Recommendation: Dominique Riquet (A8-0303/2017)

Subject	RCV etc.	Vote	RCV/EV – remarks
Vote: consent	RCV	+	511, 112, 40

Report: Iskra Mihaylova (A8-0304/2017)

Subject	RCV etc.	Vote	RCV/EV – remarks
single vote	RCV	+	563, 23, 78

Report: Miroslav Poche (A8-0293/2017)

Subject	RCV etc.	Vote	RCV/EV – remarks
single vote	RCV	+	572, 54, 36

Report: Michał Boni (A8-0309/2017)

Subject	RCV etc.	Vote	RCV/EV – remarks
single vote	RCV	+	622, 8, 33

Report: Derek Vaughan (A8-0296/2017)

Subject	RCV etc.	Vote	RCV/EV – remarks
single vote	RCV	+	554, 61, 53

Recommendation for second reading Teresa Jiménez-Becerril Barrio (A8-0317/2017)

Subject	RCV etc.	Vote	RCV/EV – remarks
Approval without vote

Report: Mihai Ţurcanu (A8-0270/2017)

Subject	Am No	Author		RCV, etc.		Vote		RCV/EV - remarks
Amendments by the committee responsible – put to the vote collectively	1-17 20-27 29-37 39-41 44 46-84 87 91-93 95 98-104 106 108 110 112-118 120-122 126-130 133-135 139-162 164-169 171 179 181 184 187-188 193 202 204 208-221 228-233 238-242 247-251 255-264 269-273 278 280 282-286 288-291 295-300 302 304-312 315-324	committee				+
Amendments by the committee responsible – separate votes	18	committee		split
				1		+
				2/EV		+		376, 281, 9
	19	committee		split
				1		+
				2		-
	28	committee		split
				1		+
				2/EV		-		313, 340, 15
	38	committee		split
				1/EV		+		563, 80, 27
				2		-
	42	committee		split
				1		+
				2/EV		+		364, 288, 16
	43	committee				-
	45	committee				+
	85	committee		split
				1		+
				2		-
	86	committee		split
				1		+
				2/EV		-		305, 348, 16
	88	committee		RCV		+		365, 299, 6
	89	committee		RCV		+		538, 123, 7
	96	committee		split
				1		+
				2		+
				3		-
	97	committee				+
	105	committee		AN		+		477, 182, 13
	107	committee				+
	109	committee		split
				1		+
				2		+
	111	committee				-
	119	committee		RCV		+		363, 283, 26
	123	committee		split
				1		+
				2		+
	125	committee				-
	131	committee		EV		+		408, 242, 20
	132	committee		split
				1		+
				2		+
	137	committee				-
	138	committee		EV		-		309, 347, 16
	163	committee		EV		+		329, 320, 22
	172	committee		EV		-		288, 379, 2
	173	committee				-
	174	committee				-
	175	committee		split
				1		+
				2		+
	176	committee				+
	177	committee		split
				1/RCV		+		611, 57, 3
				2/RCV		+		490, 140, 3
	178	committee				-
	180	committee				-
	182	committee				+
	183	committee				-
	186	committee				-
	189-192	committee				-
194-197	committee		EV		-		322, 345, 2
198-201	committee		EV		-		323, 341, 3
203	committee		split
			1		+
			2		+
205	committee				+
207	committee				-
222	committee		EV		+		403, 266, 2
224-227	committee				-
234-237	committee				-
243-246	committee				-
252-254	committee				-
265-268	committee				-
274	committee		RCV		+		475, 172, 24
275	committee		split
			1		+
			2		+
			3		+
			4		+
276	committee				+
277	committee				+
279	committee				+
281	committee		RCV		+		522, 143, 6
287	committee				+
292	committee				+
293	committee				+
294	committee				+
301	committee				+
303	committee		RCV		+		534, 123, 15
Article 1, § 2, after point h	346	EFDD				-
Article 42, after § 1	345	S&D, ALDE				+
	90	committee		split
				1		↓
				2		↓
Article 46, § 1, point 2 Regulation (EC) 1107/2009 Article 3 - point 34 - introductory part	375	Verts/ALE				-
	94	committee				+
Article 46, § 1, after point 2 Regulation (EC) 1107/2009 Article 80 - after paragraph 7	378	GUE/NGL				-
After Article 46, Directive 91/676/EEC, Article 2, point (g)	401	PPE		RCV		-		138, 507, 23
Article 48, after § 1	374	Verts/ALE				-
Annex I, part II, PFC 1(A), point 2, indent 2	347	EFDD				-
Annex I, part II, PFC 1 (A), point 2, after indent 6	379	GUE/NGL				-
Annex I, part II, PFC 1 (B), point 3, point a, point 2, indent 1	348S	EFDD		RCV		-		202, 462, 7
	336	EFDD				-
	388 = 402rev CP =	ECR ENF		RCV		-		312, 345, 12
	396PC	PPE		RCV		-		307, 355, 7
Annex I, part II, PFC 1 (B), point 3, point a, point 2, indent 3	389D = 396CP = 402rev CP =	ECR PPE ENF		RCV		-		325, 336, 8
	337	EFDD				-
	343CP	S&D, ALDE		RCV		+		411, 230, 18
	349	EFDD				↓
Annex I, part II, PFC 1 (B), point 3, point a, point 2, indent 3	338D = 390D = 396CP =	EFDD ECR PPE		RCV		-		322, 332, 11
	402rev CP	ENF		RCV		-		106, 552, 10
	350	EFDD				-
	343CP	S&D, ALDE		RCV		+		402, 250, 12
	124	committee		RCV		↓
Annex I, part II, PFC 1 (B), point 3, point b	351rev	EFDD				-
Annex I, part II, PFC 1 (B), point 3, after point b	380	GUE/NGL				-
Annex I, part II, PFC 1 (C) (I), point 2, point a, point 2, indent 1	352D	EFDD		RCV		-		196, 459, 12
	339	EFDD				-
	391 = 403CP =	ECR ENF		RCV		-		321, 339, 10
	397CP	PPE		RCV		-		301, 354, 7
Annex I, part II, PFC 1 (C) (I), point 2, point a, point 2, indent 2	392D = 397CP = 403CP =	ECR PPE ENF		RCV		-		320, 340, 7
	340	EFDD				-
	344CP	S&D, ALDE		RCV		+		415, 235, 16
	353	EFDD				↓
Annex I, part II, PFC 1 (C) (I), point 2, point a, point 2, indent 3	341D = 393D = 397CP =	EFDD ECR PPE		RCV		-		330, 333, 4
	403CP	ENF		RCV		-		104, 550, 7
	354	EFDD				-
	344CP	S&D, ALDE		RCV		+		405, 249, 13
	136	committee		RCV		↓
Annex I, part II, PFC 1 (C) (I), point 2, point b	355	EFDD				-
Annex I, part II, PFC 1 (C) (I), point 2, after point b	381	GUE/NGL				-
Annex I, part II, PFC 1 (C) (I), point 2, point c	356	EFDD				-
Annex I, part II, PFC 1 (C)	342	ALDE		EV		-		326, 338, 9
	170	committee		RCV		+		417, 178, 73
Annex I, part II, PFC 2, point 2, indent 2	357	EFDD				-
Annex I, part II, PFC 2, point 2, indent 3	358	EFDD				-
Annex I, part II, PFC 2, point 2, after indent 6	382	GUE/NGL				-
Annex I, part II, PFC 2, point 3	398	PPE		EV		+		462, 194, 11
Annex I, part II, PFC 3 (A), point 2, after indent 5	383	GUE/NGL				-
Annex I, part II, PFC 3 (B), point 2, indent 1	359rev	EFDD				-
Annex I, part II, PFC3 (B), point 2, indent 2	360	EFDD				-
Annex I, part II, PFC 3 (B), point 2, after indent 5	384	GUE/NGL				-
Annex I, part II, PFC 4, point 2, indent 1	361	EFDD				-
	185	committee		EV		-		288, 373, 3
Annex I, part II, PFC 4, point 2, indent 2	362	EFDD				-
Annex I, part II, PFC 4, point 2, after indent 5	385	GUE/NGL				-
Annex I, part II, PFC 6, point 2, indent 1	363	EFDD				-
	206	committee				+
Annex I, part II, PFC 6 point 2, indent 2	364	EFDD				-
Annex I, part II, PFC 6, point 2, indent 3	365	EFDD				-
Annex I, part II, PFC 6, point 2, after indent 3	386	GUE/NGL				-
Annex I, part II, PFC 6 (B) (II), point 2, indent 1	366	EFDD				-
Annex I, part II, PFC 6 (B) (II), point 2, indent 3	367	EFDD				-
Annex II, part II, subheading 10	368D	EFDD				-
Annex II, part II, after paragraph 1	404rev	ENF		RCV		-		113, 460, 95
Annex II, part II, CMC 1, point 1, point e	369D	EFDD				-
	223	committee				+
Annex II, part II, CMC 7, paragraph, indent 2 and table	377D	Verts/ALE				-
Annex III, part 1, after paragraph 7	370 = 376 = 387 =	EFDD Verts/ALE GUE/NGL		EV		-		315, 354, 0
Annex III, part 2, PFC 1 (B), after paragraph 2	373	Verts/ALE				-
	371	EFDD				-
Annex III, part 2, PFC 1 (C) (I), after paragraph 1	372	EFDD				-
Annex III, part 2, PFC 2, indent 2	399	PPE				+
Annex III, part 3, PFC 2	400	PPE				-
Annex III, part 3, PFC 3	313	committee				+
		original text		split
				1		↓
				2		↓
Annex III, part 3, PFC 4	314	committee				+
		original text		split
				1		↓
				2		↓
After recital 8	394	PPE		EV		-		305, 356, 6
	395	PPE		EV		+		485, 179, 2
Vote: Commission proposal			RCV		+		298, 234, 135

Requests for roll-call votes
S&D:	amendments 338, 341, 343, 344, 348, 352, 389, 392, 396, 397, 401
ECR:	amendments 124, 136, 388, 389, 390, 391, 392, 393, 396, 397
Verts/ALE:	amendments 338, 348, 389, 390, 396PC, 402PC
EFDD:	amendments 88, 89, 105, 119, 170, 177, 274, 281, 303
ENF:	amendments 402 (first and third parts), 403 (first and third parts), 404

Requests for separate votes
PPE:	amendments 111, 124, 125, 136, 137, 172, 173, 174, 178, 180, 183, 185, 186
ECR:	amendment 138
ALDE:	amendments 189-192, 194-201, 222, 224-227, 234-237, 243-246, 252-254, 265-268, 287, 292-294
Verts/ALE:	amendments 43, 45, 88, 97, 105, 107, 131, 163, 170, 175, 176, 182, 189-192, 194-201, 205, 207, 223, 224-227, 234-237, 243-246, 252-254, 265-268, 274, 276, 277, 279, 301, 303
EFDD:	amendments 88, 89, 105, 119, 170, 177, 274, 281, 303

Requests for split votes
ALDE:
Commission proposal, Annex III, part 3, PFC 3
First part	Text as a whole excluding the words: ‘± 1,0 at any time in the distribution chain’ and ‘- 25% relative deviation of the declared value at any time in the distribution chain’
Second part	those words
Commission proposal, Annex III – part 3 – PFC 4
First part	Text as a whole excluding the words: ‘± 75% relative deviation at any time in the distribution chain’, ‘± 1,0 at any time in the distribution chain’, ‘- 25% relative deviation at any time in the distribution chain’, ‘- 25% relative deviation at any time in the distribution chain’, ‘- 25% relative deviation at any time in the distribution chain’, ‘± 75% relative deviation at any time in the distribution chain’, ‘± 75% relative deviation at any time in the distribution chain’ and ‘± 75% relative deviation at any time in the distribution chain’
Second part	those words
amendment 90
First part:	‘With regard to Part II of Annex I, the empowerment to adopt delegated acts referred to in paragraphs 1 and 4 of this Article shall not cover adaptations to the contaminant limits specified therein, unless new contaminant limits are necessary as a consequence of adding new component materials under Annex II.’
Second part:	‘When new contaminant limits are set, those limits shall only apply to the new component materials added.’
Verts/ALE:
amendment 18
First part	Text as a whole excluding the words: ‘degradation of soil organic compounds’ and ‘Therefore, they act in addition to fertilisers’
Second part	those words
amendment 19
First part	The text as a whole without the second, third and fourth occurrences of the word ‘new’
Second part	those words
amendment 28
First part	‘CE-marked fertilising products should be placed on the market only if they are sufficiently effective and do not present a risk to human, animal or plant health, to safety or to the environment when properly stored and used for their intended purpose, and under conditions of use which can be reasonably foreseen, that is when such use could result from lawful and readily predictable human behaviour. Therefore, requirements for safety and quality, as well as appropriate control mechanisms, should be established.’
Second part	Deletion of the sentence ‘Furthermore, the intended use of CE marked fertilising products should not lead to food or feed becoming unsafe.’
amendment 38
First part	Text as a whole excluding the words: ‘from the phyllosphere’
Second part	those words
amendment 42
First part	Text as a whole excluding the words: ‘and provided that they do not influence the conditions for making them available on the market.’
Second part	those words
amendment 85
First part	Text as a whole excluding the word: ‘new’
Second part	that word
amendment 86
First part	Text as a whole excluding the word: ‘new’
Second part	that word
amendment 96
First part	Text as a whole excluding the words: ‘confined’ and ‘or phyllosphere’
Second part	‘confined’
Third part	‘or phyllosphere’
amendment 109
First part	Text as a whole excluding the words: ‘peat, including’
Second part	those words
amendment 123
First part	Text as a whole excluding the words: ‘peat, including’
Second part	those words
amendment 132
First part	Text as a whole excluding the words: ‘Organic carbon (Corg) in the CE marked fertilising product shall not exceed 1 % by mass.’
Second part	those words
amendment 175
First part	Text as a whole excluding the words: ‘, including mulch’
Second part	those words
amendment 177
First part	Text as a whole excluding the words: ‘peat,’
Second part	those words
amendment 203
First part	Text as a whole excluding the word: ‘confined’
Second part	that word
amendment 275
First part	‘b a) improving the soil as a biodegradable mulch film, which complies in particular with the requirements of points 2a and 3 of CMC 10, or’
Second part	‘b b) binding components of the fertilising product, without any contact with the soil, or’
Third part	‘(bc) improving the stability of the CE marked fertilising products, or’
Fourth part	‘(bd) improving water penetration into soil.’
ENF:
amendment 402
First part	Indent 1
Second part	Indent 2
Third part	Indent 3
amendment 403
First part	Indent 1
Second part	Indent 2
Third part	Indent 3

Miscellaneous

Amendments 325, 326, 327, 328 and 329 had been withdrawn.

Amendments 330-335 had been cancelled.

Report: Michał Boni (A8-0359/2016)

Subject	Am No	Author	RCV etc.	Vote	RCV/EV – remarks
Provisional agreement
Provisional agreement	23	committee	RCV	+	609, 19, 29

Report: Alain Cadec (A8-0285/2017)

Subject	RCV etc.	Vote	RCV/EV – remarks
Vote: Commission proposal	RCV	+	599, 57, 2

Motion for a resolution: B8-0567/2017

Subject	Am No	Author	RCV etc.		Vote		RCV/EV – remarks
Motion for a resolution B8-0567/2017 (ENVI Committee)
§ 1	17	ENF	RCV		-		91, 551, 24
§ 2	12	PPE	EV		-		326, 327, 16
After § 4	7	S&D, GUE/NGL, Verts/ALE	split
			1/RCV		+		578, 81, 7
			2/RCV		+		342, 293, 23
§ 5	13	PPE	split
			1/RCV		-		235, 403, 30
			2/RCV		-		206, 419, 47
	2	EFDD	RCV		-		145, 501, 23
	1	S&D	RCV		+		353, 280, 36
	6	Verts/ALE	RCV		+		332, 307, 30
	18	ENF	RCV		-		71, 582, 4
§ 7	14	PPE	EV		-		306, 337, 21
After § 7	19	ENF	RCV		-		42, 589, 36
§ 8	20	ENF	split
			1/RCV		-		102, 524, 44
			2/RCV		-		90, 523, 51
§ 10	3	EFDD	RCV		-		270, 379, 19
	15	PPE			-
	21	ENF	RCV		-		100, 523, 45
Recital B	16	PPE			-
Recital C	8	PPE			-
After recital I	9	PPE	EV		+		329, 322, 21
After recital K	4	Verts/ALE			-
Recital L	10	PPE	EV		+		381, 269, 17
Recital P	11	PPE	EV		+		326, 321, 20
After Recital Q	5	Verts/ALE			-
Vote: resolution (text as a whole)				RCV		+		355, 204, 111

Requests for roll-call votes
Verts/ALE:	amendments 6, 7, 13; final vote
ENF:	amendments 17, 18, 19, 21
GUE/NGL	amendments 1, 2, 13; final vote
EFDD:	amendments 1, 2, 3, 20

Requests for split votes
ENF:
amendment 20
First part	‘Invites the Commission and the Member States to ensure sufficient testing and monitoring of glyphosate residues in feed, food and drinks produced in, as well as imported into, the Union, in order to address the current data gap pointed out by EFSA; invites the Commission and the Member States to immediately withdraw existing authorisations for glyphosate-tolerant genetically modified organisms and not to validate new ones;’
Second part	‘stresses that Member States should be able to ban the import of glyphosate-treated products;’
PPE:
amendment 7
First part	‘Calls on the Commission and the Member States not to approve the use of glyphosate for pre-harvest desiccation’
Second part	‘with effect from 16 December 2017.’
S&D:
amendment 13
First part	Text as a whole excluding the words: ‘renew’
Second part	those words
Miscellaneous:
Laurenţiu Rebega (ENF Group) had also signed amendments 17 and 18.

Motion for a resolution: B8-0568/2017

Subject	RCV etc.	Vote	RCV/EV – remarks
Motion for a resolution B8-0568/2017 (ENVI Committee)
Vote: resolution (text as a whole)	RCV	+	433, 201, 33

Requests for roll-call votes
Verts/ALE, ENF:	final vote

Motion for a resolution: B8-0570/2017

Subject	RCV etc.	Vote	RCV/EV – remarks
Motion for a resolution B8-0570/2017 (ENVI Committee)
Vote: resolution (text as a whole)	RCV	+	433, 202, 31

Requests for roll-call votes
Verts/ALE, ENF:	final vote

Motion for a resolution: B8-0569/2017

Subject	RCV etc.	Vote	RCV/EV – remarks
Motion for a resolution B8-0569/2017 (ENVI Committee)
Vote: resolution (text as a whole)	RCV	+	434, 201, 28

Requests for roll-call votes
Verts/ALE, ENF:	final vote

Report: Jens Geier (A8-0301/2017)

Subject	RCV etc.	Vote	RCV/EV – remarks
single vote	RCV	+	553, 70, 42

Report: Jens Geier (A8-0298/2017) (Majority of Parliament’s component Members + 3/5 of the votes cast)

Subject	RCV etc.	Vote	RCV/EV – remarks
Vote: resolution (text as a whole)	RCV	+	562, 65, 44

Motion for a resolution: B8-0565/2017

Subject	Am No	Author	RCV etc.		Vote		RCV/EV – remarks
Motion for a resolution B8-0565/2017 (BUDG Committee)
§ 1	12	GUE/NGL			-
	8	EFDD			-
§ 2	13	GUE/NGL			-
§ 3	14	GUE/NGL			-
	9	EFDD			-
After § 3	15	GUE/NGL	split
			1		-
			2		-
	16	GUE/NGL			-
	17	GUE/NGL	split
			1/RCV		-		159, 489, 20
			2/RCV		↓
	18	GUE/NGL			-
	19	GUE/NGL	RCV		-		137, 500, 27
§ 4	1	ENF	RCV		-		75, 566, 23
	10	EFDD			-
	20	GUE/NGL	RCV		-		20, 624, 25
After § 4	21	GUE/NGL	RCV		-		35, 564, 67
§ 5	2	ENF	RCV		-		84, 503, 70
	22	GUE/NGL			-
	11	EFDD			-
	7	S&D			-
§ 7	23D	GUE/NGL			-
	3	ENF	RCV		-		85, 570, 11
After § 7	24	GUE/NGL	RCV		-		220, 410, 37
§ 9	25	GUE/NGL	RCV		-		71, 501, 96
§ 10	§	original text	split
			1		+
			2		+
After § 10	4	ENF			-
§ 13	5	ENF			-
After § 16	26	GUE/NGL	RCV		-		69, 546, 57
§ 17	6	ENF	RCV		-		93, 501, 70
Vote: resolution (text as a whole)				RCV		+		442, 189, 37

Requests for roll-call votes
ENF:	amendments 1, 2, 3, 6
GUE/NGL:	amendments 17, 19, 20, 21, 24, 25, 26; final vote

Requests for split votes
Verts/ALE:
§ 10
First part	Text as a whole excluding the words: ‘and defence’
Second part	those words
amendment 15
First part	‘Deplores the option deliberated to increase the budgetary allocation for militarism, securitarianism and foreign interference, a political and ideological option that has not only been funding and promoting several contemporary armed conflicts, but has also been at the root of the migration flows and the looting of resources in developing countries;’
Second part	‘denounces the fact that for the post-2020 period the Commission claims that it will allocate EUR 1.5 billion of the EU budget to the European Defence Fund per year, which, together with Member States’ contributions to finance joint development projects, could generate costs in the field of defence research and capability of EUR 5.5 billion per year;’
amendment 17
First part	Text as a whole excluding the words: ‘and external action’
Second part	those words

Report: Virginie Rozière (A8-0295/2017)

Subject	Am No	Author	RCV etc.		Vote		RCV/EV – remarks
Alternative motion for a resolution	1	ENF	RCV		-		45, 550, 66
§ 3	§	original text	RCV		+		338, 322, 5
§ 13	§	original text	RCV		+		358, 285, 24
§ 19	§	original text	sep		+
§ 23	§	original text	sep/EV		-		300, 357, 9
§ 25	§	original text	split
			1/RCV		+		604, 49, 14
			2/RCV		+		343, 277, 33
§ 35	2	76+ MEPs	RCV		-		288, 346, 34
§ 36	§	original text	RCV		+		404, 249, 12
§ 38	3	76+ MEPs	RCV		-		294, 350, 26
§ 48	§	original text	split
			1/RCV		+		615, 27, 22
			2/RCV		+		349, 272, 24
§ 50	4	76+ MEPs	RCV		-		308, 351, 7
§ 57	§	original text	split
			1		+
			2		+
§ 58	§	original text	split
			1		+
			2/RCV		-		323, 330, 15
§ 61	§	original text	sep		+
§ 65	§	original text	sep/EV		-		303, 360, 4
§ 67	§	original text	RCV		+		333, 318, 18
Recital C	§	original text	sep/EV		+		363, 296, 5
Recital N	§	original text	RCV		+		328, 307, 23
Recital V	§	original text	sep/EV		-		308, 326, 32
Recital Y	§	original text	sep		+
Recital AG	§	original text	sep		+
Recital AK	§	original text	RCV		+		367, 256, 43
Vote: Motion for a resolution (JURI Committee)				RCV		+		399, 101, 166

Requests for roll-call votes
ENF:	amendment 1
S&D:	amendments 2, 3, 4; recitals N, AK; §§ 3, 13, 25, 48
76+ Members:	amendments 2, 3, 4; §§ 36, 67

Requests for separate votes
76+ Members:	recitals C, N, V, Y, AG, AK; §§ 3, 13, 19, 23, 36, 61, 65, 67

Requests for split votes
76+ Members:
§ 25
First part	‘Considers that the implementation of comprehensive legal regulations on the protection of whistle-blowers encourages a ‘speak up’ culture and that whistle-blowing should be promoted as an act of good citizenship; urges the Member States and the EU institutions, therefore, to promote the positive role that whistle-blowers play, as well the serious concerns regarding their often vulnerable and defenceless position, in particular through awareness-raising and protection campaigns, communication and training efforts; recommends to the Commission, in particular, that a comprehensive plan on this issue be presented; calls, in this context, for a website to be launched where useful information on the protection of whistle-blowers should be provided, and through which complaints can be submitted;’
Second part	‘stresses that this website should be easily accessible to the public and should keep their data anonymous;’
§ 48
First part	Text as a whole excluding the words: ‘considers, therefore, that in the case of alleged retaliatory actions taken against the whistle-blower, the employer shall provide evidence that these actions are unrelated to the report made by the whistle-blower; considers that the protection of the whistle-blower should be granted on the basis of the information exposed and not on the intention of the whistle-blower;’
Second part	those words
§ 57
First part	‘Calls on Member States and EU institutions, in cooperation with all relevant authorities, to introduce and take all possible necessary measures to protect the confidentiality of the information sources in order to prevent any discriminatory actions or threats, as well as to establish transparent channels for information disclosure, to set up independent national and EU authorities to protect whistle-blowers,’
Second part	‘and to consider providing those authorities with specific support funds; calls also for the establishment of a centralised European authority for the effective protection of whistle-blowers and people who assist their acts based on the model of national privacy watchdogs;’
§ 58
First part	‘Calls on the Commission, in order for these measures to be effective, to develop instruments focusing on providing protection against unjustified legal prosecutions, economic sanctions and discrimination;’
Second part	‘suggests the setting up of national funds or a European fund, financed in part from monies recovered or proceeds from fines, to give appropriate financial support to whistle-blowers in the EU;’

Report: Laura Agea (A8-0292/2017)

Subject	Am No	Author	RCV etc.		Vote		RCV/EV – remarks
§ 2	§	original text	split
			1		+
			2		-
			3		-
			4		-
§ 3	§	original text	split
			1/RCV		+		527, 133, 5
			2/RCV		-		299, 351, 13
§ 7	§	original text	split
			1		+
			2/EV		+		363, 292, 4
§ 9	§	original text	split
			1		+
			2		+
§ 21	§	original text	split
			1/RCV		+		496, 151, 21
			2/RCV		-		287, 358, 9
§ 36	§	original text	split
			1		+
			2		+
§ 43	§	original text	split
			1		+
			2/EV		-		322, 331, 6
			3/EV		+		328, 315, 20
			4		+
§ 47, point c	§	original text	split
			1		+
			2		-
§ 53	§	original text	split
			1/RCV		+		539, 75, 44
			2/RCV		-		304, 307, 43
§ 44	§	original text	sep		-
Recital G	§	original text	sep		-
Recital M	§	original text	split
			1		+
			2		+
Recital X	§	original text	sep/EV		-		311, 314, 24
Recital AV	§	original text	sep/EV		+		346, 273, 20
Recital BA	§	original text	sep		+
Recital BC	§	original text	sep/EV		+		291, 269, 92
Vote: resolution (text as a whole)				RCV		+		451, 147, 42

Requests for roll-call votes
S&D:	§§ 3, 21
Verts/ALE:	§§ 3, 21, 53

Requests for separate votes
76+ Members:	recitals G, X, AV, BA, BC, § 44

Requests for split votes
76+ Members:
Recital M
First part	Text as a whole excluding the word: ‘universal’
Second part	that word
§ 2
First part	Text as a whole excluding the words: ‘be based on the redistribution of the wealth produced’, ‘wage increases, and’ and ‘universal, free and’
Second part	‘be based on the redistribution of the wealth produced’
Third part	‘wage increases, and’
Fourth part	‘universal, free and’
§ 3
First part	‘Highlights the importance of adequate public funding to finance minimum income schemes; ‘calls on the Commission to specifically monitor the use of the 20 % of the total allocation of the ESF devoted to fighting poverty and social exclusion, and also to examine, in the forthcoming review of the Common Provisions Regulation for the Structural Funds (Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013), and in particular in the framework of the European Social Fund and the EU Programme for Employment and Social Innovation (EaSI), the funding possibilities for helping every Member State establish a minimum income scheme where it does not exist or improve the functioning and effectiveness of existing systems,’
Second part	‘and, if necessary, to take into consideration the setting-up of an appropriate European Fund, on a temporary basis, to work as an instrument of cohesion policy and European solidarity;’
§ 7
First part	Text as a whole excluding the words: ‘Highlights the importance of the automatic stabilisation dimension of welfare systems for the absorption of social shock waves caused by external effects such as recessions;’ and 'also'
Second part	those words
§ 9
First part	Text as a whole excluding the words: ‘high-quality universal’
Second part	those words
§ 21
First part	Text as a whole excluding the words: ‘points out in this regard that it has been shown that it is legally possible to have a framework directive on minimum income within the context of the current EU Treaties; is of the view that a framework of this kind should be based on tangible factors and should bear in mind the social and economic context and historical practices of each Member State, and that it could be an incentive to motivate people to be economically active; ‘
Second part	those words
§ 36
First part	‘Argues that minimum income schemes are transitional instruments for reducing and fighting poverty, social exclusion and inequality, and that they should be seen as a social investment; ‘
Second part	‘notes the counter-cyclical effects of minimum income schemes;’
§ 43
First part	Text as a whole excluding the words: ‘designed at European level concerning common objectives’, ‘in contributing to a level playing field among Member States’ and ‘and to consider further steps’
Second part	‘designed at European level concerning common objectives’
Third part	‘in contributing to a level playing field among Member States’
Fourth part	‘and to consider further steps’
§ 47 (c)
First part	Text as a whole excluding the words: ‘such as homeless people, refugees, asylum seekers, Roma or young people’
Second part	those words
§ 53
First part	Text as a whole excluding the words: ‘and a policy environment dominated by austerity;’
Second part	those words