Index 
 Înapoi 
 Înainte 
 Text integral 
Procedură : 2016/2302(INI)
Stadiile documentului în şedinţă
Stadii ale documentului : A8-0139/2017

Texte depuse :

A8-0139/2017

Dezbateri :

PV 18/05/2017 - 8
CRE 18/05/2017 - 8

Voturi :

PV 18/05/2017 - 11.5
Explicaţii privind voturile

Texte adoptate :

P8_TA(2017)0222

Dezbateri
Joi, 18 mai 2017 - Strasbourg Ediţie revizuită

12.2. Combinarea corectă a surselor de finanțare pentru regiunile Europei: echilibrarea instrumentelor financiare și a granturilor în politica de coeziune a UE (A8-0139/2017 - Andrey Novakov)
Înregistrare video a intervenţiilor
 

Mündliche Erklärungen zur Abstimmung

 
  
MPphoto
 

  Andrejs Mamikins (S&D). – Madam President, EU cohesion policy mainly consist of a mix of grants and financial instruments. Some Latvian officials support the replacement of grants with loans in the future. The arguments are that it is more difficult to receive grants than loans, because you have to persuade the bank to give you the loan to realise the project for this money, check the proper realisation of the project and only after that do you receive the grant.

This algorithm makes it difficult for businesses. Sometimes projects do not, at the beginning, have a profitable future but receiving the grant is a final aim of the project. On the other side, grants have a lot of positive features, each of these instruments have their strengths and weaknesses, both grants and financial instruments have their specific roles in cohesion policy. Financial instruments perform better in well-developed regions and metropolitan areas while grants address regional structural issues in outermost regions and regions with a high unemployment rate. I voted in favour.

 
Aviz juridic - Politica de confidențialitate