Retour au portail Europarl

Choisissez la langue de votre document :

  • bg - български
  • es - español
  • cs - čeština
  • da - dansk
  • de - Deutsch
  • et - eesti keel
  • el - ελληνικά
  • en - English (sélectionné)
  • fr - français
  • ga - Gaeilge
  • hr - hrvatski
  • it - italiano
  • lv - latviešu valoda
  • lt - lietuvių kalba
  • hu - magyar
  • mt - Malti
  • nl - Nederlands
  • pl - polski
  • pt - português
  • ro - română
  • sk - slovenčina
  • sl - slovenščina
  • fi - suomi
  • sv - svenska
Ce document n'est pas disponible dans votre langue. Il vous est proposé dans une autre langue parmi celles disponibles dans la barre des langues.

Parliamentary questions
PDF 44kWORD 25k
22 May 2012
E-005174/2012
Question for written answer E-005174/2012
to the Commission
Rule 117
Konrad Szymański (ECR) and Alejo Vidal-Quadras (PPE)

 Subject: Investigation of monopolistic practices on the EU gas market
 Answer in writing 

On 27 September 2011, the Commission carried out an unexpected inspection of companies that had signed contracts with Gazprom or with its subsidiaries and joint ventures. The inspection focused on 20 companies in 10 different Member States, including E.ON Ruhrgas, RWE, OMV, SPP, Bulgargas, Bulgarstransgas, Overgas, Lietuvos Dujos, Eesti Gaas, Gazprom Germania, Vemex as well as PGNiG, Gaz-System and EuRoPolGaz.

The relevant investigation has sought to shed light on Gazprom’s monopolistic practices and the implementation of the third energy package.

Given the lack of further information, I would like to ask the following questions:

Does the Commission plan to initiate any legal proceedings against Gazprom or any of the companies mentioned above?
What is the timetable for the investigation and any legal steps that are planned?
Has an analysis of the documents acquired in the course of the investigation and of the inspection of 27 October 2011 been completed?
Has the Commission established whether, in any of the cases under investigation, EC law has been infringed?
Have any talks been initiated with the companies targeted by the investigation?

 OJ C 254 E, 04/09/2013
Avis juridique - Politique de confidentialité