REPORT on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Union and Regulation (EU) 2016/1037 on protection against subsidised imports from countries not members of the European Union
27.6.2017 - (COM(2016)0721 – C8‑0456/2016 – 2016/0351(COD)) - ***I
Committee on International Trade
Rapporteur: Salvatore Cicu
DRAFT EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION
on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Union and Regulation (EU) 2016/1037 on protection against subsidised imports from countries not members of the European Union
(COM(2016)0721 – C8‑0456/2016 – 2016/0351(COD))
(Ordinary legislative procedure: first reading)
The European Parliament,
– having regard to the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council (COM(2016)0721),
– having regard to Article 294(2) and Article 207(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament (C8‑0456/2016),
– having regard to Article 294(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
– having regard to the opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee of 29 March 2017[1],
– having regard to the resolution of the European Parliament of 12 May 2016 on China’s market economy status[2],
– having regard to Rule 59 of its Rules of Procedure,
– having regard to the report of the Committee on International Trade and the opinion of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy (A8-0236/2017),
1. Adopts its position at first reading hereinafter set out;
2. Calls on the Commission to refer the matter to Parliament again if it replaces, substantially amends or intends to substantially amend its proposal;
3. Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the national parliaments.
Amendment 1 Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 2 Proposal for a regulation Recital 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 3 Proposal for a regulation Recital 4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 4 Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 5 Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 Article 2 – paragraph 6a – point a | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 6 Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 Article 2 – paragraph 6a – point b | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 7 Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 Article 2 – paragraph 6a – point c | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 8 Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 Article 2 – paragraph 6a – point d | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 9 Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 Article 2 – paragraph 6a – point e | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 10 Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 Article 2 – paragraph 7 – point a – subparagraph 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 11 Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 Article 2 – paragraph 7 – point a – subparagraph 2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 12 Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 Article 2 – paragraph 7 – point a – subparagraph 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 13 Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 a (new) Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 Article 3 – paragraph 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 14 Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 Article 11 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 15 Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 Article 11 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 4a | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 16 Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 a (new) Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 Article 16 – paragraph 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 17 Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 b (new) Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 Article 18 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 18 Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 c (new) Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 Article 18 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 19 Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 d (new) Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 Annex -I (new) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 20 Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 Regulation (EU) 2016/1037 Article 10 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 21 Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
This Regulation shall apply to all decisions on the initiation of proceedings, and to all proceedings, including original investigations and review investigations, initiated, on or after the date on which this Regulation enters into force. |
This Regulation shall apply to all investigations under Article 5 of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 initiated on or after ...[insert date of entry into force of this Regulation]. For all other investigations, this Regulation shall apply from the date on which the first expiry review of the relevant measures, following that date is terminated. |
- [1] Not yet published in the Official Journal
- [2] Texts adopted, P8_TA(2016)0223
OPINION of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy (30.5.2017)
for the Committee on International Trade
on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Union and Regulation (EU) 2016/1037 on protection against subsidised imports from countries not members of the European Union
(COM(2016)0721 – C8‑0456/2016 – 2016/0351(COD))
Rapporteur: Jerzy Buzek
AMENDMENTS
The Committee on Industry, Research and Energy calls on the Committee on International Trade, as the committee responsible, to take into account the following amendments:
Amendment 1 Proposal for a regulation Citation 2 a (new) | ||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | |||||||||||||||
|
Having regard to the resolution of the European Parliament of 12 May 2016 on China’s market economy status, | |||||||||||||||
Amendment 2 Proposal for a regulation Recital 1 a (new) | ||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | |||||||||||||||
|
(1a) The Union should be able to protect its industry against dumping effectively, and future Union action should accord with WTO rules. An instrument with the same rules for all trading partners is the correct basis for lasting trade relations. | |||||||||||||||
Amendment 3 Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 | ||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | |||||||||||||||
(2) Articles 2(7)(a) and 2(7)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 stipulate the basis on which normal value should be determined in the case of imports from non-market economy countries. In view of developments with respect to certain countries that are Members of the WTO, it is appropriate that, for those countries, normal value should be determined on the basis of paragraphs 1 to 6a of Article 2 of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036, with effect from the date on which this Regulation enters into force, and subject to the provisions of this Regulation. In the case of countries which are, at the date of initiation, not Members of the WTO and listed in Annex I of Regulation (EU) 2015/7552 , norma1 value should be determined on the basis of paragraph 7 of Article 2 of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036, as amended by this Regulation. This Regulation should be without prejudice to establishing whether or not any WTO Member is a market economy. |
(2) In view of developments in world trade, concerning also Members of the WTO, including their effects on domestic industry, it is appropriate to determine normal value on the basis of paragraphs 1 to 6a of Article 2 of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036, with effect from the date on which this Regulation enters into force, and subject to the provisions of this Regulation. In the case of non-market-economy countries which are Members of the WTO or that, at the date of initiation, are not Members of the WTO and listed in Annex I of Regulation (EU) 2015/7552 , norma1 value should be determined on the basis of paragraph 7 of Article 2 of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036, as amended by this Regulation. | |||||||||||||||
__________________ |
__________________ | |||||||||||||||
2 Regulation (EU) 2015/755 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2015 on common rules for imports from certain third countries (OJ L 123, 19.5.2015, p. 33). |
2 Regulation (EU) 2015/755 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2015 on common rules for imports from certain third countries (OJ L 123, 19.5.2015, p. 33). | |||||||||||||||
Justification | ||||||||||||||||
The rapporteur maintains an explicit reference to market or non-market economy status for WTO Members, as provided for instance by Article 15.d of the Protocol of Accession of China to the WTO. | ||||||||||||||||
Amendment 4 Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 a (new) | ||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | |||||||||||||||
|
(2 a) In view of the Council agreement to modernise the Union's trade defence instruments (TDIs) and in order to have effective anti-dumping measures, it is necessary to take into account that the lesser duty rule unjustly reduces the anti-dumping duties at a level below the dumping margin. For that purpose and, as proposed by the European Parliament in its position adopted at first reading on 16 April 2014 relating to the modernisation of TDIs, the lesser duty rule should be removed, the trade defence proceedings should be accelerated, provisional duties should be imposed, and trade unions and SMEs should be allowed to submit anti-dumping complaints. | |||||||||||||||
Amendment 5 Proposal for a regulation Recital 3 | ||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | |||||||||||||||
(3) In the light of experience gained in past proceedings, it is appropriate to clarify the circumstances in which significant distortions affecting to a considerable extent free market forces may be deemed to exist. In particular, it is appropriate to clarify that this situation may be deemed to exist, inter alia, when reported prices or costs, including the costs of raw materials, are not the result of free market forces because they are affected by government intervention. It is further appropriate to clarify that in considering whether or not such a situation exists regard may be had, inter alia, to the potential impact of the following: the market in question is to a significant extent served by enterprises which operate under the ownership, control or policy supervision or guidance of the authorities of the exporting country; state presence in firms allowing the state to interfere with respect to prices or costs; public policies or measures discriminating in favour of domestic suppliers or otherwise influencing free market forces; and access to finance granted by institutions implementing public policy objectives. It is further appropriate to provide that the Commission services may issue a report describing the specific situation concerning these criteria in a certain country or a certain sector; that such report and the evidence on which it is based may be placed on the file of any investigation relating to that country or sector; and that interested parties should have ample opportunity to comment on the report and the evidence on which it is based in each investigation in which such report or evidence is used. |
(3) In the light of experience gained in past proceedings, it is appropriate to clarify the circumstances in which significant distortions affecting to a considerable extent free market forces may be deemed to exist. In particular, it is appropriate to clarify that this situation may be deemed to exist, inter alia, when reported prices or costs, including the costs of raw materials and other production factors, are not the result of free market forces because they are affected by state intervention at any level, including central, regional and provincial level. It is further appropriate to clarify that in considering whether or not such a situation exists regard may be had, inter alia, to the potential impact of the following: | |||||||||||||||
|
the market in question is to a significant extent served by enterprises, such as public bodies, which operate under the ownership, control or policy supervision or guidance, whether direct or indirect, of the authorities of the exporting country; state presence in firms allowing the state to interfere with respect to prices or costs; public policies or measures discriminating in favour of domestic suppliers, for example through the use of state-fixed prices, or discrimination in the tax, trade or currency regimes; or otherwise influencing free market forces, including the allocation of resources; the absence of a transparent and non-discriminatory company law which ensures adequate corporate governance, such as the application of international accounting standards, the protection of shareholders and public availability of accurate company information; the absence and implementation of a coherent, effective and transparent set of laws which ensure the respect of property rights and the operation of a functioning bankruptcy regime; the absence of a genuine financial sector which operates independently from the state and which in law and practice is subject to sufficient guarantee provisions and adequate supervision; lack of compliance with international social and environmental standards having as result an impact on costs production. | |||||||||||||||
|
It is further appropriate to provide that the Commission should issue, as soon as possible, a report describing the specific situation concerning these criteria in a certain country or a certain sector; that such report and the evidence on which it is based should be placed on the file of any investigation relating to that country or sector and updated on a regular basis as appropriate; and that interested parties should have ample opportunity to comment on the report and the evidence on which it is based in each investigation in which such report or evidence is used. | |||||||||||||||
Amendment 6 Proposal for a regulation Recital 4 | ||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | |||||||||||||||
(4) It is further appropriate to recall that costs should normally be calculated on the basis of records kept by the exporter or producer under investigation. However, where there are significant distortions in the exporting country with the consequence that costs reflected in the records of the party concerned are artificially low, such costs may be adjusted or established on any reasonable basis, including information from other representative markets or from international prices or benchmarks. In the light of experience gained in past proceedings, it is appropriate to further clarify that, for the purposes of applying the provisions introduced by this regulation, due account should be taken of all relevant evidence, including relevant assessment reports regarding the circumstances prevailing on the domestic market of the exporting producers and the evidence on which they are based, which has been placed on the file, and upon which interested parties have had an opportunity to comment. |
(4) It is further appropriate to recall that costs should normally be calculated on the basis of records kept by the exporter or producer under investigation. However, where there are significant distortions in the exporting country with the consequence that costs reflected in the records of the party concerned are artificially low and do not reflect actual market values, such costs should be adjusted or established on any reasonable basis, including information from other representative markets or from undistorted international prices or benchmarks, including Union prices or benchmarks where appropriate. In the light of experience gained in past proceedings, it is appropriate to further clarify that, for the purposes of applying the provisions introduced by this regulation, due account should be taken of all relevant evidence, including relevant assessment reports regarding the circumstances prevailing on the domestic market of the exporting producers and the evidence on which they are based, which has been placed on the file, and upon which interested parties have had an opportunity to comment. | |||||||||||||||
Amendment 7 Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 | ||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | |||||||||||||||
(6) Absent any other specific transitional rules regulating the matter, it is appropriate to provide for the application of this Regulation to all decisions on the initiation of proceedings, and to all proceedings, including original investigations and review investigations, initiated, on or after the date on which this Regulation enters into force, subject to Article 11(9) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036. Furthermore, by way of specific transitional rule, and having regard to the absence of any other specific transitional rule regulating the matter, it is appropriate to provide that, in the case of a transition from a normal value calculated pursuant to Articles 2(7)(a) or 2(7)(b) to a normal value calculated pursuant to paragraphs 1 to 6a of Article 2, the reasonable period of time provided for in the first sub-paragraph of Article 11(3) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 should be deemed to elapse on the date on which the first expiry review following such transition is initiated. With a view to reducing the risk of circumvention of the provisions of this Regulation, the same approach should apply with respect to reviews conducted pursuant to Article 11(4) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036. It is also appropriate to recall that a transition from a normal value calculated pursuant to Articles 2(7)(a) or 2(7)(b) to a normal value calculated pursuant to paragraphs 1 to 6a of Article 2 would not in itself constitute sufficient evidence within the meaning of Article 11(3) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036. Such transitional rules should complete a lacuna that would otherwise risk to generate legal uncertainty, should provide a reasonable opportunity for interested parties to adapt themselves to the expiry of the old rules and the entry into force of the new rules, and should facilitate the efficient, orderly and equitable administration of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036. |
(6) Absent any other specific transitional rules regulating the matter, it is appropriate to provide for the application of this Regulation to all decisions on the initiation of proceedings, and to all proceedings, including original investigations and review investigations, initiated, on or after the date on which this Regulation enters into force, subject to Article 11(9) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036. Furthermore, by way of specific transitional rule, and having regard to the absence of any other specific transitional rule regulating the matter, it is appropriate to provide that, in the case of a transition from a normal value calculated pursuant to Articles 2(7)(a) or 2(7)(b) to a normal value calculated pursuant to paragraphs 1 to 6e of Article 2, the reasonable period of time provided for in the first sub-paragraph of Article 11(3) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 should be deemed to elapse on the date on which the first expiry review following such transition is initiated. With a view to reducing the risk of circumvention of the provisions of this Regulation, the same approach should apply with respect to reviews conducted pursuant to Article 11(4) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036. It is also appropriate to recall that a transition from a normal value calculated pursuant to Articles 2(7)(a) or 2(7)(b) to a normal value calculated pursuant to paragraphs 1 to 6e of Article 2 would not in itself constitute sufficient evidence within the meaning of Article 11(3) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036. Such transitional rules should complete a lacuna that would otherwise risk to generate legal uncertainty, should provide a reasonable opportunity for interested parties to adapt themselves to the expiry of the old rules and the entry into force of the new rules, and should facilitate the efficient, orderly and equitable administration of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036. | |||||||||||||||
Amendment 8 Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 a (new) | ||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | |||||||||||||||
|
(7 a) The Union should coordinate with major trading partners through multilateral or bilateral actions before and during investigations. In this regards, a comparative follow-up on the anti-dumping calculation with our major trading partners should be exercised by the Commission and the results should be communicated to the stakeholders. | |||||||||||||||
Amendment 9 Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 Article 2 – paragraph 6a – point a | ||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Amendment 10 Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 Article 2 – paragraph 6a – point b | ||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Amendment 11 Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 Article 2 – paragraph 6a – point b a (new) | ||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Amendment 12 Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 Article 2 – paragraph 6a – point c | ||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Amendment 13 Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 Article 2 – paragraph 6a – point d | ||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Amendment 14 Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 Article 2 – paragraph 6a – point e | ||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Amendment 15 Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 | ||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | |||||||||||||||
This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union. |
This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union. | |||||||||||||||
|
By that date the Commission will have published its report referred to in point 1 of Article 1 of this Regulation, as regards Article 6a (c) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036. | |||||||||||||||
|
|
PROCEDURE – COMMITTEE ASKED FOR OPINION
Title |
Protection against dumped and subsidised imports from countries not members of the EU |
||||
References |
COM(2016)0721 – C8-0456/2016 – 2016/0351(COD) |
||||
Committee responsible Date announced in plenary |
INTA 21.11.2016 |
|
|
|
|
Opinion by Date announced in plenary |
ITRE 21.11.2016 |
||||
Rapporteur Date appointed |
Paloma López Bermejo 5.12.2016 |
||||
Discussed in committee |
27.2.2017 |
|
|
|
|
Date adopted |
30.5.2017 |
|
|
|
|
Result of final vote |
+: –: 0: |
30 21 5 |
|||
Members present for the final vote |
Bendt Bendtsen, Xabier Benito Ziluaga, José Blanco López, Reinhard Bütikofer, Jerzy Buzek, Angelo Ciocca, Edward Czesak, Jakop Dalunde, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Christian Ehler, Ashley Fox, Adam Gierek, Theresa Griffin, Hans-Olaf Henkel, Kaja Kallas, Barbara Kappel, Krišjānis Kariņš, Seán Kelly, Jaromír Kohlíček, Peter Kouroumbashev, Zdzisław Krasnodębski, Miapetra Kumpula-Natri, Janusz Lewandowski, Paloma López Bermejo, Edouard Martin, Angelika Mlinar, Nadine Morano, Dan Nica, Angelika Niebler, Morten Helveg Petersen, Miroslav Poche, Michel Reimon, Herbert Reul, Paul Rübig, Massimiliano Salini, Algirdas Saudargas, Jean-Luc Schaffhauser, Neoklis Sylikiotis, Evžen Tošenovský, Claude Turmes, Vladimir Urutchev, Kathleen Van Brempt, Henna Virkkunen, Lieve Wierinck, Anna Záborská, Flavio Zanonato, Carlos Zorrinho |
||||
Substitutes present for the final vote |
Soledad Cabezón Ruiz, Jude Kirton-Darling, Constanze Krehl, Barbara Kudrycka, Olle Ludvigsson, Florent Marcellesi, Marian-Jean Marinescu, Marisa Matias, Markus Pieper, Sofia Sakorafa, Anne Sander, Pavel Telička, Anneleen Van Bossuyt |
||||
Substitutes under Rule 200(2) present for the final vote |
Fabio Massimo Castaldo, Nicola Danti, Gabriele Preuß |
||||
FINAL VOTE BY ROLL CALL IN COMMITTEE ASKED FOR OPINION
30 |
+ |
|
ALDE |
Kaja Kallas, Angelika Mlinar, Morten Helveg Petersen, Pavel Telicka, Lieve Wierinck |
|
ENF |
Angelo Ciocca, Jean-Luc Schaffhauser |
|
PPE |
Bendt Bendtsen, Jerzy Buzek, Christian Ehler, Krišjānis Kariņš, Seán Kelly, Barbara Kudrycka, Janusz Lewandowski, Marian-Jean Marinescu, Angelika Niebler, Markus Pieper, Herbert Reul, Massimiliano Salini, Anne Sander, Algirdas Saudargas, Vladimir Urutchev, Henna Virkkunen, Anna Záborská, Pilar del Castillo Vera |
|
Verts/ALE |
Reinhard Bütikofer, Jakop Dalunde, Florent Marcellesi, Michel Reimon, Claude Turmes |
|
21 |
- |
|
EFDD |
Fabio Massimo Castaldo |
|
GUE |
Xabier Benito Ziluaga, Jaromír Kohlícek, Paloma López Bermejo, Marisa Matias |
|
S&D |
José Blanco López, Soledad Cabezón Ruiz, Adam Gierek, Theresa Griffin, Jude Kirton-Darling, Peter Kouroumbashev, Constanze Krehl, Miapetra Kumpula-Natri, Olle Ludvigsson, Edouard Martin, Dan Nica, Miroslav Poche, Gabriele Preuβ, Kathleen Van Brempt, Flavio Zanonato, Carlos Zorrinho |
|
5 |
0 |
|
ECR |
Edward Czesak, Ashley Fox, Hans-Olaf Henkel, Evžen Tošenovský, Anneleen Van Bossuyt |
|
Key to symbols:
+ : in favour
- : against
0 : abstention
PROCEDURE – COMMITTEE RESPONSIBLE
Title |
Protection against dumped and subsidised imports from countries not members of the EU |
||||
References |
COM(2016)0721 – C8-0456/2016 – 2016/0351(COD) |
||||
Date submitted to Parliament |
9.11.2016 |
|
|
|
|
Committee responsible Date announced in plenary |
INTA 21.11.2016 |
|
|
|
|
Committees asked for opinions Date announced in plenary |
ITRE 21.11.2016 |
JURI 21.11.2016 |
|
|
|
Rapporteurs Date appointed |
Salvatore Cicu 28.11.2016 |
|
|
|
|
Discussed in committee |
24.1.2017 |
4.5.2017 |
|
|
|
Date adopted |
20.6.2017 |
|
|
|
|
Result of final vote |
+: –: 0: |
33 3 2 |
|||
Members present for the final vote |
William (The Earl of) Dartmouth, Laima Liucija Andrikienė, Tiziana Beghin, David Borrelli, Daniel Caspary, Salvatore Cicu, Santiago Fisas Ayxelà, Eleonora Forenza, Jude Kirton-Darling, Patricia Lalonde, Bernd Lange, Emma McClarkin, Anne-Marie Mineur, Sorin Moisă, Alessia Maria Mosca, Franz Obermayr, Franck Proust, Tokia Saïfi, Matteo Salvini, Marietje Schaake, Helmut Scholz, Joachim Schuster, Hannu Takkula, Iuliu Winkler, Jan Zahradil |
||||
Substitutes present for the final vote |
Eric Andrieu, Klaus Buchner, Dita Charanzová, Nicola Danti, Seán Kelly, Sander Loones, Georg Mayer, Bolesław G. Piecha, Jarosław Wałęsa |
||||
Substitutes under Rule 200(2) present for the final vote |
Clara Eugenia Aguilera García, Birgit Collin-Langen, Edouard Martin, Massimiliano Salini |
||||
Date tabled |
27.6.2017 |
||||
FINAL VOTE BY ROLL CALL IN COMMITTEE RESPONSIBLE
33 |
+ |
|
ALDE |
Dita Charanzová, Patricia Lalonde, Marietje Schaake, Hannu Takkula |
|
ECR |
Sander Loones, Emma McClarkin, Jan Zahradil |
|
EFDD |
William (The Earl of) Dartmouth |
|
ENF |
Georg Mayer, Franz Obermayr, Matteo Salvini |
|
PPE |
Laima Liucija Andrikienė, Daniel Caspary, Salvatore Cicu, Birgit Collin-Langen, Santiago Fisas Ayxelà, Seán Kelly, Franck Proust, Massimiliano Salini, Tokia Saïfi, Jarosław Wałęsa, Iuliu Winkler |
|
S&D |
Clara Eugenia Aguilera García, Eric Andrieu, Nicola Danti, Jude Kirton-Darling, Bernd Lange, Edouard Martin, Sorin Moisă, Alessia Maria Mosca, Joachim Schuster |
|
Verts/ALE |
Klaus Buchner |
|
3 |
- |
|
EFDD |
Tiziana Beghin, David Borrelli |
|
GUE/NGL |
Anne-Marie Mineur |
|
2 |
0 |
|
GUE/NGL |
Eleonora Forenza, Helmut Scholz |
|
Key to symbols:
+ : in favour
- : against
0 : abstention