Heidi Hautala moved an oral amendment to paragraph 8, which then read as follows: ‘8. Calls for an immediate, full, transparent, credible and impartial investigation into the death of Azerbaijani blogger and activist Mehman Galandarov on 28 April 2017 while in the custody of the Azerbaijani authorities,’
3. Pakistan, notably the situation of human rights defenders and the death penalty
‘Deplores the roll-back in Pakistan over respect for human rights and the rule of law, and in particular the increase in extrajudicial killings and the intimidation of and use of force against journalists, human rights defenders, NGOs and critics of the government; recalls the obligations of the Pakistani government to ensure respect for fundamental rights;’
Second part
welcomes Pakistan’s adoption of a Human Rights Action Plan, and calls for it to be translated into tangible progress;’
Third part
warns in this regard that the EU will be extremely concerned if activists continue to fall victim to such practices and progress is not observed;’
‘Welcomes the suspension of executions of people on death row convicted of drug trafficking pending a review of their case; urges the Government of Indonesia to continue to halt all such executions and to retry them in accordance with international standards;’
Second part
‘calls for an immediate reinstatement of the moratorium on the use of the death penalty with a view to abolishing the death penalty;’
5. Implementation of the European Fund for Strategic Investments
Report: José Manuel Fernandes, Udo Bullmann (A8-0200/2017)
Vote: IMCO committee, resolution (text as a whole)
RCV
+
510, 60, 48
Requests for roll-call votes
ENF:
amendment 7
7. Online platforms and the Digital Single Market
Report: Henna Virkkunen, Philippe Juvin (A8-0204/2017)
Subject
Am No
Author
RCV etc.
Vote
RCV/EV – remarks
Alternative motion for a resolution
1
ECR
-
§ 27
§
original text
split
1
+
2
+
§ 29
§
original text
split
1
+
2
+
3
+
4
+
§ 30
§
original text
sep
+
§ 33
§
original text
split
1
+
2
+
3
+
§ 35
§
original text
sep
+
§ 36
§
original text
split
1
+
2
+
§ 37
§
original text
split
1
+
2
+
§ 38
§
original text
split
1
+
2
+
§ 39
§
original text
split
1
+
2
+
§ 58
§
original text
split
1
+
2
+
§ 59
§
original text
split
1
+
2
+
3
+
4
+
5
+
§ 60
§
original text
sep
+
§ 61
§
original text
split
1
+
2
+
3
+
§ 67
§
original text
sep
+
§ 68
§
original text
split
1
+
2
+
§ 75
§
original text
split
1
+
2
+
Recital H
§
original text
sep
+
Vote: ITRE, IMCO committees resolution (text as a whole)
RCV
+
393, 146, 74
Requests for separate votes
MEPs
recital H, §§ 30, 35, 36, 60, 67
Requests for split votes
MEPs:
§ 27
First part
Text as a whole without the words: ‘also calls on the Member States to develop new protection mechanisms where necessary so as to ensure adequate coverage for online platform workers’
Second part
those words
§ 29
First part
Text as a whole without the words: ‘Notes that the current EU intermediary limited liability regime is one of the issues raised by certain stakeholders in the ongoing debate on online platforms;’ ‘believes, therefore, that the liability regime should be further clarified, since it is a crucial pillar for the EU's digital economy;’ and ‘recalling that platforms not playing a neutral role as defined in the e-commerce Directive cannot claim liability exemption;’
Second part
‘Notes that the current EU intermediary limited liability regime is one of the issues raised by certain stakeholders in the ongoing debate on online platforms;’
Third part
‘believes, therefore, that the liability regime should be further clarified, since it is a crucial pillar for the EU's digital economy;’
Fourth part
‘recalling that platforms not playing a neutral role as defined in the e-commerce Directive cannot claim liability exemption;’
§ 33
First part
Text as a whole without the words: ‘welcomes the ongoing work on the AVMS Directive and the Commission's intention to propose measures for video-sharing platforms in order to protect minors and for taking down content related to hate speech;’ and ‘notes the absence of references to content relating to incitement to terrorism;’
Second part
‘welcomes the ongoing work on the AVMS Directive and the Commission's intention to propose measures for video-sharing platforms in order to protect minors and for taking down content related to hate speech;’
Third part
‘notes the absence of references to content relating to incitement to terrorism;’
§ 36
First part
Text as a whole without the words: ‘and to verify the possibility of legislative intervention’
Second part
those words
§ 37
First part
Text as a whole without the words: ‘regulatory measures complemented by’
Second part
those words
§ 38
First part
‘Welcomes the Code of Conduct on Countering Illegal Hate Speech for the industry, agreed in 2016 and supported by the Commission,’
Second part
‘and asks the Commission to develop adequate and reasonable means for online platforms to identify and remove illegal goods and content;’
§ 39
First part
Text as a whole without the words: ‘as regards data ownership’
Second part
those words
§ 58
First part
Text as a whole without the words: ‘to assess the need for criteria and thresholds setting the conditions under which online platforms may be made subject to further market surveillance, and’
Second part
those words
§ 59
First part
Text as a whole without the words: ‘Stresses that the rights of authors and creators must be protected also in the digital era, and recalls the importance of creative industry for employment and the economy in the EU;’, ‘such as internet service providers’ and ‘active’ and ‘to ensure traceability’
Second part
‘Stresses that the rights of authors and creators must be protected also in the digital era, and recalls the importance of creative industry for employment and the economy in the EU;’
Third part
‘such as internet service providers’
Fourth part
‘active’
Fifth part
‘to ensure traceability’
§ 61
First part
Text as a whole without the words: ‘not only for companies but also for the health and safety of consumers, who must be made aware of the reality of the illicit trade in fake products’ and ‘a revision of’
Second part
‘not only for companies but also for the health and safety of consumers, who must be made aware of the reality of the illicit trade in fake products’
Third part
‘a revision of’
§ 68
First part
‘Welcomes the actions of the Commission to better enforce competition law in the digital world, and stresses the need to take timely decisions in competition cases in light of the fast-moving pace of the digital sector;’
Second part
‘notes, however, that in some regards EU competition law has to be adjusted to the digital world in order to be fit for purpose;’
§ 75
First part
Text as a whole without the words: ‘become world leaders and to’