Index 
 Previous 
 Next 
 Full text 
Procedure : 2010/2998(RSP)
Document stages in plenary
Document selected : B7-0225/2011

Texts tabled :

B7-0225/2011

Debates :

PV 06/04/2011 - 16
CRE 06/04/2011 - 16

Votes :

PV 07/04/2011 - 6.6
CRE 07/04/2011 - 6.6
Explanations of votes
Explanations of votes

Texts adopted :

P7_TA(2011)0151

Verbatim report of proceedings
Thursday, 7 April 2011 - Strasbourg OJ edition

6.6. 2010 progress report on the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (B7-0225/2011) (vote)
Minutes
  

Before the vote:

 
  
MPphoto
 

  Nikolaos Salavrakos (EFD).(EL) Madam President, I wish to submit a motion in accordance with Rule 177 to adjourn the debate, because Mr Zoran Thaler, who acted as the rapporteur for this report, is no longer with us, following the serious allegations made in the Sunday Times. In my view, he enjoys a presumption of innocence; however, in light of the accusations against him, the present report on FYROM does not enjoy a presumption of credibility. At best, this report will harbour a seed of doubt. I therefore move that the debate be adjourned, that a new rapporteur be appointed, and that it be re-tabled in three months’ time, in order to maintain Parliament’s integrity.

 
  
MPphoto
 

  President. – We indeed have a new rapporteur who has taken over the report. Mr Vigenin, if you care to take the floor, I will allow you to do so briefly.

 
  
MPphoto
 

  Kristian Vigenin (S&D). – Madam President, we should not enter into this propaganda exercise. This report has been discussed.

(Applause)

There was broad agreement between all political groups on this report. It was adopted by the Committee on Foreign Affairs by an overwhelming majority. We had a good debate yesterday, and I would ask you to continue with the vote now.

 
  
 

(The request to postpone the vote was rejected)

Before the vote on Amendment 1:

 
  
MPphoto
 

  Eduard Kukan (PPE). – Madam President, I want to propose that the final vote on this resolution be a roll-call vote.

 
  
MPphoto
 

  President. – Let us wait until we get to the final vote and we will see if the House wishes to do that.

 
  
 

Before the final vote:

 
  
MPphoto
 

  Gerard Batten (EFD). – Madam President, it says that roll calls may be taken with 24 hours notice. If there is another rule which supersedes this and says a roll call can be decided by Parliament, would you please tell us what the number is. Otherwise, we could all request roll calls when we felt like it.

 
  
MPphoto
 

  President. – I have the power as your presiding Vice-President today to decide whether we take a roll-call vote or not. It is Rule 20 that gives me the power, but I am going to ask the House nevertheless. Let us have a show of hands. Do you wish to vote by roll-call? It is clear that the House wishes to vote by roll-call in accordance with my wish also, so I open the vote on the final motion for a resolution.

(Parliament agreed to the request for a roll-call vote)

 
Legal notice - Privacy policy