Index 
 Vorige 
 Volgende 
 Volledige tekst 
Procedure : 2016/2302(INI)
Stadium plenaire behandeling
Documentencyclus : A8-0139/2017

Ingediende teksten :

A8-0139/2017

Debatten :

PV 18/05/2017 - 8
CRE 18/05/2017 - 8

Stemmingen :

PV 18/05/2017 - 11.5
Stemverklaringen

Aangenomen teksten :

P8_TA(2017)0222

Debatten
Donderdag 18 mei 2017 - Straatsburg Herziene uitgave

12.2. Een goede financieringsmix voor de regio's van Europa: op zoek naar een evenwichtige verdeling van financieringsinstrumenten en subsidies in het cohesiebeleid van de EU (A8-0139/2017 - Andrey Novakov)
Video van de redevoeringen
 

Mündliche Erklärungen zur Abstimmung

 
  
MPphoto
 

  Andrejs Mamikins (S&D). – Madam President, EU cohesion policy mainly consist of a mix of grants and financial instruments. Some Latvian officials support the replacement of grants with loans in the future. The arguments are that it is more difficult to receive grants than loans, because you have to persuade the bank to give you the loan to realise the project for this money, check the proper realisation of the project and only after that do you receive the grant.

This algorithm makes it difficult for businesses. Sometimes projects do not, at the beginning, have a profitable future but receiving the grant is a final aim of the project. On the other side, grants have a lot of positive features, each of these instruments have their strengths and weaknesses, both grants and financial instruments have their specific roles in cohesion policy. Financial instruments perform better in well-developed regions and metropolitan areas while grants address regional structural issues in outermost regions and regions with a high unemployment rate. I voted in favour.

 
Juridische mededeling - Privacybeleid