Procedure : 2019/2082(DEC)
Document stages in plenary
Document selected : A9-0062/2020

Texts tabled :

A9-0062/2020

Debates :

Votes :

Texts adopted :

P9_TA(2020)0109

<Date>{03/03/2020}3.3.2020</Date>
<NoDocSe>A9-0062/2020</NoDocSe>
PDF 186kWORD 74k

<TitreType>REPORT</TitreType>

<Titre>on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Training for the financial year 2018</Titre>

<DocRef>(2019/2082(DEC))</DocRef>


<Commission>{CONT}Committee on Budgetary Control</Commission>

Rapporteur: <Depute>Ryszard Czarnecki</Depute>

AMENDMENTS
1. PROPOSAL FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT DECISION
 2. PROPOSAL FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT DECISION
 3. MOTION FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT RESOLUTION
 OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON CIVIL LIBERTIES, JUSTICE AND HOME AFFAIRS
 INFORMATION ON ADOPTION IN COMMITTEE RESPONSIBLE
 FINAL VOTE BY ROLL CALL IN COMMITTEE RESPONSIBLE

1. PROPOSAL FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT DECISION

on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Training for the financial year 2018

(2019/2082(DEC))

The European Parliament,

 having regard to the final annual accounts of the European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Training for the financial year 2018,

 having regard to the Court of Auditors’ annual report on EU agencies for the financial year 2018, together with the agencies’ replies[1],

 having regard to the statement of assurance[2] as to the reliability of the accounts and the legality and regularity of the underlying transactions provided by the Court of Auditors for the financial year 2018, pursuant to Article 287 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

 having regard to the Council’s recommendation of 18 February 2020 on discharge to be given to the Agency in respect of the implementation of the budget for the financial year 2018 (05761/2020 – C9‑0049/2020),

 having regard to Article 319 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

 having regard to Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union and repealing Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002[3], and in particular Article 208 thereof,

 having regard to Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 July 2018 on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union, amending Regulations (EU) No 1296/2013, (EU) No 1301/2013, (EU) No 1303/2013, (EU) No 1304/2013, (EU) No 1309/2013, (EU) No 1316/2013, (EU) No 223/2014, (EU) No 283/2014, and Decision No 541/2014/EU and repealing Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012[4], and in particular Article 70 thereof,

 having regard to Regulation (EU) 2015/2219 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2015 on the European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Training (CEPOL) and replacing and repealing Council Decision 2005/681/JHA[5], and in particular Article 20 thereof,

 having regard to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 1271/2013 of 30 September 2013 on the framework financial regulation for the bodies referred to in Article 208 of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council[6], and in particular Article 108 thereof,

 having regard to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/715 of 18 December 2018 on the framework financial regulation for the bodies set up under the TFEU and Euratom Treaty and referred to in Article 70 of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 of the European Parliament and of the Council[7], and in particular Article 105 thereof,

 having regard to Rule 100 of and Annex V to its Rules of Procedure,

 having regard to the opinion of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs,

 having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control (A9-0062/2020),

1. Grants the Executive Director of the European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Training discharge in respect of the implementation of the Agency's budget for the financial year 2018;

2. Sets out its observations in the resolution below;

3. Instructs its President to forward this decision, and the resolution forming an integral part of it, to the Executive Director of the European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Training, the Council, the Commission and the Court of Auditors, and to arrange for their publication in the Official Journal of the European Union (L series).

 


 

2. PROPOSAL FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT DECISION

on the closure of the accounts of the European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Training for the financial year 2018

(2019/2082(DEC))

The European Parliament,

 having regard to the final annual accounts of the European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Training for the financial year 2018,

 having regard to the Court of Auditors’ annual report on EU agencies for the financial year [2019], together with the agencies’ replies[8],

 having regard to the statement of assurance[9] as to the reliability of the accounts and the legality and regularity of the underlying transactions provided by the Court of Auditors for the financial year 2018, pursuant to Article 287 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

 having regard to the Council’s recommendation of 18 February 2020 on discharge to be given to the Agency in respect of the implementation of the budget for the financial year 2018 (05761/2020 – C9‑0049/2020),

 having regard to Article 319 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

 having regard to Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union and repealing Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002[10], and in particular Article 208 thereof,

 having regard to Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 July 2018 on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union, amending Regulations (EU) No 1296/2013, (EU) No 1301/2013, (EU) No 1303/2013, (EU) No 1304/2013, (EU) No 1309/2013, (EU) No 1316/2013, (EU) No 223/2014, (EU) No 283/2014, and Decision No 541/2014/EU and repealing Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012[11], and in particular Article 70 thereof,

 having regard to Regulation (EU) 2015/2219 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2015 on the European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Training (CEPOL) and replacing and repealing Council Decision 2005/681/JHA[12], and in particular Article 20 thereof,

 having regard to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 1271/2013 of 30 September 2013 on the framework financial regulation for the bodies referred to in Article 208 of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council[13], and in particular Article 108 thereof,

 having regard to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/715 of 18 December 2018 on the framework financial regulation for the bodies set up under the TFEU and Euratom Treaty and referred to in Article 70 of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 of the European Parliament and of the Council[14], and in particular Article 105 thereof,

 having regard to Rule 100 of and Annex V to its Rules of Procedure,

 having regard to the opinion of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs,

 having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control (A9-0062/2020),

1. Approves the closure of the accounts of the European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Training for the financial year 2018;

2. Instructs its President to forward this decision to the Executive Director of the European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Training, the Council, the Commission and the Court of Auditors, and to arrange for its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union (L series).

 


 

3. MOTION FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT RESOLUTION

with observations forming an integral part of the decision on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Training for the financial year 2018

(2019/2082(DEC))

The European Parliament,

 having regard to its decision on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Training for the financial year 2018,

 having regard to Rule 100 of and Annex V to its Rules of Procedure,

 having regard to the opinion of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs,

 having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control (A9-0062/2020),

A. whereas, according to its statement of revenue and expenditure[15], the final budget of the European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Training (‘CEPOL’ or the 'Agency') for the financial year 2018 was EUR 10 416 720 representing a decrease of 1.02 % compared to 2017; whereas the Agency is financed mainly by a contribution from the Union;

B. whereas the Court of Auditors (the 'Court'), in its annual report on the Agency for the financial year 2018 (the 'Court’s report'), has stated that it has obtained reasonable assurances that the Agency’s annual accounts are reliable and that the underlying transactions are legal and regular;

Budget and financial management

1. Notes with satisfaction that the budget monitoring efforts during the financial year 2018 resulted in a budget implementation rate of 97.97 %, representing an increase of 0.88 % compared to 2017; notes that the payment appropriations execution rate was 76.51 %, representing a decrease of 7.51 % compared to the previous year;

Performance

2. Notes that the Agency uses key performance indicators to measure its training activities and their impact, in particular the satisfaction level of the participants, in order to assess the added value provided by those activities, and uses performance indicators to improve its budget management;

3. Notes with satisfaction that the Agency successfully delivered its mandate throughout 2018, and that in some cases it exceeded objectives set in its working programme for 2018;

4. Observes that the Agency started two new Union-funded projects, the EU/MENA Counter-Terrorism Training Partnership 2 and the Financial Investigation in-service training programme in Western Balkans, both of which demonstrate the Agency’s increasing recognition as a key Union actor contributing to European security through external action;

5. Notes that in 2018, the Agency conducted the pilot EU-Strategic Training Needs Assessment (EU-STNA) and that more than 87 % of the Agency’s residential and online training events (residential activities, webinars, online courses) addressed gaps in capability in relation to critical security threats stemming from the European Agenda on Security.

6. Welcomes the fact that the Agency continues to cooperate closely with the Justice and Home Affairs agencies’ network, and the nine agencies which comprise it (including in particular the European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation and the European Border and Coast Guard Agency); notes that those agencies share training and organise courses; strongly encourages the Agency to actively seek further and broader cooperation with all of the Union agencies; urges the Agency to explore the possibilities of sharing of resources on overlapping tasks (such as IT and other services) with agencies in the Agency’s proximity, notably the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights in Vienna and the European Labour Authority in Bratislava;

7. Questions the necessity for an agency dedicated specifically to the purpose of law enforcement training; appeals to the Commission to consider merging the Agency with the European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation (‘Europol’); underlines that fact that the Agency and Europol have a very similar field of operation and that the merger will simplify the funding of the two agencies, as well as clarify the system of Union agencies for the general public; 

8. Calls on the Commission to conduct a feasibility study in order to assess the possibility of (if not fully merging) at the very least setting up shared synergies with the European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation (‘Europol’); calls upon the Commission to evaluate both scenarios, namely the transfer of the Agency to the Europol headquarters in The Hague, and the transfer of the Europol headquarters to the Agency’s headquarters in Budapest; notes that such an act would mean sharing corporate and support services and the management of common premises, as well as shared ICT, telecommunications and internet-based infrastructures, thereby saving huge amounts of money which would be used to fund both agencies further;

9. Observes that, following the five year periodical external evaluation which was concluded in January 2016, and for which the Agency had to implement corrective actions by the end of 2018, the evaluation report was adopted by the Agency and incorporated 17 recommendations covering five areas relating to the Agency’s structure and working practices; notes that since the adoption of the action plan, 24 activities have been completed, 3 activities relating to further development of E-net are still ongoing, 4 activities are no longer considered relevant and 1 activity has been put on hold;

10. Encourages the Agency to pursue the digitalisation of its services;

11. Welcomes the fact that the Court has declared the transactions underlying the annual accounts of CEPOL for the financial year 2018 to be legal and regular in all material respects and that its financial position on 31 December 2018 is fairly represented; recalls that the budget of the Agency increased from EUR 9 to 10 million (+11 %) while its staff decreased from 53 to 51 (-4 %) compared to 2017; deplores however the fact that CEPOL had to refuse numerous valid and legitimate training requests from Member States in crucial areas of law enforcement because of budgetary restraints; is concerned that CEPOL currently cannot sufficiently cover the demand from Member States regarding education and training for law enforcement communities in the Union and its neighbourhood;

Staff policy

12. Notes that, on 31 December 2018, the establishment plan was 100 % executed, with 32 temporary agents appointed out of 32 authorised under the Union budget (compared to 31 authorised posts in 2017); notes that in addition, 18 contract agents and 4 seconded national experts worked for the Agency in 2018;

13. Observes that, as a consequence of its relocation from the United Kingdom to Hungary and the lower correction coefficient applied to staff salaries as a result, the staff turnover has been high and geographical balance has not always been maintained as applications from Member States other than the host country have decreased; notes that in 2018, the Agency continued to receive a significant number of applications from Hungarian citizens and host Member State nationals continued to be overrepresented in the total number of staff; observes that the legal dispute regarding the relocation was closed by the Court during 2018, and the initial judgment was confirmed; highlights that a low correction coefficient applied to staff salaries may create difficult situations which may hamper an agency's ability to effectively perform its daily duties; stresses that agencies located in countries where a low correction coefficient is applied should receive further support from the Commission for implementing complementary measures in order to make them more attractive to current and prospective staff; calls on the Commission to assess the impact and viability of applying salary correction coefficients in the future;

14. Recalls the suggestion of the Court that vacancy notices be published on the website of the European Personnel Selection Office in order to increase publicity; understands the Agency’s reply concerning the high translation costs triggered by such publication; furthermore acknowledges that the Agency in 2018 also published all vacancies on the interagency job board developed by the EU Agencies Network; reiterates however, that (to avoid incurring high translation costs) the Agency should take a first step in this direction and make use of the capability to publish titles of such vacancies in all the official languages of the Union with a link to the full text in the English language only;

15. Notes with satisfaction that an even gender balance was achieved in 2018 with respect to senior management positions (3 men and 3 women), but is concerned that at management board level there is an imbalance in the participation of men (17 members) and women (9 members);

Procurement

16. Recalls, from the Court´s report, that by the end of 2017 the Agency had not yet introduced all the tools launched by the Commission which aimed to introduce a single solution for the electronic exchange of information with third parties participating in public procurement procedures (e-procurement); notes that, according to the Agency’s reply, it has introduced e-invoicing and e-tendering, and it intends to adopt e-submission; calls on the Agency to report to the discharge authority on the progress made in this regard by June 2020;

17. Notes with concern that the Agency awarded a framework contract for travel arrangements for its own staff and for participants in training, without requesting an explanation from the winning tenderer for its potentially abnormally low tender; notes that according to the Agency’s reply, the evaluation committee did not proceed in seeking clarifications because, in the course of their daily work, they were already aware of the prices charged by the company holding the previous contract; acknowledges that the Agency accepts the Court’s observation that this assessment was not formalised in the evaluation report; calls on the Agency to request and analyse the reasons behind potentially abnormally low tenders, and to ensure that all assessments are adequately formalised in future evaluation reports;

Prevention and management of conflicts of interest and transparency

18. Appreciates the existing measures taken by the Agency, and its ongoing efforts in relation to securing transparency, in relation to prevention and management of conflicts of interests, and in relation to whistle-blower protection; expresses satisfaction that the Agency has set up and implemented internal rules on whistleblowing and that it has published CVs and declarations of interest for members of the management board and of the executive director;

Other comments

19. Welcomes the fact that, in February 2017, the Agency successfully concluded ISO 9001:2015 certification of the Agency’s management system in order to improve and better demonstrate its commitment to quality; observes that, based on the positive results of surveillance audits implemented in 2018 as well as in the beginning of 2019, the Agency has maintained its certification;

20. Notes with concern that, unlike most of the other agencies, the Agency did not carry out a comprehensive analysis of the likely impact of the United Kingdom’s decision to withdraw from the European Union on its organisation, operations and accounts; notes that according to the Agency’s reply, the United Kingdom’s decision to withdraw from the European Union has been discussed in management meetings, in discussions in the inter-agency network for procurement officers and in the inter-agency legal network, and also that the communications received from the Commission have been followed closely, and that the corresponding risks have been evaluated as limited;

21. Notes the Agency’s efforts to ensure a cost-effective and environment-friendly work-place; regrets that the Agency does not have a carbon off-setting scheme in place but acknowledges on the basis of the Agency’s reply that the cost of participating in such a scheme cannot be covered from its limited financial resources; and acknowledges that the Agency encourages its staff to make use of public transportation to reduce emissions;

22. Calls upon the Agency to direct its focus at disseminating the results of its research to the general public, and to reach out to public via social media and other media outlets;

o

o  o

23. Refers, for other observations of a cross-cutting nature accompanying its decision on discharge, to its resolution of … March 2020[16] on the performance, financial management and control of the agencies.


 

 

 

OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON CIVIL LIBERTIES, JUSTICE AND HOME AFFAIRS (21.1.2020)

<CommissionInt>for the Committee on Budgetary Control</CommissionInt>


<Titre>on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Training (CEPOL) for the financial year 2018</Titre>

<DocRef>(2019/2082(DEC))</DocRef>

Rapporteur for opinion: <Depute>Roberta Metsola</Depute>

 

SUGGESTIONS

The Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs calls on the Committee on Budgetary Control, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions into its motion for a resolution:

1. Reiterates the role of the European Union Agency of Law Enforcement Training (‘CEPOL’ or ‘the Agency’) in providing national law enforcement experts with information on the latest developments in the field of law enforcement, and in facilitating the sharing of best practices;

2. Welcomes the fact that the Court of Auditors ('the Court') has declared the transactions underlying the annual accounts of CEPOL for the financial year 2018 to be legal and regular in all material respects and that its financial position on 31 December 2018 is fairly represented; recalls that the budget of the Agency increased from EUR 9 to 10 million (+11 %) while its staff decreased from 53 to 51 (-4 %) compared to 2017; deplores however the fact that CEPOL had to refuse numerous valid and legitimate training requests of Member States in crucial areas of law enforcement because of budgetary restraints; is concerned that CEPOL currently cannot sufficiently cover the demand from Member States regarding education and training for law enforcement communities in the Union and its neighbourhood;

3. Notes that CEPOL launched a call in December 2017 for tender for a framework contract for travel services with an estimated market volume of EUR 8.5 million over a period of 4 years; notes that, despite the awarding of the contract to the cheapest tenderer whose offer amounted to 56 % of the average of its two competitors, the payments incurred in 2018 (EUR 2.06 million) almost reached the estimated market volume of EUR 2.13 million; shares the view of the Court that in cases where offers from tenderers seem to be abnormally low, the Agency should analyse the underlying reasons to ensure its estimation of the market volume is correct, and that the contract is awarded to the tenderer offering the best price-quality ratio; 

4.  Notes with concern that CEPOL continues to experience a high staff turnover and a limited number of applications from other Member States; reiterates its worries that this might impact on the operations of the Agency; notes in this regard that the Staff Regulations offer the necessary flexibility for labour market conditions prevailing in the Union to be taken into account when recruiting officials in order to address the specific needs of the institutions; calls on CEPOL to take measures to improve the situation;

5. Expresses its satisfaction that CEPOL has implemented two out of the six outstanding recommendations of the Court, namely those concerning the revalidation of the accounting system and the comprehensive Brexit impact analysis;

6. Regrets that corrective actions regarding two outstanding recommendations of the Court, i.e. the high staff turnover and the publication of vacancy notices on the European Personnel Selection Office website, are still ongoing, and therefore calls on the Agency to take the necessary steps to finalise these corrective actions in a timely manner and to follow up without delay on the outstanding recommendation regarding e-procurement, namely the introduction of e-submission;

7. Stresses the importance of providing gender-based data in order to be able to analyse the evolution of gender balance within the Agency's staff and governing bodies.


INFORMATION ON ADOPTION IN COMMITTEE ASKED FOR OPINION

Date adopted

13.1.2020

 

 

 

Result of final vote

+:

–:

0:

48

5

0

Members present for the final vote

Konstantinos Arvanitis, Malik Azmani, Pietro Bartolo, Nicolas Bay, Vladimír Bilčík, Vasile Blaga, Saskia Bricmont, Damien Carême, Caterina Chinnici, Tudor Ciuhodaru, Clare Daly, Lena Düpont, Cornelia Ernst, Sylvie Guillaume, Evin Incir, Sophia in ‘t Veld, Patryk Jaki, Assita Kanko, Fabienne Keller, Alice Kuhnke, Jeroen Lenaers, Juan Fernando López Aguilar, Roberta Metsola, Javier Moreno Sánchez, Maite Pagazaurtundúa, Kostas Papadakis, Nicola Procaccini, Emil Radev, Paulo Rangel, Terry Reintke, Michal Šimečka, Birgit Sippel, Sylwia Spurek, Tineke Strik, Tom Vandendriessche, Bettina Vollath, Ann Widdecombe, Elena Yoncheva, Javier Zarzalejos

Substitutes present for the final vote

Damian Boeselager, Patrick Breyer, Delara Burkhardt, Lucia Ďuriš Nicholsonová, Beata Kempa, Ondřej Kovařík, Kris Peeters, Robert Roos, Miguel Urbán Crespo, Loránt Vincze, Petar Vitanov, Maria Walsh, Tomáš Zdechovský

Substitutes under Rule 209(7) present for the final vote

Lukas Mandl

 


 

FINAL VOTE BY ROLL CALL IN COMMITTEE ASKED FOR OPINION

48

+

ECR

Lucia Ďuriš Nicholsonová, Patryk Jaki, Assita Kanko, Beata Kempa, Nicola Procaccini

GUE/NGL

Konstantinos Arvanitis, Clare Daly, Cornelia Ernst, Miguel Urbán Crespo

PPE

Vladimír Bilčík, Vasile Blaga, Lena Düpont, Jeroen Lenaers, Lukas Mandl, Roberta Metsola, Kris Peeters, Emil Radev, Paulo Rangel, Loránt Vincze, Maria Walsh, Javier Zarzalejos, Tomáš Zdechovský

RENEW

Malik Azmani, Sophia in 't Veld, Fabienne Keller, Ondřej Kovařík, Maite Pagazaurtundúa, Michal Šimečka

S&D

Pietro Bartolo, Delara Burkhardt, Caterina Chinnici, Tudor Ciuhodaru, Sylvie Guillaume, Evin Incir, Juan Fernando López Aguilar, Javier Moreno Sánchez, Birgit Sippel, Sylwia Spurek, Petar Vitanov, Bettina Vollath, Elena Yoncheva

VERTS/ALE

Damian Boeselager, Patrick Breyer, Saskia Bricmont, Damien Carême, Alice Kuhnke, Terry Reintke, Tineke Strik

 

5

-

ECR

Robert Roos

ID

Nicolas Bay, Tom Vandendriessche

NI

Kostas Papadakis, Ann Widdecombe

 

0

0

 

 

 

Key to symbols:

+ : in favour

- : against

0 : abstention

 

 


 

INFORMATION ON ADOPTION IN COMMITTEE RESPONSIBLE

Date adopted

19.2.2020

 

 

 

Result of final vote

+:

–:

0:

21

2

0

Members present for the final vote

Matteo Adinolfi, Olivier Chastel, Caterina Chinnici, Lefteris Christoforou, Ryszard Czarnecki, José Manuel Fernandes, Luke Ming Flanagan, Isabel García Muñoz, Cristian Ghinea, Monika Hohlmeier, Jean-François Jalkh, Joachim Kuhs, Sabrina Pignedoli, Michèle Rivasi, Nico Semsrott, Angelika Winzig, Lara Wolters, Tomáš Zdechovský

Substitutes present for the final vote

Maria Grapini, David Lega, Mikuláš Peksa, Ramona Strugariu

Substitutes under Rule 209(7) present for the final vote

József Szájer

 


 

FINAL VOTE BY ROLL CALL IN COMMITTEE RESPONSIBLE

21

+

ECR

Ryszard Czarnecki

GUE/NGL

Luke Ming Flanagan

ID

Jean-François Jalkh

NI

Sabrina Pignedoli

PPE

Lefteris Christoforou, José Manuel Fernandes, Monika Hohlmeier, David Lega, József Szájer, Angelika Winzig, Tomáš Zdechovský

RENEW

Olivier Chastel, Cristian Ghinea, Ramona Strugariu

S&D

Caterina Chinnici, Isabel García Muñoz, Maria Grapini, Lara Wolters

VERTS/ALE

Mikuláš Peksa, Michèle Rivasi, Nico Semsrott

 

2

-

ID

Matteo Adinolfi, Joachim Kuhs

 

0

0

 

 

 

 

 

Key to symbols:

+ : in favour

- : against

0 : abstention

 

 

[1] OJ C 417, 11.12.2019, p. 1.

[2] OJ C 417, 11.12.2019, p. 109.

[3] OJ L 298, 26.10.2012, p. 1.

[4] OJ L 193, 30.7.2018, p. 1.

[5] OJ L 319, 4.12.2015, p. 1.

[6] OJ L 328, 7.12.2013, p. 42.

[7] OJ L 122, 10.5.2019, p. 1.

[8] OJ C 417, 11.12.2019, p. 1.

[9] OJ C 417, 11.12.2019, p. 109.

[10] OJ L 298, 26.10.2012, p. 1.

[11] OJ L 193, 30.7.2018, p. 1.

[12] OJ L 319, 4.12.2015, p. 1.

[13] OJ L 328, 7.12.2013, p. 42.

[14] OJ L 122, 10.5.2019, p. 1.

[15] OJ C 7, 9.1.2019, p. 1

[16] Texts adopted, P9_TA(2020)0000.

Last updated: 18 March 2020Legal notice - Privacy policy