• DE - Deutsch
  • EN - English
  • FR - français
Parliamentary question - P-007025/2020(ASW)Parliamentary question
P-007025/2020(ASW)

Answer given by Ms McGuinness on behalf of the European Commission

The EU taxonomy is not a mandatory framework that pre-determines all future investment, it is a voluntary tool that translates the EU’s green objectives of climate-neutrality, restoring environmental sustainability and reducing emissions into criteria for investment purposes. The agriculture sector can make a significant contribution to combat climate change.

The taxonomy criteria largely follow the recommendations of the Technical Expert Group (TEG) on Sustainable Finance, which are based on latest scientific evidence and have been subject to public scrutiny.

For agriculture, the criteria draw from the common agricultural policy (CAP), and go further than the existing legal requirements, because they aim to recognise the best practices that are fully in line with the EU’s climate and environmental objectives, including the Green Deal.

The role agriculture can play in the transition is recognised in the taxonomy, allowing for considerable flexibility in how the criteria can be met, recognising climatic variations and existing national laws and practices.

Furthermore, farmers are not subject to any new mandatory performance criteria and farmers who do not fall under the scope of the Non-Financial Reporting Directive[1] are not subject to any mandatory disclosure requirements.

The taxonomy fully recognises the contribution of forestry and bioenergy to meeting the Union’s climate and energy objectives, building on national best practices and the recast Renewable Energy Directive[2].

The taxonomy criteria go beyond specific aspects of the directive, in order to meet the requirements in Article 19 of the Taxonomy Regulation[3] agreed by co-legislators in a balanced and effective way.

Last updated: 25 February 2021
Legal notice - Privacy policy