Amendment 41 did not concern all language versions and was therefore not put to the vote (Rule 151(1)(d)). Requests for roll-call votes IND/DEM: final vote
3. Amendments to the Convention on future multilateral cooperation in the North-East Atlantic Fisheries *
Requests for roll-call votes IND/DEM: final vote Miscellaneous Patrizia Toia moved an oral amendment to paragraph 12, which then read: ‘Calls on the Commission and the Member States to develop a legal framework that recognises the components of the social economy;’
Requests for roll-call votes IND/DEM: final vote ALDE: am 1 and final vote Requests for separate votes PPE-DE: Recital B, indent 5 Requests for split votes PPE-DE Recital B, indent 4 First part: ‘- new press information ... detainees’ Second part: ‘during the Barroso government,’ Miscellaneous Recital B, indent 4, should read as follows: ‘the statements by the Spanish Foreign Minister in the Spanish Parliament clarifying the information published by El País about military flights,’
18. Annual Report (2007) on the main aspects and basic choices of the CFSP
Requests for roll-call votes IND/DEM: final vote GUE/NGL: ams 10, 14, 15, 17 PSE: am 7 Requests for separate votes GUE/NGL: §§ 6, 11, 12, 37, 53, 55, 61 Miscellaneous If Amendment 18 was adopted, the rapporteur proposed that the new text be inserted after the current paragraph 12.
20. The role of NATO in the security architecture of the EU
Requests for roll-call votes PSE: ams 11 and 14 IND/DEM: citation 5, ams 12, 18 and 19, final vote GUE/NGL: ams 19, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29 Requests for separate votes GUE/NGL: §§ 11, 13, 19, 24, recital N Requests for split votes PSE § 22 First part: ‘Strongly welcomes ... new security challenges;’ Second part: ‘welcomes the efforts ... EU defence capabilities;’ Am 17 First part: ‘Considers that the EU and NATO ... and the rule of law;’ Second part: ‘is of the view that, if ... in all Euro-Atlantic structures;’ Miscellaneous Ari Vatanen (rapporteur) moved an oral amendment to paragraph 29, which then read as follows: ‘Underlines that the experience of EU operations demonstrates that a permanent planning and command capability for EU operations would increase the effectiveness and credibility of EU operations; recalls that, given the civilian-military focus of the EU, such a structure would not duplicate anything that exists elsewhere; further recalls that the NATO Headquarters is primarily intended for military planning whereas the EU possesses expertise in planning and conducting civilian, military and civilian-military operations which no other global actor is currently able to conduct successfully;’ On behalf of the PPE-DE Group, Vytautas Landsbergis moved an oral amendment to amendment 17, which then read as follows: ‘Considers that the EU and NATO must maintain a realistic and frank dialogue with Russia, including on human rights and the rule of law, regional security, energy, missile defence, non-proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, the limitation of armed forces and space policy; is of the view that, if and when Russia becomes a genuine democracy, and refuses military threats as a means of political pressure on its neighbours, the depth of cooperation between it and the EU could reach unprecedented levels, including the prospect of Russia's membership in all Euro-Atlantic structures;’
21. The Barcelona Process: Union for the Mediterranean