Indeks 
 Prethodno 
 Sljedeće 
 Cjeloviti tekst 
Postupak : 2021/2064(INI)
Faze dokumenta na plenarnoj sjednici
Odabrani dokument : A9-0252/2022

Podneseni tekstovi :

A9-0252/2022

Rasprave :

PV 22/11/2022 - 24
CRE 22/11/2022 - 24

Glasovanja :

PV 23/11/2022 - 4.6
Objašnjenja glasovanja

Doneseni tekstovi :

P9_TA(2022)0407

Doslovno izvješće
XML 8k
Srijeda, 23. studenog 2022. - Strasbourg Revidirano izdanje

18.4. Stanje u Libiji (A9-0252/2022 - Giuliano Pisapia)
Videozapis govora
  

Mündliche Stimmerklärungen

 
  
MPphoto
 

  Clare Daly (The Left). – Mr President, I voted against this report. Its timing is pretty appropriate coming, as it does, a few short weeks after the 11th anniversary of the day Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi was killed during the NATO assault on Libya: sodomised with a bayonet and shot in the head. The NATO intervention in Libya, carried out in the name of protecting freedom, democracy and human rights, is one we’d do well to remember as NATO plays out its proxy war in Ukraine in the name of, you’ve guessed it, freedom, democracy and human rights.

Because what happens after NATO intervenes in your country on this basis? Terror, death, lawlessness, rape, poverty, starvation. Libya is a country riven by conflict, its economy shattered, its population – formerly the wealthiest in Africa – ridden and mired in poverty. Migrants are bought and sold in slave markets. A million people rely on humanitarian aid. It’s a country of mass graves, of crimes against humanity. This is NATO’s legacy. This is NATO’s right strategy and democracy.

 
  
MPphoto
 

  Mick Wallace (The Left). – Mr President, the report claims the EU is redoubling its diplomatic efforts to promote peace in Libya. France spearheaded the illegal and unprovoked NATO war of aggression on Libya because it saw Gaddafi as a threat to its interests in the region – in particular, France’s precious colonial cash-cow, the CFA franc.

In the process of this war, massive quantities of weapons were pumped into the region by NATO and Gulf states. Today, multiple militias fight each other with these weapons and continue to receive military supplies from European states, Gulf states, Turkey and Russia.

Why do these reports always fail to acknowledge our role in the destabilisation we claim to be so worried about? Two years ago, Italy was engaged in a proxy war against France and Russia for control of resources in Libya. How can we square that with the notion that we want to promote peace in Libya? How in God’s name can we have any credibility?

 
Posljednje ažuriranje: 1. srpnja 2024.Pravna obavijest - Politika zaštite privatnosti