Parliamentary question - E-003781/2025Parliamentary question
E-003781/2025

Very serious doubts about the Commission’s commitment to safeguard clauses in the EU-Mercosur Agreement

Question for written answer  E-003781/2025
to the Commission
Rule 144
Mathilde Androuët (PfE)

On 3 September 2025, the Commission referred in relation to Mercosur to ‘a legal act that operationalises the bilateral safeguards chapter’[1]. The plan is for that act to bolster ‘safeguards protecting sensitive European products’[2].

In December 2024, the Veblen Institute took the view that ‘the clauses added at the EU’s request’ were ‘in no way sufficient’ with regard to health and the environment, and that ‘some of the new provisions’ could make it ‘exceedingly difficult to adopt and effectively implement mirror measures’[3].

A recent French edition of Contexte quotes a new memo from the Veblen Institute which stresses that the Commission’s commitment to safeguard clauses is simply a ‘unilateral political declaration ... which has no binding legal on Mercosur countries’, and it makes no mention of ‘the importance of meeting European health or environmental standards for agricultural production, although that is brandished as France’s main red line’[4].

Can the Commission rebut in detail the Veblen Institute’s analysis?

Submitted: 29.9.2025

Last updated: 9 October 2025
Legal notice - Privacy policy