Zum Portal des Europäischen Parlaments zurückkehren

Choisissez la langue de votre document :

  • bg - български
  • es - español
  • cs - čeština
  • da - dansk
  • de - Deutsch
  • et - eesti keel
  • el - ελληνικά
  • en - English (ausgewählt)
  • fr - français
  • ga - Gaeilge
  • hr - hrvatski
  • it - italiano
  • lv - latviešu valoda
  • lt - lietuvių kalba
  • hu - magyar
  • mt - Malti
  • nl - Nederlands
  • pl - polski
  • pt - português
  • ro - română
  • sk - slovenčina
  • sl - slovenščina
  • fi - suomi
  • sv - svenska
Dieses Dokument liegt nicht in Ihrer Sprache vor. Bitte wählen Sie eine Sprache aus der Liste der verfügbaren Sprachen aus.

Parliamentary questions
PDF 40kWORD 24k
7 November 2012
E-010091-12
Question for written answer E-010091-12
to the Commission
Rule 117
Christian Engström (Verts/ALE)

 Subject:  Transparency in court cases about complaints against the Commission
 Answer in writing 

Dr Patrick Breyer, who is an EU citizen and a member of the regional parliament of Schleswig-Holstein, has made a complaint against the Commission because it refused to give access to documents in a court case regarding the Data Retention Directive and its implementation (Case T-188/12).

In this connection, the Commission has requested that Dr Breyer remove both his own complaint and the Commission’s answer to him from the Internet, where he has published them.

1. Does the Commission have a general policy of refusing any access to court documents even in completed cases, such as Case T-188/12?

2. If so, for how long has this policy been in effect, and how many requests for documents have been denied each year that it has been in effect?

3. If not, why did the Commission refuse Dr Breyer access to those documents?

4. Why has the Commission demanded that Dr Breyer remove his complaint against the Commission and the Commission’s answer from the Internet, where he has published them?

5. If a Member of the European Parliament were to republish those two documents, would the Commission make a similar demand to that MEP? If so, on what legal basis? If not, why not, given that it has already made such a demand to the citizen who lodged the complaint against the Commission?

 OJ C 320 E, 06/11/2013
Rechtlicher Hinweis - Datenschutzbestimmungen