Indekss 
 Iepriekšējais 
 Nākošais 
 Pilns teksts 
Procedūra : 2016/2302(INI)
Dokumenta lietošanas cikls sēdē
Dokumenta lietošanas cikls : A8-0139/2017

Iesniegtie teksti :

A8-0139/2017

Debates :

PV 18/05/2017 - 8
CRE 18/05/2017 - 8

Balsojumi :

PV 18/05/2017 - 11.5
Balsojumu skaidrojumi

Pieņemtie teksti :

P8_TA(2017)0222

Debašu stenogramma
Ceturtdiena, 2017. gada 18. maijs - Strasbūra

12.2. Eiropas reģioniem piemērotākā finansējumu kombinācija: finanšu instrumentu un dotāciju līdzsvarošana ES kohēzijas politikā (A8-0139/2017 - Andrey Novakov)
Visu runu video
 

Mündliche Erklärungen zur Abstimmung

 
  
MPphoto
 

  Andrejs Mamikins (S&D). – Madam President, EU cohesion policy mainly consist of a mix of grants and financial instruments. Some Latvian officials support the replacement of grants with loans in the future. The arguments are that it is more difficult to receive grants than loans, because you have to persuade the bank to give you the loan to realise the project for this money, check the proper realisation of the project and only after that do you receive the grant.

This algorithm makes it difficult for businesses. Sometimes projects do not, at the beginning, have a profitable future but receiving the grant is a final aim of the project. On the other side, grants have a lot of positive features, each of these instruments have their strengths and weaknesses, both grants and financial instruments have their specific roles in cohesion policy. Financial instruments perform better in well-developed regions and metropolitan areas while grants address regional structural issues in outermost regions and regions with a high unemployment rate. I voted in favour.

 
Juridisks paziņojums - Privātuma politika