• DE - Deutsch
  • EN - English
Parliamentary question - E-000866/2021(ASW)Parliamentary question
E-000866/2021(ASW)

Answer given by Mr Sinkevičius on behalf of the European Commission

The report by the European Environmental Agency (EEA)[1] analyses the results of Member States’ reporting under the EU’s nature directives[2] in support of a Commission report[3].

The quote referred to by the Honourable Member is part of the interpretation of the data reported by Member States regarding forestry related pressures[4] on habitat types and species pointing to increased extraction of forest products and intensified forestry practices.

One of the consequences is the reduced EU carbon sink reported under the LULUCF Regulation[5], acknowledged also in the Climate Action Progress Report 2020[6]. Member States need to transpose the enhanced Renewable Energy Directive (REDII) sustainability criteria[7] for bioenergy by 30 June 2021 at the latest

Forests are important for safeguarding biodiversity, regulating climate and water and soil stabilisation and for the purification of air.

As such, they play a crucial role for achieving the EU’s objectives of restoring biodiversity and reaching climate neutrality by 2050, as set out in the European Green Deal[8] and the EU Biodiversity Strategy[9], which also announced the intention to put forward an EU Forest Strategy in 2021.

The data collected in the frame of the reporting under the nature directives point to a need to adapt certain forest management practices and ensure an increased level of protection of old-growth forests for the benefit of biodiversity as well as for climate mitigation and adaptation.

A recent report[10] of the Commission’s Joint Research Centre presents some forestland management pathways with respect to biodiversity and climate, highlighting the need to consider at least both of these, when addressing the issue of environmental sustainability of forests.

Last updated: 27 April 2021
Legal notice - Privacy policy