Go back to the Europarl portal

Choisissez la langue de votre document :

  • bg - български
  • es - español
  • cs - čeština
  • da - dansk
  • de - Deutsch
  • et - eesti keel
  • el - ελληνικά
  • en - English (Selected)
  • fr - français
  • ga - Gaeilge
  • hr - hrvatski
  • it - italiano
  • lv - latviešu valoda
  • lt - lietuvių kalba
  • hu - magyar
  • mt - Malti
  • nl - Nederlands
  • pl - polski
  • pt - português
  • ro - română
  • sk - slovenčina
  • sl - slovenščina
  • fi - suomi
  • sv - svenska
Parliamentary questions
PDF 39kWORD 9k
28 May 2021
E-002833/2021
Question for written answer  E-002833/2021
to the Commission
Rule 138
Geoffroy Didier (PPE)
 Answer in writing 
 Subject: Wirecard scandal and persistent shortcomings in financial regulation

In June 2020, the collapse of Wirecard, a German financial services company, turned the spotlight on the persistent shortcomings in financial regulation. An investigation into the practices employed by Wirecard is under way and various forms of financial manipulation have come to light. Many errors and problems have been highlighted, in both the German and EU systems. The consequences of these manipulations are being felt not only by the financial markets, but also by the SMEs and individuals who had financial links with the company. Lessons must be learnt from this scandal, and with that in mind can the Commission answer the following questions:

1. In order to make supervision as effective as possible, does the Commission plan to introduce dual audits for every stage of an audit, or just the most sensitive ones?

2. Does the Commission intend to establish a European agency to monitor capital markets and prevent improper practices specific to national financial cultures?

3. What other verification mechanisms would the Commission like to introduce to keep up with innovation and technological advances in the financial sector?

Original language of question: FR
Last updated: 14 June 2021Legal notice - Privacy policy