Go back to the Europarl portal

Choisissez la langue de votre document :

  • bg - български
  • es - español
  • cs - čeština
  • da - dansk
  • de - Deutsch
  • et - eesti keel
  • el - ελληνικά
  • en - English (Selected)
  • fr - français
  • ga - Gaeilge
  • hr - hrvatski
  • it - italiano
  • lv - latviešu valoda
  • lt - lietuvių kalba
  • hu - magyar
  • mt - Malti
  • nl - Nederlands
  • pl - polski
  • pt - português
  • ro - română
  • sk - slovenčina
  • sl - slovenščina
  • fi - suomi
  • sv - svenska
Parliamentary questions
PDF 38kWORD 9k
15 September 2020
P-005047/2020
Priority question for written answer P-005047/2020
to the Commission
Rule 138
Margrete Auken (Verts/ALE)
 Answer in writing 
 Subject: Burden-sharing or common European solutions concerning an increased greenhouse-gas emissions-reduction target for 2023

Would a higher 2023 climate-neutrality target (e.g. 55 or 60%) be obtained primarily via increased national burden-sharing targets in the non-ETS sector or through a mix of different actions at EU level, including a review of the ETS and the Energy Taxation Directive, and possibly Europe-wide regulation of agricultural emissions? If a solution is being considered that combines the two approaches (burden-sharing and action at EU level), how will that solution be divided between the two approaches?

Original language of question: DA
Last updated: 21 September 2020Legal notice - Privacy policy