REPORT on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2006/1/EC on the use of vehicles hired without drivers for the carriage of goods by road
29.5.2018 - (COM(2017)0282 – C8‑0172/2017 – 2017/0113(COD)) - ***I
Committee on Transport and Tourism
Rapporteur: Cláudia Monteiro de Aguiar
- 001-014 (PDF - 117 KB)
- 001-014 (DOC - 26 KB)
- 015-020 (PDF - 297 KB)
- 015-020 (DOC - 76 KB)
- 021-026 (PDF - 297 KB)
- 021-026 (DOC - 76 KB)
- 027-027 (PDF - 189 KB)
- 027-027 (DOC - 11 KB)
- 028-032 (PDF - 288 KB)
- 028-032 (DOC - 76 KB)
- 031-031/REV2 (PDF - 183 KB)
- 031-031/REV2 (DOC - 68 KB)
- 033-033/REV1 (PDF - 267 KB)
- 033-033/REV1 (DOC - 68 KB)
- 033-037 (PDF - 297 KB)
- 033-037 (DOC - 76 KB)
- 037-037/REV2 (PDF - 182 KB)
- 037-037/REV2 (DOC - 68 KB)
DRAFT EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION
on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2006/1/EC on the use of vehicles hired without drivers for the carriage of goods by road
(COM(2017)0282 – C8‑0172/2017 – 2017/0113(COD))
(Ordinary legislative procedure: first reading)
The European Parliament,
– having regard to the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council (COM(2017)0282),
– having regard to Article 294(2) and Article 91(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament (C8‑0172/2017),
– having regard to Article 294(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
– having regard to the opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee of 6 December 2017[1]
– after consulting the Committee of the Regions,
– having regard to Rule 59 of its Rules of Procedure,
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Transport and Tourism (A8-0193/2018),
1. Adopts its position at first reading hereinafter set out;
2. Calls on the Commission to refer the matter to Parliament again if it replaces, substantially amends or intends to substantially amend its proposal;
3. Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the national parliaments.
Amendment 1 Proposal for a directive Recital 2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(2) The use of hired vehicles can reduce the costs of undertakings carrying goods on their own account or for hire and reward and at the same time increase their operational flexibility. It can therefore contribute to an increase in the productivity and competitiveness of the undertakings concerned. Moreover, as hired vehicles tend to be younger than the average fleet, they are also safer and less polluting. |
(2) Such use of hired vehicles can reduce the costs of undertakings carrying goods on their own account or for hire and reward whilst increasing their operational flexibility. That use of hired vehicles can therefore contribute to an increase in the productivity and competitiveness of the undertakings concerned. Moreover, since hired vehicles tend to be younger than the average fleet, they may often be safer and less polluting. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 2 Proposal for a directive Recital 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(3) Directive 2006/1/EC does not enable undertakings to fully benefit from the advantages of using hired vehicles. That Directive allows Member States to restrict the use by their undertakings of hired vehicles with a maximum permissible laden weight of more than six tonnes for own account operations. Moreover, Member States are not required to allow the use of a hired vehicle on their respective territories if the vehicle has been registered or put into circulation in compliance with the laws in a Member State other than the one of establishment of the undertaking hiring it. |
(3) Directive 2006/1/EC does not enable undertakings to fully benefit from the advantages of using hired vehicles. That Directive allows Member States to restrict the use, by the undertakings established within their territories, of hired vehicles with a maximum permissible laden weight of more than six tonnes for own account operations. Moreover, Member States are not required to allow the use on their respective territories of a hired vehicle that has been registered or put into circulation in compliance with the laws in a Member State other than the one of establishment of the undertaking hiring it. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 3 Proposal for a directive Recital 4 a (new) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(4 a) Member States should not be allowed to restrict the use on their respective territories of a vehicle hired by an undertaking duly established on the territory of another Member State, provided that the vehicle is registered and complies with operating standards and safety requirements, or put into circulation in compliance with the laws of any Member State and authorised to be operated by the Member State of establishment of the undertaking responsible . | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 4 Proposal for a directive Recital 5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(5) The level of road transport taxation still differs considerably within the Union. Therefore, certain restrictions, which also indirectly affect the freedom to provide vehicle hiring services, remain justified in order to avoid fiscal distortions. Consequently, Member States should have the option to limit the length of time a vehicle hired in a Member State other than the one of establishment of the undertaking hiring it can be used within their respective territories. |
(5) The level of road transport taxation still differs considerably within the Union. Therefore, certain restrictions, which also indirectly affect the freedom to provide vehicle hiring services, remain justified for the purpose of avoiding fiscal distortions. Consequently, Member States should have the option to limit, subject to the conditions laid down in this Directive and within their respective territories, the length of time an established undertaking can use a hired vehicle registered or put into circulation in another Member State. They should also be allowed to limit the number of such vehicles being hired by an undertaking established within their territories. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 5 Proposal for a directive Recital 5 a (new) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(5 a) In order to enforce these measures, the information on the registration number of the hired vehicle should be provided in the Member States’ national electronic registers as established by Regulation (EC) No 1071/2009. Competent authorities of the Member State of establishment that are being informed of the use of a vehicle which the operator has hired and which is registered or put into circulation in compliance with the laws in another Member State should inform the competent authorities of that other Member State thereof. Member States should use the Internal Market Information System (IMI) to that end. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 6 Proposal for a directive Recital 6 a (new) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(6a) In order to maintain operational standards, meet safety requirements and ensure decent working conditions for drivers, it is important for carriers to have guaranteed access to assets and direct support infrastructure in the country in which they are performing their operations. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 7 Proposal for a directive Recital 7 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(7) The implementation and effects of this Directive should be monitored by the Commission and be documented by it in a report. Any future action in this area should be considered in light of that report. |
(7) The implementation and effects of this Directive should be monitored by the Commission and be documented by it in a report at the latest three years after the date of transposition of this Directive. The report should take due account of the impact on road safety, on tax revenues and on the environment. The report should also assess all infringements of this Directive, including cross-border infringements. The need for future action in this area should be considered in light of that report. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 8 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point a – point ii Directive 2006/1/EC Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point a | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 9 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b Directive 2006/1/EC Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point b | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 10 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 Directive 2006/1/EC Article 3 – paragraph 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 11 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 Directive 2006/1/EC Article 3 – paragraph 1 a (new) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 12 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 a (new) Directive 2006/1/EC Article 3 a (new) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 13 Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 Directive 2006/1/EC Article 5 a – paragraph 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment 14 Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Member States shall bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive by [OP: please insert the date calculated 18 months following the entry into force] at the latest. They shall communicate to the Commission the text of those provisions without delay. |
Member States shall bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive by ... [20 months after the date of entry into force of this Directive]. They shall communicate to the Commission the text of those provisions without delay. |
- [1] OJ C 129, 11.4.2018, p. 71.
EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
Introduction
Road transport is the dominant transport mode for goods and passengers in the EU and employs around 1.6 million people. Over the years, the EU has developed a range of rules to ensure a fair, well-functioning, safe and socially sustainable road transport sector. European legislation on the use of hired vehicles without drivers for the carriage of goods by road has been in operation for 25 years. Current Directive 2006/1/EC provides for a minimum level of the market opening for the use of such vehicles, but still includes legal provisions from the 1980s that reflect the needs of the sector at that time. This legislation has to be reviewed to correspond to operators’ actual needs, as well as to align with the latest issues in the haulage market sector and with current EU policy priorities.
The Commission’s proposal
The Commission presented a review of the Directive 2006/1/EC on the use of vehicles hired without drivers for the carriage of goods by road, as part of several proposals in the area of road transport ('Europe on the Move' package for clean, competitive and connected mobility) on 31 May 2017. It is closely linked to the new rules on access to the profession and access to the haulage market, as well as to the access to the coach and bus market, with an overall aim to ensuring fair competition, simplifying existing rules, preserving the internal market and ensuring the rights of workers in this sector.
Current Directive 2006/1/EC:
• allows Member States to restrict the use of hired goods vehicles with a gross vehicle weight above six tonnes for own account operations;
• restricts the use of a vehicle which has been hired in a Member State different from the one where the undertaking hiring the vehicle is established.
The Commission proposal would remove these restrictions and establish a uniform regulatory framework across the EU to ensure equal access for transport operators to the market for hired vehicles. It seeks to:
• allow the use within its territory of vehicles hired by undertakings established on the territory of another Member State, provided that the vehicle is registered or put into circulation in compliance with the laws of a Member State;
• allow the use of a vehicle hired in another Member State for at least four months in any given calendar year to enable undertakings to meet temporary or seasonal demand peaks and/or to replace defective or damaged vehicles.
Rapporteur’s position
The Rapporteur supports the overall aim of the Commission’s legislative package “Europe on the Move” and this proposal, as it is an opportunity to foster a level playing field and fair competition for rental and leasing companies in the EU while lessening unnecessary administrative burdens and boosting enforcement.
The Rapporteur agrees that the Member States should not restrict the use on their territories of a vehicle hired by an undertaking duly established on the territory of another Member State provided the vehicle complies with current operating standards and safety requirements.
The Rapporteur shares the view that due to the various levels of road transport taxation within the Union, the Member States should have the option to limit, within their respective territories, the length of time an established undertaking may use a hired vehicle registered or put into circulation in another Member State.
Moreover, an option should be given to the Member States to limit the number of such vehicles being hired by an undertaking established within their territories, provided that they allow use of a number of vehicles at least corresponding to 25% of the overall vehicle fleet owned by that or, in case of an undertaking having a fleet of less than four vehicles, the use of at least one hired vehicle.
The Rapporteur also believes that proper enforcement is key to ensuring the correct implementation and application of this proposal. For that, the existing national electronic registers as established by Regulation (EC) 1071/2009, should include the registration number of the hired vehicle as well as the validity period of the certified copy of the Community licence, indicating for how long a Member State shall allow its operators to use hired vehicles within its territory.
The Commission’s report should be submitted at the latest 3 years after the transposition deadline, describing the impact and various effects of this proposal on road safety, environment and tax revenues, and identifying such key metrics as the number of vehicles, registered in another Member State, hired by transport operators as well as the number of infringements related to the use of hired vehicles, overall as well as cross-border.
PROCEDURE – COMMITTEE RESPONSIBLE
Title |
Use of vehicles hired without drivers for the carriage of goods by road |
||||
References |
COM(2017)0282 – C8-0172/2017 – 2017/0113(COD) |
||||
Date submitted to Parliament |
31.5.2017 |
|
|
|
|
Committee responsible Date announced in plenary |
TRAN 15.6.2017 |
|
|
|
|
Rapporteurs Date appointed |
Cláudia Monteiro de Aguiar 30.6.2017 |
|
|
|
|
Discussed in committee |
23.1.2018 |
20.3.2018 |
15.5.2018 |
|
|
Date adopted |
24.5.2018 |
|
|
|
|
Result of final vote |
+: –: 0: |
24 15 1 |
|||
Members present for the final vote |
Lucy Anderson, Inés Ayala Sender, Georges Bach, Deirdre Clune, Michael Cramer, Luis de Grandes Pascual, Andor Deli, Karima Delli, Isabella De Monte, Ismail Ertug, Jacqueline Foster, Dieter-Lebrecht Koch, Miltiadis Kyrkos, Bogusław Liberadzki, Cláudia Monteiro de Aguiar, Tomasz Piotr Poręba, Gabriele Preuß, Christine Revault d’Allonnes Bonnefoy, Dominique Riquet, Massimiliano Salini, David-Maria Sassoli, Claudia Schmidt, Claudia Țapardel, Keith Taylor, Pavel Telička, Wim van de Camp, Marie-Pierre Vieu, Janusz Zemke, Elżbieta Katarzyna Łukacijewska |
||||
Substitutes present for the final vote |
Daniel Dalton, Michael Gahler, Maria Grapini, Ramona Nicole Mănescu, Marek Plura, Jozo Radoš, Matthijs van Miltenburg |
||||
Substitutes under Rule 200(2) present for the final vote |
Eleonora Evi, Jude Kirton-Darling, José Ignacio Salafranca Sánchez-Neyra, Annie Schreijer-Pierik, Anneleen Van Bossuyt, Marco Zullo |
||||
Date tabled |
29.5.2018 |
||||
FINAL VOTE BY ROLL CALL IN COMMITTEE RESPONSIBLE
24 |
+ |
|
ALDE ECR EFDD PPE
S&D VERTS/ALE |
Jozo Radoš, Dominique Riquet, Pavel Telička, Matthijs van Miltenburg Tomasz Piotr Poręba, Anneleen Van Bossuyt Eleonora Evi, Marco Zullo Georges Bach, Deirdre Clune, Andor Deli, Michael Gahler, Dieter-Lebrecht Koch, Ramona Nicole Mănescu, Cláudia Monteiro de Aguiar, Marek Plura, José Ignacio Salafranca Sánchez-Neyra, Massimiliano Salini, Claudia Schmidt, Annie Schreijer-Pierik, Luis de Grandes Pascual, Wim van de Camp Inés Ayala Sender Karima Delli |
|
15 |
- |
|
GUE/NGL S&D
VERTS/ALE |
Marie-Pierre Vieu Lucy Anderson, Isabella De Monte, Ismail Ertug, Maria Grapini, Jude Kirton-Darling, Miltiadis Kyrkos, Bogusław Liberadzki, Gabriele Preuß, Christine Revault d'Allonnes Bonnefoy, David-Maria Sassoli, Claudia Țapardel, Janusz Zemke Michael Cramer, Keith Taylor |
|
1 |
0 |
|
ECR |
Jacqueline Foster |
|
Key to symbols:
+ : in favour
- : against
0 : abstention