REPORT on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending directive 2010/31/EU on the energy performance of buildings
18.10.2017 - (COM(2016)0765 – C8‑0499/2016 – 2016/0381(COD)) - ***I
Committee on Industry, Research and Energy
Rapporteur: Bendt Bendtsen
- DRAFT EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION
- EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
- ANNEX: LIST OF ENTITIES OR PERSONSFROM WHOM THE RAPPORTEUR HAS RECEIVED INPUT
- OPINION of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
- PROCEDURE – COMMITTEE RESPONSIBLE
- FINAL VOTE BY ROLL CALL IN COMMITTEE RESPONSIBLE
DRAFT EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION
on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending directive 2010/31/EU on the energy performance of buildings
(COM(2016)0765 – C8‑0499/2016 – 2016/0381(COD))
(Ordinary legislative procedure: first reading)
The European Parliament,
– having regard to the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council (COM(2016)0765),
– having regard to Article 294(2) and Article 194(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament (C8‑0499/2016),
– having regard to Article 294(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
– having regard to the reasoned opinions submitted, within the framework of the Protocol No 2 on the application of the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality, by the Dutch Senate and by the Dutch House of Representatives,
– having regard to the European Economic and Social Committee, of 26 April 2017[1],
– having regard to the opinion of the Committee of the Regions of 13 July 2017[2],
– having regard to Rule 59 of its Rules of Procedure,
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy and the opinion of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety (A8-0314/2017),
1. Adopts its position at first reading hereinafter set out;
2. Calls on the Commission to refer the matter to Parliament again if it replaces, substantially amends or intends to substantially amend its proposal;
3. Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the national parliaments.
Amendment 1 Proposal for a directive Recital 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(1) The Union is committed to a sustainable, competitive, secure and decarbonised energy system. The Energy Union and the Energy and Climate Policy Framework for 2030 establish ambitious Union commitments to reduce greenhouse gas emissions further (by at least 40 % by 2030, as compared with 1990), to increase the proportion of renewable energy consumed (by at least 27 %) and to make energy savings of at least 27 %, reviewing this level having in mind an Union level of 30 %10, and to improve Europe’s energy security, competitiveness and sustainability. |
(1) The Union is committed to a sustainable, competitive, secure and decarbonised energy system and to a high level of human health protection. The Energy Union and the Energy and Climate Policy Framework for 2030 establish ambitious Union commitments to reduce greenhouse gas emissions further (by 80 to 95 % by 2050, as compared with 1990), to increase the proportion of renewable energy consumed in accordance with Directive .../2018/EU [on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources, COD (2016)0382] and to make energy savings in accordance with Directive 2012/27/EU as amended by Directive .../2018/EU [COD 2016/0376] and to improve Europe’s energy security, competitiveness, affordability and sustainability. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 2 Proposal for a directive Recital 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(6) The Union is committed to developing a secure, competitive and decarbonised energy system by 205012. To meet this goal, Member States and investors need milestones to ensure that buildings are decarbonised by 2050. In order to ensure this decarbonised building stock by 2050, Member States should identify the intermediary steps to achieving the mid-term (2030) and long-term (2050) objectives. |
(6) The Union is committed to developing a secure, competitive and decarbonised energy system by 2050. To achieve this goal, it is vital that the existing building stock, which is responsible for about 36 % of all CO2 emissions in the Union, is highly energy efficient and decarbonised up to nearly zero-energy standard by 2050. Member States should seek a cost-efficient equilibrium between decarbonising energy supplies and reducing final energy consumption. To that end, Member States and investors need a clear vision to guide their policies and investment decisions, which includes well-defined national milestones and actions for energy efficiency to achieve the short-term (2030), mid-term (2040) and long-term (2050) objectives. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
__________________ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
12 Communication on an Energy roadmap 2050, (COM(2011) 885 final). |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 3 Proposal for a directive Recital 6 a (new) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(6a) The 2015 Paris Agreement on climate change following the 21st Conference of the Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (COP 21) must be reflected in the Union's efforts to decarbonise its building stock. Taking into account that almost 50 % of Union's final energy is used for heating and cooling, of which 80 % is used in buildings, achievement of Union’s energy and climate goals strongly depends on the Union’s efforts to refurbish its building stocks by giving priority to energy efficiency and savings, making full use of the ‘energy efficiency first’ principle as well as ensuring effective deployment of renewables. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 4 Proposal for a directive Recital 7 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(7) The provisions on long-term renovation strategies provided for in Directive 2012/27/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council13 should be moved to Directive 2010/31/EU, where they fit more coherently. |
(7) The provisions on long-term renovation strategies provided for in Directive 2012/27/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council should be moved to Directive 2010/31/EU, where they fit more coherently, and updated to clarify the ambitions of a highly energy efficient and decarbonised building stock. The long-term renovation strategies and the renovations they stimulate will boost growth and competitiveness through the creation of local, non-outsourceable jobs, and provide citizens with energy efficient, healthy and safe buildings. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 5 Proposal for a directive Recital 7 a (new) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(7a) To facilitate the cost effective achievement of the Union's climate and energy goals as well as cost-efficient renovations in buildings, national long-term renovation strategies should integrate considerations for improvements to health and indoor climate, including by combining renovation with the removal of asbestos and other harmful substances, preventing the illegal removal of harmful substances, and facilitating compliance with existing legislative acts such as Directive 2009/148/EC1a and Directive (EU) 2016/22841b. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
__________________ | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1aDirective (EU) 2016/2284 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 December 2016 on the reduction of national emissions of certain atmospheric pollutants, amending Directive 2003/35/EC and repealing Directive 2001/81/EC. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1b Directive (EU) 2016/2284 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 December 2016 on the reduction of national emissions of certain atmospheric pollutants, amending Directive 2003/35/EC and repealing Directive 2001/81/EC. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 6 Proposal for a directive Recital 7 b (new) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(7b) To achieve a highly energy efficient and decarbonised building stock, and to ensure that the long-term renovation strategies will deliver the necessary progress, in particular by an increase in deep renovations, Member States must offer clear guidelines and outline measurable, targeted actions, including for the worst performing segments of the national building stock, for energy-poor consumers, for social housing and for households subject to split-incentive dilemmas, while taking into consideration affordability. To further support the necessary improvements in the national rental stock, Member States should consider the introduction or continued application of requirements for a certain level of energy performance, according to the energy performance certificates, for rental properties. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 7 Proposal for a directive Recital 7 c (new) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(7 c) Taking into account the Commission’s impact assessment, specifying that renovation would be needed at an average rate of 3 % to cost-effectively accomplish the Union’s ambitions for energy efficiency, it is essential that Member States specify their expected output and contribution to achieving the overall energy efficiency target(s) in 2030 of [X %], in accordance with Directive 2012/27/EU as amended by Directive .../2018/EU [COD 2016/0376] , taking into account that every 1 % increase in energy savings reduces gas imports by 2,6 % and thereby contributes actively to the Union’s energy independence. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 8 Proposal for a directive Recital 7 d (new) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(7d) Ambitious goals for deep renovation of the existing building stock will create millions of jobs in the Union, in particular in small and medium-sized enterprises. In that context, it is necessary for Member States to provide a clear link between their national long-term renovation strategies and adequate initiatives to promote skills development and education in the construction and energy efficiency sectors. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 9 Proposal for a directive Recital 8 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(8) The agendas of the Digital Single Market and the Energy Union should be aligned and serve common goals. The digitalisation of the energy system is quickly changing the energy landscape, from the integration of renewables to smart grids and smart-ready buildings. In order to digitise the building sector, targeted incentives should be provided to promote smart-ready systems and digital solutions in the built environment. |
(8) The agendas of the Digital Single Market and the Energy Union should be aligned and serve common goals. The digitalisation of the energy system is quickly changing the energy landscape, from the integration of renewables to smart grids and smart-ready buildings. This offers new opportunities for energy savings, by providing consumers with more accurate information about their consumption patterns, and by enabling the system operator to better manage the grid. In order to digitise the building sector and promote a systemic development of smart cities, targeted incentives should be provided to promote suitable and smart-ready systems and digital solutions in the built environment while taking into account the less digitally engaged consumers. Those incentives should take into account the Union’s connectivity targets and ambitions for deployment on high-capacity communication networks, which are a prerequisite for smart homes and well-connected communities, also ensuring that the development of such networks is not hampered by building solutions that might negatively affect connectivity. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 10 Proposal for a directive Recital 9 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(9) In order to adapt this Directive to the technical progress, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union should be delegated to the Commission to supplement it by defining the smartness indicator and enabling its implementation. The smartness indicator should be used to measure buildings’ capacity to use ICT and electronic systems to optimise operation and interact with the grid. The smartness indicator will raise awareness amongst building owners and occupants of the value behind building automation and electronic monitoring of technical building systems and will give confidence to the occupant about the actual savings of these new enhanced-functionalities. |
(9) In order to adapt this Directive to the technical progress, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) should be delegated to the Commission to supplement it by defining the smartness indicator and enabling its implementation in accordance with the methodology set out in this Directive. The smartness indicator should be coherent with energy performance certificates and should be used to measure buildings' capacity to use ICT and electronic systems to optimise operation, performance, indoor comfort and interact with the grid. The smartness indicator will raise awareness amongst building owners and occupants of the value behind building automation and electronic monitoring of technical building systems and will give confidence to the occupant about the actual savings of these new enhanced-functionalities. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 11 Proposal for a directive Recital 10 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(10) Innovation and new technology also make it possible for buildings to support the overall decarbonisation of the economy. For example, buildings can leverage the development of the infrastructure necessary for the smart charging of electric vehicles also provide a basis for Member States, if they choose to, to use car batteries as a source of power. To reflect this aim, the definition of technical building systems should be extended. |
(10) Innovation and new technology also make it possible for buildings to support the overall decarbonisation of the economy, including the transport sector. For example, buildings can leverage the development of the infrastructure necessary for deployment of the smart charging of electric vehicles and also provide a basis for Member States, if they choose to, to use car batteries as a source of power. To reflect this aim, the definition of technical building systems should be extended. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 12 Proposal for a directive Recital 10 a (new) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(10a) Pre-cabling and pre-tubing set the right conditions for the rapid deployment of recharging points if and where needed. Member States should therefore ensure the development of electro-mobility in a balanced and cost-effective way. In particular, where a major renovation touching upon electric infrastructure takes place, adequate roll out of pre-cabling and pre-tubing should follow with a view to providing the sufficient cabling, tubing and electric power within the meaning of Directive 2014/94/EU for the installation of recharging points in parking spaces. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 13 Proposal for a directive Recital 10 b (new) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(10b) A clear vision for a decarbonised building stock by 2050 requires a high level of ambition. When the energy use will be brought closer to zero the share of embodied energy will be more decisive in the whole life-cycle of the buildings. The future vision for a decarbonised building stock should include the embodied energy in buildings. Therefore building with wood is positive for the climate. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 14 Proposal for a directive Recital 10 c (new) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(10c) Research into, and the testing of, new solutions for optimising the energy performance of historical buildings and sites should be encouraged, while also safeguarding and preserving cultural heritage. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 15 Proposal for a directive Recital 10 d (new) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(10d) Member States should take into account that innovation and new technology ask for enhanced investments in education and skills, which are necessary for the successful implementation of such technologies. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 16 Proposal for a directive Recital 10 e (new) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(10e) This Directive can hardly prejudge development and innovation in the field of electronic mobility, buildings or smart systems. Therefore the principle of technology neutrality should apply throughout this Directive. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 17 Proposal for a directive Recital 10 f (new) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(10f) Nature-based solutions, such as well-designed street vegetation, green roofs and walls providing insulation and shade to buildings reduce energy demand by limiting the need for heating and cooling and improving a building’s energy performance. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 18 Proposal for a directive Recital 10 g (new) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(10g) The requirements for electro-mobility infrastructure set out in this Directive should form part of a holistic strategic urban planning in Member States to promote alternative, safe and sustainable modes of transport and applying a coherent approach to the electrical infrastructure by providing for example dedicated parking infrastructure for electrical bicycles and for people of reduced mobility. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 19 Proposal for a directive Recital 11 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(11) The impact assessment identified two existing sets of provisions, whose aim could be achieved in a more efficient manner compared to the current situation. First the obligation, before any construction starts, to carry out a feasibility study on highly-efficiency alternative systems becomes an unnecessary burden. Second, provisions related to inspections of heating systems and air-conditioning systems were found to not sufficiently ensure, in an efficient manner, the initial and maintained performance of these technical systems. Even cheap technical solutions with very short payback periods, such as hydraulic balancing of the heating system and installation/replacement of thermostatic control valves, are insufficiently considered today. Provisions related to inspections are amended to ensure a better result from inspections. |
(11) The impact assessment identified existing provisions, whose aim could be achieved in a more efficient manner compared to the current situation. Provisions related to inspections of heating systems and air-conditioning systems were found to not sufficiently ensure, in an efficient manner, the initial and maintained performance of these technical systems. Furthermore, cheap technical solutions with very short payback periods, such as hydraulic balancing of the heating system and installation/replacement of thermostatic control valves, are insufficiently considered today and should be explored further, including as solutions for assisting energy-poor consumers. Provisions related to inspections are amended to ensure a better result from inspections. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 20 Proposal for a directive Recital 11 a (new) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(11a) For new buildings, Member States should ensure that, before construction starts, the technical, environmental and economic feasibility of high-efficiency alternative systems is taken into account. Such systems could include decentralised energy supply systems based on energy from renewable sources or waste heat; cogeneration; district or block heating or cooling and heat pumps. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 21 Proposal for a directive Recital 11 b (new) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(11b) The 2009 WHO guidelines provide that, concerning indoor air quality, better performing buildings provide higher comfort levels and wellbeing for their occupants and improve health. Thermal bridges, inadequate insulation and unplanned air pathways can result in surface temperatures below the dew point of the air and in dampness. It is therefore essential to ensure a complete and homogeneous insulation of the building including balconies, fenestrations, roofs, walls, doors and floor. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 22 Proposal for a directive Recital 12 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(12) Notably for large installations, building automation and electronic monitoring of technical building systems have proven to be an effective replacement for inspections. The installation of such equipment should be considered as the most cost-effective alternative to inspections in large non-residential and multifamily buildings of a sufficient size that allow a payback of less than three years. The current possibility to opt for alternative measures is therefore deleted. For small scale installations, the documentation of the system performance by installers and the registration of this information in the databases on energy performance certification will support the verification of compliance with the minimum requirements set for all technical building systems and reinforce energy performance certificates role. In addition, existing regular safety inspections and programmed maintenance work will remain an opportunity to provide direct advice on energy efficiency improvements. |
(12) Building automation, facility management and electronic monitoring of technical building systems holds great potential to provide cost-effective and significant energy savings for both consumers and businesses. For large installations in particular, building automation and electronic monitoring of technical building systems have proven to be effective and can, in some cases, replace inspections in large non-residential and multifamily buildings of a sufficient size that allow a payback of less than three years as it enables acting on the information provided, thereby securing energy savings over time. The current possibility to opt for alternative measures is therefore deleted, however it should be possible to exempt technical systems explicitly covered by an ESCO programme from the inspection requirement. To avoid double inspections, installations that are operated by a utility or network operator and that are subject to inspections at the system level should be exempt from this requirement. For small-scale installations, the documentation of the system performance by installers and the registration of this information in the databases on energy performance certification will support the verification of compliance with the minimum requirements set for all technical building systems and reinforce energy performance certificates (EPC) role. In addition, existing regular safety inspections and programmed maintenance work will remain an opportunity to provide direct advice on energy efficiency improvements. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 23 Proposal for a directive Recital 12 a (new) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(12 a) Member States should ensure that energy performance upgrades of existing buildings also contribute to achieving a healthy indoor environment, including by the removal of asbestos and other harmful substances and by avoiding problems such as mould, as well as safeguarding the fundamental safety structures of the buildings, in particular in relation to fire safety and seismic safety. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 24 Proposal for a directive Recital 12 b (new) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(12b) It is important to ensure that measures to improve the energy performance of buildings do not focus only on the building envelope, but include all elements and technical systems in a building. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 25 Proposal for a directive Recital 13 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(13) To ensure their best use in building renovation, financial measures related to energy efficiency should be linked to the depth of the renovation, which should be assessed by comparing energy performance certificates (EPCs) issued before and after the renovation. |
(13) To ensure their best use in building renovation, public financial measures related to energy efficiency should be linked to the depth of the renovation and promote holistic building renovations as the best way of ensuring high energy performance and improved indoor comfort. Such renovations should be assessed by comparing energy performance certificates (EPCs) issued before and after the renovation where proportionate to the extent of the renovation, or by similar adequate and proportionate documentation methods. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 26 Proposal for a directive Recital 13 a (new) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(13a) Financial mechanisms and incentives should have a central position in the national long-term renovation strategies and be actively promoted by Member States, including by facilitating energy efficient mortgage standards for certified energy efficient building renovations, promoting investments for public authorities in an energy efficient building stock, such as by clarifying accounting standards for public investments, and by providing accessible and transparent advisory tools for consumers on their financing options for energy efficient renovations in buildings. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 27 Proposal for a directive Recital 13 b (new) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(13b) Mechanisms to finance energy-efficient new buildings, as well as energy efficiency measures in the building stock, should come from private, public-private and public sources. For private investments, the risk for investments in the modernisation of the building stock should be reduced. Public-private partnerships should especially be taken into consideration for energy efficiency measures in public buildings to decrease the financial burden on smaller and financially weaker cities, regions and Member States. Further, Member States should encourage energy efficiency measures, especially in social housing and housing for the weakest market participants, by public financial support for which Union funds could be used. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 28 Proposal for a directive Recital 13 c (new) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(13c) Where the energy performance certificate attests to the fact that a building’s energy performance has improved, it should be possible to include the certification costs in the incentive provided by the Member State concerned. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 29 Proposal for a directive Recital 14 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(14) Access to financing is easier when good-quality information is available. Public buildings with a total useful floor area over 250 m² should therefore be required to disclose their actual energy consumption. |
(14) Access to financing is easier when good-quality information is available. Public buildings that are owned by the State, region or municipality or that are privately owned for public use, with a total useful floor area over 250 m² should therefore be required to disclose their actual energy consumption. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 30 Proposal for a directive Recital 15 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(15) The current independent control systems for EPCs should be strengthened to ensure certificates are of good quality, can be used for compliance checking and for producing statistics on the regional/national building stocks. High-quality data on the building stock is needed and this could be partially generated by the registers and databases that almost all Member States are currently developing and managing for EPCs. |
(15) The current independent control systems for EPCs should be strengthened to ensure certificates are of good quality, can be used for compliance checking and for producing harmonised statistics on the local/regional/national building stocks. High-quality data on the building stock is needed and this could be partially generated by the registers and databases that almost all Member States are currently developing and managing for EPCs. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 31 Proposal for a directive Recital 16 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(16) To meet the objectives of energy efficiency policy for buildings, the transparency of EPCs should be improved by ensuring that that all necessary parameters for calculations, for both certification and minimum energy performance requirements, are set out and applied consistently. Member States should put in place adequate measures to ensure, for example, that the performance of installed, replaced or updated technical building systems is documented in view of building certification and compliance checking. |
(16) To meet the objectives of energy efficiency policy for buildings, the transparency of EPCs should be improved by ensuring that that all necessary parameters for calculations, for both certification and minimum energy performance requirements, are set out and applied consistently. Member States should put in place adequate measures to ensure, for example, that the performance of installed, replaced or updated technical building systems is documented in view of building certification and compliance checking. With a view to ensuring a well-functioning EPC system, the Commission should, when reviewing the application of this Directive, assess the need for further harmonisation of EPCs. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 32 Proposal for a directive Recital 16 a (new) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(16a) Recognition, promotion and application of the now finalised set of CEN EPBD standards across the Member States would have a positive impact on the revision of this Directive. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 33 Proposal for a directive Recital 17 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(17) Commission Recommendation (EU) 2016/1318 of 29 July 2016 on nearly zero-energy buildings presented how the implementation of the Directive could simultaneously ensure the transformation of the building stock and the shift to a more sustainable energy supply, which also supports the heating and cooling strategy. To make sure appropriate implementation takes place, the general framework for the calculation of the energy performance of buildings should be updated with the support of the work elaborated by the European Committee for Standardisation (CEN), under Mandate M/480 that was given by the European Commission. |
(17) Commission Recommendation (EU) 2016/1318 of 29 July 2016 on nearly zero-energy buildings presented how the implementation of the Directive could simultaneously ensure the transformation of the building stock and the shift to a more sustainable energy supply, which also supports the heating and cooling strategy. To make sure appropriate implementation takes place, the general framework for the calculation of the energy performance of buildings should be updated with the support of the work elaborated by the European Committee for Standardisation (CEN), under Mandate M/480 that was given by the European Commission. Calculations of energy performance of buildings should be applied pursuing the optimal energy performance, in accordance with the principle of “energy efficiency first” and while expressed in a numeric indicator of primary energy use in kWh/(m².y), Member States should supplement this by providing an additional numeric indicator for the entire building’s overall energy needs. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 34 Proposal for a directive Recital 19 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(19) The objectives of this Directive, namely to reduce the energy needed to meet the energy demand associated with the typical use of buildings, cannot be adequately achieved by the Member States acting alone. The objectives of the Directive can be more effectively ensured by acting at Union level because this guarantees consistency shared objectives, understanding and political drive. Therefore, the Union adopts measures in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty on the European Union. In accordance with the principle of proportionality, as also set out in that Article, this Directive does not go beyond what is necessary to achieve those objectives. |
(19) Since the objectives of this Directive, namely to reduce the energy needed to meet the energy demand associated with the typical use of buildings, cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States but can rather, by reason of the need to ensure consistency of the shared objective, understanding and political drive, be better achieved at Union level the Union may adopt measures, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty on the European Union. In accordance with the principle of proportionality, as set out in that Article, this Directive does not go beyond what is necessary in order to achieve those objectives. This Directive fully respects the Member States’ national specifics and differences and their competences in accordance with Article 194(2) TFEU. Further, the objective of this Directive is to allow the sharing of best practices in order to facilitate the transition to a highly energy efficient building stock in the Union, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 35 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point -1 (new) Directive 2010/31/EU Article 1 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 a (new) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 36 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Directive 2010/31/EU Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 37 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 a (new) Directive 2010/31/EC Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3 a (new) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 38 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 b (new) Directive 2010/31/EU Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3 b (new) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 39 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 c (new) Directive 2010/31/EU Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3 c (new) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 40 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 d (new) Directive 2010/31/EU Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3 d (new) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 41 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 e (new) Directive 2010/31/EU Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 17 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 42 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 f (new) Directive 2010/31/EU Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 19 a (new) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 43 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a Directive 2010/31/EU Article 2a – paragraph 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 44 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b Directive 2010/31/EU Article 2a – paragraph 2 –subparagraph 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 45 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b Directive 2010/31/EU Article 2a – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 a (new) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 46 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b Directive 2010/31/EU Article 2a – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 47 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b Directive 2010/31/EU Article 2a – paragraph 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 48 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b Directive 2010/31/EU Article 2a – paragraph 3 a (new) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 49 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b Directive 2010/31/EU Article 2a – paragraph 3 b(new) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 50 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b Directive 2010/31/EU Article 2a – paragraph 3 c (new) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 51 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point a Directive 2010/31/EU Article 6 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 52 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 Directive 2010/31/EU Article 7 – paragraph 5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 53 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point a Directive 2010/31/EU Article 8 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 54 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point b Directive 2010/31/EU Article 8 – paragraph 2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 55 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point b Directive 2010/31/EU Article 8 – paragraph 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 56 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point b Directive 2010/31/EU Article 8 – paragraph 4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 57 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point b Directive 2010/31/EU Article 8 – paragraph 4 a (new) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 58 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point b Directive 2010/31/EU Article 8 – paragraph 4 b (new) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 59 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point b Directive 2010/31/EU Article 8 – paragraph 4 c (new) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 60 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point c Directive 2010/31/EU Article 8 – paragraph 5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 61 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point c Directive 2010/31/EU Article 8 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 62 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point c Directive 2010/31/EU Article 8 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 63 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 – point a Directive 2010/31/EU Article 10 – paragraph 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 64 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 – point b Directive 2010/31/EU Article 10 – paragraph 6a | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 65 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 – point b Directive 2010/31/EU Article 10 – paragraph 6b | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 66 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 – point a Directive 2010/31/EU Article 14 – paragraph 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 67 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 – point b Directive 2010/31/EU Article 14 – paragraph 2 – introductory part | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 68 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 – point b Directive 2010/31/EU Article 14 – paragraph 2 – point a | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 69 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 – point b Directive 2010/31/EU Article 14 – paragraph 3 – introductory part | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 70 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 – point b Directive 2010/31/EU Article 14 – paragraph 3 – point a | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 71 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 – point b Directive 2010/31/EU Article 14 – paragraph 3 – point b | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 72 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 – point b Directive 2010/31/EU Article 14 – paragraph 3 a (new) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 73 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 – point b Directive 2010/31/EU Article 14 – paragraph 3 b (new) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 74 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8 – point a Directive 2010/31/EU Article 15 – paragraph 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 75 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8 – point b Directive 2010/31/EU Article 15 – paragraph 2 – introductory part | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 76 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8 – point b Directive 2010/31/EU Article 15 – paragraph 2 – point a | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 77 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8 – point b Directive 2010/31/EU Article 15 – paragraph 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 78 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8 – point b Directive 2010/31/EU Article 15 – paragraph 3 a (new) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 79 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8 – point b Directive 2010/31/EU Article 15 – paragraph 3 b (new) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 80 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(9) in Article 19, ‘2017’ is replaced by ‘2028’; |
(9) in Article 19, ‘2017’ is replaced by ‘2024’; | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 81 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9 a (new) Directive 2010/31/EU Article 19 – paragraph 1 a (new) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 82 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9 b (new) Directive 2010/31/EU Article 19 a (new) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 83 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10 Directive 2010/31/EU Article 20 – paragraph 2 –subparagraph 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 84 Proposal for a directive Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point a Directive 2010/31/EU Annex I – point 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 85 Proposal for a directive Annex I – paragraph 1 – point b Directive 2010/31/EU Annex I – point 2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 86 Proposal for a directive Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 a (new) Directive 2010/31/EU Annex I a (new) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
The Union’s building stock consumes a substantial part of Europe’s final energy demand, in particular by fossil fuels. A better performing building stock holds a significant potential for improved energy security and reduced imports of energy to Europe, lower energy bills for European energy consumers, healthier living conditions as well as increased growth and jobs, in particular in SMEs.
To fulfil our international commitments under the COP21 agreement and to achieve the Union’s own targets for decarbonisation and energy efficiency in a cost-effective manner, the non-ETS sectors - such as buildings and transport - must deliver on their potential. An ambitious and future-proof Directive for the Energy Performance of Buildings is therefore needed to secure a highly energy efficient and decarbonised European building stock.
Long-term planning and actions by Member States reinforced
A key element to secure the needed renovations of the building stock is the national long-term renovation strategies, comprised in the national climate and energy plans of the Governance Regulation.
The rapporteur recommends strengthening the requirements to the content of the national long-term renovation strategies, in order to deliver the needed renovations in particular of the existing building stock. Member States must, with due consideration to subsidiarity, ensure comprehensive and ambitious renovation strategies, outlining specific actions to target the worst performing building stock, tackle split-incentives, consider relevant trigger points in the life cycle of a building, tackle legal accounting limits for public investments, and ensure access to information about financial instruments available for energy renovations for consumers.
Proportionate electro-mobility requirements
The Commission’s proposal aims at using the revision of the Directive to contribute further to decarbonisation of transport by using the infrastructure around buildings to facilitate the rollout of electric mobility infrastructure.
The rapporteur suggests focusing the requirements of the Directive to either pre-cabling or pre-tubing, to ensure a proportionate cost-level, and to focus the requirement only on related renovations, i.e. electrical infrastructure or parking lot, to ensure that incentives to renovate are not undermined. Additionally, the rapporteur strengthens the requirement towards public buildings and public parking lots operated by private entities, to ensure that public authorities contribute adequately.
Better regulation and good incentives for renovations
The Commission’s original proposal includes several suggested updates of the existing Directive to ensure less administrative burdens when renovating and give better conditions for carrying out energy renovations.
The rapporteur builds on that proposal in order to ensure better regulation and proper incentives to carry out energy renovations. The suggestions include strengthening the elements of the proposal concerning the use of building automation, to clarify its value in its own right, and to clarify its use as alternative to inspections for simplification purposes. The rapporteur also outlines the specific conditions, scope and purpose for the delegation of competences to the Commission to develop a smartness indicator. The Rapporteur furthermore suggests clarifying the documentation requirements for energy savings achieved by renovations to ensure proportionality by introducing alternative and adequately secure documentation options, thereby not undermining incentives to conduct renovations.
Correct picture of buildings’ energy performance
The Commission proposes that the calculation of the Primary Energy Factor (PEF) shall discount and give equal treatment to renewables produced on-site and off-site. The PEF is used for the calculation of the energy performance of a building.
The rapporteur argues to maintain the reference to equal treatment of on-site and off-site renewables, to ensure cost-effective rollout of renewables, but deletes the reference to obligatory discounting, as this entails a risk of undermining the correct picture of buildings’ actual energy consumption and performance. Thereby, incentives to make energy efficiency improvements could be undermined. All other PEF-issues remain regulated by Energy Efficiency Directive and Renewable Energy Directive.
ANNEX: LIST OF ENTITIES OR PERSONSFROM WHOM THE RAPPORTEUR HAS RECEIVED INPUT
Organization |
|
European Building Automation and Controls Association, EU.bac |
|
Velux |
|
Danish Energy Association |
|
Rockwool |
|
DG Energy |
|
Veolia |
|
Schöck |
|
DONG Energy |
|
Estonian Energy Ministry |
|
Buildings Performance Institute Europe, BPIE |
|
AFCO Worldwide |
|
European Heat Pump Association, EHPA |
|
KREAB |
|
EUFORES |
|
Confederation of Danish Industries, DI |
|
Active House Alliance |
|
European Alliance to Save Energy, EU-ASE |
|
EUROPEAN RENEWABLE ENERGIES FEDERATION asbl |
|
Schneider Electric |
|
EpiCenter |
|
EON |
|
Danish District Heating Association, DANVA |
|
Electric Underfloor Heating Alliance |
|
ENEL SPA |
|
Confederation of Danish Enterprises |
|
Novozymes |
|
Euroheat & Power |
|
UNION FRANCAISE DE L’ELECTRICITE |
|
Bosch |
|
AmCham EU |
|
The Danish Construction Association |
|
Danish Ministry for Climate and Energy |
|
Eco Council Denmark |
|
Smart Energy Demand Coalition EU |
|
WWF |
|
Danish Association of Construction Clients, DACC |
|
Local Government Denmark |
|
European Historic Houses Association |
|
International Union of Property Owners |
|
Director General of the European Property Federation |
|
Council of European Municipalities and Regions |
|
Orgalime |
|
CEZ group |
|
Eni |
|
European Environmental Bureau (EEB) |
|
Climate Action Network Europe |
|
European Energy Forum |
|
HydrogenEurope |
|
GD4S coalition |
|
Eurelectric |
|
SolarPowerEurope |
|
WindEurope |
|
FireSafeEurope |
|
VOEWG |
|
Swedish PermRep |
|
Green Building Council Denmark |
|
Confederation of Norwegian Enterprise |
|
REHVA |
|
ENGIE |
|
Statoil |
|
E.on |
|
Fleishman Hillard |
|
GRDF |
|
Saint Gobain |
|
PlasticsEurope |
|
European Construction Industry Federation |
|
Grace Public Affairs |
|
Smart Energy Demand Coalition |
|
European Forum for Manufacturing |
|
British Chamber of Commerce in Belgium |
|
Council of Gas Detection and Environmental Monitoring (CoGDEM) |
|
European Facility Management Coalition |
|
EuroCommerce |
|
EDSO for Smart Grids |
|
EnerginetDK |
|
EnergyCoalition |
|
Danfoss |
|
Grundfoss |
|
EnergiWatch |
|
Cembreau |
|
EDF |
|
Dalkia |
|
Enel |
|
BDEW - German Association of Energy and Water Industries |
|
EPEE |
|
European Builders Confederation (EBC) |
|
Eurima |
|
EuroAce - European Alliance of Companies for Energy Efficiency in Buildings |
|
FIEC - European Construction Industry Federation |
|
Tesla |
|
CoGen |
|
European Federation of Building and Woodworkers |
|
European Aluminium |
|
Fédération du Commerce et de la Distribution |
|
Knauf Insulation |
|
The European Chemical Industry Council, CEFIC |
|
CableEurope |
|
BASF |
|
ABB |
|
Norsk Hydro ASA |
|
CEMEX |
|
Association of North German Chambers of Commerce and Industry |
|
European Engineering Industries Association |
|
International Energy Agency |
|
European Copper Institute |
|
BDR Thermea |
|
EC Power A/S |
|
Platform for Eletro-Mobility |
|
European Solar Thermal Industry Federation (ESTIF) |
|
German Federation of Companies in the Gas and Water Industry (figawa) |
|
Glass for Europe |
|
Shell |
|
GreenEnergyOptions, GEO |
|
SustainSolutions |
|
European Mortgage Federation |
|
European Construction Industry Federation |
|
Siemens |
|
Vattenfall |
|
EUnited |
|
HSSE |
|
Dow |
|
Renault Group |
|
Transport & Environment |
|
Bellona |
|
Austrian Federal Economic Chamber (WKÖ) |
|
Vestas |
|
Housing Europe |
|
Danish Social Housing Federation |
|
Dutch Social Housing Federation |
|
French Social Housing Federation |
|
German Social Housing Federation |
|
European Union of House builders and Developers |
|
BEUC |
|
World Green Building Council (WorldGBC) |
|
Snam S.p.A. |
|
BDI/BDA The German Business Representation |
|
European Federation of Intelligent Energy Efficiency Services |
|
German Retail Federation |
|
Architects' Council of Europe - Conseil des Architectes d’Europe |
|
Swedish Petroleum and Biofuel Institute |
|
AFEP |
|
Cercle de l'Industrie |
|
ES-SO European Solar Shading Organization |
|
E3G - Third Generation Environmentalism |
|
European Economic and Social Committee |
|
European Heating Industry (EHI) |
|
Federal Chamber of German Architects |
|
European Federation of National Organisations Working with the Homeless |
|
NALCO Water |
|
Avisa Partners |
|
LightingEurope AISBL |
|
BMW Group |
|
Ecofys |
|
Danske Arkitektvirksomheder |
|
United Technologies Corporation UTC |
|
EU association for engineering building services and installers |
|
European Geothermal Energy Council |
|
AEBIOM |
|
EuroFuel |
|
Rud-Pedersen |
|
Client Earth |
|
OPINION of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety (19.9.2017)
for the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy
on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2010/31/EU on the energy performance of buildings
(COM(2016)0765 – C8‑0499/2016 – 2016/0381(COD))
Rapporteur: Anneli Jäätteenmäki
SHORT JUSTIFICATION
The Commission proposal tries to increase the energy efficiency of the European building stock and to contribute positively to the EU climate goals. The chosen method is to enhance implementation of the existing directive and to propose some provisions that go beyond the current situation. Putting energy efficiency first is rightly restated as the guiding principle.
Given the slow annual renovation rate of European buildings (around 0,4-1,2% depending on the Member State) and the complex interplay between EU legislation, national building codes, building practices, economic trends and the ownership structure of the building stock, there still remains enormous untapped energy saving potential. In light of the current trend, the coming years will not radically change the situation.
Without further measures, energy efficiency renovations will be carried out when they are economically reasonable and have the proper incentives in place in order to incentivise reaching the energy efficiency goals.
It is important that the Member States know their building stock and thus help the different actors to prioritise the renovations based on cost-efficiency. This is encouraged in the amendment to Article 2 on the long-term renovation strategies.
Currently, there is an urgent need for widely available financing products that would include and support the positive aspects of energy efficiency renovations, such as the higher asset value and healthier living conditions for the occupants. The Commission's efforts in enabling financing, such as the “Smart Finance for Smart Buildings” initiative are to be encouraged.
The rapporteur would like to stress two major issues: healthy building and the Commission proposal on electro-mobility.
First, one cannot overstate the importance of healthy buildings. A healthy building is designed to fulfil the needs of its occupants and can be modified to accommodate future needs. It is constructed from durable, repairable and recyclable non-toxic materials. It uses energy efficiently and might also produce it, has sufficient natural light and is ventilated and heated properly to maintain good indoor air quality and temperature.
Nowadays, most people spend most of their time indoors. According to estimates, tens of millions of Europeans suffer from bad indoor air quality, often because of excessive dampness, which encourages the growth of mould and can also cause structural damage to the building.
The range of affected buildings varies from private dwellings to public buildings. The way buildings are built and maintained has huge effects on public health and the well-being of the whole population.
Energy inefficient houses and energy poverty are intimately linked. If the housing estates postpone the necessary renovations due to lack of financing, they risk further degrading of the living conditions and also decrease the value of the housing stock.
For the rapporteur, the second major issue is the proposal on electro-mobility, introduced in the amended Article 8.
The proposition includes all new non-residential buildings and existing non-residential buildings undergoing major renovation with more than ten parking spaces. Newly built residential buildings and those undergoing major renovations are also included. For the first category, at least 10 % of the parking spaces should be equipped with a recharging point. For the second category, every parking space should be equipped with pre-cabling.
In the rapporteur’s view, the charging infrastructure obligations proposed by the Commission undermine the efficient allocation of both private and public money.
Currently, charging technology is being developed at a fast pace. Many Member States have already taken steps to build the charging infrastructure. The cost of a charging point is decreasing. Private companies and public utilities have viable business cases for building the network and pricing electric vehicle charging.
For new buildings, both non-residential and residential, the necessary infrastructure can be integrated to the design process from the beginning. It is therefore wise to make new buildings future proof by ducting. This would leave sufficient flexibility for the sizing of the cabling and ensure that the necessary charging infrastructure can easily be built when needed.
For existing non-residential buildings, the obligation should be relaxed to apply only in cases where the renovation concerns electric infrastructure of the building. This would help to keep the return for investment for the actual energy efficiency improvements higher.
AMENDMENTS
The Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety calls on the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy, as the committee responsible, to take into account the following amendments:
Amendment 1 Proposal for a directive Recital 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(1) The Union is committed to a sustainable, competitive, secure and decarbonised energy system. The Energy Union and the Energy and Climate Policy Framework for 2030 establish ambitious Union commitments to reduce greenhouse gas emissions further (by at least 40 % by 2030, as compared with 1990), to increase the proportion of renewable energy consumed (by at least 27 %) and to make energy savings of at least 27 %, reviewing this level having in mind an Union level of 30 %10, and to improve Europe’s energy security, competitiveness and sustainability. |
(1) The Union is committed to a sustainable, competitive, secure and decarbonised energy system and to a high level of human health protection. The Energy Union and the Energy and Climate Policy Framework for 2030 establish ambitious Union commitments to reduce greenhouse gas emissions further (by at least 40 % by 2030, as compared with 1990), to increase the proportion of renewable energy consumed (by at least 27%) and to make energy savings of at least 27%, reviewing this level having in mind an Union level of at least 30 %10, to improve Europe’s energy security, competitiveness and sustainability and to promote access to affordable energy in order to reduce energy poverty. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 2 Proposal for a directive Recital 1 a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(1a) The Commission has co-financed a number of projects which foster experience and good practices in regional collaboration, practices which can be shared across the Union with a view to improving the implementation of this Directive. Examples of those projects include MARIE, and its extension SHERPA, along with ELIH-MED and PROFORBIOMED. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 3 Proposal for a directive Recital 2 a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(2a) Improvements to the energy efficiency in buildings reduce the demand for heating fuels, in particular solid heating fuels, and therefore contribute to improving air quality through reduced emission pollutants and achieving, in a cost effective manner, the objectives of Union’s air quality policy, as established in particular by Directive (EU) 2016/2284 of the European Parliament and of the Council1a. Energy efficiency should therefore be considered to be an element of air quality policy, especially in Member States where achieving Union’s limits on emissions of air pollutants is problematic and energy efficiency could help attain those goals. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
_________________ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1a Directive (EU) 2016/2284 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 December 2016 on the reduction of national emissions of certain atmospheric pollutants, amending Directive 2003/35/EC and repealing Directive 2001/81/EC (OJ L 344, 17.12.2016, p. 1-31). | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Justification | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The residential sector is responsible for important shares of pollutant emissions, such as BaP, PM2.5 and PM10 in Europe stemming from smoke caused by burning solid fuels used for residential heating. These pollutants increase mortality, morbidity and hospitalization, especially as measured emission values often go well beyond the limits established by the EU air quality legislation. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 4 Proposal for a directive Recital 2 b (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(2b) Around 50 million households in the Union are affected by energy poverty. Energy poverty should be considered to be the inability of a household to support an adequate level of energy supply so as to guarantee basic levels of comfort and health, due to a combination of low income, high-energy prices and low quality, poor performing housing stock. Current building renovation rates are insufficient and buildings owned or occupied by low-income citizens at risk of energy poverty are the hardest to reach. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 5 Proposal for a directive Recital 5 a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(5a) The Union's building stock will need to become ‘nearly zero-energy buildings’ (nZEB) by 2050, in line with the objectives of COP21 (the Paris Agreement). The current building renovation rates are insufficient and those buildings owned or occupied by low-income citizens at risk of energy poverty are the hardest to reach. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 6 Proposal for a directive Recital 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(6) The Union is committed to developing a secure, competitive and decarbonised energy system by 205012. To meet this goal, Member States and investors need milestones to ensure that buildings are decarbonised by 2050. In order to ensure this decarbonised building stock by 2050, Member States should identify the intermediary steps to achieving the mid-term (2030) and long-term (2050) objectives. |
(6) The Union is committed to developing a secure, competitive and decarbonised energy system by 205012. In the light of the Paris Agreement and to meet this goal, Member States and investors need ambitious targets and clear milestones and measures to ensure that buildings are decarbonised and that the overall energy efficiency of buildings is increased so that they reach the nZEB standard by 2050. In order to ensure this decarbonised building stock by 2050, Member States should identify intermediary steps and the trajectory to achieving mid-term (2030 and 2040) and long-term (2050) objectives and stimulate the renovation of the existing building stock as the current building renovation rates are insufficient. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 7 Proposal for a directive Recital 6 a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(6a) To meet the targets for decarbonising the building stock by 2050, and to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and promote the transition to a low-carbon economy, it will be necessary to take a holistic approach to defining energy-efficient buildings. The construction of new buildings and the renovation of existing buildings should aim to create buildings that fulfil the needs of occupants and that can be modified to accommodate future needs, that are constructed from durable, repairable and recyclable non-toxic materials, that use energy efficiently and that could also produce energy, that have sufficient natural light, that fulfil safety requirements, including fire safety, and that are ventilated and heated properly to maintain a healthy indoor air quality. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 8 Proposal for a directive Recital 6 b (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(6b) The Paris Agreement must be reflected in the Union's efforts to decarbonise its building stock, taking into account that almost 50 % of the Union's final energy demand is used for heating and cooling, of which 80 % is used in buildings. The Union´s energy and climate goals therefore need to be met by switching supply to nearly 100 % renewables by 2050 at the latest, which can be achieved only by reducing energy consumption and making full use of the ‘energy efficiency first’ principle, as energy efficiency measures are the most cost effective way of achieving reductions in greenhouse gas emissions. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 9 Proposal for a directive Recital 6 c (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(6c) As up to 90 % of the 2050 built environment already exists, more ambitious efforts are needed to accelerate the rate of renovating and decarbonising the existing building stock. As 30 years is a relatively short time period to renew the existing building stock, the incentives and standards set today will ultimately determine whether the Union will reach its long-term climate and energy goals. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 10 Proposal for a directive Recital 7 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(7) The provisions on long-term renovation strategies provided for in Directive 2012/27/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council13 should be moved to Directive 2010/31/EU, where they fit more coherently |
(7) The provisions on long-term renovation strategies provided for in Directive 2012/27/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council13 should be moved to Directive 2010/31/EU, where they fit more coherently, and where they accomplish Member States' plans to arrive at a nearly zero energy buildings stock by 2050. While keeping that long-term objective, they should be accompanied by binding milestones for 2030 and 2040. The long-term renovation strategies and the renovation work that they stimulate will contribute to boosting growth through the creation of jobs, and to providing clean and affordable energy to consumers. Financing mechanisms and financial incentives should be given a central position in the Member States’ long-term national renovation strategies and be actively promoted by them. Furthermore, a strategy for promoting specialist support and advice for consumers and for training specialists should be included. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
_________________ |
_________________ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
13 Directive 2012/27/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 on energy efficiency, amending Directives 2009/125/EC and 2010/30/EU and repealing Directives 2004/8/EC and 2006/32/EC (OJ L 315, 14.11.2012, p. 1). |
13 Directive 2012/27/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 on energy efficiency, amending Directives 2009/125/EC and 2010/30/EU and repealing Directives 2004/8/EC and 2006/32/EC (OJ L 315, 14.11.2012, p. 1). | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 11 Proposal for a directive Recital 7 a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(7a) The construction industry alone directly accounts for 18 million jobs in the Union and generates 9 % of its GDP. Energy efficiency measures in the building industry with ambitious goals for the deep, gradual renovation of existing building stock have the potential to accelerate the modernisation of that sector and its associated workforce and to create millions of jobs in the Union, in particular in micro-, small and medium-sized enterprises. Underlying cost-optimality calculations for elaborating Member States' long-term renovation strategies and decisions on their minimum performance criteria should also duly take account the economic value of co-benefits of energy efficiency measures, such as job creation, asset value, reduced import dependence, health or indoor and outdoor air quality, via harmonised reference values as a part of the guidance for the Union’s cost-optimality calculation methodology. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 12 Proposal for a directive Recital 7 b (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(7b) As the building stock in the Union is being modernised to a higher level of energy efficiency, it is also becoming more complex. There is an increasing need for cooperation between the different professionals on-site. The right set of professional skills plays an essential part in untapping that potential and improving the building stock. Encouragement for systemic thinking should start from the educational system and continue throughout the careers of builders. In that context, it is necessary for Member States to provide a clear link between their national long-term renovation strategies and suitable initiatives, to promote skills and education, lifelong training and skills for technicians and professionals working in the construction and energy efficiency sectors as well as to inform communities groups and small businesses on energy awareness, efficiency measures and building renovation. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 13 Proposal for a directive Recital 7 c (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(7c) National renovation strategies should set out the expected results and the contribution to achieving the overall energy efficiency target in the short term (2030), medium term (2040) and long term (2050). | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 14 Proposal for a directive Recital 9 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(9) In order to adapt this Directive to the technical progress, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union should be delegated to the Commission to supplement it by defining the smartness indicator and enabling its implementation. The smartness indicator should be used to measure buildings’ capacity to use ICT and electronic systems to optimise operation and interact with the grid. The smartness indicator will raise awareness amongst building owners and occupants of the value behind building automation and electronic monitoring of technical building systems and will give confidence to the occupant about the actual savings of these new enhanced-functionalities. |
(9) In order to adapt this Directive to the technical progress, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union should be delegated to the Commission to supplement it by defining the smartness indicator and enabling its implementation. The smartness indicator should be used to measure buildings’ capacity to use ICT and electronic systems to optimise operation, particularly the supply and use of energy (such as water and air), and interact with the grid. The smartness indicator will raise awareness amongst building owners and occupants of the value behind building automation and electronic monitoring of technical building systems and will give confidence to the occupant about the actual savings of these new enhanced-functionalities. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 15 Proposal for a directive Recital 10 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(10) Innovation and new technology also make it possible for buildings to support the overall decarbonisation of the economy. For example, buildings can leverage the development of the infrastructure necessary for the smart charging of electric vehicles also provide a basis for Member States, if they choose to, to use car batteries as a source of power. To reflect this aim, the definition of technical building systems should be extended. |
(10) Innovation and new technology also make it possible for buildings to support the overall decarbonisation of the economy. For example, buildings can leverage the development of the infrastructure necessary for the smart charging of electric vehicles and also provide a basis for Member States, if they choose to, to use car batteries as a source of power. In view of the energy efficiency target, water may also be a source of energy in buildings. Heat recovery units may, for example, make it possible to produce heat from waste water. To reflect this aim of overall decarbonisation, the definition of technical building systems should be extended. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 16 Proposal for a directive Recital 10 a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(10a) Water is an essential element of many technical building systems, such as heating and cooling systems, and in domestic uses. The supply of the pump and pressure systems required to transport water uses a lot of energy. In addition, water leaks account for 24 % of total water consumption in the Union, resulting in energy and water loss. More effective management and a decrease in water use in new and renovated buildings would therefore contribute to the objective of rational use of resources. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 17 Proposal for a directive Recital 10 b (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(10 b) Measures to further improve the energy performance of buildings should take into account the Union’s nZEB benchmarks required for new buildings by 2021, and the requirement for a fully nZEB building stock by 2050, and, in this context, should also take into account climatic and local conditions as well as indoor climate; health and safety requirements including fire safety, indoor and outdoor air quality, and cost-effectiveness, including non-energy related benefits. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Justification | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The EU benchmark for nZEB defined in the Commission Recommendation (EU) 2016/1318 shall serve as a guidance for MS that are lagging behind in improving energy performance requirements. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 18 Proposal for a directive Recital 10 c (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(10c) The promotion of alternative, safe and sustainable modes of transport, such as bicycles, also contributes to the overall decarbonisation of the economy and should be integrated by the Member States as an element of the long-term strategies aimed at increasing the renovation rate of the building stock across the Union. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 19 Proposal for a directive Recital 10 d (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(10d) Member States should provide incentives for the use of natural building materials with low carbon content and the deployment of green rooftops in the occasion of major building renovations as they can be effectively used for improving air quality, for addressing the worsening of climatic conditions, particularly in urban areas, and for improving the overall energy performance of buildings. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 20 Proposal for a directive Recital 11 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(11) The impact assessment identified two existing sets of provisions, whose aim could be achieved in a more efficient manner compared to the current situation. First the obligation, before any construction starts, to carry out a feasibility study on highly-efficiency alternative systems becomes an unnecessary burden. Second, provisions related to inspections of heating systems and air-conditioning systems were found to not sufficiently ensure, in an efficient manner, the initial and maintained performance of these technical systems. Even cheap technical solutions with very short payback periods, such as hydraulic balancing of the heating system and installation/replacement of thermostatic control valves, are insufficiently considered today. Provisions related to inspections are amended to ensure a better result from inspections. |
(11) The impact assessment identified two existing sets of provisions, whose aim could be achieved in a more efficient manner compared to the current situation. First the obligation, before any construction starts, to carry out a feasibility study on highly-efficiency alternative systems becomes an unnecessary burden. Second, provisions related to inspections of heating systems and air-conditioning systems were found to not sufficiently ensure, in an efficient manner, the initial and maintained performance of these technical systems. Cheap technical solutions with very short payback periods, such as hydraulic balancing of the heating system and installation/replacement of thermostatic control valves, are insufficiently considered today and should be fully exploited, including as solutions for assisting energy-poor consumers. Provisions related to inspections are amended to ensure a better result from inspections. Factors such as the original design and position of the building should be taken in account with a view to achieving greater initial energy efficiency, which would, in turn, lead to savings in other improvements, such as the fittings, outer structure and lighting. To obtain real-time data so that systems can be optimised when necessary, monitoring systems also need to be developed. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 21 Proposal for a directive Recital 12 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(12) Notably for large installations, building automation and electronic monitoring of technical building systems have proven to be an effective replacement for inspections. The installation of such equipment should be considered as the most cost-effective alternative to inspections in large non-residential and multifamily buildings of a sufficient size that allow a payback of less than three years. The current possibility to opt for alternative measures is therefore deleted. For small scale installations, the documentation of the system performance by installers and the registration of this information in the databases on energy performance certification will support the verification of compliance with the minimum requirements set for all technical building systems and reinforce energy performance certificates role. In addition, existing regular safety inspections and programmed maintenance work will remain an opportunity to provide direct advice on energy efficiency improvements. |
(12) Notably for large installations, building automation and electronic monitoring of technical building systems have proven to be an effective replacement for inspections and maintenance. The installation of such equipment should be considered as the most cost-effective alternative to inspections in large non-residential and multifamily buildings of a sufficient size that allow a payback of less than three years. The current possibility to opt for alternative measures is therefore deleted. For small scale installations, the documentation of the system performance by installers and the registration of this information in the databases on energy performance certification will support the verification of compliance with the minimum requirements set for all technical building systems and reinforce energy performance certificates role. In addition, existing regular safety inspections and programmed maintenance work will remain an opportunity to provide direct advice on energy efficiency improvements. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 22 Proposal for a directive Recital 12 a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(12a) The deployment of technical building systems should relate to equipment (new technologies, smart equipment), but also systems governing their operation and interaction. That relates, in particular, to the transmission of energy in buildings and systems to manage water and air efficiently. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 23 Proposal for a directive Recital 12 b (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(12b) In the case of staged deep renovations, technical building systems and building automation and control systems also present an opportunity to realise savings potential with relatively short payback periods, allowing to generate additional savings over longer periods to be re-invested in the next stage of renovation. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 24 Proposal for a directive Recital 13 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(13) To ensure their best use in building renovation, financial measures related to energy efficiency should be linked to the depth of the renovation, which should be assessed by comparing energy performance certificates (EPCs) issued before and after the renovation. |
(13) To ensure their best use in building renovation, both public and private financial measures related to energy efficiency should be linked to the depth of the renovation and should promote a holistic approach to building renovations in order to ensure that all parts and technical building systems, including building maintenance, result in a high level of energy efficiency and improved indoor air quality with positive impact on health, well-being, comfort and productivity. Such renovations should be assessed by comparing energy performance certificates (EPCs) issued before and after the renovation, or another transparent and proportionate method. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 25 Proposal for a directive Recital 13 a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(13a) Long-term renovation strategies with clear milestones and measures stimulate energy efficiency investments from the private sector. Long-term investments should be further stimulated by facilitating access to refinancing of portfolios the assets of which have energy efficiency renovations characteristics. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 26 Proposal for a directive Recital 13 b (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(13b) In order to encourage renovations, long-term private financing and de-risking tools should be promoted by implementing energy efficient mortgage standards for certified energy efficient building renovations. A lower risk weighting in capital requirements should be recognized for financial institutions providing energy efficient mortgages. The requirements should reflect the potential risk mitigating effects of energy efficiency and be reviewed in light of de-risking data gain, and where appropriate, a lower capital charge for energy efficiency mortgage collateral should be considered. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 27 Proposal for a directive Recital 13 c (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(13c) In that regard, small-scale efficiency actions in individual apartments remain important. Such actions are often useful in alleviating fuel poverty. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 28 Proposal for a directive Recital 13 d (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(13d) Where a new energy performance certificate demonstrates an improvement in the building’s efficiency, its cost may be included in the incentive provided by a Member State. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 29 Proposal for a directive Recital 14 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(14) Access to financing is easier when good-quality information is available. Public buildings with a total useful floor area over 250 m² should therefore be required to disclose their actual energy consumption. |
(14) Access to financing is easier with an ambitious and stable long-term framework in place and when good-quality information is available. This information also includes EPCs, information from maintenance and inspections and energy performance databases. Public buildings, including those owned, managed and occupied by public authorities, whether owned by the Member State, region, or municipality, or privately owned but publicly used buildings, should meet their role and lead by example by becoming nZEB buildings in accordance with Directive 2012/27/EU and disclose their actual energy consumption. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 30 Proposal for a directive Recital 15 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(15) The current independent control systems for EPCs should be strengthened to ensure certificates are of good quality, can be used for compliance checking and for producing statistics on the regional/national building stocks. High-quality data on the building stock is needed and this could be partially generated by the registers and databases that almost all Member States are currently developing and managing for EPCs. |
(15) The current independent control systems for EPCs should be strengthened to ensure certificates are of good quality, can be used for compliance checking and for producing harmonised statistics on the local, regional and national building stocks. High-quality data on the building stock is needed and this could be partially generated by the registers and databases that almost all Member States are currently developing and managing for EPCs. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 31 Proposal for a directive Recital 16 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(16) To meet the objectives of energy efficiency policy for buildings, the transparency of EPCs should be improved by ensuring that that all necessary parameters for calculations, for both certification and minimum energy performance requirements, are set out and applied consistently. Member States should put in place adequate measures to ensure, for example, that the performance of installed, replaced or updated technical building systems is documented in view of building certification and compliance checking. |
(16) To meet the objectives of energy efficiency for buildings as part of the Union’s binding energy efficiency target of at least 40 % by 2030, the transparency of EPCs should be improved by ensuring that that all necessary parameters for calculations, for both certification and minimum energy performance requirements, are set out and applied consistently. Member States should put in place adequate measures to ensure, for example, that the performance of installed, replaced or updated technical building systems is documented in view of building certification and compliance checking. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 32 Proposal for a directive Recital 18 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(18) The provisions of this Directive should not prevent Member States from setting more ambitious energy performance requirements at building level and for building elements as long as such measures are compatible with Union law. It is consistent with the objectives of this Directive and of Directive 2012/27/EC that these requirements may, in certain circumstances, limit the installation or use of products subject to other applicable Union harmonisation legislation, provided that such requirements should not constitute an unjustifiable market barrier. |
(18) The provisions of this Directive should not prevent Member States from setting more ambitious energy performance and indoor air quality requirements at building level and for building elements as long as such measures are compatible with Union law. It is consistent with the objectives of this Directive and of Directive 2012/27/EC that these requirements may, in certain circumstances, limit the installation or use of products subject to other applicable Union harmonisation legislation, provided that such requirements should not constitute an unjustifiable market barrier. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 33 Proposal for a directive Recital 18 a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(18a) Member States should base their calculation of the energy performance of a transparent or translucent building element of the building envelope on its energy balance, meaning taking energy losses as well as energy gains from passive solar irradiance into account. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 34 Proposal for a directive Recital 18 b (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(18b) Cities, regional and local authorities show already the example by implementing energy efficiency measures, building renovation schemes and enabling self-generation. Bodies such as the Covenant of Mayors, smart cities and communities or 100 % renewable energy communities contribute through the actions of their members to increase energy performance and allow the sharing of best practices for energy transition. Projects at a district level showcase, in particular, the need to consider the function of buildings integrated in a local energy system, local mobility plan and their ecosystem in general. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 35 Proposal for a directive Recital 18 c (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(18c) It is important to build multi-level governance strategies and macro-regional collaboration in line with the climate diversity of the Union and the challenges that climate change poses to different regions. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 36 Proposal for a directive Recital 18 d (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(18d) This Directive should be an additional instrument in the framework of the Energy Union and the Union's new energy governance to tackle energy poverty. For that reason, it encourages the Union to produce a clear common definition of energy poverty, and calls for the existing studies to be considered with a view to finding a possible definition as soon as possible. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 37 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Directive 2010/31/EU Article 2 – point 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 38 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 a (new) Directive 2010/31/EU Article 2 – point 3 a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 39 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 b (new) Directive 2010/31/EU Article 2 – point 19 a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 40 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a Directive 2010/31/EU Article 2a – paragraph 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 41 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a a (new) Directive 2010/31/EU Article 2a – paragraph 1 a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 42 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a b (new) Directive 2010/31/EU Article 2a – paragraph 1 b (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Justification | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The measures to attain, monitor and evaluate the achievement of the decarbonisation goals set in the long-term renovation strategies for the national building stocks should be clearly specified in action plans prepared at national level. Public participation shall be ensured in the preparation and adoption of the national action plans. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 43 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a c (new) Directive 2010/31/EU Article 2a – paragraph 1 c (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 44 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b Directive 2010/31/EU Article 2a – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 45 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b Directive 2010/31/EU Article 2a – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 46 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b Directive 2010/31/EU Article 2a – paragraph 2 a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 47 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b Directive 2010/31/EU Article 2a – paragraph 3 – point a | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 48 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b Directive 2010/31/EU Article 2a – paragraph 3 – point b | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 49 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b Directive 2010/31/EU Article 2a – paragraph 3 – point b a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 50 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b Directive 2010/31/EU Article 2a – paragraph 3 – point b b (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 51 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b Directive 2010/31/EU Article 2 a – paragraph 3 – point c a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 52 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b a (new) Directive 2010/31/EU Article 2a – paragraph 3 a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 53 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 a (new) Directive 2010/31/EU Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point a | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 54 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point a Directive 2010/31/EU Article 6 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Justification | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In order to reduce administrative burden for Member States while enabling their compliance with Art 15 § 8 of the Renewables Directive (recast) and Art 9, paragraph 3, c Directive 2010/31/EU, provisions on feasibility assessment of highly energy efficiency alternative systems should be streamlined. It must be noted that this requirement reduces the risk of lock-in effects and stranded assets bearing in mind that installed devices tend to last for more than 25 years on average. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 55 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 a (new) Directive 2010/31/EU Article 7 – paragraph 1 a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 56 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 Directive 2010/31/EU Article 7 – paragraph 5 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Justification | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In order to reduce administrative burden for Member States while enabling their compliance with Art 15 § 8 of the Renewables Directive (recast) and Art 9, paragraph 3, c Directive 2010/31/EU, provisions on feasibility assessment of highly energy efficiency alternative systems should be streamlined. It must be noted that this requirement reduces the risk of lock-in effects and stranded assets bearing in mind that installed devices tend to last for more than 25 years on average. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 57 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point a Directive 2010/31/EU Article 8 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Justification | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Hydronic balancing prevents that radiators installed at a remote location of the heating pump are not sufficiently supplied with hot water whereas radiators near the pump are oversupplied. It provides constant temperature levels and optimal energy use. Self-regulating devices that regulate room temperature and hydronic balancing are very cost efficient measures to save energy in buildings. In some Member States thermostatic radiator valves are standard since 1978, in other simple radiator valves are used in large scope. Replacing the remaining simple valves would grant 4% of the EU energy reduction goals for 2020. The replacement of simple radiator valves in one building saves on average 13% to 19% of the energy needed to heat the building. The payback time of those measures is only a couple of months. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 58 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point b – introductory part Directive 2010/31/EU Article 8 – paragraph 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(In line with the Directive concerning common rules for the internal market in electricity (recast), in particular Articles, 19-22, 18 and Annex III.) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Justification | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Accurate smart meters can achieve both: enabling consumer participation and contributing to energy savings in buildings through consumer awareness. The provisions on intelligent metering should therefore not be removed from this Directive. Member States shall continue to encourage the introduction of intelligent metering systems in accordance with the revised Electricity Directive, whenever a building is constructed or undergoes major renovation, as this will also allow a more cost-efficient deployment. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 59 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point b Directive 2010/31/EU Article 8 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Justification | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
For new non-residential buildings, the requisite electronic infrastructure can be integrated into the planning from the beginning. It is therefore wise to make new buildings future-proof by fitting pre-cabling or ducting. For existing non-residential buildings, the obligation should be relaxed to apply only in cases where the renovation affects the parking area or the electrical infrastructure of the building. A symbolic charging point should be installed in parking areas. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 60 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point b Directive 2010/31/EU Article 8 – paragraph 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 61 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point c Directive 2010/31/EU Article 8 – paragraph 5 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 62 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point c Directive 2010/31/EU Article 8 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 63 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 – point a Directive 2010/31/EU Article 10 – paragraph 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 64 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 – point b Directive 2010/31/EU Article 10 – paragraph 6a | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 65 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 a (new) Directive 2010/31/EU Article 11 – paragraph 9 a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 66 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 – point a Directive 2010/31/EU Article 14 – paragraph 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 67 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 – point b Directive 2010/31/EC Article 14 – paragraph 2 – point a | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 68 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 – point b Directive 2010/31/EU Article 14 – paragraph 3 – point b | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 69 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 – point b Directive 2010/31/EU Article 14 – paragraph 3 a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Justification | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Some Member States already have equivalent measures to inspections such as advice systems in place which have shown to be successful to increase the energy efficiency of heating systems. This flexibility and alternative measure should be kept for Member States. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 70 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 – point b Directive 2010/31/EU Article 14 – paragraph 3 b (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Justification | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The role of energy performance contracts in increasing the energy efficiency of buildings must be increased, as those contracts offer a holistic approach to renovations, including financing, implementation of construction work and energy management. In entering into an energy performance contract, the building owner enters into a contract with an energy efficiency company regarding the implementation of energy efficiency measures. Inspections and audits are part of the contract. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 71 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8 – point a Directive 2010/31/EU Article 15 – paragraph 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 72 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8 – point b Directive 2010/31/EC Article 15 – paragraph 2 – point a | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 73 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8 – point b Directive 2010/31/EU Article 15 – paragraph 3 – point b | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 74 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8 – point b Directive 2010/31/EU Article 15 – paragraph 3 a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Justification | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Some Member States should have the flexibility to opt for equivalent measures to inspections such as advice systems in place. This flexibility and alternative measure should be kept for Member States. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 75 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8 – point b Directive 2010/31/EU Article 15 – paragraph 3 b (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Justification | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The role of energy performance contracts in increasing the energy efficiency of buildings must be increased, as those contracts offer a holistic approach to renovations, including financing, implementation of construction work and energy management. In entering into an energy performance contract, the building owner enters into a contract with an energy efficiency company regarding the implementation of energy efficiency measures. Inspections and audits are part of the contract. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 76 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9 Directive 2010/31/EU Article 19 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 77 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Directive 2010/31/EU Article 23 – paragraph 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 78 Proposal for a directive Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point a Directive 2010/31/EU Annex I – point 1 – subparagraph 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Justification | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Der Text aus dem aktuellen Anhang I der Richtlinie 2010/31/EU wurde wieder eingeführt. Um die Gesamtenergieeffizienz eines Gebäudes zu bestimmen, ist es nicht ausreichend einzig den Primärenergiebedarf zu evaluieren. Zuerst sollte die Energiemenge berechnet werden, die gebraucht wird, um den typischen Energieverbrauch eines Gebäudes zu decken. Dieser Endenergieverbrauch und der Primärenergiebedarf eines Gebäudes sollten zur Bewertung der Gesamtenergieeffizienz verwendet werden. Die Primärenergie beschreibt vielmehr die Qualität der verwendeten Energie als die Menge der Energie, die zur Deckung des Energiebedarfs eines Gebäudes nötig ist. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 79 Proposal for a directive Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point a Directive 2010/31/EU Annex I – point 1 – paragraph 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Justification | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
An EU approach to accelerate innovation and energy savings across Europe is indispensable to avoid fragmentation of the internal market. The EPB standards, which were recently approved by National Standard Bodies, make it possible to calculate the energy performance of buildings across the EU using the same methodologies. These methodologies rely on the most recent data, helping the market uptake of the most efficient heating technologies. A transitional period of two years will enable planners and architects to put these EPB standards to the test and resolve any remaining inconsistencies. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 80 Proposal for a directive Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b Directive 2010/31/EU Annex I – point 2 – subparagraph 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Justification | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Overheating is an equally important problem that affects the health and comfort of building users, as well as the energy performance of buildings. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 81 Proposal for a directive Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b (new) Directive 2010/31/EU Annex 1 – point 2 – subparagraph 3 a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Justification | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Different forms of on-site RES have different characteristics i.e. they have alternative uses, interact differently with the overall energy system etc. Hence the PEFs for the purpose of determining the energy performance requirements should be differentiated according to two major groupings: 1) Conversion technologies, which use a RES resource generated on-site and which cannot be exported (ambient heat) or conversion technologies, which use a RES resource generated on-site and which can be exported (micro-wind) 2 ) Conversion technologies, which use a RES resource that is not generated on-site (pellets for pellet boilers). | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 82 Proposal for a directive Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point c a (new) Directive 2010/31/EU Annex I – point 5 a (new) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Justification | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Member States are so far not guided to for the calculation of the energy performance of building elements that form part of the building envelope. Common calculation methods could improve the level playing field in the internal market. |
PROCEDURE – COMMITTEE ASKED FOR OPINION
Title |
Energy performance of buildings |
||||
References |
COM(2016)0765 – C8-0499/2016 – 2016/0381(COD) |
||||
Committee responsible Date announced in plenary |
ITRE 12.12.2016 |
|
|
|
|
Opinion by Date announced in plenary |
ENVI 12.12.2016 |
||||
Rapporteur Date appointed |
Anneli Jäätteenmäki 20.2.2017 |
||||
Discussed in committee |
29.5.2017 |
|
|
|
|
Date adopted |
7.9.2017 |
|
|
|
|
Result of final vote |
+: –: 0: |
53 0 6 |
|||
Members present for the final vote |
Marco Affronte, Catherine Bearder, Ivo Belet, Biljana Borzan, Lynn Boylan, Paul Brannen, Soledad Cabezón Ruiz, Nessa Childers, Birgit Collin-Langen, Mireille D’Ornano, Miriam Dalli, Seb Dance, Stefan Eck, José Inácio Faria, Karl-Heinz Florenz, Arne Gericke, Julie Girling, Sylvie Goddyn, Jytte Guteland, Anneli Jäätteenmäki, Jean-François Jalkh, Benedek Jávor, Karin Kadenbach, Urszula Krupa, Peter Liese, Norbert Lins, Valentinas Mazuronis, Susanne Melior, Massimo Paolucci, Gilles Pargneaux, Piernicola Pedicini, Bolesław G. Piecha, Pavel Poc, Frédérique Ries, Annie Schreijer-Pierik, Davor Škrlec, Renate Sommer, Claudiu Ciprian Tănăsescu, Ivica Tolić, Nils Torvalds, Adina-Ioana Vălean, Jadwiga Wiśniewska, Damiano Zoffoli |
||||
Substitutes present for the final vote |
Nicola Caputo, Jørn Dohrmann, Elena Gentile, Jan Huitema, Merja Kyllönen, Stefano Maullu, Mairead McGuinness, Keith Taylor, Carlos Zorrinho |
||||
Substitutes under Rule 200(2) present for the final vote |
Bendt Bendtsen, Norbert Erdős, Jill Evans, György Hölvényi, Barbara Lochbihler, Olle Ludvigsson, Elżbieta Katarzyna Łukacijewska |
||||
FINAL VOTE BY ROLL CALL IN COMMITTEE ASKED FOR OPINION
53 |
+ |
|
ALDE |
Catherine Bearder, Anneli Jäätteenmäki, Valentinas Mazuronis, Frédérique Ries, Nils Torvalds |
|
ECR |
Jørn Dohrmann, Arne Gericke, Julie Girling, Urszula Krupa, Bolesław G. Piecha, Jadwiga Wiśniewska |
|
EFDD |
Piernicola Pedicini |
|
ENF |
Mireille D'Ornano, Sylvie Goddyn, Jean-François Jalkh |
|
GUE/NGL |
Lynn Boylan, Stefan Eck, Merja Kyllönen |
|
PPE |
Ivo Belet, Bendt Bendtsen, Birgit Collin-Langen, Norbert Erdős, José Inácio Faria, Karl-Heinz Florenz, György Hölvényi, Peter Liese, Norbert Lins, Elżbieta Katarzyna Łukacijewska, Stefano Maullu, Mairead McGuinness, Annie Schreijer-Pierik, Renate Sommer, Ivica Tolić, Adina-Ioana Vălean |
|
S&D |
Biljana Borzan, Paul Brannen, Soledad Cabezón Ruiz, Nicola Caputo, Nessa Childers, Miriam Dalli, Seb Dance, Elena Gentile, Jytte Guteland, Karin Kadenbach, Olle Ludvigsson, Susanne Melior, Massimo Paolucci, Gilles Pargneaux, Pavel Poc, Claudiu Ciprian Tănăsescu, Damiano Zoffoli, Carlos Zorrinho |
|
VERTS/ALE |
Benedek Jávor |
|
0 |
- |
|
|
|
|
6 |
0 |
|
ALDE |
Jan Huitema |
|
VERTS/ALE |
Marco Affronte, Jill Evans, Barbara Lochbihler, Davor Škrlec, Keith Taylor |
|
PROCEDURE – COMMITTEE RESPONSIBLE
Title |
Energy performance of buildings |
||||
References |
COM(2016)0765 – C8-0499/2016 – 2016/0381(COD) |
||||
Date submitted to Parliament |
30.11.2016 |
|
|
|
|
Committee responsible Date announced in plenary |
ITRE 12.12.2016 |
|
|
|
|
Committees asked for opinions Date announced in plenary |
ENVI 12.12.2016 |
|
|
|
|
Rapporteurs Date appointed |
Bendt Bendtsen 25.1.2017 |
|
|
|
|
Discussed in committee |
28.2.2017 |
29.5.2017 |
10.7.2017 |
|
|
Date adopted |
11.10.2017 |
|
|
|
|
Result of final vote |
+: –: 0: |
51 1 11 |
|||
Members present for the final vote |
Bendt Bendtsen, Xabier Benito Ziluaga, José Blanco López, David Borrelli, Jonathan Bullock, Cristian-Silviu Buşoi, Jerzy Buzek, Edward Czesak, Jakop Dalunde, Christian Ehler, Fredrick Federley, Ashley Fox, Adam Gierek, Theresa Griffin, András Gyürk, Rebecca Harms, Hans-Olaf Henkel, Eva Kaili, Kaja Kallas, Krišjānis Kariņš, Seán Kelly, Jeppe Kofod, Jaromír Kohlíček, Peter Kouroumbashev, Zdzisław Krasnodębski, Miapetra Kumpula-Natri, Christelle Lechevalier, Janusz Lewandowski, Paloma López Bermejo, Edouard Martin, Angelika Mlinar, Nadine Morano, Dan Nica, Angelika Niebler, Aldo Patriciello, Morten Helveg Petersen, Miroslav Poche, Carolina Punset, Michel Reimon, Paul Rübig, Massimiliano Salini, Algirdas Saudargas, Sven Schulze, Neoklis Sylikiotis, Dario Tamburrano, Patrizia Toia, Evžen Tošenovský, Claude Turmes, Vladimir Urutchev, Kathleen Van Brempt, Henna Virkkunen, Martina Werner, Lieve Wierinck, Hermann Winkler, Anna Záborská, Flavio Zanonato, Carlos Zorrinho |
||||
Substitutes present for the final vote |
Mario Borghezio, Rosa D’Amato, Jude Kirton-Darling, Olle Ludvigsson, Florent Marcellesi, Luděk Niedermayer |
||||
Date tabled |
23.10.2017 |
||||
FINAL VOTE BY ROLL CALL IN COMMITTEE RESPONSIBLE
51 |
+ |
|
ALDE |
Fredrick Federley, Kaja Kallas, Angelika Mlinar, Morten Helveg Petersen, Carolina Punset, Lieve Wierinck |
|
GUE/NHL |
Jaromír Kohlíček, Paloma López Bermejo, Neoklis Sylikiotis, Xabier Benito Ziluaga |
|
PPE |
Bendt Bendtsen, Jerzy Buzek, Cristian-Silviu Buşoi, Christian Ehler, András Gyürk, Krišjānis Kariņš, Seán Kelly, Janusz Lewandowski, Nadine Morano, Angelika Niebler, Luděk Niedermayer, Aldo Patriciello, Paul Rübig, Massimiliano Salini, Algirdas Saudargas, Sven Schulze, Vladimir Urutchev, Henna Virkkunen, Anna Záborská |
|
S&D |
José Blanco López, Adam Gierek, Theresa Griffin, Eva Kaili, Jude Kirton-Darling, Jeppe Kofod, Peter Kouroumbashev, Miapetra Kumpula-Natri, Olle Ludvigsson, Edouard Martin, Dan Nica, Miroslav Poche, Patrizia Toia, Kathleen Van Brempt, Martina Werner, Flavio Zanonato, Carlos Zorrinho |
|
VERTS/ALE |
Jakop Dalunde, Rebecca Harms, Florent Marcellesi, Michel Reimon, Claude Turmes |
|
1 |
- |
|
EFDD |
Jonathan Bullock |
|
11 |
0 |
|
ECR |
Edward Czesak, Ashley Fox, Hans-Olaf Henkel, Zdzisław Krasnodębski, Evžen Tošenovský |
|
EFDD |
David Borrelli, Rosa D'Amato, Dario Tamburrano |
|
ENF |
Mario Borghezio, Christelle Lechevalier |
|
PPE |
Hermann Winkler |
|
Key to symbols:
+ : in favour
- : against
0 : abstention