REPORT on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (Cedefop) and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 337/75
28.7.2017 - (COM(2016)0532 – C8-0343/2016 – 2016/0257(COD)) - ***I
Committee on Employment and Social Affairs
Rapporteur: Anne Sander
DRAFT EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION
on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (Cedefop) and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 337/75
(COM(2016)0532 – C8-0343/2016 – 2016/0257(COD))
(Ordinary legislative procedure: first reading)
The European Parliament,
– having regard to the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council (COM(2016)0532),
– having regard to Article 294(2) and to Article 166(4), Article 165(4) and Article 149 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament (C8-0343/2016),
– having regard to Article 294(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
– having regard to the opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee of 30 March 2017[1],
– after consulting the Committee of the Regions,
– having regard to Rule 59 of its Rules of Procedure,
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs and the opinion of the Committee on Budgets (A8-0273/2017),
1. Adopts its position at first reading hereinafter set out;
2. Calls on the Commission to refer the matter to Parliament again if it replaces, substantially amends or intends to substantially amend its proposal;
3. Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the national parliaments.
Amendment 1 Proposal for a regulation Recital 1 a (new) | |||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||
|
(1a) In accordance with Article 149, Article 165(4) and Article 166(4) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), Cedefop encourages cooperation between Member States and supports their activities through initiatives aimed at developing exchanges of information and best practices in the field of vocational training. | ||||||||||||
Amendment 2 Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Amendment 3 Proposal for a regulation Recital 3 a (new) | |||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||
|
(3a) This Regulation repeals Regulation (EEC) No 337/75, with the aim of updating Cedefop’s mandate and tasks to better reflect its current activities which go beyond vocational education and training and include work on skills and qualifications and adapt its mandate and tasks to current policy priorities and strategies, taking into account recent policy developments in the field of vocational education and training, skills and qualifications. | ||||||||||||
Amendment 4 Proposal for a regulation Recital 4 | |||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||
(4) Implementation of a vocational education and training policy will require a focus on the interface between education and training and the world of work, making sure that the knowledge, skills and competences acquired support employability in changing labour markets and are relevant to the needs of citizens and society. |
(4) Implementation of a vocational education and training policy will require a focus on the interface and transition between education and training and the world of work, making sure that the knowledge, skills and competences acquired support integration in changing labour markets and are relevant to the needs of citizens and society. | ||||||||||||
Amendment 5 Proposal for a regulation Recital 5 | |||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||
(5) Council Regulation (EEC) No 337/75 has been amended several times. Since further amendments are to be made, it should be repealed in the interest of clarity. |
(5) Regulation (EEC) No 337/75 has been amended several times. Since further amendments are to be made, it should be repealed in the interest of clarity, without deviating from its main objectives and without compromising its original goals. | ||||||||||||
Amendment 6 Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 a (new) | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Amendment 7 Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Justification | |||||||||||||
Common Compromise replacing amendments 4, 30, 31, 32 (Cedefop); 2, 50, 51, 52 (Eurofound); 3, 30, 31, 32 (EU-OSHA) | |||||||||||||
Amendment 8 Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 a (new) | |||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||
|
(7a) The tripartite nature of Cedefop, Eurofound, and EU-OSHA represents a comprehensive approach based on the social dialogue between the social partners and Union and national authorities, which is extremely valuable for the purpose of finding joint and sustainable solutions. | ||||||||||||
Amendment 9 Proposal for a regulation Recital 8 a (new) | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Amendment 10 Proposal for a regulation Recital 8 b (new) | |||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||
|
(8b) In its procurement activities, Cedefop should respect environmental, labour and social high-quality standards, as well as high-level of transparency, and fair competition rules. | ||||||||||||
Amendment 11 Proposal for a regulation Recital 8 c (new) | |||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||
|
(8c) Cedefop's budget should be prepared in accordance with the principle of performance-based budgeting, taking into account its objectives and expected results. | ||||||||||||
Amendment 12 Proposal for a regulation Recital 9 | |||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||
(9) The provisions concerning Cedefop's staff set out in Regulation (EEC) No 337/75 should be aligned with the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union (‘Staff Regulations’) and the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the European Union (‘CEOS’), laid down by Council Regulation (EEC, Euratom, ECSC) No 259/687 . |
(9) The provisions concerning Cedefop's staff set out in Regulation (EEC) No 337/75 should be aligned with the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union (‘Staff Regulations’) and the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the European Union (‘CEOS’), laid down by Council Regulation (EEC, Euratom, ECSC) No 259/687. Given its updated remit , Cedefop should be equipped with adequate staff in order to enable it to discharge its remit. | ||||||||||||
__________________ |
__________________ | ||||||||||||
7 Council Regulation (EEC, Euratom, ECSC) No 259/68 (OJ L 56, 4.3.1968, p. 1). |
7 Council Regulation (EEC, Euratom, ECSC) No 259/68 (OJ L 56, 4.3.1968, p. 1). | ||||||||||||
Amendment 13 Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 2 | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Amendment 14 Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point e a (new) | |||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||
|
(ea) based on its own analysis and research, provide policy makers with research-based policy proposals in the field of vocational education and training; | ||||||||||||
Justification | |||||||||||||
Cedefop is well capable to take the step from analysis and information provision to transfer this into valuable proposals for policy-making. This should be explicit in its tasks and mandate | |||||||||||||
Amendment 15 Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point h | |||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||
(h) manage and make available tools, datasets and services for skills, occupations and qualifications to citizens, companies, policy makers, social partners and other stakeholders. |
(h) in collaboration with the Commission, manage and make available tools, datasets and services for skills, occupations and qualifications to citizens, companies, policy makers, social partners and other stakeholders. | ||||||||||||
Amendment 16 Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 3 | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Amendment 17 Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 3 a (new) | |||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||
|
3a. The Agency may participate in all public tenders organised by the Commission in its fields of expertise with respect to rules of transparency, fair competition and social rights. | ||||||||||||
Amendment 18 Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point d a (new) | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Amendment 19 Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3 | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Amendment 20 Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 3 | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Amendment 21 Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 3 a (new) | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Justification | |||||||||||||
Common Compromise replacing amendments 53, 62, 69 and 70 (Cedefop) | |||||||||||||
Amendment 22 Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 4 | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Justification | |||||||||||||
Alignment with the term of office of the Chairperson and the Deputy Chairpersons (renewed once) (Article 7 - paragraph 2). Common Compromise replacing amendments 9, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75 (Cedefop), (105), 106, 107, 108 (Eurofound), 11, (74), 75, 76, 77, 78 (EU-OSHA) | |||||||||||||
Amendment 23 Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 5 a (new) | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Justification | |||||||||||||
Common Compromise replacing amendments 10, 15, 77, 78, 79, 101 and 102 (Cedefop) | |||||||||||||
Amendment 24 Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point a | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Justification | |||||||||||||
Common Compromise replacing amendments 11 and 80 (Cedefop) | |||||||||||||
Amendment 25 Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point f | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Justification | |||||||||||||
Common Compromise replacing amendment 81 (Cedefop) | |||||||||||||
Amendment 26 Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point g | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Justification | |||||||||||||
Common Compromise replacing amendment 12 (Cedefop) | |||||||||||||
Amendment 27 Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point k | |||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||
(k) appoint the Executive Director and where relevant extend the term of office or remove the Executive Director from office in accordance with Article 18; |
(k) appoint the Executive Director and where relevant renew the term of office or remove the Executive Director from office in accordance with Article 18; | ||||||||||||
Amendment 28 Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point n | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Amendment 29 Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 3 | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Amendment 30 Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Amendment 31 Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 1 | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Amendment 32 Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 3 | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Amendment 33 Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 4 | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Amendment 34 Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 5 | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Justification | |||||||||||||
Common Compromise replacing amendments 16, 109, 110, 111 (Cedefop), 31, 149, 150, 151 (Eurofound), 15, 109, 110, 111, 112 (EU-OSHA) | |||||||||||||
Amendment 35 Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 6 | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Amendment 36 Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 1 | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Justification | |||||||||||||
Common Compromise replacing amendment 114 (Cedefop) | |||||||||||||
Amendment 37 Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 5 – point b a (new) | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Justification | |||||||||||||
Common Compromise replacing amendment 18, 120 and 121 (Cedefop) | |||||||||||||
Amendment 38 Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 5 – point b b (new) | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Justification | |||||||||||||
Common Compromise replacing amendment 18, 120 and 121 (Cedefop) | |||||||||||||
Amendment 39 Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 5 – point j | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Amendment 40 Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 5 – point j a (new) | |||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||
|
(ja) cooperating with other Union agencies, and concluding cooperation agreements with them. | ||||||||||||
Amendment 41 Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 6 | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Justification | |||||||||||||
Common Compromise replacing amendments 19, 124, 125,126 and 127 (Cedefop) | |||||||||||||
Amendment 42 Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 6 a (new) | |||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||
|
6a. The Executive Director may, after consulting the Executive Board, appoint a Deputy Director subject to the approval, by a simple majority vote, of the Management Board. The Deputy Director shall be selected from among the Agency’s senior staff and his or her mandate shall terminate at the same time as that of the Executive Director, or earlier, for disciplinary reasons, subject to the approval, by a simple majority vote, of the Management Board. The Executive Director shall provide reasons justifying the need to appoint a Deputy Director and shall allocate proper resources for that purpose. The duties of the Deputy Director shall be clearly defined, shall refer only to managing the day-to-day business of the Agency, and shall be approved by the Executive Board following proposals by the Executive Director. The Deputy Director shall attend the meetings of the Management Board and the Executive Board. | ||||||||||||
Amendment 43 Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 a (new) | |||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||
|
The provisional draft estimate shall be based on the objectives and expected results of the annual programming document referred to in Article 6(1) and shall take into account the financial resources necessary to achieve those objectives and expected results, in accordance with the principle of performance-based budgeting. | ||||||||||||
Amendment 44 Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 b (new) | |||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||
|
The provisional draft estimate shall ensure that expenditure on staff is adequate to allow the Agency to discharge its remit. | ||||||||||||
Amendment 45 Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 4 | |||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||
4. The Commission shall send the draft estimates to the budgetary authority together with the draft general budget of the Union. |
4. The Commission shall submit the draft estimates to the budgetary authority and to the Agency together with the draft general budget of the Union.. | ||||||||||||
Amendment 46 Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 5 | |||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||
5. The accounting officer shall, by 1 July following each financial year, send the final accounts to the European Parliament, the Council, the Commission and the Court of Auditors, together with the Management Board's opinion. |
5. The accounting officer shall, by 1 July following each financial year, send the final accounts to the European Parliament, the Council, the Commission and the European Court of Auditors, together with the Management Board's opinion. | ||||||||||||
Amendment 47 Proposal for a regulation Article 18 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Amendment 48 Proposal for a regulation Article 18 – paragraph 4 | |||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||
4. The Management Board, acting on a proposal from the Commission that takes into account the assessment referred to in paragraph 3, may extend the term of office of the Executive Director once, for no more than five years. |
4. The Management Board, acting on a proposal from the Commission that takes into account the assessment referred to in paragraph 3, may renew the term of office of the Executive Director once. | ||||||||||||
Amendment 49 Proposal for a regulation Article 18 – paragraph 5 | |||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||
5. An Executive Director whose term of office has been extended may not participate in another selection procedure for the same post at the end of the overall period. |
5. An Executive Director whose term of office has been renewed may not participate in another selection procedure for the same post at the end of the overall period. | ||||||||||||
Amendment 50 Proposal for a regulation Article 18 – paragraph 6 | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Amendment 51 Proposal for a regulation Article 21 – paragraph 4 | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Justification | |||||||||||||
Common Compromise replacing amendments 22, 140, 141 and 142 (Cedefop) | |||||||||||||
Amendment 52 Proposal for a regulation Article 22 – paragraph 3 | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Amendment 53 Proposal for a regulation Article 23 – paragraph -1 (new) | |||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||
|
-1. The Agency shall act with a high level of transparency. | ||||||||||||
Amendment 54 Proposal for a regulation Article 27 – paragraph -1 (new) | |||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||
|
-1. In accordance with Article 30(4) of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council1a, the Agency shall carry out ex-ante evaluations of those of its activities which entail significant expenditure as well as ex-post evaluations. | ||||||||||||
|
__________________ | ||||||||||||
|
1a Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union and repealing Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 (OJ L 298, 26.10.2012, p. 1) | ||||||||||||
Amendment 55 Proposal for a regulation Article 27 – paragraph 2 | |||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||
2. Where the Commission considers that the continuation of the Agency is no longer justified with regard to its assigned objectives, mandate and tasks, it may propose that this Regulation be amended accordingly or repealed |
2. Where the Commission considers that the continuation of the Agency is no longer justified with regard to its assigned objectives, mandate and tasks, it may propose that this Regulation be amended accordingly or repealed. Such proposal shall be made only after a detailed assessment and after informing and consulting the European Parliament, the Member States and the social partners. |
- [1] OJ C209, 30.7.2017, p 4.
EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
The European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (Cedefop) is one of the longest established EU agencies. The quality of the analyses and data it provides on vocational education and training systems and policies and its ability to foster exchanges of ideas and good practice have given it a high profile and a high degree of credibility with political decision-makers.
As a leading centre of expertise, over the years Cedefop has broadened the scope of its activities to cover skills and qualifications, as part of its efforts to take account of economic, social, political and technological developments. The advent of the digital age has completely changed the way we look at vocational education and training policies. Tomorrow we will certainly be doing jobs which do not exist today. This means that skills and qualifications will constantly have to be developed to meet the changing needs of businesses. This also means that lifelong learning needs to be encouraged.
With those aims in view, and on the basis of Cedefop’s data and analyses, in June 2016 the Commission launched ‘A New Skills Agenda for Europe’ to help the 70 million EU citizens who do not have adequate reading, writing, arithmetical and digital skills. In so doing the Commission stated its intention of drawing on Cedefop’s expertise and skills in implementing this large-scale project. The agency’s precise role should be clarified, however, in order to maintain good relations among the stakeholders and ensure that Cedefop’s remit is not undermined.
It was against this specific backdrop that on 23 August 2016 the Commission proposed a revision of Cedefop’s Founding Regulation, which dates back to 1975, the year in which the agency was set up.
The revision has twin aims: bring some provisions of the Founding Regulation into line with the Common Approach on Decentralised Agencies, and update Cedefop’s objectives and tasks in such a way that the Founding Regulation reflects the real nature of the agency’s work.
In her draft report, the rapporteur welcomes the fact that the common approach is finally being implemented; that approach was the subject of a strongly worded joint statement, issued by the Commission, the Council and the European Parliament in Strasbourg on 12 June 2012, in which the three institutions called for the governance and efficiency of the decentralised agencies to be enhanced so that they can support the implementation of public policies more effectively.
The rapporteur also welcomes the updating of the agency’s objectives and tasks to bring them into line with the work it does already, which is entirely in keeping with the current priorities of European vocational education and training policy. She likewise applauds the retention of the agency’s unique tripartite governance system involving governments and employers’ and workers’ organisations.
The rapporteur questions the timing of the revision, however. However beneficial it may be for Cedefop’s functioning and effectiveness, it would have made more sense to arrange the work programme in such a way that the revision could incorporate the conclusions which will be delivered at the end of the year, following the completion of the external assessment of the agency and its work.
OPINION of the Committee on Budgets (27.4.2017)
for the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs
on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (Cedefop) and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 337/75
(COM(2016)0532 – C8‑0343/2016 – 2016/0257(COD))
Rapporteur: Jens Geier
SHORT JUSTIFICATION
The Commission proposed the present draft Regulation in order to align certain provisions of the existing Regulation governing Cedefop with the Common Approach on Decentralised Agencies. The revision also offers the opportunity to update the objectives and tasks of Cedefop
The other two so-called tripartite Agencies of the European Union, the European Agency for Safety and Health at Work (EU-OSHA) and European Foundation for the improvement of living and working conditions (Eurofound) are undergoing a revision of their respective Founding Regulations at the same time as Eurofound.
The budgetary implications in terms of human and financial resources, as presented in more detail in the Legislative Financial Statement, are in line with Commission Communication (2013)519.
The Rapporteur proposes to amend certain provisions relating to the cooperation between the tripartite Agencies, with a view of enhancing this cooperation.
Further, the Rapporteur proposes to introduce a representative designated by the European Parliament into the Management Board of the Agency, to replace one Commission representative. This approach is in line with the Joint Statement of the Council of the European Union and the European Commission on decentralised agencies of 19 July 2012.
AMENDMENTS
The Committee on Budgets calls on the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs, as the committee responsible, to take into account the following amendments:
Amendment 1 Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 2 Proposal for a regulation Recital 8 a (new) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(8a) The Agency's budget should be prepared in accordance with the principle of performance-based budgeting taking into account its objectives and expected results. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 3 Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 4 Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3. In carrying out its tasks, the Agency shall maintain a close dialogue particularly with specialised bodies, whether public or private, national or international, public authorities and educational institutions and with workers' and employers’ organisations. The Agency, without prejudice to its own aims, shall ensure cooperation with other European Union Agencies aimed at avoiding overlaps and promoting synergy and complementarity in their activities, in particular with the European Training Foundation, Eurofound and EU-OSHA. |
3. In carrying out its tasks, the Agency shall maintain a close dialogue particularly with specialised bodies, whether public or private, national or international, public authorities and educational institutions and with workers' and employers’ organisations. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 5 Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 3 a (new) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
3a. The Agency, without prejudice to its own aims, shall cooperate with other Union agencies, in particular with the European Training Foundation, the European Foundation for the improvement of living and working conditions, and the European Agency for Safety and Health at Work, in order to achieve coordination and financial savings, and to avoid duplication and promote synergy and complementarity in their activities. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 6 Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 3 b (new) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
3b. The Agency shall conclude cooperation agreements with other relevant Union agencies in order to facilitate and promote cooperation with them. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 7 Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Justification | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The Joint Statement of the European Parliament, the Council of the European Union and the European Commission on decentralised agencies of 19 July 2012 envisages a possibility for the Parliament to designate one member of the Management Board. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 8 Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 9 Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 5 – point j a (new) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(ja) cooperating with other Union agencies, and concluding cooperation agreements with them. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 10 Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 a (new) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The provisional draft estimate shall be based on the objectives and expected results of the annual programming document referred to in Article 6(1) and shall take into account the financial resources necessary to achieve those objectives and expected results, in accordance with the principle of performance-based budgeting. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 11 Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 12 Proposal for a regulation Article 22 – paragraph 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 13 Proposal for a regulation Article 27 – paragraph 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
PROCEDURE – COMMITTEE ASKED FOR OPINION
Title |
European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (Cedefop) |
||||
References |
COM(2016)0532 – C8-0343/2016 – 2016/0257(COD) |
||||
Committee responsible Date announced in plenary |
EMPL 12.9.2016 |
|
|
|
|
Opinion by Date announced in plenary |
BUDG 12.9.2016 |
||||
Rapporteur Date appointed |
Jens Geier 15.9.2016 |
||||
Date adopted |
25.4.2017 |
|
|
|
|
Result of final vote |
+: –: 0: |
30 2 0 |
|||
Members present for the final vote |
Nedzhmi Ali, Jean Arthuis, Richard Ashworth, Lefteris Christoforou, Gérard Deprez, Manuel dos Santos, José Manuel Fernandes, Eider Gardiazabal Rubial, Jens Geier, Esteban González Pons, Bernd Kölmel, Zbigniew Kuźmiuk, Vladimír Maňka, Clare Moody, Victor Negrescu, Jan Olbrycht, Younous Omarjee, Paul Rübig, Petri Sarvamaa, Jordi Solé, Patricija Šulin, Eleftherios Synadinos, Indrek Tarand, Inese Vaidere, Monika Vana, Daniele Viotti, Stanisław Żółtek |
||||
Substitutes present for the final vote |
Jean-Paul Denanot, Ivana Maletić, Derek Vaughan, Rainer Wieland, Tomáš Zdechovský |
||||
FINAL VOTE BY ROLL CALL IN COMMITTEE ASKED FOR OPINION
30 |
+ |
|
ALDE |
Nedzhmi Ali, Jean Arthuis, Gérard Deprez |
|
ECR |
Richard Ashworth, Bernd Kölmel, Zbigniew Kuźmiuk |
|
GUE/NGL |
Younous Omarjee |
|
PPE |
Lefteris Christoforou, José Manuel Fernandes, Esteban González Pons, Ivana Maletić, Jan Olbrycht, Paul Rübig, Petri Sarvamaa, Patricija Šulin, Inese Vaidere, Rainer Wieland, Tomáš Zdechovský |
|
S&D |
Jean-Paul Denanot, Eider Gardiazabal Rubial, Jens Geier, Vladimír Maňka, Clare Moody, Victor Negrescu, Derek Vaughan, Daniele Viotti, Manuel dos Santos |
|
Verts/ALE |
Jordi Solé, Indrek Tarand, Monika Vana |
|
2 |
- |
|
ENF |
Stanisław Żółtek |
|
NI |
Eleftherios Synadinos |
|
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
Key to symbols:
+ : in favour
- : against
0 : abstention
PROCEDURE – COMMITTEE RESPONSIBLE
Title |
European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (Cedefop) |
||||
References |
COM(2016)0532 – C8-0343/2016 – 2016/0257(COD) |
||||
Date submitted to Parliament |
23.8.2016 |
|
|
|
|
Committee responsible Date announced in plenary |
EMPL 12.9.2016 |
|
|
|
|
Committees asked for opinions Date announced in plenary |
BUDG 12.9.2016 |
|
|
|
|
Rapporteurs Date appointed |
Anne Sander 22.9.2016 |
|
|
|
|
Discussed in committee |
22.3.2017 |
25.4.2017 |
|
|
|
Date adopted |
12.7.2017 |
|
|
|
|
Result of final vote |
+: –: 0: |
47 3 1 |
|||
Members present for the final vote |
Guillaume Balas, Brando Benifei, Enrique Calvet Chambon, David Casa, Ole Christensen, Martina Dlabajová, Lampros Fountoulis, Elena Gentile, Arne Gericke, Marian Harkin, Czesław Hoc, Danuta Jazłowiecka, Agnes Jongerius, Rina Ronja Kari, Jan Keller, Ádám Kósa, Agnieszka Kozłowska-Rajewicz, Jean Lambert, Jérôme Lavrilleux, Patrick Le Hyaric, Jeroen Lenaers, Verónica Lope Fontagné, Thomas Mann, Dominique Martin, Anthea McIntyre, Joëlle Mélin, Elisabeth Morin-Chartier, Marek Plura, Terry Reintke, Robert Rochefort, Claude Rolin, Sven Schulze, Siôn Simon, Romana Tomc, Yana Toom, Marita Ulvskog, Renate Weber, Tatjana Ždanoka, Jana Žitňanská |
||||
Substitutes present for the final vote |
Maria Arena, Lynn Boylan, Tania González Peñas, Marju Lauristin, Paloma López Bermejo, Anne Sander, Joachim Schuster, Michaela Šojdrová, Helga Stevens, Flavio Zanonato |
||||
Substitutes under Rule 200(2) present for the final vote |
Andrejs Mamikins, Elena Valenciano |
||||
Date tabled |
28.7.2017 |
||||
FINAL VOTE BY ROLL CALL IN COMMITTEE RESPONSIBLE
47 |
+ |
|
ALDE ECR GUE/NGL PPE S&D VERTS/ALE |
Martina Dlabajová, Marian Harkin, Robert Rochefort, Yana Toom, Renate Weber Arne Gericke, Czesław Hoc, Anthea McIntyre, Helga Stevens, Jana Žitňanská Lynn Boylan, Tania González Peñas, Rina Ronja Kari, Patrick Le Hyaric, Paloma López Bermejo David Casa, Danuta Jazłowiecka, Agnieszka Kozłowska-Rajewicz, Ádám Kósa, Jérôme Lavrilleux, Jeroen Lenaers, Verónica Lope Fontagné, Thomas Mann, Elisabeth Morin-Chartier, Marek Plura, Claude Rolin, Anne Sander, Sven Schulze, Michaela Šojdrová, Romana Tomc Maria Arena, Guillaume Balas, Brando Benifei, Ole Christensen, Elena Gentile, Agnes Jongerius, Jan Keller, Marju Lauristin, Andrejs Mamikins, Joachim Schuster, Siôn Simon, Marita Ulvskog, Elena Valenciano, Flavio Zanonato Jean Lambert, Terry Reintke, Tatjana Ždanoka |
|
3 |
- |
|
ENF NI |
Dominique Martin, Joëlle Mélin Lampros Fountoulis |
|
1 |
0 |
|
ALDE |
Enrique Calvet Chambon |
|
Key to symbols:
+ : in favour
- : against
0 : abstention