Choisissez la langue de votre document :
- bg - български
- es - español
- cs - čeština
- da - dansk
- de - Deutsch
- et - eesti keel
- el - ελληνικά
- en - English (Selected)
- fr - français
- ga - Gaeilge
- hr - hrvatski
- it - italiano
- lv - latviešu valoda
- lt - lietuvių kalba
- hu - magyar
- mt - Malti
- nl - Nederlands
- pl - polski
- pt - português
- ro - română
- sk - slovenčina
- sl - slovenščina
- fi - suomi
- sv - svenska
| Parliamentary questions |
| |||
| 10 June 2020 |
| |||
| Question for written answer E-003468/2020 to the Commission Rule 138 Patrick Breyer (Verts/ALE) |
| |||
 Subject: Promoting ‘authoritative content’ to counter disinformation and misinformation | ||||
Citing concerns about disinformation and misinformation, the Commission is calling on digital platform operators to ‘promote authoritative content’. 1. Which sources or content exactly does the Commission consider to be authoritative? 2. Who should be deciding which content is authoritative and should be promoted (state authorities, platform operators, independent fact-checkers, users themselves)? 3. Would the Commission agree that every internet user should be in control of the content proposed to them and the algorithms used to curate that content, and that they should be able to use external software or services to curate content? |
| Last updated: 27 June 2020 | Legal notice - Privacy policy |