1. Amending certain CAP regulations as regards the conditionality system, types of intervention in the form of direct payment, types of intervention in certain sectors and rural development and annual performance reports, data and interoperability governance, suspensions of payments annual performance clearance and controls and penalties ***I
Text as a whole without the words: ‘Natura 2000 sites are to be automatically deemed compliant with GAEC standards 2 to 7, provided that conservation measures which cover GAEC 2 to 7 per designated protected areas management plan are in place and implemented in full on the entirety of the respective area.’
Second part
those words
S&D, Verts/ALE:
Amendment 23
First part
Text as a whole without the words: ‘or part of their’; ‘or in conversion to organic farming’; ‘for the certified or in conversion part of their holding’ and without the words ‘Farmers whose holding is situated in sites designated as special areas of conservation or special protection areas under Council Directive 92/43/EEC and Directive 2009/147/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council are deemed to comply with GAEC standards 1 to 7 listed in Annex III of this Regulation for the part of their holding situated in these sites.’
Second part
‘or part of their’ and ‘for the certified or in conversion part of their holding’
Third part
‘or in conversion to organic farming’
Fourth part
‘Farmers whose holding is situated in sites designated as special areas of conservation or special protection areas under Council Directive 92/43/EEC and Directive 2009/147/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council are deemed to comply with GAEC standards 1 to 7 listed in Annex III of this Regulation for the part of their holding situated in these sites.’
Miscellaneous
Erratum in all languages.
2. Strengthening of the position of farmers in the food supply chain ***I
‘Further considers questionable the compensation of the additional needs for the centralised customs system in Heading 1 and CBAM in Heading 3 by a commensurate decrease of allocations under the Customs Control Equipment Instrument in Heading 4;’
Second part
‘regrets that the current budgetary situation has led the Commission to redeploy significant funds across Headings and recalls its long-standing position that new policy priorities, tasks or needs should be accompanied by fresh money; stresses strongly that recurrent redeployments are not a viable way to finance the Union’s priorities as they damage investments and jeopardise the delivery of agreed policy objectives;’
7. Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: application EGF/2025/002 DE/Goodyear 2 – Germany