§§ 1, 9, 11, 13, 14, 22; Recitals A, C, D, E, F, G; amendments 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12, 13, 19; final vote
Requests for separate votes
ECR
Recital G
ALDE:
§§ 11, 13, 23
PPE:
§ 15; Recital F
Requests for split votes
ALDE:
Citation 13
First part
Text as a whole excluding the words: ‘the very large number of’
Second part
those words
Recital A
First part
Text as a whole excluding the words: ‘a very large number of’ and ‘arbitrary measures taken against them’
Second part
those words
§ 1
First part
Text as a whole excluding the words: ‘with great concern that problems concerning the German family law system, including the controversial role of the Jugendamt, denounced through petitions by non-German parents, still remain unsolved; underlines’
Second part
those words
PPE:
§ 9
First part
Text as a whole excluding the words: ‘Strongly’ and ‘on the number of cases in Germany in which court rulings were not in line with the recommendations of the Jugendamt and’
Second part
those words
§ 11
First part
‘Condemns the fact that, in cases of supervised parental access, the failure by non-German parents to comply with the Jugendamt officials’ procedure to adopt German as the language during conversations with their children has led to the harsh interruption of conversations’ without the word ‘harsh’
Second part
‘harsh’
Third part
‘and to a ban on contact between the non-German parents and their children; believes that this procedure adopted by the Jugendamt officials constitutes clear discrimination based on origin and language against non-German parents;’
§ 14
First part
Text as a whole excluding the words: ‘German’ and ‘without unlawful interference’
Second part
those words
Recital D
First part
‘whereas the Jugendamt is responsible for the implementation of the decisions taken by the German courts;’
Second part
‘whereas the broad interpretation of these decisions by the Jugendamt has often been detrimental to the effective protection of the rights of non-German parents;’
Recital E
First part
‘whereas the non-recognition and non-enforcement by the competent German authorities of decisions and judgments taken by other EU Member States’ judicial authorities in family disputes having cross-border implications can represent a breach of the principle of mutual recognition and mutual trust among Member States,’
Second part
‘thus jeopardising the effective protection of the best interests of the child;’
ALDE, PPE:
Recital C
First part
‘whereas in family disputes involving children, the Jugendamt delivers a recommendation to the judges,’
Second part
‘the nature of which is practically binding,’
Third part
‘and can adopt temporary measures, such as the ‘Beistandschaft’ (legal advisership),’
Fourth part
‘which cannot be challenged;’
Miscellaneous
Amendments 11 and 24 had been withdrawn.
Pirkko Ruohonen-Lerner had also signed joint motion for a resolution B8-0546/2018.
Text as a whole excluding the words: ‘including its policy on Russia’ and ‘is concerned, however, about Serbia’s continuing military cooperation with Russia and Belarus’
Second part
those words
The Verts/ALE Group had taken over the request previously tabled by the PPE Group for a split vote on amendment 4:
First part
‘Regrets the reiterated denial of the Srebrenica genocide by some Serbian authorities; reminds them that fully cooperating with the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia, and its successor the International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals, also implies fully accepting and implementing its rulings and decisions;’
Second part
‘stresses that the recognition of the Srebrenica genocide is a fundamental step in Serbia’s path towards joining the European Union;’
Text as a whole excluding the words: ‘and Euro-Atlantic’ and ‘whereas the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia is considered to be the candidate country which has made the most progress in aligning its legislation with the EU acquis;’
Second part
‘and Euro-Atlantic’
Third part
‘whereas the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia is considered to be the candidate country which has made the most progress in aligning its legislation with the EU acquis;’
Knut Fleckenstein moved an oral amendment after § 21, which then read as follows:
"Notes with concern that women living in rural and remote areas and Roma and Egyptian women continue to have limited access to primary health care and sexual and reproductive health services, and are often unaware about the availability of such services; calls therefore on the Albanian authorities to ensure better information about such services and ensure that they are accessible, affordable and of quality."
Nikos Androulakis (S&D Group) had also signed Amendment 7.
‘whereas the academic community and education institutions are increasingly vulnerable to interference, pressure or repression from states, the business sector or other non-state actors; whereas every year, hundreds of attacks on universities, higher education institutions and their members are reported around the world, including killings, violence and disappearances, imprisonment wrongful imprisonment/detention, wrongful prosecution, loss of position, wrongful dismissal/expulsion from study, and restrictions on travel or movement, and other extreme or systemic threats;’
Second part
‘whereas violations of academic freedoms are also occurring within Member States of the European Union and its closest partners;’
recital N
First part
Text as a whole excluding the words: ‘including within the EU’
Second part
‘including within the EU’
amendment 1
First part
‘whereas there is an urgent need to adequately address academic freedom during the accession process to the EU in order to prevent the occurrence of attacks in EU Member States,’
Second part
‘such as the attempts to close the Central European University (CEU) in Budapest, which are set to result in the relocation of student admissions to Vienna as of 2019, as well as the blocking of gender studies in Hungary;’
Third part
‘whereas candidate countries should commit to core higher education values, including academic freedom and institutional autonomy;’
amendment 2
First part
‘include the defence and protection of academic freedom and institutional autonomy in the Copenhagen criteria for the EU accession process with a view to preventing attacks on academic freedom in Member States,’
‘whereas sterilisation of women with disabilities without their knowledge or consent is a widespread form of violence,’
Second part
‘in particular affecting members of ethnic minorities such as Roma women;’
Recital L
First part
Text as a whole excluding the words: ‘on the grounds of, among other factors, their gender identity, gender expression, and sex characteristics,’
Second part
those words
Recital V
First part
Text as a whole excluding the words: ‘and precarious’
Second part
those words
§ 4
First part
‘Highlights the fact that women and girls with disabilities suffer from double discrimination due to the intersection of gender and disability, and may often even be exposed to multiple discrimination’
Second part
‘arising from the intersection of gender and disability with sexual orientation, gender identity, gender expression, sex characteristics, country of origin, class, migration status, age, religion or ethnicity;’
§ 11
First part
Text as a whole excluding the words: ‘including trans-specific healthcare as well as’ and the words ‘sexual and reproductive health’ and the words ‘and rights’
Second part
‘including trans-specific healthcare as well as’
Third part
‘sexual and reproductive health’ without the words ‘and rights’
Fourth part
'and rights'
§ 19
First part
Text as a whole excluding the words: ‘and rights’ and ‘calls on the Member States to implement legislative measures that safeguard physical integrity, freedom of choice and self-determination with regard to the sexual and reproductive life of girls and women with disabilities;’
Second part
those words
§ 24
First part
Text as a whole excluding the words: ‘multiple births, premature births, adoptive parents, co-parents,’
Second part
those words
§ 28
First part
Text as a whole excluding the words: ‘gender identity, gender expression, sexual orientation’
Second part
those words
§ 35
First part
‘Calls on the Member States to develop strategies to combat bullying and harassment, including in educational contexts and online, against children and young people on the grounds of disability,’
Second part
‘gender identity or expression, sexual orientation, migration status, class, age, religion or ethnicity;’
§ 37
First part
Text as a whole excluding the words: ‘sexual and reproductive health, family planning’ and the words ‘and trans-specific healthcare’
Second part
‘sexual and reproductive health, family planning’
Third part
‘and trans-specific healthcare’
§ 45
First part
‘Reiterates its call on the Commission to submit a comprehensive European strategy to fight violence against women with a proposal for a legislative act for preventing and combating gender-based violence, paying particular attention to women and girls with disabilities;’
Second part
‘also calls for the establishment of an EU observatory on gender-based violence;’