Go back to the Europarl portal

Choisissez la langue de votre document :

  • bg - български
  • es - español
  • cs - čeština
  • da - dansk
  • de - Deutsch
  • et - eesti keel
  • el - ελληνικά
  • en - English (Selected)
  • fr - français
  • ga - Gaeilge
  • hr - hrvatski
  • it - italiano
  • lv - latviešu valoda
  • lt - lietuvių kalba
  • hu - magyar
  • mt - Malti
  • nl - Nederlands
  • pl - polski
  • pt - português
  • ro - română
  • sk - slovenčina
  • sl - slovenščina
  • fi - suomi
  • sv - svenska
Parliamentary questions
PDF 43kWORD 9k
12 May 2020
Question for written answer E-002927/2020
to the Vice-President of the Commission / High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy
Rule 138
Maximilian Krah (ID)
 Answer in writing 
 Subject: Willingness of the High Representative to engage in discussions with the Ukrainian opposition on a promising peace initiative

On 12 March 2020, I tabled a priority question for written answer on a promising peace initiative put forward by the Ukrainian opposition. This initiative is the brainchild of a Ukrainian MP who co-chairs Ukraine’s second strongest political party and previously served as chief of staff to former President Leonid Kuchma. Viktor Medvedchuk, at the request of then President Petro Poroschenko, also played a key role in negotiating the Minsk agreements.

On 7 May, I received an ‘answer’ from High Representative/Vice-President Borrell which completely sidestepped my perfectly clear questions. I demand clear answers to clear questions.

1. What does the Union's High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy think of this Ukrainian initiative?

2. Is High Representative/Vice-President Borrell willing to hold talks with the Ukrainian opposition on this initiative which would bring all parties involved in the War in Donbass together for talks facilitated by political figures from a number of EU Member States?

Original language of question: DE
Last updated: 2 June 2020Legal notice - Privacy policy