Index 
 Previous 
 Next 
 Full text 
Procedure : 2012/2016(BUD)
Document stages in plenary
Document selected : A7-0215/2012

Texts tabled :

A7-0215/2012

Debates :

PV 03/07/2012 - 11
CRE 03/07/2012 - 11

Votes :

PV 04/07/2012 - 7.12
CRE 04/07/2012 - 7.12
Explanations of votes
Explanations of votes

Texts adopted :

P7_TA(2012)0289

Verbatim report of proceedings
Wednesday, 4 July 2012 - Strasbourg OJ edition

7.12. 2013 budget - mandate for trilogue (A7-0215/2012 - Giovanni La Via) (vote)
Minutes
 

– Before the vote:

 
  
MPphoto
 

  Bernd Posselt (PPE).(DE) Mr President, I have just one question for our Legal Service. I would ask the Legal Service to get someone to check whether it is possible to table an amendment that is meaningless, because Amendment 20 calls for Parliament to have a single seat. Please read the Treaty: there has been a single seat for a long time, and that seat is Strasbourg. We can concentrate the work here without the Council – that has been in the Treaty for a long time. On that basis, the amendment is unlawful.

 
  
MPphoto
 

  President. – Mr Posselt, the services have examined this amendment and the result is reflected in the order of voting that we are going to follow.

– Before the vote on paragraph 88:

 
  
MPphoto
 

  Giovanni La Via, rapporteur. Mr President, I want to add an oral amendment to paragraph 88. The text of the oral amendment is: ‘a sufficient level of payments to allow for the 2012 June European Council commitment to mobilise EU budget funds for fast-acting growth measures to be implemented without any delay and within the current MFF’.

 
  
 

(Parliament accepted the oral amendment)

 
Legal notice - Privacy policy