Návrh uznesenia - B6-0574/2006Návrh uznesenia
Tento dokument nie je k dispozícii vo vašom jazyku. Je k dispozícii v inom jazyku spomedzi jazykov uvedených v menu jazyka.



to wind up the debate on statements by the Council and Commission
pursuant to Rule 103(2) of the Rules of Procedure
by Jules Maaten, Danutė Budreikaitė and Fiona Hall
on behalf of the ALDE Group
on the export of toxic waste to Africa

Postup : 2006/2642(RSP)
Postup v rámci schôdze
Postup dokumentu :  
Predkladané texty :
Prijaté texty :


European Parliament resolution on the export of toxic waste to Africa

The European Parliament,

–  having regard to Rule 103(2) of its Rules of Procedure,

A.  whereas around 500 tonnes of chemical waste have been dumped in several areas in the neighbourhood of Abidjan, where 5 million people live,

B.  whereas eight people have died so far and many thousands have been taken to hospital for treatment for nosebleeds, diarrhoea, nausea, eye irritation and breathing difficulties; whereas the consequences of this dumping of toxic waste may be far-reaching, including soil contamination and surface and groundwater pollution,

C.  whereas the toxic waste was dumped by a Greek-owned, Panamanian-flagged tanker leased by Trafigura, a Netherlands-based company; whereas such sharing of responsibilities creates a systematic and unacceptable problem with regard to the enforcement of EC legislation,

D.  whereas environmental regulations in the North have made the disposal of hazardous waste expensive,

E.  whereas the Amsterdam port authorities found out about the hazardous nature of the waste when unloading the ship, but then pumped it back on board; whereas the Netherlands authorities allowed the ship to leave their territory despite knowing of the nature of the waste and about the captain's unwillingness to pay for environmentally sound disposal in the Netherlands,

F.  whereas the company had the opportunity to dispose of the waste in a legal and safe manner in Europe, but chose a cheaper alternative in Côte d'Ivoire,

G.  whereas Africa is a dumping ground for all kinds of hazardous waste; whereas Greenpeace has identified 80 sites where hazardous waste from developed countries has been dumped: old computers in Nigeria, radioactive tanks in Somalia, dumping of chlorine in Cameroon, etc.,

H.  whereas most African countries do not have strong regulations to protect the environment and the livelihood of their populations against hazardous waste,

I.  whereas the export of hazardous waste from the EU to non-OECD countries has been prohibited since January 1997, pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 259/1993,

J.  whereas the dumping of hazardous waste in Côte d'Ivoire is just the tip of the iceberg of ongoing shipments of hazardous waste from the EU to non-OECD countries; whereas major amounts of electrical and electronic waste are being dumped in non-OECD countries under the pretext of 'reuse'; whereas a significant number of old EU vessels laden with toxic substances and materials are being scrapped in Asia under conditions that are extremely harmful to workers and the environment,   

1.  Calls on the Commission, the Netherlands and Côte d'Ivoire to fully investigate this case, to establish responsibilities at all levels, to bring to justice those responsible for this environmental crime, and to ensure that the environmental contamination is comprehensively dealt with and the victims are compensated;

2.  Calls on the Commission and the Member States to take all necessary measures to ensure full enforcement of the existing waste shipment regulation;

3.  Calls on the Commission to put forward legislative proposals to close the loopholes in the current regime and so end the shipments to non-OECD countries of waste electrical and electronic equipment and obsolete vessels;

4.  Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council and Commission, the Member States, the Secretary-General of the United Nations and the Government of Côte d'Ivoire.