Index 
 Previous 
 Next 
 Full text 
Procedure : 2007/2076(INI)
Document stages in plenary
Document selected : A6-0516/2007

Texts tabled :

A6-0516/2007

Debates :

PV 16/01/2008 - 15
CRE 16/01/2008 - 15

Votes :

PV 17/01/2008 - 6.3
CRE 17/01/2008 - 6.3
Explanations of votes
Explanations of votes

Texts adopted :

P6_TA(2008)0016

Verbatim report of proceedings
Thursday, 17 January 2008 - Strasbourg OJ edition

6.3. (A6-0516/2007, Lydie Polfer) A more effective EU policy for the South Caucasus (vote)
Minutes
  

– Before the vote on Amendment 3:

 
  
MPphoto
 
 

  Lydie Polfer, rapporteur. − (FR) Mr President, I just wanted to ask Mr Tannock if the addition he is proposing is in fact an addition, or whether his aim is to remove the section on violence and ill-treatment in police custody and penitentiary institutions. If his amendment is to be an addition, I can of course support it. If, however, he wishes part of the existing text to be deleted, I can only recommend that we vote against it.

 
  
MPphoto
 
 

  Charles Tannock (PPE-DE). – (FR) It is an addition. Thank you.

 
  
  

– Before the vote on Amendment 7:

 
  
MPphoto
 
 

  Lydie Polfer, rapporteur. − (FR) Mr President, in paragraph 32 we repeat the two conditions, i.e. territorial integrity and self-determination, even though they are already mentioned in paragraph 30. However, the author of the amendment has added ‘self-determination of the people who live there’. I strongly recommend that we delete the words ‘of the people who live there’ because that would exclude the refugees and persons displaced in their own country. Therefore, if the author of the amendment agrees to delete those few words, I will be able to support the amendment; otherwise, I recommend that we reject it.

 
  
MPphoto
 
 

  Charles Tannock (PPE-DE). – Mr President, I have agreed to that change to the oral amendment.

 
  
  

(Parliament agreed to accept the oral amendment)

– Before the vote on Amendment 8/rev:

 
  
MPphoto
 
 

  Charles Tannock (PPE-DE). – Mr President, as we agreed at the beginning of the session, it will be an addition now. In the actual text it says to replace the words ‘in the Baku-Tbilisi-Erzurum gas pipeline’ with the words ‘in the trans-Caspian energy corridor projects’. But by negotiation at the beginning of the voting session, I have already agreed this should be an addition rather than a replacement, so can we include the words ‘in the trans-Caspian energy corridor projects’.

 
  
  

(Parliament agreed to accept the oral amendment)

 
Legal notice - Privacy policy