1. Extension of the provisions of Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 and Regulation (EC) No 987/2009 to nationals of third countries who are not already covered by these provisions solely on the ground of their nationality ***II
Recommendation for second reading: Jean Lambert (A7-0261/2010)
Subject
RCV etc.
Vote
RCV/EV – remarks
approval without vote
+
2. Appointment of a Member of the Court of Auditors (Mr Lazaros Stavrou Lazarou, CY)
Requests for roll-call votes Verts/ALE: final vote S&D: paragraphs 2 and 4, and final vote
Miscellaneous The PPE Group had proposed splitting paragraph 4 into two paragraphs: —paragraph 4 ‘4. Calls upon states applying the death penalty to declare an immediate moratorium on executions; further encourages countries such as China, Egypt, Iran, Malaysia, Sudan, Thailand and Vietnam to issue official statistics concerning the use of the death penalty in these countries; also urges North Korea to immediately and permanently stop public executions;’ —paragraph 4a (new) ‘4a. Calls on Japan to shed light into its system of capital punishment;’ Jean Lambert had also signed joint motion for a resolution RC-B7-0541/2010/rev. Jan Philipp Albrecht had also signed motion for a resolution B7-0544/2010.
11. EU action on oil exploration and extraction in Europe
Motion for a resolution B7-0540/2010 (ENVI Committee)
§ 7
§
Original text
split
amended orally
1
+
2
+
§ 9
§
Original text
sep
+
§ 10
§
Original text
split
1
+
2
+
§ 12
§
Original text
split
1
+
2
+
§ 13
§
Original text
sep
+
§ 15
§
Original text
split
1
+
2
+
§ 16
§
Original text
+
amended orally
§ 17
1D
ECR
RCV
+
323, 285, 23
2
PPE
RCV
↓
§ 22
§
Original text
split
1
+
2/EV
+
359, 268, 6
§ 25
3
PPE
-
Vote: resolution (text as a whole)
RCV
+
601, 23, 13
Requests for roll-call votes ECR: Amendment 1 PPE: Amendment 2, final vote Verts/ALE: Amendments 1, 2, final vote
Requests for split votes PPE: § 7 First part: ‘Calls on the Commission ... with Member States;’ Second part: ‘notes that ... climate change;’ § 10 First part: ‘Urges the Commission ... in the EU;’ Second part: ‘and other forms of seabed exploitation;’ § 12 First part: ‘Notes the absence of ... oil disasters and’ Second part: ‘calls on the Commission ... Environmental Liability Directive;’ § 15 First part: Text as a whole excluding the words ‘and to the global climate’ Second part: those words § 22 First part: Text as a whole excluding the words ‘for example ... offshore installations’ Second part: those words
Requests for separate votes PPE: §§ 9, 13
Miscellaneous Corien Wortmann-Kool moved the following oral amendment to paragraph 7, which then read as follows: ‘7. Calls on the Commission in particular to review the EU’s capacity for immediate response to accidents involving offshore installations and to develop a European action plan in cooperation with Member States; notes that special attention must be given to the Arctic zone, due to its fragility and its importance in mitigating climate change; moreover notes that the Mediterranean, Baltic and North Sea area has to be taken into consideration;’ Vytautas Landsbergis moved an oral amendment to paragraph 16, which then read as follows: ‘16. Calls on the Commission to bring forward legislation to ensure that uniformly high safety standards apply across all EU oil platforms and drilling operations by EU and third countries, from the Atlantic Margin to the Black Sea; calls on the Commission and the Member States to work with the International Maritime Organisation (IMO), to strengthen international safety and control rules and standards;’
12. Conference on Biological Diversity – Nagoya 2010
Motion for a resolution B7-0536/2010 (ENVI Committee)
After § 10
16
Verts/ALE
+
§ 12, point 14
17
Verts/ALE
RCV
-
96, 472, 12
§ 16
1
PPE, ECR
RCV
+
340, 219, 14 See ‘Miscellaneous’ below
§
Original text
RCV
↓
After § 30
5
S&D, Verts/ALE, GUE/NGL
-
6
S&D, PPE, Verts/ALE, ALDE, GUE/NGL
+
7
S&D, Verts/ALE, ALDE GUE/NGL
+
8
S&D, PPE, Verts/ALE, ALDE, GUE/NGL
+
9
S&D, PPE, Verts/ALE, ALDE, GUE/NGL
+
10
S&D, PPE, Verts/ALE, ALDE, GUE/NGL
+
11
S&D, PPE, Verts/ALE, ALDE, GUE/NGL
+
12
S&D, Verts/ALE, ALDE, GUE/NGL
+
13
S&D, PPE, Verts/ALE, ALDE, GUE/NGL
+
18
Verts/ALE
+
19
Verts/ALE
+
20
Verts/ALE
-
After recital B
14
Verts/ALE
+
15
Verts/ALE
+
After Recital C
2
S&D, PPE, Verts/ALE, ALDE, GUE/NGL
+
3
S&D, PPE, Verts/ALE, ALDE, GUE/NGL
+
4
S&D, PPE, Verts/ALE, ALDE, GUE/NGL
+
Vote: resolution (text as a whole)
RCV
+
505, 22, 41
Requests for roll-call votes PPE: Amendment 1, final vote Verts/ALE: Amendment 17, § 16, final vote
Miscellaneous Owing to problems with the electronic display in the Chamber, the President decided to repeat the roll-call vote on Amendment 1. The ALDE Group had withdrawn its signature from Amendment 5. Gay Mitchell and Martin Kastler had withdrawn their signatures from Amendments 5 and 7.
13. Basel II and revision of the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD 4)
Requests for split votes ECR: Amendment 6 First part: ‘Calls on the Commission ... liquidity requirements;’ Second part: ‘calls for transactions ... between third parties;’
14. Health care systems in Sub-Saharan Africa and Global Health
Requests for roll-call votes ECR: § 62 S&D: final vote
Requests for split votes ECR, PPE: § 6 First part: Text as a whole excluding the words ‘the right to exercise full’ and ‘abortion’ Second part: ‘the right to exercise full’ Third part: ‘abortion’ PPE § 19 First part: ‘Deplores ... in many African countries;’ Second part: ‘and the fact ... development resource;’
Requests for separate votes ECR: §§ 9, 10 PPE: § 9
Motion for a resolution B7-0535/2010 (EMPL Committee)
§ 13
3
PPE
+
§ 15
4
PPE
+
§ 17
1
> 40 Members
+
amended orally
6
PPE
+
Vote: resolution (text as a whole)
+
Miscellaneous Amendments 2 and 5 were cancelled. Amendment 1 had been tabled by Danuta Maria Hübner and others. Csaba Őry had moved an oral amendment to Amendment 1: ‘17. Is of the opinion that the role of the ESF in improving workers’ employability and adaptability must be strengthened; calls on the Commission to consider all possible policy options for boosting the contribution of the ESF in the context of the future architecture of the structural funds in order to enhance the social model of the European Union; believes that there are considerable advantages in maintaining the ESF under the basic regulation on general provisions on the funds, but with its own rules;’