Go back to the Europarl portal

Choisissez la langue de votre document :

  • bg - български
  • es - español
  • cs - čeština
  • da - dansk
  • de - Deutsch
  • et - eesti keel
  • el - ελληνικά
  • en - English (Selected)
  • fr - français
  • ga - Gaeilge
  • hr - hrvatski
  • it - italiano
  • lv - latviešu valoda
  • lt - lietuvių kalba
  • hu - magyar
  • mt - Malti
  • nl - Nederlands
  • pl - polski
  • pt - português
  • ro - română
  • sk - slovenčina
  • sl - slovenščina
  • fi - suomi
  • sv - svenska
Parliamentary questions
PDF 40kWORD 9k
20 December 2019
E-004576/2019
Question for written answer
to the Commission
Rule 138
Eugen Jurzyca
 Answer in writing 
 Subject: VAT gap – best practices

According to a document prepared for the Commission, ‘Study and Reports on the VAT Gap in the EU-28 Member States’, the EU’s widest VAT gap is 50 times the size of the narrowest: in 2017, the VAT gap was 0.6% in Cyprus but 35.5% in Romania. A sharing of best practices could help countries with high tax evasion levels to establish a more efficient tax collection system, without the need for further harmonisation of European legislation.

Does the Commission have information explaining the discrepancies between Member States’ VAT gaps? 

Is the Commission planning to analyse the most efficient practices for tackling VAT evasion, in countries with a narrow VAT gap, and recommend those practices to countries with a wide VAT gap?

 

Last updated: 15 January 2020Legal notice - Privacy policy