Rodyklė 
 Ankstesnis 
 Kitas 
 Visas tekstas 
Procedūra : 2023/2501(RSP)
Procedūros eiga plenarinėje sesijoje
Dokumento priėmimo eiga : B9-0234/2023

Pateikti tekstai :

B9-0234/2023

Debatai :

Balsavimas :

Balsavimo rezultatų paaiškinimas

Priimti tekstai :

P9_TA(2023)0204

Posėdžio stenograma
XML 8k
Ketvirtadienis, 2023 m. gegužės 11 d. - Strasbūras Atnaujinta informacija

12.3. ES ir JAV duomenų privatumo sistemos teikiamos apsaugos tinkamumas (B9-0234/2023)
Kalbų vaizdo įrašas
 

Oral explanations of vote

 
  
MPphoto
 

  Mick Wallace (The Left). – Madam President, the resolution is rightfully critical of the Data Privacy Framework. It rightly concludes that, as happened with the Schrems I and II cases, the Framework would not survive the criminal justice of the EU. The problem, of course, for the CJEU in the Schrems case, as revealed by Edward Snowden, was the mass surveillance of non—US citizens by the US intelligence services.

However, given Parliament’s very obvious awareness of this mass surveillance of EU citizens by the US, as evidenced in the resolution, one has to wonder why the recent clamour to restrict the use of TikTok on corporate devices in the Parliament wasn’t also accompanied by a call to do the same for US social media platforms and why such mass media hysteria in relation to TikTok and complete silence on the biggest players in the game?

We have zero evidence of Chinese surveillance of EU citizens via TikTok – though I’m sure they’re surveilling their own. Banning TikTok is a geopolitical decision, pandering to the US empire and rooted in anti—China racism.

 
Atnaujinta: 2023 m. rugsėjo 19 d.Teisinė informacija - Privatumo politika