Go back to the Europarl portal

Choisissez la langue de votre document :

<Date>{03/03/2020}3.3.2020</Date>
<NoDocSe>A9-0060/2020</NoDocSe>
PDF 194kWORD 76k

<TitreType>REPORT</TitreType>

<Titre>on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Banking Authority for the financial year 2018</Titre>

<DocRef>(2019/2090(DEC))</DocRef>


<Commission>{CONT}Committee on Budgetary Control</Commission>

Rapporteur: <Depute>Ryszard Czarnecki

</Depute>

1. PROPOSAL FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT DECISION
 2. PROPOSAL FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT DECISION
 3. MOTION FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT RESOLUTION
 OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON ECONOMIC AND MONETARY AFFAIRS
 INFORMATION ON ADOPTION IN COMMITTEE RESPONSIBLE
 FINAL VOTE BY ROLL CALL IN COMMITTEE RESPONSIBLE

1. PROPOSAL FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT DECISION

on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Banking Authority for the financial year 2018

(2019/2090(DEC))

The European Parliament,

 having regard to the final annual accounts of the European Banking Authority for the financial year 2018,

 having regard to the Court of Auditors’ annual report on EU agencies for the financial year 2018, together with the agencies’ replies[1],

 having regard to the statement of assurance[2] as to the reliability of the accounts and the legality and regularity of the underlying transactions provided by the Court of Auditors for the financial year 2018, pursuant to Article 287 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

 having regard to the Council’s recommendation of 18 February 2020 on discharge to be given to the Authority in respect of the implementation of the budget for the financial year 2018 (05761/2020 – C9‑0057/2020),

 having regard to Article 319 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

 having regard to Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union and repealing Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002[3], and in particular Article 208 thereof,

 having regard to Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 July 2018 on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union, amending Regulations (EU) No 1296/2013, (EU) No 1301/2013, (EU) No 1303/2013, (EU) No 1304/2013, (EU) No 1309/2013, (EU) No 1316/2013, (EU) No 223/2014, (EU) No 283/2014, and Decision No 541/2014/EU and repealing Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012[4], and in particular Article 70 thereof,

 having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 November 2010 establishing a European Supervisory Authority (European Banking Authority), amending Decision No 716/2009/EC and repealing Commission Decision 2009/78/EC[5], and in particular Article 64 thereof,

 having regard to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 1271/2013 of 30 September 2013 on the framework financial regulation for the bodies referred to in Article 208 of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council[6], and in particular Article 108 thereof,

 having regard to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/715 of 18 December 2018 on the framework financial regulation for the bodies set up under the TFEU and Euratom Treaty and referred to in Article 70 of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 of the European Parliament and of the Council[7], and in particular Article 105 thereof,

 having regard to Rule 100 of and Annex V to its Rules of Procedure,

 having regard to the opinion of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs,

 having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control (A9-0060/2020),

1. Grants the Executive Director of the European Banking Authority discharge in respect of the implementation of the Authority’s budget for the financial year 2018;

2. Sets out its observations in the resolution below;

3. Instructs its President to forward this decision, and the resolution forming an integral part of it, to the Executive Director of the European Banking Authority, the Council, the Commission and the Court of Auditors, and to arrange for their publication in the Official Journal of the European Union (L series).

 


 

2. PROPOSAL FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT DECISION

on the closure of the accounts of the European Banking Authority for the financial year 2018

(2019/2090(DEC))

The European Parliament,

 having regard to the final annual accounts of the European Banking Authority for the financial year 2018,

 having regard to the Court of Auditors’ annual report on EU agencies for the financial year 2018, together with the agencies’ replies[8],

 having regard to the statement of assurance[9] as to the reliability of the accounts and the legality and regularity of the underlying transactions provided by the Court of Auditors for the financial year 2018, pursuant to Article 287 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

 having regard to the Council’s recommendation of 18 February 2020 on discharge to be given to the Authority in respect of the implementation of the budget for the financial year 2018 (05761/2020 – C9‑0057/2020),

 having regard to Article 319 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

 having regard to Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union and repealing Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002[10], and in particular Article 208 thereof,

 having regard to Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 July 2018 on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union, amending Regulations (EU) No 1296/2013, (EU) No 1301/2013, (EU) No 1303/2013, (EU) No 1304/2013, (EU) No 1309/2013, (EU) No 1316/2013, (EU) No 223/2014, (EU) No 283/2014, and Decision No 541/2014/EU and repealing Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012[11], and in particular Article 70 thereof,

 having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 November 2010 establishing a European Supervisory Authority (European Banking Authority), amending Decision No 716/2009/EC and repealing Commission Decision 2009/78/EC[12], and in particular Article 64 thereof,

 having regard to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 1271/2013 of 30 September 2013 on the framework financial regulation for the bodies referred to in Article 208 of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council[13], and in particular Article 108 thereof,

 having regard to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/715 of 18 December 2018 on the framework financial regulation for the bodies set up under the TFEU and Euratom Treaty and referred to in Article 70 of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 of the European Parliament and of the Council[14], and in particular Article 105 thereof,

 having regard to Rule 100 of and Annex V to its Rules of Procedure,

 having regard to the opinion of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs,

 having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control (A9-0060/2020),

1. Approves the closure of the accounts of the European Banking Authority for the financial year 2018;

2. Instructs its President to forward this decision to the Executive Director of the European Banking Authority, the Council, the Commission and the Court of Auditors, and to arrange for its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union (L series).

 


 

3. MOTION FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT RESOLUTION

with observations forming an integral part of the decision on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Banking Authority for the financial year 2018

(2019/2090(DEC))

The European Parliament,

 having regard to its decision on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Banking Authority for the financial year 2018,

 having regard to its resolution of 16 January 2020 on institutions and bodies of the Economic and Monetary Union: preventing post-public employment conflicts of interest[15],

 having regard to Rule 100 of and Annex V to its Rules of Procedure,

 having regard to the opinion of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs,

 having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control (A9-0060/2020),

A. whereas, according to its statement of revenue and expenditure[16], the final budget of the European Banking Authority (the ‘Authority’) for the financial year 2018 was EUR 42 584 409, representing an increase of 10,84 % compared to 2017; whereas the increase was related to the relocation process of the Authority to Paris; whereas the Authority is financed by a contribution from the Union (EUR 16 142 578, representing 37,91 %), and contributions from national supervisory authorities of the Member States and observers (EUR 26 441 831, representing 62,09 %)[17];

B. whereas the Court of Auditors (the ‘Court’), in its report on the annual accounts of the European Banking Authority for the financial year 2018 (the ‘Court’s report’), states that it has obtained reasonable assurances that the Authority’s annual accounts are reliable and that the underlying transactions are legal and regular;

Budget and financial management

1. Notes with satisfaction that the budget monitoring efforts during the financial year 2018 resulted in a budget implementation rate of 99,85 %, representing an increase of 3,94 % compared to 2017; notes that the rate of execution of payment appropriations was 88,23 %, representing a slight increase of 0,96 % compared to the previous year;

Performance

2. Notes that the Authority uses fourteen key performance indicators to assess, to the extent that results are within the control of the Authority, the results of its activities, and to improve its budget management;

3. Notes with satisfaction that the Authority delivered the bulk of its regulatory products in line with its work programme and achieved all the targets stated in the applications of the Authority’s service level agreements;

4. Welcomes the fact that the Authority shares practices, initiatives and templates with the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) and the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority, with which the Authority holds regular meetings; strongly encourages the Authority to actively seek further and broader cooperation with all Union agencies;

5. Recalls the Authority’s new role, tasks and resources in the fight against money laundering and terrorist financing; believes that the effective performance of that role and those tasks depends on the support of the Board of Supervisors; regrets in that context the rejection of a proposal to investigate the Danske Bank money-laundering case;

6. Recalls that the Authority has to date not opened an inquiry into dividend arbitrage trading schemes such as cum-ex or cum-cum as called for by Parliament; encourages the Authority to inquire, together with ESMA, into dividend arbitrage schemes in order to stop ongoing and prevent future practices that threaten the integrity of Union financial markets;

7. Regrets that cooperation between the Authority and ESMA for the preparation of a joint procurement procedure for the renting of office space in Paris was stopped and that the Authority and ESMA carried out separate procurement procedures, not only for office space but also for other related services; calls on the Authority to report to the discharge authority on the reasons behind that missed opportunity for economies of scale and efficiency gains; urges the Authority to consider the idea of joint procurement procedures and the sharing of resources on overlapping tasks among other agencies with similar activities or situated in the proximity of the Authority's headquarters;

8. Calls upon the Authority to improve and intensify its communication with Member States; urges the Authority to improve and intensify its cooperation with Member States and Member States' national banks and commercial banking bodies; stresses the importance of such smooth collaboration to the Authority's goal of creating a single banking rulebook;

9. Emphasises that the Authority’s role in promoting a common supervisory regime across the European financial system is essential in order to ensure financial stability, a better integrated, more efficient and safer financial market, as well as a high degree of consumer protection in the Union by promoting fairness and transparency on the product and financial services market;

10. Recalls the importance of supervising the financial sector, which is a necessary and truly effective instrument in combating tax fraud and money laundering;

11. Notes that the Authority will see its role, powers and resources in the field of anti-money laundering and combating the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT) reinforced in the context of the new legislative proposals on which political agreement was reached in March 2019[18]; stresses that the Authority should take a leading role in the prevention of money laundering, taking advantage of the new competences and the creation of a new internal AML/CFT committee, and should therefore be provided with increased capacity in human and material resources to contribute effectively to the consistent and efficient prevention of the use of the financial system for the purposes of money laundering and the financing of terrorism;

12. Underlines that the Authority, when carrying out its activities, needs to pay particular attention to ensuring compatibility with Union law, to respecting the principle of proportionality and to complying with the fundamental principles of the internal market;

13. Urges the Authority to deliver its proposals for reducing the supervisory reporting burden for small and non-complex institutions within the timeframe set by Parliament and the Council in order to achieve more proportionality[19]; asks the Authority to ensure the consistent use of definitions in all regulatory and non-regulatory documents[20];

14. Notes that the Authority’s workload is constantly evolving and includes both regulatory tasks and the enforcement and application of Union law; notes that in order to facilitate that evolution, budgetary and personnel resources have been reallocated internally; stresses that the Authority must never attempt to go beyond its mandate; points out that focussing on the mandate assigned by Parliament and the Council will lead to a more effective and efficient use of resources;

15. Requests that the Authority conduct an inquiry into dividend arbitrage trading schemes such as cum-ex in order to assess potential threats to the integrity of financial markets and to national budgets, to establish the nature and magnitude of actors in such schemes, to assess whether there were breaches of either Union or national law, to assess the actions taken by financial supervisors in Member States, and to make appropriate recommendations for reform and for action to the competent authorities concerned;

Staff policy

16. Notes that, on 31 December 2018, the establishment plan was 97,93 % executed, with 145 temporary agents authorised under the Union budget (compared with 134 authorised posts in 2017); notes that, in addition, 42 contract agents and 16 seconded national experts worked for the Authority in 2018;

17. Notes that the Authority publishes vacancy notices on its website and on the website of the European Personnel Selection Office and through other related channels in order to increase publicity;

18. Notes with concern that in 2018, according to the Court’s report, the Authority, in addition to its own staff, used 42 interim workers of which 27 were for IT-related functions, with only 13 of the Authority’s own staff working in IT, causing a critical dependency on the interim agency in an area that is key for the Authority’s operations; urges the Authority to address that considerable risk to business continuity with Parliament and the Council when discussing allocation of staff for the Authority;

19. Notes with concern that an uneven gender balance is reported for 2018 with regard to the senior managers (5 men and 1 woman) and that there is no female member of the management board (5 men).

Procurement

20. Notes that the Authority has participated in several inter-institutional procurement procedures with Commission DGs and with other agencies;

21. Welcomes that, according to the Court’s report, the Authority made significant efforts in the preparation of tender documents and in tender evaluation methodology; notes, however, that there is still scope to apply more meaningful award criteria and that for the procurement procedure for the Authority’s future premises, tenderers received extra evaluation points if they declared that they could also offer space sufficient to host ESMA in the same building and that the winning tenderer had received those points, but finally did not take part in the procurement procedure for ESMA’s premises;

Prevention and management of conflicts of interests and transparency

22. Acknowledges the measures the Authority already has in place and its ongoing efforts to secure transparency, to prevent and manage conflicts of interests, and to protect whistleblowers; notes that further steps are needed in order to prevent and manage conflicts of interest, and to enhance the transparency of the Authority’s activities by reporting on the meetings that the Authority’s staff have with external stakeholders and making such reports available on the Authority’s website;

23. Recalls that in its Resolution of 16 January 2020, on Institutions and bodies in the Economic and Monetary Union: Preventing post-public employment conflicts of interest, Parliament noted its concern about the conflict of interest that has arisen as a consequence of the appointment of the Authority’s executive director as chief executive of the Association for Financial Markets in Europe (AFME) from 1 February 2020, which was insufficiently addressed by the restrictions imposed by the Board of Supervisors; expresses its concern that the Authority’s Board of Supervisors have also nominated a candidate for the position of executive director who was formerly employed as managing director for advocacy at the AFME; underlines that post-public employment and ‘revolving door’ conflict-of-interest situations are a problem common to many bodies and agencies across the Union which affect their reputations; encourages the Authority to enhance its policy regarding conflict of interest;

24. Notes that following the development of the Authority’s anti-fraud strategy for the period 2015–2017, the anti-fraud team has continued to coordinate and implement that strategy;

Internal controls

25. Notes that, according to the Court’s report, one of the main obligations resulting from Directive 2008/104/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council[21] and UK labour law is that interim workers work under the same working conditions as workers employed directly by the user undertaking; notes, however, that the contracts did not require the temporary work agencies to explicitly respect those conditions and that there is no evidence that the Authority itself carried out any comparison between the working conditions of its own staff and of interim staff, which caused litigation and reputational risks; calls on the Authority to analyse the working conditions of its interim workers and to ensure they are in line with Union and national labour law;

26. Notes that, following the Commission’s Internal Audit Service audit report in 2018 on The Single Rulebook - Questions & Answers in the European Banking Authority, the Authority prepared an action plan to address some potential areas for improvement; calls on the Authority to report to the discharge authority on the developments in that regard;

Other Comments

27. Notes that due to the United Kingdom`s decision to withdraw from the Union, the seat of the Authority has gradually been moved to Paris, France as of March 2019; notes that the Authority’s accounts include provisions for related costs amounting to EUR 4,7 million and disclose that EUR 10,4 million remains in  future contractual payments for the offices in London;

28. Underlines the responsibility of the financial system to meet sustainability challenges and ensure that the Union meets the obligations undertaken in the framework of the Paris Agreement under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change; highlights the crucial role of the Authority in integrating environmental, social and governance related factors into the regulatory and supervisory framework and in mobilising and guiding private capital flows towards sustainable investments; therefore stresses the need for sufficient resources to monitor the implementation of that framework by financial institutions and national competent authorities;

29. Is of the opinion that the Court should carry out an audit on the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of the Authority's relocation once all the costs of the move are clear, in order to identify best practices and address areas for improvement;

30. Calls upon the Authority to focus on disseminating the results of its research to the public, and to reach out to the public via social media and other media outlets;

 

 

o

o  o

31. Refers, for other observations of a cross-cutting nature accompanying its decision on discharge, to its resolution of … March 2020[22] on the performance, financial management and control of the agencies.


 

OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON ECONOMIC AND MONETARY AFFAIRS (27.1.2020)

<CommissionInt>for the Committee on Budgetary Control</CommissionInt>


<Titre>on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Banking Authority for the financial year 2018</Titre>

<DocRef>(2019/2090(DEC))</DocRef>

Rapporteur for opinion: <Depute>Derk Jan Eppink</Depute>

 

SUGGESTIONS

The Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs calls on the Committee on Budgetary Control, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions into its motion for a resolution:

1. Underlines that, in the opinion of the Court of Auditors (the ‘Court’), the transactions of the European Banking Authority (the ‘Authority’) underlying the annual accounts for the year 2018 are legal and regular in all material aspects;

2. Emphasises that the Authority’s role in promoting a common supervisory regime across the European financial system is essential in order to ensure financial stability, a better integrated, more efficient and safer financial market, as well as a high degree of consumer protection in the Union by promoting fairness and transparency on the product and financial services market;

3. Recalls the importance of supervising the financial sector, which is a necessary and truly effective instrument in combating tax fraud and money laundering;

4. Underlines the responsibility of the financial system in meeting sustainability challenges and ensuring that the Union meets its obligations undertaken in the framework of the Paris Agreement under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change; highlights the crucial role of the Authority in integrating environmental, social and governance related factors into the regulatory and supervisory framework and in mobilising and guiding private capital flows towards sustainable investments; therefore stresses the need for sufficient resources to monitor the implementation of that framework by financial institutions and national competent authorities;

5. Notes that the Authority will see its role, powers and resources in the field of anti-money laundering and combating the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT) reinforced in the context of the new legislative proposals on which political agreement was reached in March 2019[23]; stresses that the Authority should take a leading role in the prevention of money laundering, taking advantage of the new competences and the creation of a new internal AML/CFT committee, and should therefore be provided with increased capacity in human and material resources to contribute effectively to the consistent and efficient prevention of the use of the financial system for the purposes of money laundering and the financing of terrorism;

6. Underlines that the Authority, when carrying out its activities, needs to pay particular attention to ensuring compatibility with Union law, to respecting the principle of proportionality and to complying with the fundamental principles of the internal market;

7. Urges the Authority to deliver its proposals for reducing the supervisory reporting burden for small and non-complex institutions within the timeframe set by the European Parliament and the Council in order to achieve more proportionality[24]; asks the Authority to ensure the consistent use of definitions in all regulatory and non-regulatory documents[25];

8. Underlines the importance of an open, efficient and independent administration for all Union agencies and the Union as a whole; recalls the problem of conflict of interest arising from ‘revolving door’ situations and stresses the need for a unified legal framework to address such issues;

9. Notes that the Authority’s workload is constantly evolving and includes both regulatory tasks and the enforcement and application of Union law; notes that in order to facilitate that evolution, budgetary and personnel resources have been reallocated internally; stresses that the Authority must never attempt to go beyond its mandate; points out that focussing on the mandate assigned by the European Parliament and the Council will lead to a more effective and efficient use of resources;

10. Notes that, according to the Court’s annual report on EU agencies for the financial year 2018[26], interim workers should work under the same working conditions as workers employed directly by the user undertaking; notes, however, that it seems likely that the Authority did not carry out any comparison between the working conditions of its own staff and those of interim workers; therefore calls on the Authority to analyse the working conditions of its interim workers and ensure that they are in line with Union and national labour law;

11. Questions whether using temporary workers and external consultancies rather than increasing the number of its own staff constitutes the best use of resources in the long-term, particularly in strategic sectors such as IT, as stated by the Court;

12. Recalls that the Authority has to date not opened an inquiry into dividend arbitrage trading schemes such as cum-ex or cum-cum as called for by the European Parliament[27];

13. Requests that the Authority conduct an inquiry into dividend arbitrage trading schemes such as cum-ex in order to assess potential threats to the integrity of financial markets and to national budgets, to establish the nature and magnitude of actors in such schemes, to assess whether there were breaches of either national or Union law, to assess the actions taken by financial supervisors in Member States, and to make appropriate recommendations for reform and for action to the competent authorities concerned;

14. Regrets that opportunities for economies of scale and efficiency gains were not realised due to the decision not to have joint procurement procedures between the Authority and the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) when the Authority moved its seat from London to Paris; calls on the Authority to strengthen cooperation with ESMA concerning administrative support services and facility management services, which are not related to its core activities, where feasible;

15. Notes that as a result of the completed move of its seat to Paris in 2019, the Authority’s accounts include provisions for related costs amounting to EUR 4,7 million and provisions for remaining future contractual payments for its offices in London amounting to EUR 10,4 million; suggests that an audit be conducted once all the costs and consequences of the move are clear in order to identify best practices and areas for improvement;

16. Recalls the Authority’s new role, tasks and resources in the fight against money laundering and terrorist financing; holds that the effective performance of this role and tasks depends on the support of the Board of Supervisors;

17. Regrets in this context the rejection of a proposal to investigate the Danske Bank money laundering case.


INFORMATION ON ADOPTION IN COMMITTEE ASKED FOR OPINION

Date adopted

23.1.2020

 

 

 

Result of final vote

+:

–:

0:

47

4

0

Members present for the final vote

Marek Belka, Stefan Berger, Gilles Boyer, Engin Eroglu, Markus Ferber, Jonás Fernández, Frances Fitzgerald, José Manuel García-Margallo y Marfil, Luis Garicano, Sven Giegold, Neena Gill, Valentino Grant, José Gusmão, Enikő Győri, Eero Heinäluoma, Danuta Maria Hübner, Stasys Jakeliūnas, Othmar Karas, Billy Kelleher, Georgios Kyrtsos, Philippe Lamberts, Aušra Maldeikienė, Costas Mavrides, Siegfried Mureşan, Luděk Niedermayer, Dimitrios Papadimoulis, Piernicola Pedicini, Lídia Pereira, Sirpa Pietikäinen, Dragoş Pîslaru, Luisa Porritt, Robert Rowland, Alfred Sant, Martin Schirdewan, Joachim Schuster, Molly Scott Cato, Pedro Silva Pereira, Irene Tinagli, Ernest Urtasun, Inese Vaidere, Johan Van Overtveldt, Stéphanie Yon-Courtin

Substitutes present for the final vote

Francesca Donato, Martin Hlaváček, Eugen Jurzyca, Bogdan Rzońca, Julie Ward

Substitutes under Rule 209(7) present for the final vote

César Luena, Cristina Maestre Martín De Almagro, Rob Rooken, Anna Zalewska

 

 


 

FINAL VOTE BY ROLL CALL IN COMMITTEE ASKED FOR OPINION

47

+

ECR

Eugen Jurzyca, Rob Rooken, Bogdan Rzońca, Johan Van Overtveldt, Anna Zalewska

GUE/NGL

José Gusmão, Dimitrios Papadimoulis, Martin Schirdewan

PPE

Stefan Berger, Markus Ferber, Frances Fitzgerald, José Manuel García-Margallo y Marfil, Enikő Győri, Danuta Maria Hübner, Othmar Karas, Georgios Kyrtsos, Aušra Maldeikienė, Siegfried Mureşan, Luděk Niedermayer, Lídia Pereira, Sirpa Pietikäinen, Inese Vaidere

RENEW

Gilles Boyer, Engin Eroglu, Luis Garicano, Martin Hlaváček, Billy Kelleher, Dragoş Pîslaru, Luisa Porritt, Stéphanie Yon-Courtin

S&D

Marek Belka, Jonás Fernández, Neena Gill, Eero Heinäluoma, César Luena, Cristina Maestre Martín De Almagro, Costas Mavrides, Alfred Sant, Joachim Schuster, Pedro Silva Pereira, Irene Tinagli, Julie Ward

VERTS/ALE

Sven Giegold, Stasys Jakeliūnas, Philippe Lamberts, Molly Scott Cato, Ernest Urtasun

 

4

-

ID

Francesca Donato, Valentino Grant

NI

Piernicola Pedicini, Robert Rowland

 

0

0

 

 

 

Key to symbols:

+ : in favour

- : against

0 : abstention

 

 

 


 

INFORMATION ON ADOPTION IN COMMITTEE RESPONSIBLE

Date adopted

19.2.2020

 

 

 

Result of final vote

+:

–:

0:

18

4

0

Members present for the final vote

Olivier Chastel, Caterina Chinnici, Lefteris Christoforou, Ryszard Czarnecki, José Manuel Fernandes, Luke Ming Flanagan, Isabel García Muñoz, Cristian Ghinea, Monika Hohlmeier, Jean-François Jalkh, Joachim Kuhs, Sabrina Pignedoli, Michèle Rivasi, Nico Semsrott, Angelika Winzig, Lara Wolters, Tomáš Zdechovský

Substitutes present for the final vote

Maria Grapini, David Lega, Mikuláš Peksa, Ramona Strugariu

Substitutes under Rule 209(7) present for the final vote

József Szájer

 


 

FINAL VOTE BY ROLL CALL IN COMMITTEE RESPONSIBLE

18

+

ECR

Ryszard Czarnecki

PPE

Lefteris Christoforou, José Manuel Fernandes, Monika Hohlmeier, David Lega, József Szájer, Angelika Winzig, Tomáš Zdechovský

RENEW

Olivier Chastel, Cristian Ghinea, Ramona Strugariu

S&D

Caterina Chinnici, Isabel García Muñoz, Maria Grapini, Lara Wolters

VERTS/ALE

Mikuláš Peksa, Michèle Rivasi, Nico Semsrott

 

4

-

GUE/NGL

Luke Ming Flanagan

ID

Jean-François Jalkh, Joachim Kuhs

NI

Sabrina Pignedoli

 

0

0

 

 

 

 

 

Key to symbols:

+ : in favour

- : against

0 : abstention

 

 

[1] OJ C 417, 11.12.2019, p. 1.

[2] OJ C 417, 11.12.2019, p. 34.

[3] OJ L 298, 26.10.2012, p. 1.

[4] OJ L 193, 30.7.2018, p. 1.

[5] OJ L 331, 15.12.2010, p. 12.

[6] OJ L 328, 7.12.2013, p. 42.

[7] OJ L 122, 10.5.2019, p. 1.

[8] OJ C 417, 11.12.2019, p. 1.

[9] OJ C 417, 11.12.2019, p. 34.

[10] OJ L 298, 26.10.2012, p. 1.

[11] OJ L 193, 30.7.2018, p. 1.

[12] OJ L 331, 15.12.2010, p. 12.

[13] OJ L 328, 7.12.2013, p. 42.

[14] OJ L 122, 10.5.2019, p. 1.

[15] Texts adopted, P9_TA(2020)0017.

[16] OJ C 419, 19.11.2018, p. 3.

[17] OJ C 419, 19.11.2018, p. 2.

[18]  https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/IP_19_1655

[19]  Based on input provided by IHK München and Genossenschaftsverband Bayern.

[20]  Based on input provided by Michael Ikrath, Member of the European Economic and Social Committee.

[21] Directive 2008/104/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2008 on temporary agency work (OJ L 327, 5.12.2008, p. 9).

[22] Texts adopted, P9_TA(2020)0000.

[23]  https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/IP_19_1655

[24]  Based on input provided by IHK München and Genossenschaftsverband Bayern.

[25]  Based on input provided by Michael Ikrath, Member of the European Economic and Social Committee.

[26]  OJ C 417, 11.12.2019, p. 1.

[27]  https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/RC-8-2018-0551_EN.html

Last updated: 18 March 2020Legal notice - Privacy policy