Go back to the Europarl portal

Choisissez la langue de votre document :

  • bg - български
  • es - español
  • cs - čeština
  • da - dansk
  • de - Deutsch
  • et - eesti keel
  • el - ελληνικά
  • en - English (Selected)
  • fr - français
  • ga - Gaeilge
  • hr - hrvatski
  • it - italiano
  • lv - latviešu valoda
  • lt - lietuvių kalba
  • hu - magyar
  • mt - Malti
  • nl - Nederlands
  • pl - polski
  • pt - português
  • ro - română
  • sk - slovenčina
  • sl - slovenščina
  • fi - suomi
  • sv - svenska
Parliamentary questions
PDF 38kWORD 10k
9 April 2021
E-001908/2021
Question for written answer  E-001908/2021
to the Commission
Rule 138
Cindy Franssen (PPE)
 Answer in writing 
 Subject: Sustainability impact assessment of the EU-Mercosur trade agreement

On 17 March 2021, the European Ombudsman(1) concluded that the European Commission should have waited for the conclusions of an updated sustainability impact assessment before concluding negotiations on the EU-Mercosur trade agreement(2). In view of this:

1. Does the Commission acknowledge that a mistake was made in concluding the negotiations before the sustainability impact assessment had been finalised?

2. Why are the negotiations on the trade agreement with Mercosur the only ones since the introduction of such impact assessments where the Commission did not wait for the final conclusions of the study?

3. How will the Commission ensure that due account is taken of the conclusions of the study before the trade agreement is ratified?

(1)https://www.ombudsman.europa.eu/nl/decision/en/139418
(2)https://www.ombudsman.europa.eu/nl/press-release/en/139425
Original language of question: NL
Last updated: 26 April 2021Legal notice - Privacy policy