‘Regrets the fact that many of the recommendations are too vague and lack the specificity required to ensure effective implementation; reiterates the need to set out a timeline for the implementation of the recommendations’
Second part
‘and to detail the possible consequences in the event of non-compliance;’
PPE
§ 9
First part
Text as a whole without the words: ‘and rights’
Second part
those words
§ 26
First part
‘Recalls its position regarding the involvement of a panel of independent experts to advise the three institutions, in close cooperation with the FRA;’
Second part
‘repeats its call on the Commission to invite the FRA to provide methodological advice and conduct comparative research to add detail in key areas of the annual report, given the intrinsic links between fundamental rights and the rule of law;’
Third part
‘asks its Bureau, in light of the reluctance of the Commission and the Council, to organise a public procurement procedure in order to create such a panel under the auspices of Parliament, in line with the commitment undertaken in its previous resolutions, in order to advise Parliament on compliance with Article 2 TEU values in different Member States and to show by example how such a panel could work in practice;’
ECR
§ 25
First part
Text as a whole without the words: ‘recalls that the Parliament has already indicated that Hungary has turned into a hybrid regime of electoral autocracy, according to the relevant indices;’