Stenograma dezbaterilor

Luni, 14 februarie 2022 - Strasbourg

17. Banca Centrală Europeană - raportul anual pe 2021 (dezbatere)

  President. – The next item is the debate on the report by Dimitrios Papadimoulis, on behalf the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs, on the European Central Bank – annual report 2021 (2021/2063(INI)) (A9—0351/2021).

I would like to remind Members that for all the debates of this part-session there will be no catch—the—eye procedure, no blue cards will be accepted and, furthermore, as during recent part-sessions, remote interventions from Parliament’s liaison offices in the Member States are foreseen.

I would also like to remind colleagues that interventions in the Chamber will be made from the central rostrum and I therefore kindly invite you to keep an eye on the speakers’ list and to approach the rostrum when your speaking time is imminent.

  Δημήτριος Παπαδημούλης, Εισηγητής. – Κυρία Πρόεδρε, κυρία Lagarde, κύριε Επίτροπε Gentiloni, κυρίες και κύριοι συνάδελφοι, θεωρώ ότι είναι ιδιαίτερα σημαντική η στιγμή που συζητούμε αυτή την έκθεση, γιατί η διαμόρφωσή της συμπίπτει με τρεις σημαντικές παραμέτρους. Η πρώτη είναι η θετική πολιτική της Ευρωπαϊκής Κεντρικής Τράπεζας για την αντιμετώπιση της κρίσης της πανδημίας. Το δεύτερο γεγονός είναι η επανεξέταση της στρατηγικής της Ευρωπαϊκής Κεντρικής Τράπεζας μετά από 18 ολόκληρα χρόνια. Και το τρίτο είναι αυτό που μόλις σημειώσαμε: η επέτειος 20 χρόνων από τη δημιουργία του ευρώ.

Η έκθεση καταγράφει ότι οι αποφάσεις νομισματικής πολιτικής της Ευρωπαϊκής Κεντρικής Τράπεζας για την αντιμετώπιση της πανδημίας ήταν ένα θετικό, σημαντικό βήμα, το οποίο προκάλεσε έναν θετικό αντίκτυπο στη ζώνη του ευρώ. Η εισαγωγή του PEPP, η αύξηση του όγκου των αγορών, η αυξημένη ευελιξία στην αγορά των ομολόγων και η χαλάρωση των κριτηρίων επιλεξιμότητας, η πολιτική των βασικών επιτοκίων συνέβαλαν στην οικονομική ανάκαμψη, στη βελτίωση των συνθηκών χρηματοδότησης, παρότι αυτή η ανάκαμψη ήταν άνιση και σε ορισμένες περιπτώσεις, μεγάλωσε τις κοινωνικές και τις περιφερειακές ανισότητες. Για αυτό, στην έκθεσή μας υποστηρίζουμε πως η υποστηρικτική πολιτική της ΕΚΤ πρέπει να παραμείνει για όσο διάστημα χρειάζεται για την ενίσχυση της ανάκαμψης και την ενθάρρυνση των δημόσιων και ιδιωτικών επενδύσεων. Θα ήθελα, στο σημείο αυτό, να ευχαριστήσω τους σκιώδεις εισηγητές, τους συνεργάτες μας, τη γραμματεία της επιτροπής ECON για τη συνεργασία τους στη διάρκεια αυτών των επίπονων διαπραγματεύσεων και να σημειώσω με ικανοποίηση ότι η έκθεση που συζητούμε σήμερα υπερψηφίστηκε στην επιτροπή ECON με τη μεγαλύτερη πλειοψηφία των τελευταίων ετών: 49 ψήφοι υπέρ, 8 κατά και μία αποχή. Θα ήθελα, επίσης, να εκφράσω την αισιοδοξία μου ότι και η ολομέλεια θα στηρίξει με την ίδια ευρύτητα και πλειοψηφία το κείμενο της έκθεσης όπως ψηφίστηκε και στην επιτροπή.

Στον χρόνο που μου απομένει θα ήθελα να σημειώσω ορισμένα πράγματα. Θα ήθελα να υπογραμμίσω και ένα θέμα που αφορά την πατρίδα μου την Ελλάδα, κυρία Lagarde. Η συμπερίληψη των ελληνικών ομολόγων στο πρόγραμμα PEPP αποτέλεσε και αποτελεί ένα σημαντικό θετικό βήμα. Παραμένει, ωστόσο, ανοικτό το ζήτημα ότι τα ελληνικά ομόλογα εξακολουθούν να μην είναι επιλέξιμα στο πλαίσιο του προγράμματος αγοράς στοιχείων ενεργητικού του δημόσιου τομέα, παρά τη σημαντική πρόοδο που έχει επιτευχθεί. Με την έκθεσή μας ζητούμε, με ευρύτατη πλειοψηφία, από την ΕΚΤ να επανεξετάσει, όσο διαρκεί ο σχετικός ορίζοντας των σχετικών ευέλικτων επανεπενδύσεων, αυτά που πρέπει να γίνουν και να παράσχει ειδικές συστάσεις, έτσι ώστε τα ελληνικά ομόλογα να παραμείνουν επιλέξιμα και η ανάκαμψη στην πατρίδα μου την Ελλάδα να μην κινδυνεύσει από έναν νέο γύρο λιτότητας και μια νέα κρίση χρέους.

Τελειώνοντας, νομίζω ότι είναι πολύ σημαντικό να συνεχιστούν χωρίς υποχωρήσεις τα θετικά βήματα και στη δράση της ΕΚΤ στην καταπολέμηση της κλιματικής κρίσης, καθώς, επίσης, και να απαγκιστρωθούμε από δογματικές προσεγγίσεις στον τρόπο προσέγγισης της αρχής ουδετερότητας της αγοράς. Ήδη, η ΕΚΤ έχει παρεκκλίνει σε αρκετές περιπτώσεις, προκειμένου να πετύχει τους στόχους της, από αυτή την αρχή. Πρέπει να συνεχίσουμε με πραγματισμό και με ρεαλισμό. Τέλος, νομίζω ότι είναι σημαντικό να διευκολυνθεί η πρόσβαση των μικρών και μεσαίων επιχειρήσεων στη χρηματοδότηση που πάσχει σε πολλές χώρες, να ολοκληρωθεί επιτέλους, κύριε Gentiloni, κυρία Lagarde και κύριοι του Συμβουλίου που απουσιάζετε, το ευρωπαϊκό σύστημα ασφάλισης καταθέσεων, γιατί χωρίς τον τρίτο πυλώνα δεν υπάρχει τραπεζική ένωση, και να κάνετε περισσότερα βήματα στον τομέα της διαφάνειας, της επικοινωνίας με τους πολίτες και στην ισότητα των φύλων μέσα στην Ευρωπαϊκή Κεντρική Τράπεζα.

  Christine Lagarde, Présidente de la Banque centrale européenne. – Madame la Présidente du Parlement européen, Monsieur le Commissaire à l’économie, Monsieur le rapporteur Papadimoulis, honorables membres du Parlement européen, à nouveau je suis très heureuse de me trouver ici, à Strasbourg, devant vous, pour discuter le rapport annuel de la Banque centrale européenne pour l’année 2020.

Let me continue in English. Today’s debate is an important pillar in the ECB’s accountability relationship with this Parliament. It is crucial for the ECB to explain its actions to the public and to you, as their elected representatives. But as I have said before, we need to be equally focused on listening, and it is in this spirit that I have read your report and that I look forward to hearing your views during today’s debate.

What I will do in these preliminary remarks in front of you is, first of all, outline our view of the current economic situation in the euro area and explain our monetary policy stance. I had the opportunity to discuss these issues last week in the context of the regular dialogue with the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs, well known as ECON, chaired by Ms Tinagli. I will then briefly discuss how the ECB’s new strategy addresses some of the key points identified in your report and ensures that our monetary policy strategy is fit for purpose both for today and in the future.

So let me turn to the economic outlook and our ECB monetary policy. Recent data confirms that quarterly growth slowed to 0.3% in the final quarter of 2021, which still allowed gross domestic product to recover to its pre-pandemic level. The moderation in growth momentum has resulted mainly from the rapid spread of the Omicron variant. The associated containment measures have dampened activity, particularly in consumer services such as travel, tourism, hospitality and entertainment. The current pandemic wave and associated restrictions are likely to continue to have a negative impact on growth at the start of this year, 2022.

Two other factors, namely supply bottlenecks and high energy costs, are also expected to dampen economic activity in the near term. However, the economic impact of the current pandemic wave appears to be less damaging to activity than previous ones. Moreover, the aforementioned bottlenecks will still persist for some time, but there are signs that they may be starting to ease a bit. This will allow the economy to pick up strongly again later this year.

Inflation has risen sharply in recent months, and it further surprised on the upside in January, with the rate increasing to 5.1% from 5% in December. Inflation is likely to remain high in the near term. Energy prices, as you also highlight in your report, continue to be the main reason for the elevated rate of inflation. Their direct impact accounted for over half of headline inflation in January, and energy costs are also pushing up prices across many sectors. Food prices have also increased owing to seasonal factors, elevated transportation costs and the higher price of fertilisers. In addition, price rises have become more widespread with the prices of a large number of goods and services having increased markedly.

Financing conditions for the economy have remained favourable. While market interest rates have increased since December, bank funding costs have so far remained contained. Bank lending rates to firms and to households continue to stand at historically low levels.

Turning now to the risk assessment, we continue to see the risks to the economic outlook as broadly balanced over the medium term. Uncertainties related to the pandemic have abated somewhat. At the same time, geopolitical tensions have increased and persistently high costs of energy could exert a stronger than expected drag on consumption and on investment. The pace at which bottlenecks are resolved is also a further risk to the outlook for growth and inflation. Compared with our projections in December, risks to the inflation outlook are tilted to the upside – particularly in the near term.

If price pressures feed through into higher—than—anticipated wage rises or if the economy returns more quickly to full capacity, inflation could turn out to be higher.

In a few weeks, the March ECB staff projections will provide an updated assessment, taking the most recent data into account. This will help the Governing Council better appraise the implications of the surprisingly high December and January inflation figures for the medium—term outlook. In particular, we will carefully examine how higher energy prices will transmit through the economy and affect the outlook overall.

Two channels could be at play, pulling inflation dynamics in different directions. On the one hand, rising energy costs can drive up prices directly by increasing the cost of production, as well as indirectly by having second—round effects on wages.

On the other hand, they can have a negative impact on the incomes of households and the earnings of companies, thereby reducing economic activity and dampening the inflation outlook.

In the past, the euro area has been vulnerable to the second channel as surges in energy prices weakened the spending power of households and reduced inflation over the medium term.

Obviously, in our assessment of the inflation outlook, we have to bear in mind that demand conditions in the euro area do not show the same signs of overheating that can be observed in other major economies. This increases the likelihood that the current price pressures will subside before becoming entrenched, enabling us to deliver on our 2% target over the medium term. Indeed, while moving up over recent months, indicators of longer—term inflation expectations are consistent with these expectations.

Survey—based measures point to inflation returning to 2% by 2023 and remaining close to this level thereafter. Market—based indicators have stabilised around levels somewhat below 2%. The solid anchoring of long—term inflation expectations in the euro area, which you also acknowledge in your report, is a reassuring development coming after a long period when they were overdue.

To sum up, the euro area economy has continued to recover, although growth is expected to remain subdued in the first quarter of 2022. While the outlook for inflation is uncertain, it is likely to remain elevated for longer than previously expected, but to decline in the course of this year.

At the Governing Council meeting earlier this month, we confirmed the decisions we took in December. Accordingly, we will continue reducing the pace of our asset purchases step—by—step over the coming quarters and we will end net purchases under the Pandemic Emergency Purchase Programme at the end of March.

In view of the current uncertainty, we need more than ever to maintain flexibility and optionality in the conduct of monetary policy. Our monetary policy is always data dependent, and this is all the more important in the situation that we are facing at the moment. We will remain attentive to the incoming data and carefully assess the implications for the medium—term inflation outlook.

Those implications are key parameters in our forward guidance. Our forward guidance has several dimensions. There is a defined sequencing between the end of our net asset purchases and the lift—off date. A rate hike will not occur before our net asset purchases finish. Moreover, there are three conditions that will have to be met before the Governing Council feels sufficiently confident that a tilt in our policy rate is appropriate. All three conditions are meant as safeguards against the premature increase in interest rates. Finally, any adjustment to our policy will be gradual.

Let me now turn to the topic of how we are making our monetary policy strategy fit for today, but also for new challenges. Last year, the ECB and the euro system at large concluded their first strategy review in almost two decades. I would like to reiterate my gratitude to the ECON Committee and all its members for their valuable input. I’m very pleased to read in your report that you welcome the outcome.

Our new strategy would ensure that we have a strong foundation to guide us in the conduct of monetary policy in the years to come. We are now working hard to put it into practice. I could discuss many areas in that strategy review, but I’m going to focus on only three that you highlighted in your report in which the review is having an impact on our daily work.

The first area is how we take our monetary policy decisions. In your report, you highlight the importance of ensuring the necessity, suitability and proportionality of all our monetary policy measures. Indeed, before taking any decision, the Governing Council conducts a careful evaluation of the effectiveness, the efficiency and the proportionality of its actions, including the potential side effects, based on an integrated assessment of all relevant factors.

This assessment builds on a revised analytical framework, which brings together the economic analysis and the monetary and financial analysis as well. Our new strategy recognises financial stability as a precondition for price stability and vice versa. In line with this, we undertook our first in—depth assessment of the inter—relationship between monetary policy and financial stability at our last meeting in December. We will continue to do so twice a year going forward.

The second area that I would like to point to, which you also mentioned in the report, is the impact of climate change. I’m pleased that your report welcomes our action plan on how to incorporate climate change considerations in our monetary policy framework. I’m equally pleased to tell you that the implementation of the Climate Change Action Plan is on track. The milestones for 2022 include a detailed plan for disclosure requirements in the collateral framework and asset purchases, a pilot stress test on the euro system balance sheet and proposals to adopt the framework of our corporate bond purchase programmes.

We are also working, together with other central banks across the euro area, on new exploratory climate related statistical indicators, and we are adapting our macroeconomic models.

Integrating climate—related indicators and risks is not a distraction. It is essential to better understanding how climate change is affecting the economy, is affecting the inflation outlook, is affecting monetary policy transmission and is affecting financial stability.

So the third and last area that I would like to touch on is how we communicate and engage with the people we serve and whom you represent. Good communication is crucial for our policy, for our credibility and for the trust people have in us. But communicating well to different audiences is challenging, in particular in the euro area. I welcome that the report encourages us to make further progress on this front. Our aim is to ensure that markets, elected representatives like yourselves and the wider public better understand how we reach our decisions, the reasons behind these decisions and how they affect people’s daily lives. In other words, we need to be clear about what we call the three ‘A’s.

First: Aim. We must be clear about our aim. Our new symmetric inflation target of 2% over the medium—term is simple, clear and easy to convey to the wider public. Second: Assessment. We must be clear about our assessment. We need to clearly explain how we process incoming economic and financial data, what we judge to be short term movements and what we consider influential factors relevant for our medium—term horizon. Third: Actions. We must also be clear about actions taken. Our audience should be able to understand what we are trying to achieve with our measures, as well as why they are effective, efficient and proportionate to our aim.

Clearly communicating these three ‘A’s to different audiences often means being more simple and more straightforward – but being more simple doesn’t mean that we should be simplistic. It means being more inclusive when we talk. Following on from our strategy review, we are using clearer, more narrative—driven language, together with visuals that people can relate to.

Finally, in our communication, we need to be open about what we can and what we cannot do as a central bank. For example, our monetary policy cannot fill a pipeline with gas, cannot clear backlogs at ports and cannot train more lorry drivers.

So let me conclude here. We’re very well aware that many people across the euro area are concerned about the rising cost of living at the moment – as you also highlight in your report – and the burden is primarily borne, we know, by those with lower incomes who must face the day—to—day hardship of having to cope with higher prices.

We remain committed to delivering on our price stability mandate, as we have done over the past 20 years. Our target is an inflation rate of 2% over the medium term. To achieve this, we will take the right actions, at the right time.

But it is also a task to openly engage with people’s concerns with regard to monetary policy. As I said when I first spoke to you here two years ago, the ongoing dialogue between the ECB and the European Parliament is the key channel for this. Independence and accountability are two sides of the same coin for the ECB. One will not exist without the other.

With that in mind, I look forward to our exchange this afternoon and to the final resolution on the ECB’s annual report.

  Paolo Gentiloni, Member of the Commission. – Madam President, President Lagarde, honourable Members, it’s very important to discuss today the European Central Bank’s annual report, on the basis of your report. So I would like, first of all, to thank the rapporteur, Dimitrios Papadimoulis, and the members of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs (ECON Committee) for their valuable assessment and reflections.

The Commission widely agrees with the general thrust of the committee’s report. As you know, the EU economy lost momentum in late 2021 following a strong rebound in the previous two quarters. This slowdown can be attributed to the Omicron variant and to the continued global supply-side disruptions.

Furthermore, a recent increase in energy prices and inflationary pressures could weigh on economic activity. So the risks for growth in our forecast are balanced and the risk for inflation is tilted to the upside. But the fact that we have this high inflation doesn’t mean that we currently see compelling evidence suggesting that high inflation could become entrenched. So, in our winter forecast, inflation is expected to reach 3.5% in 2022 before easing in 2023 and we share the ECB’s clear assessment of the current situation.

We also agree with the ECON Committee’s report that the ECB’s policy response to the COVID-19 crisis was effective. Furthermore, let me say that fiscal and monetary policies have acted as strategic complements in their autonomy, of course, in stabilising economic activity against the adverse effects of the pandemic.

As regards fiscal policy for next year, the Commission will provide Member States with guidance in the coming weeks to facilitate the coordination. Furthermore, the Commission will share orientation on possible changes to the economic governance framework with the objective of achieving a broad-based consensus, well in time for 2023 – the year when the general escape clause is expected to be ‘untriggered’, so to say.

The ECON Committee’s report further discusses the international role of the euro, digital payments, euro counterfeiting – topics we consider very important. The Commission and the ECB aim to ensure a strong European digital finance sector and a well-integrated payment sector. In this context, both institutions are jointly examining the possibility of a digital euro. The essential elements of the digital euro need to be set out in a legislative proposal, on which the colleges later will have the last word.

Our goal is to table legislation in early 2023, preceded by a consultation. The euro in the digital era would be a way to also deliver on the international role of the euro agenda. Thank you, and I welcome the debate today and the discussion we will have on this occasion.

VORSITZ: EVELYN REGNER
Vizepräsidentin

(Die Aussprache wird unterbrochen)