Index 
 Précédent 
 Suivant 
 Texte intégral 
Procédure : 2016/0052(NLE)
Cycle de vie en séance
Cycle relatif au document : A8-0072/2017

Textes déposés :

A8-0072/2017

Débats :

PV 17/05/2017 - 22
CRE 17/05/2017 - 22

Votes :

PV 18/05/2017 - 11.4
Explications de votes

Textes adoptés :

P8_TA(2017)0221

Compte rendu in extenso des débats
Jeudi 18 mai 2017 - Strasbourg Edition révisée

12.1. Accord entre l’Union européenne, l’Islande, la Principauté de Liechtenstein et le Royaume de Norvège concernant un mécanisme financier de l’EEE pour la période 2014-2021 (A8-0072/2017 - David Borrelli)
Vidéo des interventions
 

Mündliche Erklärungen zur Abstimmung

 
  
MPphoto
 

  Daniel Hannan (ECR). – Madam President, I wonder what the case is for these countries to be making payments to less developed parts of the EU. I do not think we can make a moral case for it: there are many more deserving parts of our planet than EU Member States. If you have extra money to give away you should surely be giving it to the places where it will be most put to use. It is bizarre that we are giving more to wealthy European farmers than to poor African farmers.

Perhaps the case is supposed to be economic, but if it is then I submit it is not working terribly well. If grants from the EU raised a country’s economic standard, then Greece would be the wealthiest country in Europe, having been the biggest per capita recipient of funds since 1981. There would be arguments in this House about whether the Greeks should continue to bail out the Germans.

In fact, the best way for us to raise the standards of living of any country is simply to allow them to engage in global markets, and that means looking beyond Europe and raising our eyes to more distant horizons.

 
Avis juridique - Politique de confidentialité