Motion for a resolution B8-0214/2018 (CONT committee)
§ 1
5
GUE/NGL Verts/ALE
RCV
+
464, 205, 8
8
ECR
EV
-
301, 371, 6
§ 6
9
ECR
-
After § 18
3
ENF
RCV
-
142, 527, 7
10
ECR
-
11
ECR
-
§ 20
§
original text
RCV
+
621, 60, 5
After § 20
12
ECR
-
§ 22
1
EFDD
-
6
GUE/NGL, Verts/ALE
RCV
-
260, 422, 6
7
GUE/NGL, Verts/ALE
RCV
-
289, 388, 4
§
original text
split
1/RCV
+
459, 220, 6
2/RCV
+
388, 266, 28
3/RCV
+
627, 50, 6
After § 22
2
ALDE
-
4
ENF
RCV
-
120, 528, 38
13
ECR
-
After § 23
14
ECR
-
15
ECR
-
§ 27
§
original text
sep/EV
+
372, 304, 20
Après le § 27
17
GUE/NGL, Verts/ALE
RCV
-
250, 435, 9
16
ENF
RCV
-
142, 542, 3
After § 30
18
Verts/ALE
RCV
-
196, 456, 42
Vote: resolution (text as a whole)
+
Requests for roll-call votes
ENF:
amendments 3, 4, 16
ALDE:
§§ 20, 22
GUE/NGL:
amendments 5, 6, 7, 17
Verts/ALE:
amendments 6, 7, 18
PPE:
§ 22
Requests for separate votes
ALDE:
§ 20
PPE:
§§ 20, 27
Requests for split votes
PPE, ALDE:
§ 22
First part
‘Is aware that the revocation of a favourable administrative act is generally not possible due to legal constraints,’
Second part
‘generally’
Third part
‘Is aware that the revocation of a favourable administrative act is generally not possible due to legal constraints, but nevertheless asks the Commission to reopen the procedure of appointment of the new Secretary-General in order to give other possible candidates within the European public administration the possibility to apply and hence allow for a wider choice among potential candidates from the same function group and grade; calls on the Commission to conduct open and transparent application procedures in the future;’
13. Progress on the UN global Compacts for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration and on Refugees
‘whereas experience has shown that migrants make positive contributions to the countries they live in, as well as to their home countries;’
Second part
‘whereas migrants contribute to the countries they live in by paying taxes and injecting around 85 % of their earnings into the economies of those countries; whereas in 2017 an estimated USD 596 billion was transferred in remittances globally, with USD 450 billion going to developing countries – up to three times the total of official development aid;’
14. Implementation of the EU external financing instruments: mid-term review 2017 and the future post-2020 architecture
‘Is concerned that the EU and its instruments face significant challenges, including political trade-offs between the promotion of values and rights and short-term security interests, the emergence of new actors in the field of global governance and international financial institutions, as well as numerous violent global conflicts around the world, including volatility in the EU’s immediate neighbourhood, both to the East and to the South,’
Second part
‘and an increasingly aggressive and assertive policy of Russia;’
§ 6
First part
‘Notes that EU Trust Funds were created to address the root causes of migration; ‘regrets that the contributions from the EU budget to the EU Trust Funds and the Facility for Refugees in Turkey have reduced the overall coherence, long-term vision and impact of the Union’s action;’
Second part
‘stresses once again that new priorities must be financed with new appropriations;’
Third part
‘deeply regrets that Parliament was not formally consulted or asked to give its approval at any stage of the decision-making process in relation to the ‘Turkey statement’;’
§ 24
First part
Text as a whole excluding the words: ‘the illegal annexation of Crimea and the Russian-sponsored conflict in Eastern Ukraine;’
Second part
those words
§ 55
First part
‘Stresses the need to provide additional financial resources and training support to CSOs; insists that urgent measures are required to further diminish the bureaucratic burden and procedural obstacles encountered by CSOs, especially by local CSOs; excluding the words ‘additional financial resources and’
Second part
‘additional financial resources and’
Third part
‘calls for specific budget lines devoted to capacity building for CSOs in order to enhance their ability to access funding;’
Fourth part
‘regrets that the issue of the lack of CSO participation in programming and implementing external instruments has not been raised in the Commission’s mid-term review report; calls on the Commission to mainstream a more strategic involvement of CSOs in all external instruments and programmes, as requested by both the Council and Parliament;’
§ 89
First part
‘Reiterates the fundamental importance of supporting and promoting democracy and human rights in third countries, including the protection of human rights defenders,’
Second part
‘irrespective of interference by authorities of third countries’
§ 92
First part
Text as a whole excluding the words: ‘Roma, LGBTI, persons’
Second part
those words
15. Annual reports 2015-2016 on subsidiarity and proportionality
Miscellaneous: The vote on the decision on the discharge covered the closure of accounts (see Annex IV, Article 5(1) of the Rules of Procedure).
The vote on the decision on the discharge covered both the Commission and the executive agencies (Regulation 58/2003, Article 14(3) and Regulation 1653/2004, Article 66(2).
Amendment 57 had been deleted.
17. Discharge 2016: Court of Auditors’ special reports in the context of the 2016 Commission discharge
‘Is of the view that the Members’ transport service should be used solely to reach Parliament premises from the airport or station and back again, and that minivans and minibuses should be provided to that effect in order to optimise expenditure;’
Second part
‘points out, moreover, that Members have the option of using rail transport in Belgium free of charge;’ ‘encourages the Secretary-General to negotiate with the Belgian railways to offer more direct trains between Brussels-Luxembourg railway station and Zaventem Airport at peak arrival and departure times for Members and asks the secretariat to promote train travel for Members, in order also to lower Members’ carbon footprint;’
amendment 20
First part
‘Recalls that the Code of Conduct requires Members to declare any gifts they receive when representing Parliament in an official capacity, in accordance with the conditions laid down in the Implementing Measures for the Code of Conduct, and that such gifts be recorded in the register of gifts;’
Second part
‘wonders why in 2016 only one gift was declared, while in 2015 there were 25;’
PPE:
§ 73, indent 6
First part
‘a compulsory’
Second part
‘training’ and ‘on sexual harassment and mobbing for Members and officials in positions of power;’
S&D:
§ 29
First part
‘Calls on the Secretary-General to institute measures to deal with significantly increasing hotel prices in Strasbourg, prices that have increased dramatically from one year to the next with an especially marked peak during the plenary session;’
Second part
‘recommends facilitating transport between Strasbourg and the German side of the border, where prices are significantly lower (possibly by means of a shuttle bus service between Kehl and the Parliament building);’
§ 38
First part
‘Acknowledges that, according to the Court, the costs of the geographic dispersion of Parliament amount to EUR 114million per year; notes the finding, in its resolution of 20 November 2013 on the location of the seats of the Union’s institutions, that 78 % of all missions by Parliament staff coming under the Staff Regulations arise as a direct result of the fact that Parliament’s services are geographically dispersed; recalls that the estimate of the environmental impact of that dispersal is between 11 000 to 19 000 tonnes of CO2 emissions;’
Second part
‘calls on the Council to find a solution for this waste of taxpayers money;’
Miscellaneous: Amendment 19 has been deleted.
20. Discharge 2016: EU general budget - European Council and Council
‘Notes that, according to the current discharge procedure, the CJEU submits annual activity reports to the Court of Auditors in June, the Court of Auditors then submits it report to Parliament in October, and the discharge is voted by Parliament in plenary by May; notes that, unless the discharge is postponed, at least 17 months pass between the closing of annual accounts and the closing of the discharge procedure; points out that auditing in the private sector follows a much shorter timeline; stresses that the discharge procedure needs to be streamlined and sped up’ Excluding the words ‘points out that auditing in the private sector follows a much shorter timeline’
Second part
‘points out that auditing in the private sector follows a much shorter timeline;’
Third part
‘requests that the CJEU and the Court of Auditors follow best practice in the private sector; proposes in this regard to set a deadline for the submission of annual activity reports of 31 March of the year following the accounting year and a deadline for the submission of the Court of Auditors’ reports of 1 July; proposes also to review the timetable for the discharge procedure as set down in Article 5 of Annex IV to Parliament's Rules of Procedure so that the vote on the discharge would take place in Parliament’s plenary part-session of November, thereby closing the discharge procedure within the year following the accounting year in question.’
22. Discharge 2016: EU general budget - Court of Auditors
‘Notes that under the current discharge procedure, annual activity reports are submitted to the Court in June, submitted by the Court to the Parliament in October and voted in plenary by May; notes that by the time discharge is closed, if not postponed, at least 17 months have passed since the closing of the annual accounts; points out that auditing in the private sector follows a much stricter timeline; stresses that the discharge procedure needs to be streamlined and sped up;’ Excluding the words ‘points out that auditing in the private sector follows a much stricter timeline;’
Second part
‘points out that auditing in the private sector follows a much stricter timeline;’
Third part
‘requests that the Court follows the good example set by the private sector and proposes to set a deadline for the submission of annual activity reports for 31 March of the following year, a deadline for the submission of the Court's reports for 1 July and subsequently to review the timetable for the discharge procedure as set down in Article 5 of Annex IV to Parliament's Rules of Procedure so that the vote on the discharge can be held in the plenary part-session of November, thereby closing the discharge procedure within the year following the accounting year in question;’
§ 8
First part
‘Regrets that the extent of considerations in Chapter 10 of the annual report remains limited; asks the Court to provide more detailed data on each institution in order to achieve a better view of the weaknesses in administrative expenditures;’
Second part
‘considers that country specific reporting by the Court for every Member State would be welcome in the future;’
23. Discharge 2016: EU General budget - European Economic and Social Committee
‘Notes that, according to the current discharge procedure, the Committee submits annual activity reports to the Court in June, the Court then submits its report to Parliament in October, and the discharge is voted by Parliament in plenary by May; notes that, unless the discharge is postponed, at least 17 months pass between the closing of annual accounts and the closing of the discharge procedure; points out that auditing in the private sector follows a much shorter timeline; stresses that the discharge procedure needs to be streamlined and sped up’ Excluding the words ‘points out that auditing in the private sector follows a much shorter timeline’
Second part
‘points out that auditing in the private sector follows a much shorter timeline;’
Third part
‘requests that the Committee and the Court follow best practice in the private sector; proposes in this regard to set a deadline for the submission of the annual activity reports of 31 March of the year following the accounting year and a deadline for the submission of the Court’s report of 1 July; proposes also to review the timetable for the discharge procedure as set down in Article 5 of Annex IV to Parliament's Rules of Procedure so that the vote on the discharge would take place in Parliament’s plenary part-session of November, thereby closing the discharge procedure within the year following the accounting year in question.’
24. Discharge 2016: EU general budget - Committee of the Regions
‘Notes that, according to the current discharge procedure, the Committee submits annual activity reports to the Court in June, the Court then submits its report to Parliament in October, and the discharge is voted by Parliament in plenary by May; notes that, unless the discharge is postponed, at least 17 months pass between the closing of annual accounts and the closing of the discharge procedure; points out that auditing in the private sector follows a much shorter timeline; stresses that the discharge procedure needs to be streamlined and sped up;’ excluding the words ‘points out that auditing in the private sector follows a much shorter timeline’
Second part
‘points out that auditing in the private sector follows a much shorter timeline;’
Third part
‘requests that the Committee and the Court follow best practice in the private sector; proposes in this regard to set a deadline for the submission of the annual activity reports of 31 March of the year following the accounting year and a deadline for the submission of the Court’s report of 1 July; proposes also to review the timetable for the discharge procedure as set down in Article 5 of Annex IV to Parliament's Rules of Procedure so that the vote on the discharge would take place in Parliament’s plenary part-session of November, thereby closing the discharge procedure within the year following the accounting year in question.’
§ 17
First part
Text as a whole excluding the words: ‘whilst avoiding overlap with the activities of other Union institutions;’
Second part
those words
25. Discharge 2016: EU general budget - European External Action Service
‘Expresses its support for analysing and refining the cost-effectiveness of ex post control by comparing the cost of ex post control activities with the value of detected errors; notes that the unit cost of detecting errors (cost per euro) amounted to 23 cents in 2016;’
Second part
‘acknowledges that this unit cost is related to the low error rate and hence would be lower if the sum affected by error were higher’
S&D:
§ 46
First part
‘Notes that, according to the current discharge procedure, the EEAS submits annual activity reports to the Court in June, the Court then submits its report to the Parliament in October, and the discharge is voted by Parliament in plenary by May; notes that, unless the discharge is postponed, at least 17 months pass between the closing of annual accounts and the closing of the discharge procedure; points out that auditing in the private sector follows a much shorter timeline; stresses that the discharge procedure needs to be streamlined and sped up;’ excluding the words ‘points out that auditing in the private sector follows a much shorter timeline’
Second part
‘points out that auditing in the private sector follows a much shorter timeline;’
Third part
‘requests that the EEAS and the Court follow best practice in the private sector, proposes in this regard to set a deadline for the submission of annual activity reports of 31 March of the year following the accounting year and a deadline for the submission of the Court’s reports of 1 July; proposes also to review the timetable for the discharge procedure as set down in Article 5 of Annex IV to Parliament's Rules of Procedure so that the vote on the discharge would take place in Parliament’s plenary part-session of November, thereby closing the discharge procedure within the year following the accounting year in question.’
26. Discharge 2016: EU general budget - European Ombudsman
‘Welcomes that the Ombudsman submitted its annual activity report to the Court in March; notes that the Court submitted its report to Parliament in October and that the discharge is to be voted on in plenary by Parliament by May; notes that by the time discharge is closed, if not postponed, at least 17 months have passed since the closing of the annual accounts; points out that auditing in the private sector follows a much shorter timeline; stresses that the discharge procedure needs to be streamlined and sped up’ excluding the words ‘points out that auditing in the private sector follows a much shorter timeline’
Second part
‘points out that auditing in the private sector follows a much shorter timeline;’
Third part
‘requests that the Committee and the Court of Auditors follow the good example set by the private sector and proposes to set a deadline for the submission of Annual Activity reports on 31 March of the following year, a deadline for the submission for the Court of Auditor’s reports on the 1st of July and subsequently vote on the discharge in the plenary session of November, thereby closing the discharge procedure within the year following the accounting year in question;’
27. Discharge 2016: EU general budget - European Data Protection Supervisor
‘Notes that, according to the current discharge procedure, the Supervisor submits annual activity reports to the Court in June, the Court then submits its report to Parliament in October, and the discharge is voted by Parliament in plenary by May; notes that, unless the discharge is postponed, at least 17 months pass between the closing of the annual accounts and the closing of the discharge procedure; points out that auditing in the private sector follows a much shorter timeline; stresses that the discharge procedure needs to be streamlined and sped up’ excluding the words ‘points out that auditing in the private sector follows a much shorter timeline’
Second part
‘points out that auditing in the private sector follows a much shorter timeline;’
Third part
‘requests that the Supervisor and the Court follow best practice in the private sector; proposes in this regard to set a deadline for the submission of the annual activity reports of 31 March of the year following the accounting year and a deadline for the submission of the Court’s report of 1 July; proposes also to review the timetable for the discharge procedure as set down in Article 5 of Annex IV to Parliament's Rules of Procedure so that the vote on the discharge would take place in Parliament’s plenary part-session of November, thereby closing the discharge procedure within the year following the accounting year in question.’
28. Discharge 2016: Performance, financial management and control of EU agencies
‘Emphasises that the Interinstitutional Working Group on decentralised agencies examined, in particular, the pilot case of the European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) for fee-financed agencies; states that even if agencies are fully fee-funded, they are still fully accountable to the discharge authority considering the reputational risks involved; expresses, moreover, its concerns with the quality indicators used in the EASA pilot, as these are heavily focusing on customer satisfaction and less on air safety; calls upon the Commission to examine how the independence of fully fee-funded agencies can be ensured’
Second part
‘and to consider in that regard a system whereby the fees are paid to the Commission instead of to the agencies directly and the agencies continue to be funded through the Union budget’
Miscellaneous: Monica Macovei moved the following oral amendment: ‘38. Notes that the declarations of interest of management board members, management staff and in-house experts were published by 29 agencies (94 %) on their websites; calls on the remaining agencies who have not yet done so to publish them without further delay listing membership of any other professional organisations, allowing for internal independent scrutiny; welcomes the fact that medium-sized agencies and those more likely to face a conflict of interest due to their field of work perform reviews of the declarations of interest upon their submission, on an annual basis or even more frequently;’
29. Discharge 2016: Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER)
‘Notes with concern that, according to the Corporate Europe Observatory, 46% of the Authority´s experts working at the Authority since 2015 have a conflict of interest due to having direct or indirect ties with lobbies and companies whose products are evaluated by the Authority’
Second part
‘acknowledges that internal procedures are not sufficient to ensure independence between the Authority and industries; notes that staff leaving are obliged to inform the Authority about their future employment and of any potential conflict of interest’
Third part
‘urges the Authority to enforce stricter rules on revolving doors and apply highly dissuasive sanctions in such cases;’
Miscellaneous: The vote on the decision on the discharge covered the closure of accounts (see Annex IV, Article 5(1) of the Rules of Procedure).
42. Discharge 2016: European Institute for Gender Equality (EIGE)