Amendment 4 did not concern all language versions and was therefore not put to the vote (Rule 151(1)(d)). Request for roll-call vote IND/DEM: final vote
5. EC-Guinea-Bissau agreement on fishing *
Report: Luis Manuel CAPOULAS SANTOS (A6-0271/2006)
Subject
RCV, etc.
Vote
RCV/EV – remarks
single vote
RCV
+
507, 66, 71
Requests for roll-call votes IND/DEM: final vote PPE-DE: final vote
6. Draft amending budget No 3/2006
Report: Giovanni PITTELLA / Valdis DOMBROVSKIS(qualified majority) (A6-0283/2006)
Subject
RCV, etc.
Vote
RCV/EV – remarks
single vote
+
7. Draft amending budget No 4/2006
Report: Giovanni PITTELLA(qualified majority) (A6-0284/2006)
Subject
RCV, etc.
Vote
RCV/EV – remarks
single vote
+
8. PROGRESS ***II
Recommendation for second reading:(qualified majority) Karin JÖNS (A6-0300/2006)
Requests for roll-call votes IND/DEM: final vote Verts/ALE: ams 4, 6, 9, 10, 13 and 22 Requests for separate votes ALDE: citation 7, recital M and §§ 15 and 26 Requests for split votes ALDE Recital A First part: text as a whole without the words ‘on the basis of social market economy rules and’ and ‘democracy ... interest (SGIs)’ Second part: ‘on the basis of social market economy rules and’ Third part: ‘democracy ... interest (SGIs)’ (seventh indent) Recital C First part: text as a whole without the words ‘based on social market economy rules and’ Second part: those words Recital K First part: ‘whereas ... internal market’ Second part: ‘and the Parliament’s ... competition rules’ Recital P First part: ‘whereas ... communication’ Second part: ‘and whereas pursuant ... directive’ § 13 First part: text as a whole without the words ‘and Parliament’s above-mentioned position on services in the internal market’ Second part: those words § 21 First part: ‘Points to ... State aid’ Second part: ‘and that the law should be amended accordingly’ § 23 First part: ‘is of the opinion ... procedure’ Second part: ‘notes that the principle ... from the outset;’ PPE-DE am 5 First part: text as a whole excluding the word ‘sufficient’ Second part: that word GUE/NGL § 3 First part: ‘Stresses that SGIs ... security of supply’ Second part: ‘and emphasises that ... equal treatment’ § 27 First part: ‘Recommends, in the interest ... of the standard [and]’ Second part: ‘simple and effective ... code of conduct’ am 8 First part: text as a whole without the words ‘various SGIs may have ... this policy’ Second part: those words am 18 First part: text as a whole without the words ‘public-private partnerships’ Second part: those words Verts/ALE Recital N First part: ‘whereas SGEIs have a direct effect ... in their respective markets’ Second part: ‘whereas this integration ... the concept of universal services’ § 1 First part: text as a whole without the second indent Second part: the second indent § 11 First part: text as a whole without the words ‘from the Commission’ Second part: those words § 14 First part: ‘emphasises that ... called into question’ Second part: ‘recalls the success ... into other sectors’ am 24 First part: ‘Notes that ... water and energy supply’ Second part: rest of amendment without the words ‘and SGEI’ Third part: ‘and SGEI’ am 29 First part: first paragraph without the words ‘the market cannot ensure universal access to high quality’ and ‘which’ Second part: those words PSE § 9 First part: ‘Calls on the Commission ... to define SGIs’ Second part: ‘notes that a precise ... to define their SGIs’
Amendment 76 had been withdrawn. Requests for split votes IND/DEM § 72 First part: text as a whole without the words ‘recalls in this respect that the Nice Treaty ... constitutional process’ Second part: those words PPE-DE: am 5 First part: ‘Emphasises ... region’ Second part: ‘and estimates .. EU’ am 47/78 First part: ‘Welcomes ... 2010’ Second part: ‘as ... Union’ am 31 First part: ‘Reminds ...UN’ Second part: ‘leading ... settlement’ am 51 First part: ‘Takes note of ... for EU accession’ Second part: ‘(deletion)’ § 69 First part: ‘stresses ... accession’ Second part: ‘emphasises ... sides Requests for roll-call votes IND/DEM: am 2 and final vote GUE/NGL: ams 19, 14/32/54, 15/33, 67, 68 and 69 Verts/ALE: ams 5, 9/50 and final vote Miscellaneous The Verts/ALE Group proposed that: —§ 29 be moved before § 28 to make one paragraph —§ 33 be moved to the beginning of § 31 to make one paragraph —§ 30 be moved after § 22 (in the section on ‘Democracy and the Rule of Law’) Jan Wiersma moved an oral amendment to amendment 51, which now read as follows: ‘56. Takes note of the proposal by Turkey to establish a committee of experts which should be under the auspices of the United Nations in order to overcome the tragic experience of the past, and the position of Armenia regarding that proposal; urges both the Turkish Government and the Armenian Government to continue their process of reconciliation leading to a mutually acceptable proposal; welcomes the fact that, with the recent debates in Turkey, a start at least has been made in the discussion on the painful history with Armenia; stresses that, although recognition of the Armenian genocide as such is formally not one of the Copenhagen criteria, it is indispensable for a country on the road to membership to come to terms with and recognise its past; calls in this respect on the Turkish authorities to facilitate the work of researchers, intellectuals and academics working on this question, ensuring them access to the historical archives and providing them with all relevant documents; urges Turkey to take the necessary steps, without any preconditions, to establish diplomatic and good neighbourly relations with Armenia, to withdraw the economic blockade and to open the land border at an early date, in accordance with resolutions adopted by the European Parliament between 1987 and 2005, thereby fulfilling the Accession Partnership priorities and the requirements of the Negotiating Framework on ‘peaceful settlement on border disputes’ which are both mandatory for EU accession; believes that a similar position should be adopted for the cases of other minorities (e.g. the Greeks of Pontos and the Assyrians);’ The rapporteur moved an oral amendment to amendment 59, which now read as follows: ‘G. whereas progress in the area of freedom of expression is still far from satisfactory, presenting a mixed picture featuring certain positive developments, such as the recent acquittals of Professor İbrahim Kaboğlu and Professor Baskin Oran, prosecuted under Articles 216 and 301 of the Turkish Penal Code, the journalist Murat Belge, the novelist Elif Shafak, the writer Perihan Mağden and the author Orhan Pamuk, while a number of human rights defenders are still being prosecuted and journalists and publishers continue to face trials, and the journalist Hrant Dink, whose case, despite his acquittal by a court ruling, has been referred to the Court of Cassation and who is facing up to three years in prison in connection with another trial, and others, such as the human rights activist Eren Keskin, have been sentenced,’