Choisissez la langue de votre document :
- bg - български
- es - español
- cs - čeština
- da - dansk
- de - Deutsch
- et - eesti keel
- el - ελληνικά
- en - English (Selected)
- fr - français
- ga - Gaeilge
- hr - hrvatski
- it - italiano
- lv - latviešu valoda
- lt - lietuvių kalba
- hu - magyar
- mt - Malti
- nl - Nederlands
- pl - polski
- pt - português
- ro - română
- sk - slovenčina
- sl - slovenščina
- fi - suomi
- sv - svenska
| Parliamentary questions |
| |||
| 25 November 2020 |
| |||
| Question for written answer E-006427/2020 to the Commission Rule 138 Moritz Körner (Renew) |
| |||
 Subject: Audio surveillance | ||||
Does the Commission consider that audio surveillance for law enforcement purposes in public areas is generally compatible with fundamental rights? Algorithms allow microphones in public places to react to ‘abnormal noise’ — such as accidents, shouting, gunshots or breaking glass — and automatically alert the security forces. Cameras which record images and sound could be installed in public transport. What kinds of audio surveillance for law enforcement purposes in public areas does the Commission consider to be compatible with fundamental rights and which does it consider to be incompatible? | |
| Original language of question: DE |
| Last updated: 7 December 2020 | Legal notice - Privacy policy |