Index 
 Previous 
 Next 
 Full text 
Procedure : 2007/2503(RSP)
Document stages in plenary
Document selected : B6-0042/2007

Texts tabled :

B6-0042/2007

Debates :

Votes :

PV 14/02/2007 - 5.8
CRE 14/02/2007 - 5.8
Explanations of votes

Texts adopted :

P6_TA(2007)0039

Verbatim report of proceedings
Wednesday, 14 February 2007 - Strasbourg OJ edition

5.8. PNR-SWIFT (vote)
Minutes
  

- Before the vote on paragraph 13

 
  
MPphoto
 
 

  Hubert Pirker (PPE-DE).(DE) Mr President, ladies and gentlemen, what matters here is the added value that we want the exchange of data to bring about for the citizens of the European Union, which means to say that we should insist, when the US authorities discover a terrorist suspect, on that information being forwarded to their counterparts in the EU, in the shape of Europol and Eurojust. I therefore want to put an oral amendment, in the interests of security, as follows:

‘Expects that the US authorities, in the case of acknowledged terrorist threat, are obliged to immediately inform the EU authorities about this suspicion;’

(DE) I hope that you are all able to agree to this amendment in the interests of Europe’s citizens.

 
  
  

(The oral amendment was accepted)

- Before the vote on paragraph 17

 
  
MPphoto
 
 

  Piia-Noora Kauppi (PPE-DE). – Mr President, this is an oral amendment to the last indent of Amendment 4, by the PSE Group. I shall read the oral amendment, which is slightly different to our voting list text.

The indent should read as follows: ‘as policymaker, to ensure, in cooperation with central banks and financial institutions, that European payment systems, including the updated system for wholesale payments “TARGET2” and the planned system for target securities if it becomes a reality, are fully compliant with European data protection law; calls for the ECB to provide the European Parliament with the assessment of such compliance;’

 
  
  

(The oral amendment was accepted)

- After the vote:

In view of the time, the President consulted Parliament on the issue of whether or not it intended to proceed with the vote. Parliament decided by electronic vote to proceed with the vote.

 
  
MPphoto
 
 

  Димитър Стоянов (ITS). – Господин Председател, на последното гласуване аз се въздържах дали да продължим, защото нямам нищо против да си загубя обедната почивката, за да гласувам. Но не мисля, че начинът, по който се гласува, е най-подходящият. Аз просто не мога да насмогна на бързината, на която вие гласувате. Това парламент ли е, европейски и демократичен, или е комунистически, в който всички вдигат ръка и всичко се приема набързо- набързо?

 
  
MPphoto
 
 

  President. – I would point out, ladies and gentlemen, that you are the ones who set the agenda; therefore, I just carry out your orders.

- Before the vote on paragraph 47

 
Legal notice - Privacy policy