhouse gas emissions passed on in electricity prices. Public sector climate finance will continue to play an important role in mobilising resources after 2020. Therefore, auction revenues should also be used for climate financing actions in vulnerable third countries, including adaptation to the impacts of climate change. The amount of climate finance to be mobilised will also depend on the ambition and quality of the proposed INDCs, subsequent investment plans and national adaptation planning processes. Member States should also address the social aspects of decarbonising their economies and use auction revenues to promote skill formation and reallocation of labour affected by the transition of jobs in a decarbonising economy. It should be possible for Member States to add to the compensation received through the centralised system at Union level. Such financial measures should not exceed the levels referred to in the relevant state aid guidelines. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 15 Proposal for a directive Recital 10 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(10) The main long-term incentive from this Directive for the capture and storage of CO2 (CCS), new renewable energy technologies and breakthrough innovation in low-carbon technologies and processes is the carbon price signal it creates and that allowances will not need to be surrendered for CO2 emissions which are permanently stored or avoided. In addition, to supplement the resources already being used to accelerate demonstration of commercial CCS facilities and innovative renewable energy technologies, EU ETS allowances should be used to provide guaranteed rewards for deployment of CCS facilities, new renewable energy technologies and industrial innovation in low-carbon technologies and processes in the Union for CO2 stored or avoided on a sufficient scale, provided an agreement on knowledge sharing is in place. The majority of this support should be dependent on verified avoidance of greenhouse gas emissions, while some support may be given when pre-determined milestones are reached taking into account the technology deployed. The maximum percentage of project costs to be supported may vary by category of project. |
(10) The main long-term incentive from this Directive for carbon capture and storage (CCS) and carbon capture and use (CCU), new renewable energy technologies and breakthrough innovation in low-carbon technologies and processes is the carbon price signal it creates and that allowances will not need to be surrendered for CO2 emissions which are permanently stored or avoided. In addition, to supplement the resources already being used to accelerate demonstration of commercial CCS and CCU facilities and innovative renewable energy technologies, EU ETS allowances should be used to provide guaranteed rewards for deployment of CCS and CCU facilities, new renewable energy technologies and industrial innovation in low-carbon technologies and processes in the Union for CO2 stored or avoided on a sufficient scale, provided an agreement on knowledge sharing is in place. The majority of this support should be dependent on verified avoidance of greenhouse gas emissions, while some support may be given when pre-determined milestones are reached taking into account the technology deployed. The maximum percentage of project costs to be supported may vary by category of project. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 16 Proposal for a directive Recital 11 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(11) A Modernisation Fund should be established from 2% of the total EU ETS allowances, and auctioned in accordance with the rules and modalities for auctions taking place on the Common Auction Platform set out in Regulation 1031/2010. Member States who in 2013 had a GDP per capita at market exchange rates of below 60% below the Union average should be eligible for funding from the Modernisation Fund and derogate up to 2030 from the principle of full auctioning for electricity generation by using the option of free allocation in order to transparently promote real investments modernising their energy sector while avoiding distortions of the internal energy market. The rules for governing the Modernisation Fund should provide a coherent, comprehensive and transparent framework to ensure the most efficient implementation possible, taking into account the need for easy access by all participants. The function of the governance structure should be commensurate with the purpose of ensuring the appropriate use of the funds. That governance structure should be composed of an investment board and a management committee and due account should be taken of the expertise of the EIB in the decision-making process unless support is provided to small projects through loans from a national promotional banks or through grants via a national programme sharing the objectives of the Modernisation Fund. Investments financed from the fund should be proposed by the Member States. To ensure that the investment needs in low income Member States are adequately addressed, the distribution of funds will take into account in equal shares verified emissions and GDP criteria. The financial assistance from the Modernisation Fund could be provided through different forms. |
(11) A Modernisation Fund should be established from 2% of the total EU ETS allowances, and auctioned in accordance with the rules and modalities for auctions taking place on the Common Auction Platform set out in Regulation (EU) No 1031/2010. Member States which in 2013 had a GDP per capita at market exchange rates below 60% of the Union average should be eligible for funding from the Modernisation Fund. Member States which in 2014 had a GDP per capita in EUR at market prices below 60% of the Union average should be able, up to 2030, to derogate from the principle of full auctioning for electricity generation by using the option of free allocation in order to transparently promote real investments modernising and diversifying their energy sector, in line with the Union 2030 and 2050 climate and energy goals, while avoiding distortions of the internal energy market. The rules for governing the Modernisation Fund should provide a coherent, comprehensive and transparent framework to ensure the most efficient implementation possible, taking into account the need for easy access by all participants. Such rules should be transparent, balanced and commensurate with the purpose of ensuring the appropriate use of the funds. That governance structure should be composed of an investment board, an advisory board and a management committee. Due account should be taken of the expertise of the EIB in the decision-making process unless support is provided to small projects through loans from national promotional banks or through grants via a national programme sharing the objectives of the Modernisation Fund. Investments financed from the fund should be proposed by the Member States and all financing from the fund should comply with specific eligibility criteria. To ensure that the investment needs in low income Member States are adequately addressed, the distribution of funds will take into account in equal shares verified emissions and GDP criteria. The financial assistance from the Modernisation Fund could be provided through different forms. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 17 Proposal for a directive Recital 12 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(12) The European Council confirmed that the modalities, including transparency, of the optional free allocation to modernise the energy sector in certain Member States should be improved. Investments with a value of €10 million or more should be selected by the Member State concerned through a competitive bidding process on the basis of clear and transparent rules to ensure that free allocation is used to promote real investments modernising the energy sector in line with the Energy Union objectives. Investments with a value of less than €10 million should also be eligible for funding from the free allocation. The Member State concerned should select such investments based on clear and transparent criteria. The results of this selection process should be subject to public consultation. The public should be duly kept informed at the stage of the selection of investment projects as well as of their implementation. |
(12) The European Council confirmed that the modalities, including transparency, of the optional free allocation to modernise and diversify the energy sector in certain Member States should be improved. Investments with a value of EUR 10 million or more should be selected by the Member State concerned through a competitive bidding process on the basis of clear and transparent rules to ensure that free allocation is used to promote real investments modernising or diversifying the energy sector in line with the Energy Union objectives, including that of promoting the Third Energy Package. Investments with a value of less than EUR 10 million should also be eligible for funding from the free allocation. The Member State concerned should select such investments based on clear and transparent criteria. The selection process should be subject to public consultation and the results of such selection process, including rejected projects, should be made publically available. The public should be duly kept informed at the stage of the selection of investment projects as well as of their implementation. Member States should have the possibility of transferring part of or all the corresponding allowances to the Modernisation Fund if they are eligible to use both instruments. The derogation should be terminated by the end of the trading period in 2030. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 18 Proposal for a directive Recital 13 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(13) EU ETS funding should be coherent with other Union funding programmes, including European Structural and Investment Funds, so as to ensure the effectiveness of public spending. |
(13) EU ETS funding should be coherent with other Union funding programmes, including Horizon 2020, the European Fund for Strategic Investments, European Structural and Investment Funds, and the European Investment Bank (EIB) Climate Investment Strategy, so as to ensure the effectiveness of public spending. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Justification | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The innovation fund should operate in co-ordinated manner with Horizon 2020 and EFSI. With regard to the Modernisation Fund and transitional free allocation, the climate and energy investment criteria developed by the EIB must be taken into account. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 19 Proposal for a directive Recital 14 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(14) The existing provisions which are in place for small installations to be excluded from the EU ETS allow the installations which are excluded to remain so, and it should be made possible for Member States to update their list of excluded installations and for Member States currently not making use of this option to do so at the beginning of each trading period. |
(14) The existing provisions which are in place for small installations to be excluded from the EU ETS should be extended to cover installations operated by small to medium enterprises (SMEs) emitting less than 50 000 tonnes of CO2 equivalent in each of the three years preceding the year of the application for exclusion. It should be made possible for Member States to update their list of excluded installations and for Member States currently not making use of this option to do so at the beginning of each trading period and halfway through the period. It should also be possible for installations emitting less than 5 000 tonnes of CO2 equivalent in each of the three years preceding the beginning of each trading period to be excluded from the EU ETS, subject to revision every five years. Member States should ensure that alternative equivalent measures for installations that have opted out do not result in higher compliance costs. Monitoring, reporting and verification requirements should be simplified for small emitters covered by the EU ETS. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 20 Proposal for a directive Recital 16 a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(16a) In order to considerably reduce the administrative burden faced by companies, it should be left open to the Commission to consider measures such as automating the submission and verification of emissions reports, fully exploiting the potential of information and communication technologies. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 21 Proposal for a directive Recital 17 a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(17a) The delegated acts referred to in Articles 14 and 15 should simplify the rules of monitoring, reporting and verification as far as possible in order to reduce red tape for operators. The delegated act referred to in Article 19(3) should facilitate access to and the use of the registry, especially for small operators. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 22 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point -1 (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(-1) Throughout the Directive, the term 'Community scheme' is replaced by 'EU ETS' and any necessary grammatical changes are made. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Justification | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Technical adaptation. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 23 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point -1 a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(-1a) Throughout the Directive, the term 'Community-wide' is replaced by 'Union-wide'. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Justification | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Technical adaptation. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 24 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point -1 b (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(-1b) Throughout the Directive, except in the cases referred to in points (-1) and (-1a) and in Article 26(2), the term 'Community' is replaced by 'Union' and any necessary grammatical changes are made. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Justification | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Technical adaptation. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 25 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point -1 c (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(-1c) Throughout the Directive, the words 'regulatory procedure referred to in Article 23(2)' are replaced by the words 'examination procedure referred to in Article 30c(2)'. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Justification | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Technical adaptation. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 26 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point -1 d (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(-1d) In Article 3g, in point (d) of Article 5(1), in point (c) of Article 6(2), in the second subparagraph of Article 10a(2), in Article 14(2), (3) and (4), in Article 19(1) and (4) and in Article 29a(4) the word 'regulation' is replaced by the word 'act' and any necessary grammatical changes are made. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Justification | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Technical adaptation. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 27 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point -1 e (new) Directive 2003/87/EC Article 2 – paragraph 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 28 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point -1 f (new) Directive 2003/87/EC Article 3 – point h | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Justification | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The current definition of a New Entrant - an installation obtaining a GHG permit after 30 June 2011 – needs to be amended to reflect Phase IV. In the current Directive, an installation is considered to be a new entrant 3 months before the submission by Member States of the list of installations (September 2011). The proposal for Phase 4 foresees that the submission of the list of installations be made by 30 September 2018; so keeping with the same logic, installations with an activity starting after 30 June 2018, should be considered as new entrants. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 29 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point -1 g (new) Directive 2003/87/EC Article 3 – point u a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 30 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point -1 h (new) Directive 2003/87/EC Article 3c – paragraph 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 31 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point -1 i (new) Directive 2003/87/EC Article 3c – paragraph 4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Justification | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Technical adaptation. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 32 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point -1 j (new) Directive 2003/87/EC Article 3d – paragraph 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Justification | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Unused free allowances should be made available to help address the risk of carbon leakage in industries with high carbon and trade intensity. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 33 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 1 Directive 2003/87/EC Article 3d – paragraph 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Justification | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
TFEU alignment. The content of this provision corresponds to the current wording of the basic act with few technical adjustments. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 34 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 1 a (new) Directive 2003/87/EC Article 3d – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 35 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 1 b (new) Directive 2003/87/EC Article 3e – paragraph 1 a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 36 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 2 a (new) Directive 2003/87/EC Chapter II a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 37 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 2 b (new) Directive 2003/87/EC Article 5 – subparagraph 1 – point d a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Justification | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Details of any emission reduction technologies that operators intend to use should also be included in applications for emissions permits. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 38 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 2 c (new) Directive 2003/87/EC Article 6 – paragraph 2 – points e a and e b (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 39 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 2 d (new) Directive 2003/87/EC Article 7 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 40 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 3 Directive 2003/87/EC Article 9 – paragraphs 2 and 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Justification | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Absolute minimum in order to reach the low end of the EU 2050 target of emission reductions of 80-95%. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 41 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 4 – point a Directive 2003/87/EC Article 10 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 42 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 4 – point a Directive 2003/87/EC Article 10 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 43 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 4 – point a Directive 2003/87/EC Article 10 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 44 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 4 – point a Directive 2003/87/EC Article 10 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3 a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 45 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 4 – point a Directive 2003/87/EC Article 10 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3 b (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 46 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 4 – point a Directive 2003/87/EC Article 10 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 47 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 4 – point a Directive 2003/87/EC Article 10 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 4 a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 48 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 4 – point b – point ii Directive 2003/87/EC Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point b | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 49 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 4 – point b a (new) Directive 2003/87/EC Article 10 – paragraph 3 – introductory part | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 50 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 4 – point b b (new) Directive 2003/87/EC Article 10 – paragraph 3 – point b | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 51 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 4 – point b c (new) Directive 2003/87/EC Article 10 – paragraph 3 – point f | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 52 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 4 – point b d (new) Directive 2003/87/EC Article 10 – paragraph 3 – point h | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 53 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 4 – point c Directive 2003/87/EC Article 10 – paragraph 3 – point j | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 54 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 4 – point c Directive 2003/87/EC Article 10 – paragraph 3 – point l | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 55 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 4 – point c a (new) Directive 2003/87/EC Article 10 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 56 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 4 – point c b (new) Directive 2003/87/EC Article 10 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 57 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 4 – point d Directive 2003/87/EC Article 10 – paragraph 4 – subparagraphs 1, 2 and 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Justification | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
TFEU alignment. The content of this provision corresponds to the current wording of the basic act with few technical adjustments. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 58 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 4 – point d a (new) Directive 2003/87/EC Article 10 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 4 a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 59 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 4 – point d b (new) Directive 2003/87/EC Article 10 – paragraph 5 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 60 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 5 – point a Directive 2003/87/EC Article 10a – paragraph 1 – subparagraphs 1 and 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 61 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 5 – point a a (new) Directive 2003/87/EC Article 10a – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 62 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 5 – point b Directive 2003/87/EC Article 10a – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3 – introductory part | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 63 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 5 – point b Directive 2003/87/EC Article 10a – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3 – point -i (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 64 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 5 – point b Directive 2003/87/EC Article 10a – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3 – point -i a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 65 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 5 – point b Directive 2003/87/EC Article 10a – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3 – point i | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 66 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 5 – point b Directive 2003/87/EC Article 10a – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3 – point ii | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 67 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 5 – point b Directive 2003/87/EC Article 10a – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 68 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 5 – point b a (new) Directive 2003/87/EC Article 10a – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3 a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 69 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 5 – point b b (new) Directive 2003/87/EC Article 10a – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3 b (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Justification | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
EP position is to move the text. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 70 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 5 – point b c (new) Directive 2003/87/EC Article 10a – paragraph 4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 71 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 5 – point c Directive 2003/87/EC Article 10a – paragraph 5 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 72 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 5 – point d Directive 2003/87/EC Article 10a – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 73 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 5 – point d a (new) Directive 2003/87/EC Article 10a – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 1a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 74 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 5 – point e – point i Directive 2003/87/EC Article 10a – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 75 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 5 – point e – point i Directive 2003/87/EC Article 10a – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 76 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 5 – point f – introductory part Directive 2003/87/EC Article 10a – paragraph 8 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 77 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 5 – point f – subparagraph 1 Directive 2003/87/EC Article 10a – paragraph 8 – subparagraph 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 78 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 5 – point f Directive 2003/87/EC Article 10a – paragraph 8 – subparagraph 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 79 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 5 – point f Directive 2003/87/EC Article 10a – paragraph 8 – subparagraph 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 80 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 5 – point f Directive 2003/87/EC Article 10a – paragraph 8 – subparagraph 4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 81 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 5 – point f Directive 2003/87/EC Article 10a – paragraph 8 – subparagraph 5 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Justification | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
EP position is to keep the present text for this subparagraph. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 82 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 5 – point i a (new) Directive 2003/87/EC Article 10a – paragraph 20 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Justification | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In some industry sectors capacity can be transferred between operating facilities (of the same operator). This is a characteristic of seasonal business where the production of a certain site can be increased by increasing the length of operation. Flexibility is needed to enable regular transfers of allowances between different operating sites. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 83 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 6 Directive 2003/87/EC Article 10b – title | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 84 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 6 Directive 2003/87/EC Article 10b – paragraph 1a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 85 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 6 Directive 2003/87/EC Article 10b – paragraph 1 b (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Justification | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
President Juncker supported a target of energy efficiency of at least 30%. The majority of the EP would even like to go further. This will of course lead to more emission reductions in the effort sharing. Therefore, the cap for the effort sharing should be reduced and the space should be used for protection of industry at risk of carbon leakage. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 86 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 6 Directive 2003/87/EC Article 10b – paragraph 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 87 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 6 Directive 2003/87/EC Article 10b – paragraph 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 88 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 6 Directive 2003/87/EC Article 10b – paragraph 4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 89 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 6 Directive 2003/87/EC Article 10c – paragraph 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 90 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 6 Directive 2003/87/EC Article 10c – paragraph 1 a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 91 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 6 Directive 2003/87/EC Article 10c – paragraph 1 b (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 92 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 6 Directive 2003/87/EC Article 10c – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point b | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 93 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 6 Directive 2003/87/EC Article 10c – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point c | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 94 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 6 Directive 2003/87/EC Article 10c – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point c – point i | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 95 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 6 Directive 2003/87/EC Article 10c – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1– point c – point ii | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 96 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 6 Directive 2003/87/EC Article 10c – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1– point c – point iii a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 97 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 6 Directive 2003/87/EC Article 10c – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 98 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 6 Directive 2003/87/EC Article 10c – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 99 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 6 Directive 2003/87/EC Article 10c – paragraph 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 100 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 6 Directive 2003/87/EC Article 10c – paragraph 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 101 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 6 Directive 2003/87/EC Article 10c – paragraph 6 a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 102 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 6 Directive 2003/87/EC Article 10c – paragraph 6 b (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 103 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 7 Directive 2003/87/EC Article 10d – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 104 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 7 Directive 2003/87/EC Article 10d – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 105 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 7 Directive 2003/87/EC Article 10d – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 106 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 7 Directive 2003/87/EC Article 10d – paragraph 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 107 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 7 Directive 2003/87/EC Article 10d – paragraph 3 a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 108 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 7 Directive 2003/87/EC Article 10d – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 109 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 7 Directive 2003/87/EC Article 10d – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 110 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 7 Directive 2003/87/EC Article 10d – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 111 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 7 Directive 2003/87/EC Article 10d – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 112 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 7 Directive 2003/87/EC Article 10d – paragraph 5 – introductory part | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 113 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 7 Directive 2003/87/EC Article 10d – paragraph 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 114 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 7 Directive 2003/87/EC Article 10d – paragraph 7 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 115 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8 a (new) Directive 2003/87/EC Article 11 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 116 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 8 b (new) Directive 2003/87/EC Article 11 – paragraph 3 a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Justification | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Under current provisions the European Commission fully depends on the information provided by the Member State. However, in case reporting is incorrect or other irregularities occur, a violation of the provisions in Article 10a(1) to 10c may significantly distort level playing field for industries and energy producers in the Union. In this context it is justified to give the Commission the possibility to collect information independently. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 117 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 10 a (new) Directive 2003/87/EC Article 12 – paragraph 3a | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 118 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 12 Directive 2003/87/EC Article 14 – paragraph 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Justification | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
TFEU alignment. The content of this provision corresponds to the current wording of the basic act with few technical adjustments. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 119 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 13 Directive 2003/87/EC Article 15 – paragraphs 4 and 5 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Justification | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
TFEU alignment. The content of this provision corresponds to the current wording of the basic act with few technical adjustments. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 120 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 13 a (new) Directive 2003/87/EC Article 16 – paragraph 7 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Justification | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Technical adaptation. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 121 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 14 Directive 2003/87/EC Article 16 – paragraph 12 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Justification | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
TFEU alignment. The content of this provision corresponds to the current wording of the basic act. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 122 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 15 Directive 2003/87/EC Article 19 – paragraph 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Justification | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
TFEU alignment. The content of this provision corresponds to the current wording of the basic act with few technical adjustments. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 123 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 15 a (new) Directive 2003/87/EC Article 21 – paragraph 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Justification | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Strengthens reporting and the transparency in the compliance, or lack thereof, in all sectors. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 124 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 15 b (new) Directive 2003/87/EC Article 21 – paragraph 2 a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Justification | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
While compliance by aviation operators is generally high, there are a number of cases of non-compliance which have yet to be resolved. Publishing a list of non-compliant operators would expedite enforcement. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 125 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 15 c (new) Directive 2003/87/EC Article 21 – paragraph 3 a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Justification | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In order to ensure an equal level of compliance across the Union, and to ensure a level playing field for industries participating in the EU ETS, the Commission should have the right to conduct an independent investigation where it is suspected that compliance is not ensured by national authorities. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 126 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 16 Directive 2003/87/EC Article 22 – paragraph 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Justification | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
TFEU alignment. The content of this provision corresponds to the current wording of the basic act. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 127 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 17 Directive 2003/87/EC Article 22a – title | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Justification | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Renumbering for cross-referencing purposes. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 128 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 18 Directive 2003/87/EC Article 23 – title | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Justification | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Renumbering for cross-referencing purposes. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 129 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 19 – point a Directive 2003/87/EC Article 24 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Justification | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Member States have the possibility to extend the scope of the EU ETS to add new gases and sectors. Any unilateral inclusion in the scope of the EU ETS needs to be clarified well in advance of the start of Phase IV | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 130 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 19 – point a Directive 2003/87/EC Article 24 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Justification | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
TFEU alignment. The content of this provision corresponds to the current wording of the basic act with few technical adjustments. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 131 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 19 – point b Directive 2003/87/EC Article 24 – paragraph 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Justification | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
TFEU alignment. The content of this provision corresponds to the current wording of the basic act with few technical adjustments. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 132 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 20 – point a Directive 2003/87/EC Article 24a – paragraph 1 – subparagraphs 1 and 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Justification | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
TFEU alignment. The content of this provision corresponds to the current wording of the basic act with few technical adjustments. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 133 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 22 Directive 2003/87/EC Article 25a – paragraph 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 134 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 22 a (new) Directive 2003/87/EC Article 27 – paragraph 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 135 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 22 b (new) Directive 2003/87/EC Article 27 a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 136 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 22 c (new) Directive 2003/87/EC Article 29 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 137 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 22 d (new) Directive 2003/87/EC Article 30 a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 138 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 22 e (new) Directive 2003/87/EC Annex I – paragraph 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 139 Proposal for a directive Article 1 a (new) Decision (EU) 2015/1814 Article 1 – paragraph 5 – subparagraphs 1 a and 1 b (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Justification | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The intake rate for the MSR should be doubled for the first four years of operation. |
EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
Introduction
On the 15th of July 2015 the European Commission published its proposal for Phase IV of the ETS. The proposal aims to meet the EU’s 2030 greenhouse gas emissions target of ‘at least’ 40% while protecting European industry from the risk of carbon leakage and promoting innovation and modernisation in Europe’s industrial and power sectors over the decade from 2020.[1] The proposal stems from the European Council conclusions of the 23rd and 24th of October 2014, which lay down guidelines on how these aims should be achieved.[2]
The Rapporteur supports the proposal of the European Commission as part of the EU’s ongoing 2030 climate and energy package. The Rapporteur believes that a market-based mechanism such as the ETS is the most cost-effective way of meeting our climate change obligations and notes with positivity the spread of carbon pricing around the world.
In creating this report, the Rapporteur has worked closely with his Shadow Rapporteurs, their offices and advisers and would like to put on record his thanks to them for their valuable input in the process so far. Similarly, the Rapporteur would like to put on record his thanks to the European Commission for their sustained and proactive engagement, too.
Ambition
The Rapporteur welcomes the new linear reduction factor (LRF) of 2.2% and believes it is the minimum by which the overall number of allowances should decline annually throughout Phase IV.
On the 12th of December the nations of the world arrived at the Paris Agreement, and in doing so committed to arresting the global temperature rise to ‘well below’ two degrees, while acknowledging that 1.5 degrees would better combat the worst effects of climate change.[3] The Rapporteur believes it is crucial that the ETS is able to reflect the Paris Agreement going forward and has proposed the following:
a) A new review clause instructing the European Commission to keep the LRF under review, and if necessary to put a proposal to the European Parliament and Council following the first global stocktake in 2023.
Recognising that overlapping EU climate and energy policy as well as unilateral national measures to reduce electricity generating capacity can undermine the effectiveness of the ETS and contribute to market imbalances, the Rapporteur has also proposed the following:
a) As part of its annual review of the functioning of the ETS, the Commission should consider the impact of overlapping EU polices and if necessary make a proposal to the European Parliament and the Council.
b) Every 2 years, Member States may surrender a number of allowances to the MSR equal to the number of allowances connected to electricity capacity that has come offline in that period.
Carbon Leakage
As our climate change ambition continues to ratchet, free allowances will become more scarce. The Rapporteur believes it is essential to afford adequate protection to industries at risk of carbon leakage but recognises the need to further focus this protection while ensuring benchmarks are realistic and the iniquitous cross-sectoral correction factor (CSCF) is avoided. The Rapporteur has therefore proposed the following:
a) A more focussed distribution of free allowances based on the result of multiplying a sector or sub-sectors trade intensity with third countries with its emissions intensity.
b) Qualitative assessment for all sectors within 10% of a higher category of free allocation.
c) A new benchmark reduction rate of 0.3% to account for industries that cannot achieve an annual reduction of 0.5%.
d) Up to 2% points of the auction share will be transferred to the free allowance pot to ameliorate a CSCF if it is triggered.
e) The Commission may assess sectors or sub-sectors at a further aggregated or disaggregated level other than at NACE-4.
Indirect Costs
The Rapporteur recognises that there is a market distortion when some Member States compensate for indirect costs and others do not. Furthermore, the Rapporteur believes this distortion should be addressed. However, in seeking to do so a legal issue has emerged. In light of the fact that it is against the Treaties to compel Member States to use state aid, the Rapporteur has reverted to the current status that Member State ‘may’ compensate, pending further discussion with his Shadows and legal experts.
More Dynamic Allocation
Under current rules it is only possible for allocation to change when there is a 50% change in production levels. This has contributed to under-allocation in some sectors while others have made windfall profits. In order to rectify this, the rapporteur has proposed that:
a) Allocation will change with a corresponding 10% increase or decrease in production of an installation.
Simplification
The cost and administrative burden of the ETS falls heaviest on those who can least afford it. Recognising that there is a strong drive for reducing administrative burden on industry the Rapporteur has proposed the following:
a) The small-emitters threshold will be raised from 25,000 tCO2e to 50,000 tonnes CO2e.
b) Ultra-small emitters of less than 5,000 tCO2e should be able to opt out of the ETS with no equivalent measures.
Innovation Fund
Ultimately, industries must be able to innovate their way to a low carbon future. As ambition within the ETS increases and as our greenhouse gas emission limits decrease, it is paramount that new technologies emerge to keep Europe’s industries competitive and to safeguard jobs. The Rapporteur has therefore proposed a number of changes to the Innovation Fund:
a) Half the Innovation Fund will come from the auction share.
b) The Innovation Fund will be boosted with 150 million unallocated allowances.
c) Up to 75% of the cost of projects shall be supported.
d) 60% of funding need not be dependent on verified emissions reductions.
e) Projects will be financed according to pre-determined milestones.
Modernisation Fund
The Rapporteur believes that, pursuant to the October 2014 Council conclusions, the Modernisation Fund should be primarily governed by the beneficiary Member States with involvement of the EIB and the European Commission. Furthermore, the Rapporteur believes that the investment criteria and rules of the fund should be as transparent as possible. The Rapporteur has proposed the following:
a) The threshold for small projects will be 20 million Euros.
b) Member States shall create national rules and selection criteria for small projects and those rules and criteria will be subject to public consultation.
c) The Investment Board shall be made up of beneficiary Member States, the EIB and the Commission
d) The Selection Criteria of the Investment Board shall be subject to public consultation.
Article 10c
The Rapporteur welcomes the move towards a competitive bidding process for projects undertaken through Article 10c and recognises that competition will determine best value for money. While broadly accepting the Commission proposal the Rapporteur has proposed the following:
a) The threshold for competitive bidding will be 20 million Euros.
b) The co-generation of heat and power shall be eligible for support.
MINORITY OPINION
pursuant to Rule 56(3) of the Rules of Procedure
Mireille D'Ornano
Our group cannot support this reform, which we consider far too risky, despite the good intentions it invokes from an environmental point of view. Reducing greenhouse gas emissions is certainly to be applauded, but this must not be done at the expense of our jobs in industry. The sectors concerned, such as the steel industry, already face cutthroat international competition from countries such as China. Even though they play a significant role in the sector, such countries still show few scruples when it comes to environmental matters. Moreover, the increasingly insidious strengthening of the Commission’s powers to the detriment of sovereign Member States is also a factor here. Neither can we accept the barely concealed encroachment on the powers of the International Maritime Organisation and the International Civil Aviation Organisation that will result from the wish to include the maritime and aviation sector in the ETS system. If these decisions are to be legitimate and effective, they must be taken by all the States concerned, at international level. The European Union should on no account interfere in these organisations or seek to replace them. For all these reasons, we will be voting against this report.
OPINION of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy(*) (10.11.2016)
for the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2003/87/EC to enhance cost-effective emission reductions and low-carbon investments
(COM(2015)0337 – C8‑0190/2015 – 2015/0148(COD))
Rapporteur (*)Fredrick Federley
(*) Associated committee – Rule 54 of the Rules of Procedure
SHORT JUSTIFICATION
The world is moving towards a low carbon economy, the Paris climate agreement adopted last year marks this development irreversible. The agreement sets out ambitious goals, and for the EU it is important to deliver on its promises. It is equally important that we seize the vast opportunities connected to the transformation of our economy into a low-carbon economy.
Europe has over ten years of experience with the EU emissions trading system (EU ETS). The EU ETS is the world's largest cap-and-trade scheme, covering over 11,000 power plants and industrial installations. It has been successful in bringing climate change on the agenda of boardrooms, by introducing a price on carbon – which has helped to stimulate investments in low-carbon technologies. Governments and the private sector are making the case for carbon markets all across the world, as a tool that can secure competitiveness, encourage innovation, and deliver meaningful emissions reductions. A growing group of countries, including notably China, uses or will use carbon markets to achieve its climate objectives.
In July 2015, the European Commission presented a proposal to revise the EU ETS Directive in order to reach the EU's objective of at least 40% domestic greenhouse gas emission cuts in 2030. The rapporteur welcomes the proposed reforms. However, some elements must be strengthened in order to ensure the integrity of the system, the predictability for industry and a level playing field across companies, sectors and Member States. It is vital, also in view of the recently adopted Paris agreement, that the EU ETS continues to drive adequate emission cuts. At the same time, it must prevent undue carbon costs for the best performing industries which are genuinely exposed to the risk of carbon leakage.
Delivering cost-efficient emission reductions
According to the current Directive, carbon leakage provisions end in 2020. However, for some industrial sectors it will remain necessary to continue the free allocation temporarily, as an exemption to the general rule of auctioning as main allocation method, to prevent the risk of carbon leakage. Allocation rules and benchmarks must be both realistic and provide an incentive for continuous process improvements. More frequent adjustments according to actual production data is needed in order to avoid over-allocation and to not discourage efficient industries from growing. The free allocation must be better targeted on those sectors most exposed to carbon leakage risk, ensuring full support for sectors in greatest need. This approach will minimise the need to apply a cross-sectoral correction factor that may otherwise unjustly and bluntly disadvantage the competitiveness of some industrial sectors.
Driving industrial innovation
The EU ETS can and should be a powerful tool to help scaling up innovative low-carbon technologies. The rapporteur welcomes the Commission's proposal to increase the size of the innovation fund, and the extended scope to low-carbon innovation in industrial sectors. However, the EU ETS currently fails to promote low-carbon investments and innovation on the scale needed to achieve medium and long term climate objectives. It needs a stronger innovation fund with an additional 150 million allowances to leverage private investments in breakthrough industrial technologies. As the EU ETS cap tightens and the carbon leakage provisions are reformed, the ultimate aim being 100% auctioning, policies to support investment in the transition to a low carbon economy become increasingly more important.
Consistent with an increasingly integrated energy market
The reform of the EU ETS, along with its impact on energy production and energy trade, should be consistent with the objectives of the Energy Union. An innovative and modern European energy system is vital, and more resources should be directed towards this aim. Post-2020 EU ETS rules aimed at the power sector or at the compensation of indirect carbon costs for electricity consumers need to be more harmonised, and should aim to establish a level playing field and not to distort competition in the electricity market between Member States. The transitional free allocation to the energy sector in lower income member states must be conducted in a transparent manner, ensuring economically viable projects in line with EU's long term energy and climate goals. A general review of the interaction between the EU ETS and other climate, air quality and energy policies at European and national level should be conducted regularly, in order to avoid overlapping policies and negative interaction between different instruments.
Building on the Paris agreement
What effects the Paris climate agreement will have for the EU ETS is not yet explored in detail, and is thus not possible to fully take into account for the start of phase 4.
While the Kyoto Protocol only covered 12 % of global emissions, countries accounting for over 95 % of global emissions are now required to implement national climate plans and increase ambition each fifth year. The EU ETS Directive must therefore be aligned with the Paris agreement, including the establishment of an EU ETS ratchet up mechanism that makes it possible to regularly revise the carbon leakage provisions and level of ambition.
AMENDMENTS
The Committee on Industry, Research and Energy calls on the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety, as the committee responsible, to take into account the following amendments:
Amendment 1 Proposal for a directive Recital 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(1) Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council15 established a system for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Union in order to promote reductions of greenhouse gas emissions in a cost-effective and economically efficient manner. |
(1) Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council15 established a system for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Union in order to promote reductions of greenhouse gas emissions in a cost-effective and economically efficient manner while ensuring the international competitiveness of EU industry and avoiding carbon and investment leakage. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
__________________ |
__________________ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15 Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 October 2003 establishing a scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community and amending Council Directive 96/61/EC (OJ L 275, 25.10.2003, p. 32). |
15 Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 October 2003 establishing a scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community and amending Council Directive 96/61/EC (OJ L 275, 25.10.2003, p. 32). | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 2 Proposal for a directive Recital 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(2) The European Council of October 2014 made a commitment to reduce the overall greenhouse gas emissions of the Union by at least 40% below 1990 levels by 2030. All sectors of the economy should contribute to achieving these emission reductions and the target will be delivered in the most cost-effective manner through the Union emission trading system (EU ETS) delivering a reduction of 43% below 2005 levels by 2030. This was confirmed in the intended nationally determined reduction commitment of the Union and its Member States submitted to the Secretariat of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change on 6 March 201516 . |
(2) The European Council of October 2014 made a commitment to reduce the overall greenhouse gas emissions of the Union by at least 40% below 1990 levels by 2030. All sectors of the economy should contribute to achieving these emission reductions and the target will be delivered in the most cost-effective manner through the Union emission trading system (EU ETS) delivering a reduction of 43% below 2005 levels by 2030. This was confirmed in the intended nationally determined reduction commitment of the Union and its Member States submitted to the Secretariat of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change on 6 March 2015[1]. The Paris Agreement on Climate Change (“the Agreement”), approved at the 21st session of the Conference of the Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, marks a new level of global commitment, aiming to hold the increase in the global average temperature to well below 2°C above pre-industrial levels and to pursue efforts to limit the temperature increase to 1,5°C. In accordance with the Agreement, all sectors of the economy have to contribute to the reduction of CO2 emissions. Targets and measures agreed at the international level, such as in the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) and the International Maritime Organization (IMO), are welcomed if they achieve adequate emissions reductions. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
__________________ |
__________________ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
16 http://www4.unfccc.int/submissions/indc/Submission%20Pages/submissions.aspx |
16 http://www4.unfccc.int/submissions/indc/Submission%20Pages/submissions.aspx | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 3 Proposal for a directive Recital 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(3) The European Council confirmed that a well-functioning, reformed EU ETS with an instrument to stabilise the market will be the main European instrument to achieve this target, with an annual reduction factor of 2.2% from 2021 onwards, free allocation not expiring but existing measures continuing after 2020 to prevent the risk of carbon leakage due to climate policy, as long as no comparable efforts are undertaken in other major economies, without reducing the share of allowances to be auctioned. The auction share should be expressed as a percentage figure in the legislation, to enhance planning certainty as regards investment decisions, to increase transparency and to render the overall system simpler and more easily understandable. |
(3) The European Council confirmed that a well-functioning, reformed and more effective EU ETS with an instrument to stabilise the market will be the main European instrument to achieve this target, with an annual reduction factor of 2.2% from 2021 onwards, free allocation not expiring but existing measures continuing after 2020 to prevent the risk of carbon leakage due to climate policy, as long as no comparable efforts are undertaken in other major economies, third countries or subnational regions, without reducing the share of allowances to be auctioned. The auction share should be expressed as a percentage figure in the legislation, to enhance planning certainty as regards investment decisions, to increase transparency and to render the overall system simpler and more easily understandable. While the Union is clear on its intention to maintain the EU ETS as the centrepiece of Union climate policy, other countries and regions in the world are following the Union climate policies. In 2016, some 40 countries and more than 20 cities, states and provinces use carbon-pricing mechanisms, to different extents, with more planning to implement them in the future. The Union encourages other countries to follow and persevere in their efforts. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 4 Proposal for a directive Recital 4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(4) It is a key Union priority to establish a resilient Energy Union to provide secure, sustainable, competitive and affordable energy to its citizens. Achieving this requires continuation of ambitious climate action with the EU ETS as the cornerstone of Europe’s climate policy, and progress on the other aspects of Energy Union17. Implementing the ambition decided in the 2030 framework contributes to delivering a meaningful carbon price and continuing to stimulate cost-efficient greenhouse gas emission reductions. |
(4) It is a key Union priority to establish a resilient Energy Union to provide secure, sustainable, competitive and affordable energy to its citizens. Achieving this requires continuation of ambitious climate action with the EU ETS as the cornerstone of Europe's climate policy, and progress on the other aspects of Energy Union17, while ensuring these aspects, such as those related to energy efficiency and renewable energy sources, enhance the goals of the EU ETS and do not undermine its market effectiveness. Implementing the ambition decided in the 2030 framework contributes to delivering a meaningful carbon price and continuing to stimulate cost-efficient greenhouse gas emission reductions, in order to meet the Union's long-term goal of reducing greenhouse gas emissions by 80-95% in 2050. It is regretted that the carbon price signal during Phase 3 has not been high enough to incentivise investments in low carbon technology and processes. A carbon price that is sufficient to incentivise investments in decarbonisation of the production is key for a well-functioning EU ETS. The re-industrialisation 20% target of industry's share in the Union's GDP by 2020 in this context is to be emphasised, as well as the importance of innovation, investments in R&D, employment and skills renewal. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
__________________ |
__________________ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
17 COM(2015)80, establishing a Framework Strategy for a Resilient Energy Union with a Forward-Looking Climate Change Policy |
17 COM(2015)80, establishing a Framework Strategy for a Resilient Energy Union with a Forward-Looking Climate Change Policy | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 5 Proposal for a directive Recital 5 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(5) Article 191(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union requires that Union policy is based on the principle that the polluter should pay and, on this basis, Directive 2003/87/EC provides for a transition to full auctioning over time. Avoiding carbon leakage is a justification to postpone full transition, and targeted free allocation of allowances to industry is justified in order to address genuine risks of increases in greenhouse gas emissions in third countries where industry is not subject to comparable carbon constraints as long as comparable climate policy measures are not undertaken by other major economies. |
(5) Article 191(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union requires that Union policy is based on the principle that the polluter should pay and, on this basis, Directive 2003/87/EC provides for a transition to full auctioning over time. Avoiding the risk of carbon and investment leakage is a justification to postpone full transition, and targeted free allocation of allowances to industry is justified in order to address genuine risks of increases in global greenhouse gas emissions and diversion of investments to third countries where industry is not subject to comparable carbon constraints as long as comparable climate policy measures are not undertaken by other major economies. A study commissioned by the Commission in 2013 concluded that during the years 2005 to2012 no carbon leakage had occurred. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 6 Proposal for a directive Recital 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(6) The auctioning of allowances remains the general rule, with free allocation as the exception. Consequently, and as confirmed by the European Council, the share of allowances to be auctioned, which was 57% over the period 2013-2020, should not be reduced. The Commission's Impact Assessment18 provides details on the auction share and specifies that this 57% share is made up of allowances auctioned on behalf of Member States, including allowances set aside for new entrants but not allocated, allowances for modernising electricity generation in some Member States and allowances which are to be auctioned at a later point in time because of their placement in the Market Stability Reserve established by Decision (EU) 2015/… of the European Parliament and of the Council19 . |
(6) The auctioning of allowances remains the general rule, with free allocation as an exception for a transitional period in order to maintain European global competitiveness. Consequently, and as confirmed by the European Council, the share of allowances to be auctioned, which was 57% over the period 2013-2020, should not be reduced. From 2021 onwards, the share of allowances to be auctioned should be 57% with the possibility of it being decreased by up to five percentage points to ensure a sufficient amount of free allowances. The Commission's Impact Assessment18 provides details on the auction share and specifies that this 57% share is made up of allowances auctioned on behalf of Member States, including allowances set aside for new entrants but not allocated, allowances for modernising electricity generation in some Member States and allowances which are to be auctioned at a later point in time because of their placement in the Market Stability Reserve established by Decision (EU) 2015/... of the European Parliament and of the Council19 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
__________________ |
__________________ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
18 SEC(2015)XX |
18 SEC(2015)XX | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
19 Decision (EU) 2015/… of the European Parliament and of the Council of … concerning the establishment and operation of a market stability reserve for the Union greenhouse gas emission trading scheme and amending Directive 2003/87/EC (OJ L […], […], p. […]). |
19 Decision (EU) 2015/… of the European Parliament and of the Council of … concerning the establishment and operation of a market stability reserve for the Union greenhouse gas emission trading scheme and amending Directive 2003/87/EC (OJ L […], […], p. […]). | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 7 Proposal for a directive Recital 7 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(7) To preserve the environmental benefit of emission reductions in the Union while actions by other countries do not provide comparable incentives to industry to reduce emissions, free allocation should continue to installations in sectors and sub-sectors at genuine risk of carbon leakage. Experience gathered during the operation of the EU ETS confirmed that sectors and sub-sectors are at risk of carbon leakage to varying degrees, and that free allocation has prevented carbon leakage. While some sectors and sub-sectors can be deemed at a higher risk of carbon leakage, others are able to pass on a considerable share of the costs of allowances to cover their emissions in product prices without losing market share and only bear the remaining part of the costs so that they are at a low risk of carbon leakage. The Commission should determine and differentiate the relevant sectors based on their trade intensity and their emissions intensity to better identify sectors at a genuine risk of carbon leakage. Where, based on these criteria, a threshold determined by taking into account the respective possibility for sectors and sub-sectors concerned to pass on costs in product prices is exceeded, the sector or sub-sector should be deemed at risk of carbon leakage. Others should be considered at a low risk or at no risk of carbon leakage. Taking into account the possibilities for sectors and sub-sectors outside of electricity generation to pass on costs in product prices should also reduce windfall profits. |
(7) To preserve the environmental benefit of emission reductions in the Union while actions by other countries do not provide comparable incentives to industry to reduce emissions, free allocation should continue to installations in sectors and sub-sectors at genuine risk of carbon leakage. Free allocation is not supposed to be a subsidy, but should aim to prevent the risk of carbon and investment leakage and incentivise and finance investments in low carbon technologies and processes. Experience gathered during the operation of the EU ETS confirmed that sectors and sub-sectors are at risk of carbon leakage to varying degrees, and that free allocation has prevented carbon leakage. While some sectors and sub-sectors can be deemed at a higher risk of carbon leakage, others are able to pass on a considerable share of the costs of allowances to cover their emissions in product prices without losing market share and only bear the remaining part of the costs so that they are at a low risk of carbon leakage. The Commission should determine and differentiate the relevant sectors based on their trade intensity and their emissions intensity to better identify sectors at a genuine risk of carbon leakage. Where, based on these criteria, a threshold determined by taking into account the respective possibility for sectors and sub-sectors concerned to pass on costs in product prices is exceeded, the sector or sub-sector should be deemed at risk of carbon leakage. Others should be considered at a low risk or at no risk of carbon leakage. Sectors and sub-sectors that are not exposed to the risk of carbon leakage should not receive allowances free of charge. Taking into account the possibilities for sectors and sub-sectors outside of electricity generation to pass on costs in product prices should also reduce windfall profits. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 8 Proposal for a directive Recital 8 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(8) In order to reflect technological progress in the sectors concerned and adjust them to the relevant period of allocation, provision should be made for the values of the benchmarks for free allocations to installations, determined on the basis of data from the years 2007-8, to be updated in line with observed average improvement. For reasons of predictability, this should be done through applying a factor that represents the best assessment of progress across sectors, which should then take into account robust, objective and verified data from installations so that sectors whose rate of improvement differs considerably from this factor have a benchmark value closer to their actual rate of improvement. Where the data shows a difference from factor reduction of more than 0.5% of the 2007-8 value higher or lower per year over the relevant period, the related benchmark value shall be adjusted by that percentage. To ensure a level playing field for the production of aromatics, hydrogen and syngas in refineries and chemical plants, the benchmark values for aromatics, hydrogen and syngas should continue to be aligned to the refineries benchmarks. |
(8) In order to reflect technological progress in the sectors concerned benchmarks should be fully updated with 2017 and 2018 data reflecting real technological improvements. For reasons of predictability and providing a continuous incentive for process improvement, the benchmarks should be further updated through applying a factor that represents the best assessment of progress across sectors, which should then take into account robust, objective and verified data from installations so that sectors whose rate of improvement differs considerably from this factor have a benchmark value closer to their actual rate of improvement. Where the data shows a difference from factor reduction of more than 0.5% of the value higher or lower per year over the relevant period, the related benchmark value shall be adjusted by that percentage. Where sectors have a lower rate of improvement than 0,3%, that percentage should be applied. To ensure a level playing field for the production of aromatics, hydrogen and syngas in refineries and chemical plants, the benchmark values for aromatics, hydrogen and syngas should continue to be aligned to the refineries benchmarks. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 9 Proposal for a directive Recital 9 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(9) Member States should partially compensate, in accordance with state aid rules, certain installations in sectors or sub-sectors which have been determined to be exposed to a significant risk of carbon leakage because of costs related to greenhouse gas emissions passed on in electricity prices. The Protocol and accompanying decisions adopted by the Conference of the Parties in Paris need to provide for the dynamic mobilisation of climate finance, technology transfer and capacity building for eligible Parties, particularly those with least capabilities. Public sector climate finance will continue to play an important role in mobilising resources after 2020. Therefore, auction revenues should also be used for climate financing actions in vulnerable third countries, including adaptation to the impacts of climate. The amount of climate finance to be mobilised will also depend on the ambition and quality of the proposed Intended Nationally Determined Contributions (INDCs), subsequent investment plans and national adaptation planning processes. Member States should also use auction revenues to promote skill formation and reallocation of labour affected by the transition of jobs in a decarbonising economy. |
(9) A harmonised EU mechanism should be established to compensate, taking state aid rules into account, certain installations in sectors or sub-sectors which have been determined to be exposed to a significant risk of carbon leakage because of costs related to greenhouse gas emissions passed on in electricity prices. The Protocol and accompanying decisions adopted by the Conference of the Parties in Paris need to provide for the dynamic mobilisation of climate finance, technology transfer and capacity building for eligible Parties, particularly those with least capabilities. Public sector climate finance will continue to play an important role in mobilising resources after 2020. Therefore, at least 80% of the auction revenues should be spent on climate actions listed in this Directive, including for climate financing actions in vulnerable third countries, including adaptation to the impacts of climate. The amount of climate finance to be mobilised will also depend on the ambition and quality of the proposed Intended Nationally Determined Contributions (INDCs), subsequent investment plans and national adaptation planning processes. The EU should also establish a Just Transition Fund to pool auction revenues to promote skill formation and reallocation of labour affected by the transition of jobs in a decarbonising economy. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 10 Proposal for a directive Recital 10 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(10) The main long-term incentive from this Directive for the capture and storage of CO2 (CCS), new renewable energy technologies and breakthrough innovation in low-carbon technologies and processes is the carbon price signal it creates and that allowances will not need to be surrendered for CO2 emissions which are permanently stored or avoided. In addition, to supplement the resources already being used to accelerate demonstration of commercial CCS facilities and innovative renewable energy technologies, EU ETS allowances should be used to provide guaranteed rewards for deployment of CCS facilities, new renewable energy technologies and industrial innovation in low-carbon technologies and processes in the Union for CO2 stored or avoided on a sufficient scale, provided an agreement on knowledge sharing is in place. The majority of this support should be dependent on verified avoidance of greenhouse gas emissions, while some support may be given when pre-determined milestones are reached taking into account the technology deployed. The maximum percentage of project costs to be supported may vary by category of project. |
(10) The main long-term incentive from this Directive for the capture and storage (CCS) and carbon capture and use (CCU) of CO2, new renewable energy technologies and breakthrough innovation in sustainable low-carbon technologies and processes is the carbon price signal it creates and that allowances will not need to be surrendered for CO2 emissions which are permanently stored or avoided. In addition, to supplement the resources already being used to accelerate demonstration of commercial CCS and CCU facilities and innovative renewable energy technologies, EU ETS allowances should be used to provide guaranteed rewards for deployment of CCS and CCU facilities, new renewable energy technologies and industrial innovation in sustainable low-carbon technologies and processes in the Union for CO2 stored or avoided on a sufficient scale, provided an agreement on knowledge sharing is in place. The majority of this support should be dependent on verified avoidance of greenhouse gas emissions, while some support may be given when pre-determined milestones are reached taking into account the technology deployed. The maximum percentage of project costs to be supported may vary by category of project. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 11 Proposal for a directive Recital 11 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(11) A Modernisation Fund should be established from 2% of the total EU ETS allowances, and auctioned in accordance with the rules and modalities for auctions taking place on the Common Auction Platform set out in Regulation 1031/2010. Member States who in 2013 had a GDP per capita at market exchange rates of below 60% below the Union average should be eligible for funding from the Modernisation Fund and derogate up to 2030 from the principle of full auctioning for electricity generation by using the option of free allocation in order to transparently promote real investments modernising their energy sector while avoiding distortions of the internal energy market. The rules for governing the Modernisation Fund should provide a coherent, comprehensive and transparent framework to ensure the most efficient implementation possible, taking into account the need for easy access by all participants. The function of the governance structure should be commensurate with the purpose of ensuring the appropriate use of the funds. That governance structure should be composed of an investment board and a management committee and due account should be taken of the expertise of the EIB in the decision-making process unless support is provided to small projects through loans from a national promotional banks or through grants via a national programme sharing the objectives of the Modernisation Fund. Investments financed from the fund should be proposed by the Member States. To ensure that the investment needs in low income Member States are adequately addressed, the distribution of funds will take into account in equal shares verified emissions and GDP criteria. The financial assistance from the Modernisation Fund could be provided through different forms. |
(11) A Modernisation Fund should be established from 2% of the total EU ETS allowances, and auctioned in accordance with the rules and modalities for auctions taking place on the Common Auction Platform set out in Regulation (EU) No 1031/2010. Member States who in 2013 had a GDP per capita at market exchange rates of below 60% below the Union average should be eligible for funding from the Modernisation Fund and derogate up to 2030 from the principle of full auctioning for electricity generation by using the option of free allocation in order to transparently promote real investments modernising their energy sector in line with the Union's 2030 and 2050 climate and energy goals while avoiding distortions of the internal energy market. The rules for governing the Modernisation Fund should provide a coherent, comprehensive and transparent framework to ensure the most efficient implementation possible, taking into account the need for easy access by all participants. The function of the governance structure should be commensurate with the purpose of ensuring the appropriate use of the funds. The governance structure should be composed of an investment board and an advisory board. Investments financed from the fund should be proposed by the Member States. To ensure that the investment needs in low income Member States are adequately addressed, the distribution of funds will take into account in equal shares verified emissions and GDP criteria. The financial assistance from the Modernisation Fund could be provided through different forms. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 12 Proposal for a directive Recital 12 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(12) The European Council confirmed that the modalities, including transparency, of the optional free allocation to modernise the energy sector in certain Member States should be improved. Investments with a value of €10 million or more should be selected by the Member State concerned through a competitive bidding process on the basis of clear and transparent rules to ensure that free allocation is used to promote real investments modernising the energy sector in line with the Energy Union objectives. Investments with a value of less than €10 million should also be eligible for funding from the free allocation. The Member State concerned should select such investments based on clear and transparent criteria. The results of this selection process should be subject to public consultation. The public should be duly kept informed at the stage of the selection of investment projects as well as of their implementation. |
(12) The European Council confirmed that the modalities, including transparency, of the optional free allocation to modernise the energy sector in certain Member States should be improved. Investments with a value of €10 million or more should be selected by the Member State concerned through a competitive bidding process on the basis of clear and transparent rules to ensure that free allocation is used to promote real investments modernising the energy sector in line with the Energy Union objectives. The list of both selected and rejected projects should be made publicly available. Investments with a value of less than €10 million should also be eligible for funding from the free allocation. The Member State concerned should select such investments based on clear and transparent criteria set in this Directive. The results of this selection process should be subject to public consultation. The public should be duly kept informed at the stage of the selection of investment projects as well as of their implementation. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 13 Proposal for a directive Recital 13 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(13) EU ETS funding should be coherent with other Union funding programmes, including European Structural and Investment Funds, so as to ensure the effectiveness of public spending. |
(13) EU ETS funding should be coherent with other Union funding programmes, including Horizon 2020, The European Fund for Strategic Investments, and European Structural and Investment Funds, taking into account the European Investment Bank Climate Investment Strategy to ensure the effectiveness of public spending. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 14 Proposal for a directive Recital 14 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(14) The existing provisions which are in place for small installations to be excluded from the EU ETS allow the installations which are excluded to remain so, and it should be made possible for Member States to update their list of excluded installations and for Member States currently not making use of this option to do so at the beginning of each trading period. |
(14) The existing provisions which are in place for small installations to be excluded from the EU ETS allow the installations which are excluded to be extended in order to reduce unnecessary administrative costs, and it should be made possible for Member States to update their list of excluded installations and for Member States currently not making use of this option to do so at the beginning of each trading period. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 15 Proposal for a directive Recital 16 b (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(16b) In order to considerably reduce the administrative burden faced by companies, the Commission could consider measures such as automating the submission and verification of emissions reports, fully exploiting the potential of information and communication technologies; | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 16 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point -1 (new) Directive 2003/87/EC Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point ua (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 17 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point a Directive 2003/87/EC Article 10 – paragraph 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 18 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point b – point i Directive 2003/87/EC Article 10 – paragraph 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 19 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point b – point ii Directive 2003/87/EC Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point b | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 20 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point c 2003/87/EC Article 10 – paragraph 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 21 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point c a (new) Directive 2003/87/EC Article 10 – paragraph 3a and 3b (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 22 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point d a (new) Directive 2003/87/EC Article 10 – paragraph 5 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 23 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – d b (new) Directive 2003/87/EC Article 10 – paragraph 5a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 24 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point a Directive 2003/87/EC Article 10a – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 25 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point b Directive 2003/87/EC Article 10a – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 26 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point c Directive 2003/87/EC Article 10a – paragraph 5 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 27 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point d Directive 2003/87/EC Article 10a – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 28 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point e Directive 2003/87/EC Article 10a – paragraph 7 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 29 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point f Directive 2003/87/EC Article 10a – paragraph 8 – subparagraph 1, 2 and 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 30 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 Directive 2003/87/EC Article 10b and Article 10c | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 31 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Directive2003/87/EC Article 10d | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 32 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8 Directive 2003/87/EC Article 11 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 33 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8 a (new) Directive 2003/87/EC Article 11 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 b (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 34 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10 a (new) Directive 2003/87/EC Article 12 – paragraph 3 a | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 35 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12 a (new) Directive 2003/87/EC Article 14 – paragraph 1 –subparagraph 1 b (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 36 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 19 – point b Directive 2003/87/EC Article 24 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 37 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 20 a (new) Directive2003/87/EC Article 25 – paragraphs 1ba and 1bb (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 38 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 22 a (new) Directive2003/87/EC Article 27 – paragraph 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 39 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 22 b (new) Directive2003/87/EC Article 28a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 40 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 22 c (new) Directive 2003/87/EC Article 30 – paragraph 4a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 41 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 22 d (new) Directive2003/87/EC Article 30a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 42 Proposal for a directive Annex I – paragraph 1 Directive 2003/87/EC Annex IIa | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
PROCEDURE – COMMITTEE ASKED FOR OPINION
Title |
Cost-effective emission reductions and low-carbon investments |
||||
References |
COM(2015)0337 – C8-0190/2015 – 2015/0148(COD) |
||||
Committee responsible Date announced in plenary |
ENVI 7.9.2015 |
|
|
|
|
Opinion by Date announced in plenary |
ITRE 7.9.2015 |
||||
Associated committees - date announced in plenary |
10.3.2016 |
||||
Rapporteur Date appointed |
Fredrick Federley 28.10.2015 |
||||
Discussed in committee |
17.3.2016 |
12.7.2016 |
|
|
|
Date adopted |
13.10.2016 |
|
|
|
|
Result of final vote |
+: –: 0: |
45 13 4 |
|||
Members present for the final vote |
Nikolay Barekov, Nicolas Bay, Bendt Bendtsen, Xabier Benito Ziluaga, José Blanco López, David Borrelli, Jerzy Buzek, Angelo Ciocca, Edward Czesak, Jakop Dalunde, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Christian Ehler, Fredrick Federley, Ashley Fox, Adam Gierek, Theresa Griffin, Hans-Olaf Henkel, Eva Kaili, Kaja Kallas, Barbara Kappel, Krišjānis Kariņš, Seán Kelly, Jaromír Kohlíček, Zdzisław Krasnodębski, Miapetra Kumpula-Natri, Janusz Lewandowski, Ernest Maragall, Edouard Martin, Angelika Mlinar, Nadine Morano, Dan Nica, Morten Helveg Petersen, Miroslav Poche, Carolina Punset, Herbert Reul, Paul Rübig, Algirdas Saudargas, Sergei Stanishev, Neoklis Sylikiotis, Dario Tamburrano, Patrizia Toia, Evžen Tošenovský, Claude Turmes, Vladimir Urutchev, Henna Virkkunen, Martina Werner, Lieve Wierinck, Anna Záborská, Flavio Zanonato, Carlos Zorrinho |
||||
Substitutes present for the final vote |
Michał Boni, Rosa D’Amato, Esther de Lange, Jens Geier, Benedek Jávor, Olle Ludvigsson, Vladimír Maňka, Marian-Jean Marinescu, Clare Moody, Maria Spyraki |
||||
Substitutes under Rule 200(2) present for the final vote |
Salvatore Cicu, Albert Deß |
||||
OPINION of the Committee on Development (14.7.2016)
for the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2003/87/EC to enhance cost-effective emission reductions and low-carbon investments
(COM(2015)0337 – C8‑0190/2015 – 2015/0148(COD))
Rapporteur: Jordi Sebastià
SHORT JUSTIFICATION
The 5th Assessment Report by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), completed in 2014, confirmed and further detailed the extreme gravity of the climate challenge and underlined the urgency of stepping up climate action. The response to this challenge represented by the intended nationally determined contributions (INDCs), submitted by Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change is far from sufficient, but represents major progress.
The Paris Agreement specifies the aim of global climate action to "holding the increase in the global average temperature to well below 2°C above pre-industrial levels and to pursue efforts to limit the temperature increase to 1.5°C". Through this agreement, all countries are engaging in this endeavour. The agreement has also created better conditions for steady upward revision of efforts towards levels commensurate with the climate challenge.
The opportunity to effect a step change in global climate action must be fully exploited. As a big emitter with considerable resources, the EU has great responsibility. It must help foster a process in which the countries of the world under the influence of each other's increased efforts increase their own ones, making the steady upward revision of the global effort happen.
A key task for the EU in this is to repair its Emissions Trading System (ETS) and make it a truly efficient instrument for reduction of emissions, as well as for generation of funds for promotion of renewable energy, energy savings and support for adaptation to impacts of climate challenge both within the EU and in vulnerable developing countries, in particular the least developed countries (LDCs).
The Commission proposal for amending the ETS directive is insufficient for turning the ETS into the instrument that is now needed. Your draftsman therefore proposes amendments that:
- strengthen the environmental integrity through aligning the emission cap represented by the linear reduction factor, as a first step to the higher end of the current EU 2050 economy wide GHG reduction target, i.e. 95% compared to 1990, and, as a second step, through including a regular 5-yearly review of the cap, following the UNFCCC and Paris Agreement collective reviews;
- remove allowances from the surplus placed in the Market Stability Reserve that correspond to the use of international CDM and JI credits under the ETS, thereby making the achievement of the ETS' GHG reduction target a domestic effort;
- auction all ETS allowances and earmark all of the revenues to climate action, with half of the revenues going to vulnerable developing countries, and establish an allowance import requirement for the import of energy intensive goods in order to prevent potential carbon leakage;
- ensure the aviation sector contributes to the 2030 GHG reduction target at the same level as other sectors under the EU ETS, and earmark all revenues from aviation to climate action in vulnerable developing countries
- include international shipping under climate targets through a collective fund for ship operators' contributions in respect of emissions in EU ports and during voyages to and from EU ports;
- limit the zero emission factor for biomass to waste and residues in order to reduce incentives for land-grabbing in developing countries to supply the EU market for bioenergy. Global deforestation and loss of forest carbon stock is estimated to be responsible for approximately 20% of climate change. Increasing EU demand for forest biomass through questionable zero carbon accounting risks to be at best inefficient and at worst counterproductive from the perspective of mitigating climate change.
The earmarking of ETS revenues and inclusion of international shipping emissions in the scheme are also in line with the EP position on the issue in the 2008 climate package, repeated also on other occasions.
AMENDMENTS
The Committee on Development calls on the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety, as the committee responsible, to take into account the following amendments:
Amendment 1 Proposal for a directive Recital 2 a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 2 Proposal for a directive Recital 2 b (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 3 Proposal for a directive Recital 2 c (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(2c) The Paris Agreement represents a global accord to limit and reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and seeks to achieve a 'just transition', from which developing nations are also to benefit. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 4 Proposal for a directive Recital 2 d (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(2d) Developing countries are the most vulnerable to the impact of climate change. The Union should step up its support for such countries in order to strengthen their ability to adapt and their resilience to climate change. Policy coherence at Union level should be enhanced so that the EU ETS can provide an effective complement to development cooperation policy, particularly in the context of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and the fight against climate change. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 5 Proposal for a directive Recital 2 e (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 6 Proposal for a directive Recital 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 7 Proposal for a directive Recital 3 a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 8 Proposal for a directive Recital 3 b (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 9 Proposal for a directive Recital 7 a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(7a) The zero-rating of emissions from biomass in the EU ETS constitutes a support scheme within the meaning of Directive 2009/28/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council1a. Bioliquids, biofuels and solid and gaseous biomass should only receive support and count towards the national targets where they comply with sustainability criteria set out in Directive 2009/28/EC or the Sustainable Bioenergy Policy. Consequently, the sustainability criteria should be applied for all sources of bioenergy that are consumed and zero-rated for greenhouse gas emissions within an installation or an aircraft operator's activities covered by the EU ETS. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
_________________________________ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1a Directive 2009/28/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources and amending and subsequently repealing Directives 2001/77/EC and 2003/30/EC (OJ L 140, 5.6.2009, p. 16). | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Justification | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ETS currently excludes installations using exclusively biomass from its scope, treats all biomass used in installations as carbon neutral and does not subject solid biomass to any sustainability criteria. As a consequence, a significant share of emissions are unaccounted. It is essential to end the zero-counting of biomass and to subject it to sustainability criteria. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 10 Proposal for a directive Recital 9 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(9) Member States should partially compensate, in accordance with state aid rules, certain installations in sectors or sub-sectors which have been determined to be exposed to a significant risk of carbon leakage because of costs related to greenhouse gas emissions passed on in electricity prices. The Protocol and accompanying decisions adopted by the Conference of the Parties in Paris need to provide for the dynamic mobilisation of climate finance, technology transfer and capacity building for eligible Parties, particularly those with least capabilities. Public sector climate finance will continue to play an important role in mobilising resources after 2020. Therefore, auction revenues should also be used for climate financing actions in vulnerable third countries, including adaptation to the impacts of climate. The amount of climate finance to be mobilised will also depend on the ambition and quality of the proposed Intended Nationally Determined Contributions (INDCs), subsequent investment plans and national adaptation planning processes. Member States should also use auction revenues to promote skill formation and reallocation of labour affected by the transition of jobs in a decarbonising economy. |
(9) Member States should partially compensate, in accordance with state aid rules, certain installations in sectors or sub-sectors which have been determined to be exposed to a significant risk of carbon leakage because of costs related to greenhouse gas emissions passed on in electricity prices. The Protocol and accompanying decisions adopted by the Conference of the Parties in Paris need to provide for the dynamic mobilisation of climate finance, technology transfer and capacity building for eligible Parties, particularly those with least capabilities. Public sector climate finance will continue to play an important role in mobilising resources after 2020. Acknowledging the global responsibility of the Union, Member States should promptly financially support efforts undertaken by the least developed countries (LDCs) aimed at developing low emission technologies based on the principle of technological neutrality and mitigation of climate change impact. In this regard a significant percentage of revenues generated by the auctioning of allowances by Member States should be granted to international funds, particularly: the Green Climate Fund, the Least Developed Countries Fund and the Special Climate Change Fund. The amount of climate finance to be mobilised will also depend on the ambition and quality of the proposed Intended Nationally Determined Contributions (INDCs), subsequent investment plans and national adaptation planning processes. Member States should also use auction revenues to promote skill formation and reallocation of labour affected by the transition of jobs in a decarbonising economy. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 11 Proposal for a directive Recital 10 a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 12 Proposal for a directive Recital 13 a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 13 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Directive 2003/87/EC Article 3d | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Justification | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The aviation sector should contribute to the 2030 GHG reduction target at the same level as other sectors under the EU ETS. In line with EP position on the aviation ETS proposal in 2007, and in order to be consistent with international aviation law, all revenues from EU ETS for aviation should be used to tackle climate change. In order to build confidence in developing countries regarding the EU policy measure, all revenues of aviation ETS should be earmarked for international climate finance. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 14 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 a (new) Directive 2003/87/EC Article 3e | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Justification | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Linked to Amendment 9. All allowances to aviation sector should be auctioned by Member States. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 15 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 Directive 2003/87/EC Article 9 – paragraphs 2 and 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Justification | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In the Paris Agreement countries agreed to hold the temperature increase well below 2°C and to pursue efforts to limit it to 1.5°C. The proposed ETS linear factor does not even lead to the low end of the EU target for 2050 of 80-95% below 1990 levels, agreed on the basis of a 2°C objective. To be more consistent with the Paris Agreement, it is proposed to adjust the linear factor to 2,8%, corresponding to an economy wide reduction of 95% below 1990 for 2050, i.e. the upper end of the EU 2050 target, and as a second step provide for a review clause for adjusting the linear factor after UN reviews | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 16 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point a Directive 2003/87/EC Article 10 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 a | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Justification | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The European Commission should: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
- institute a Just Transition Fund as a strong EU-wide support mechanism for workers and regions that will lose out in the low-carbon transition. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
- institute an International Climate Action Fund that would directly replenish the Green Climate Fund and would help put a stop to relying on aid budgets alone for the provision of international climate finance. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The share of allowances for the Modernisation fund, Just Transition fund, and International Climate Action Fund should be added to the auctioned allowances. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 17 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point b a (new) Directive 2003/87/EC Article 10 – paragraph 3 – introductory part | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Justification | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In line with the EP position for the 2008 climate package, all revenues (or the equivalent in financial value) from EU ETS should be earmarked for climate action and 50% should be dedicated to EU’s collective contribution to international climate finance. Collective pledging by the EU and its Member States would increase EU influence in UNFCCC negotiations and effectiveness of EU climate finance. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 18 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point c Directive 2003/87/EC Article 10 – paragraph 3 – point k | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 19 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point a Directive 2003/87/EC Article 10a – paragraph 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Justification | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LDCs are especially vulnerable to the effects of climate change and are responsible only for a very low level of greenhouse gas emissions. Therefore, particular priority should be given to addressing the needs of LDCs through the use of EU ETS allowances to fund climate action, in particular adaptation to the impacts of climate change. Collective pledging by the EU would increase EU influence in the UNFCCC negotiations while contribution through the Green Climate Fund would also encourage others to contribute a portion of their own carbon pricing schemes to the Fund. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 20 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point d Directive 2003/87/EC Article 10 a – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Justification | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The proposed wording 'should' is legally ambiguous. While a harmonised system may be desirable, forcing Member States to use state aid is legally unsound, therefore the word 'may' has been restored. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 21 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Directive 2003/87/EC Article 10 d – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Justification | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mentioned small-scale investments have a crucial role for modernization of the energy system and transition toward low emission economy, therefore should be underlined explicitly. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 22 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Directive 2003/87/EC Article 10 d – paragraph 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Justification | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Beneficiary Member States shall be given the right to select small-scale projects on their own especially when their fulfilment is envisaged within the existing national plan/programme in order to tailor the MF for national situation. In such a case only simple information to the advisory board should suffice. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 23 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10 a (new) Directive 2003/87/EC Article 11 c (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:02003L0087-20151029&qid=1458208850750&from=EN) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Justification | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In line with the EP position on ETS in 2008 and the agreement on the climate package in 2009, all sectors of the economy should contribute to emission reductions, including international maritime shipping and aviation. In the absence of action under the IMO a Fund should be established for ship operators to contribute to in respect of emissions in EU ports and for voyages to and from EU ports. If the climate action does not result in reduced emissions equal to the emissions of the covered operators, the difference should be cancelled from the Market Stability Reserve. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 24 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 22 a (new) Directive 2003/87/EC Article 27 – paragraph 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?qid=1464179550809&uri=CELEX:02003L0087-20151029) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 25 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 22 b (new) Directive 2003/87/EC Article -28 a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Justification | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In the Paris Agreement, countries agreed to hold the temperature increase well below 2°C and to pursue efforts to limit it to 1.5°C. In order to be more consistent with the Paris Agreement, it is proposed, as a first step, to adjust the linear factor to 2,8%, corresponding to an economy wide reduction of 95% below 1990 for 2050, i.e. the upper end of the EU 2050 target, and as a second step provide for a review clause for adjusting the linear factor after UNFCCC and Paris Agreement review processes. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 26 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 22 c (new) Directive 2003/87/EC Annex I – paragraph 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?qid=1464179550809&uri=CELEX:02003L0087-20151029) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 27 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 22 d (new) Directive 2003/87/EC Annex I – paragraph 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?qid=1464179550809&uri=CELEX:02003L0087-20151029) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 28 Proposal for a directive Annex III Directive 2003/87/EC Annex IV – Part A | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?qid=1464179550809&uri=CELEX:02003L0087-20151029) |
PROCEDURE – COMMITTEE ASKED FOR OPINION
Title |
Cost-effective emission reductions and low-carbon investments |
||||
References |
COM(2015)0337 – C8-0190/2015 – 2015/0148(COD) |
||||
Committee responsible Date announced in plenary |
ENVI 7.9.2015 |
|
|
|
|
Opinion by Date announced in plenary |
DEVE 17.12.2015 |
||||
Rapporteur Date appointed |
Jordi Sebastià 20.10.2015 |
||||
Discussed in committee |
24.5.2016 |
|
|
|
|
Date adopted |
12.7.2016 |
|
|
|
|
Result of final vote |
+: –: 0: |
12 11 0 |
|||
Members present for the final vote |
Louis Aliot, Ignazio Corrao, Nirj Deva, Doru-Claudian Frunzulică, Maria Heubuch, György Hölvényi, Teresa Jiménez-Becerril Barrio, Arne Lietz, Linda McAvan, Norbert Neuser, Maurice Ponga, Cristian Dan Preda, Lola Sánchez Caldentey, Elly Schlein, Eleni Theocharous, Bogdan Brunon Wenta, Anna Záborská |
||||
Substitutes present for the final vote |
Seb Dance, Jordi Sebastià, Adam Szejnfeld, Joachim Zeller |
||||
Substitutes under Rule 200(2) present for the final vote |
Maria Arena, Petras Auštrevičius |
||||
PROCEDURE – COMMITTEE RESPONSIBLE
Title |
Cost-effective emission reductions and low-carbon investments |
||||
References |
COM(2015)0337 – C8-0190/2015 – 2015/0148(COD) |
||||
Date submitted to Parliament |
15.7.2015 |
|
|
|
|
Committee responsible Date announced in plenary |
ENVI 7.9.2015 |
|
|
|
|
Committees asked for opinions Date announced in plenary |
DEVE 17.12.2015 |
BUDG 7.9.2015 |
ITRE 7.9.2015 |
IMCO 7.9.2015 |
|
Not delivering opinions Date of decision |
BUDG 3.9.2015 |
IMCO 22.9.2015 |
|
|
|
Associated committees Date announced in plenary |
ITRE 10.3.2016 |
|
|
|
|
Rapporteurs Date appointed |
Ian Duncan 16.9.2015 |
|
|
|
|
Discussed in committee |
21.6.2016 |
29.9.2016 |
|
|
|
Date adopted |
15.12.2016 |
|
|
|
|
Result of final vote |
+: –: 0: |
53 5 7 |
|||
Members present for the final vote |
Marco Affronte, Pilar Ayuso, Zoltán Balczó, Catherine Bearder, Ivo Belet, Simona Bonafè, Biljana Borzan, Paul Brannen, Soledad Cabezón Ruiz, Nessa Childers, Birgit Collin-Langen, Mireille D’Ornano, Miriam Dalli, Seb Dance, Angélique Delahaye, Ian Duncan, Bas Eickhout, Eleonora Evi, José Inácio Faria, Karl-Heinz Florenz, Francesc Gambús, Elisabetta Gardini, Gerben-Jan Gerbrandy, Jens Gieseke, Julie Girling, Sylvie Goddyn, Françoise Grossetête, Andrzej Grzyb, Jytte Guteland, György Hölvényi, Anneli Jäätteenmäki, Jean-François Jalkh, Benedek Jávor, Karin Kadenbach, Kateřina Konečná, Giovanni La Via, Peter Liese, Norbert Lins, Valentinas Mazuronis, Susanne Melior, Miroslav Mikolášik, Massimo Paolucci, Piernicola Pedicini, Bolesław G. Piecha, Frédérique Ries, Daciana Octavia Sârbu, Annie Schreijer-Pierik, Davor Škrlec, Renate Sommer, Ivica Tolić, Jadwiga Wiśniewska, Tiemo Wölken, Damiano Zoffoli |
||||
Substitutes present for the final vote |
Caterina Chinnici, Linnéa Engström, Merja Kyllönen, Ulrike Müller, Bart Staes, Keith Taylor, Mihai Ţurcanu, Claude Turmes, Carlos Zorrinho |
||||
Substitutes under Rule 200(2) present for the final vote |
Linnéa Engström, Olle Ludvigsson, Jiří Maštálka, Jens Nilsson |
||||
Date tabled |
13.1.2017 |
||||