Index 
 Previous 
 Next 
 Full text 
Procedure : 2011/0139(NLE)
Document stages in plenary
Document selected : A7-0394/2011

Texts tabled :

A7-0394/2011

Debates :

PV 12/12/2011 - 13
CRE 12/12/2011 - 13

Votes :

PV 14/12/2011 - 7.4
CRE 14/12/2011 - 7.4
Explanations of votes
Explanations of votes

Texts adopted :

P7_TA(2011)0569

Debates
Wednesday, 14 December 2011 - Strasbourg OJ edition

7.4. EU-Morocco Fisheries Partnership Agreement (A7-0394/2011 - Carl Haglund) (vote)
PV
 

- Before the vote:

 
  
MPphoto
 

  Carl Haglund, rapporteur. – Mr President, because of this somewhat unusual voting procedure concerning consent reports, I have been urged to clarify the voting procedure. It is as follows.

Voting in favour of the report means giving consent to the extension of the protocol, while voting against means not giving consent. This is because no amendments could be tabled. In other words, following the Committee on Budgets or the Committee on Development would mean voting against, while the Committee on Fisheries overturned a recommendation and wanted to be in favour. I hope this has clarified it for everyone.

 
Legal notice - Privacy policy