‘Strongly condemns the violence perpetrated against the indigenous communities of Brazil;’
Second part
‘deplores the poverty and human rights situation of the Guarani-Kaiowá population in Mato Grosso do Sul;’
GUE/NGL:
Amendment 4
First part
‘Expresses concern about the proposed constitutional amendment 215/2000 (PEC 215), to which Brazilian indigenous peoples are fiercely opposed, given that, if approved, it will threaten indigenous land rights by making it possible for anti-Indian interests related to the agro-business, timber, mining and energy industries to block the new indigenous territories from being recognised;’
Second part
‘strongly believes that companies should be held accountable for any environmental damage and human rights abuses for which they are responsible, and that the EU and the Member States should uphold this as a core principle by making it a binding provision in all trade policies;’
Miscellaneous
Javi López (S&D Group) had also signed joint motion for a resolution RC-B8-1260/2016.
3. The case of Ildar Dadin, prisoner of conscience in Russia
Text as a whole excluding the words: ‘by the Assad forces with the support of Russia and Iran, as well as the human rights abuses and violations of international humanitarian law’
Second part
those words
§ 8
First part
Text as a whole excluding the words: ‘supports the call of the Quint nations (United States, France, Germany, Italy and the United Kingdom) and the VP/HR on all armed groups fighting in Syria to cease any collaboration with Jabhat Fateh al-Sham;’
Second part
those words
Recital B
First part
Text as a whole excluding the words: ‘in spite of the unilateral humanitarian pauses declared by the Assad regime and Russia’
Second part
those words
Recital D
First part
Text as a whole excluding the words: ‘but most seriously by the Assad regime backed by Russia and Iran’
Second part
those words
GUE/NGL:
§ 14
First part
Text as a whole excluding the words: ‘including a no-fly zone over Aleppo city’
Second part
those words
Miscellaneous
Anna Elżbieta Fotyga, Ryszard Antoni Legutko, Tomasz Piotr Poręba, Karol Karski and Ryszard Czarnecki (ECR Group), and Javi López (S&D Group) had also signed joint motion for a resolution RC-B8-1249/2016.
‘whereas high transparency is crucial to gain legitimacy and trust that decisions are based on the overall public interest;’
Second part
‘whereas the increasing trend to establish ‘reading rooms’ with restricted access, even for elected representatives, to commercially sensitive files diverts from this logic;’
PPE:
Amendment 10
First part
Text as a whole excluding the words: ‘a strategic inquiry into the Commission’s handling of Barroso’s revolving door case, including’
Second part
those words
§ 5
First part
‘Encourages the Commission and Member States to empower the European Ombudsman with the ability to issue a statement of non-compliance with Regulation 1049/2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents by the various EU institutions, provided those documents do not fall within the scope of Article 9(1) of the Regulation;’
Second part
‘supports the notion that the Ombudsman should be empowered to take a decision on the release of the relevant documents, following an investigation into the non-compliance;’
§ 12
First part
‘Approves the Ombudsman’s investigation into the make-up and transparency of the work of the Commission’s expert groups; notes the Commission’s efforts to open up these groups to the public,’
Second part
‘and stresses that further actions are needed to ensure full transparency; reiterates its call on the Council, including its preparatory bodies, to join the lobby register as soon as possible and to improve the transparency of their work;’
Verts/ALE:
§ 3
First part
Text as a whole excluding the words: ‘commends the resulting publication by the Commission of numerous TTIP documents, hence promoting transparency as one of the three pillars of the Commission’s new trade strategy;’ and ‘re-emphasises the need for enhanced transparency in international agreements such as TTIP, CETA and others, as called for by numerous concerned citizens addressing the Committee on Petitions;’
Second part
‘commends the resulting publication by the Commission of numerous TTIP documents, hence promoting transparency as one of the three pillars of the Commission’s new trade strategy;’
Third part
‘re-emphasises the need for enhanced transparency in international agreements such as TTIP, CETA and others, as called for by numerous concerned citizens addressing the Committee on Petitions;’
10. Towards a definitive VAT system and fighting VAT fraud
Text as a whole excluding the words: ‘which demands fewer exemptions’
Second part
those words
§ 4
First part
Text as a whole excluding the words: ‘the recent Commission communication of 7 April 2016 and’
Second part
those words
§ 8
First part
Text as a whole excluding the words: ‘and fewer exceptions combined’
Second part
those words
§ 43
First part
‘Recognising that different VAT regimes across the European Union might also be perceived as a non-tariff barrier in the Single Market,’
Second part
‘underlines that the VAT Mini One-Stop Shop (VAT MOSS) is a good way of helping to remove this barrier and in particular of supporting SMEs in their cross-border activity; acknowledges that there are still some minor problematic issues with the VAT MOSS; calls on the Commission to further facilitate the payment of VAT obligations by companies across the EU;’
S&D:
§ 7
First part
Text as a whole excluding the words: ‘between Member States’
Second part
those words
§ 55
First part
‘Emphasises that tax legislation is an exclusive competence of the Member States;’
Second part
‘emphasises that according to Article 329(1) TFEU a group of at least nine Member States may engage in enhanced cooperation; calls on the Commission to support proposals for enhanced cooperation which aim to combat fraud and reduce administrative burdens in terms of VAT;’
Recital M
First part
‘whereas VAT is a tax on consumption which is based on a system of fractionated payments allowing for self-policing by persons liable for payment, and whereas it must only be borne by the final consumer so as to ensure neutrality for businesses;’
Second part
‘whereas it is up to Member States to organise the practical way of charging VAT in order to ensure that it is borne by the final consumer;’
GUE/NGL, S&D:
§ 31
First part
‘Takes the view that the present complicated system could be considerably simplified’
Second part
‘if the goods and services eligible for reduced tax rates were reduced and some goods and services eligible for reduced tax rates were determined jointly by Member States at EU level,’
Third part
‘while allowing Member States to decide on tax rates as long as they are compliant with the minimum tax rates in the VAT Directive and provided that this does not create risks of unfair competition;’