Report: Ilana Cicurel (A9-0201/2023)

Subject	RCV etc.	Vote	RCV/EV – remarks
Proposal for a decision	EV	+	408, 150, 48

Report: Andrzej Halicki (A9-0202/2023)

Subject	RCV etc.	Vote	RCV/EV – remarks
Proposal for a decision		+

Proposal for a regulation (COM(2023)0237 – C9-0161/2023 – 2023/0140(COD))

Subject	Am No	Author	RCV etc.	Vote	RCV/EV – remarks
Proposal to reject the Commission proposal
Rejection	13	The Left	RCV	-	52, 543, 25
Commission proposal
Article 1, § 1	4	Verts/ALE	RCV	-	142, 388, 88
Article 1, after § 1	5	Verts/ALE	RCV	-	168, 384, 65
Article 2, § 1, point 12	6	Verts/ALE	RCV	-	124, 388, 105
Article 3	18	The Left		-
Article 4, after § 2	19	The Left		-
Article 5, before § 1	20	The Left		-
Article 5, § 3	7D= 21D= 39D=	Verts/ALE The Left S&D	RCV	-	242, 362, 17
Article 6	8D	Verts/ALE	RCV	-	161, 454, 9
Article 6, § 1	22	The Left		-
Article 6, § 3	23D= 40D=	The Left S&D	RCV	-	232, 373, 16
Article 12, § 2	9	Verts/ALE	RCV	-	117, 482, 21
Article 17, § 2	10D	Verts/ALE	RCV	-	161, 376, 87
Article 18	11D= 24D= 41D=	Verts/ALE The Left S&D	RCV	-	249, 369, 5
Article 18, § 1	25D	The Left	RCV	-	247, 374, 5
Article 18, § 2	26D	The Left	RCV	-	250, 370, 6
Article 20	12D	Verts/ALE	RCV	-	154, 384, 86
Recital 15	14D= 37D=	The Left S&D	RCV	-	245, 366, 16
	1	Verts/ALE	RCV	-	161, 405, 53
Recital 16	38D	S&D	RCV	-	232, 373, 20
	15	The Left		-
Recital 41	16D= 42D=	The Left S&D	RCV	-	252, 369, 5
After recital 41	17	The Left		-
Recital 45	2	Verts/ALE	RCV	-	117, 405, 100
Recital 46	3	Verts/ALE	RCV	-	141, 386, 89
Commission proposal			RCV	+	446, 67, 112

Requests for roll-call votes
The Left:	amendments 16, 24, 25, 26
Verts/ALE:	amendments 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12
MEPs:	amendments 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42

Miscellaneous

Amendments 27-36 had been withdrawn.

Report: Lara Wolters (A9-0184/2023)

Subject	Am No	Author	RCV etc.	Vote	RCV/EV – remarks
Amendments by the committee responsible – put to the vote collectively	1-7, 9-10, 12-14, 16-18, 20-24, 28-37, 39-64, 67, 70-76,82-84, 86-88, 94, 97-102, 106- 109, 111-113, 117-120, 122-126, 128-131, 133- 202, 204-205, 207-211, 213-233, 235-236, 238- 246, 257-288, 290-297, 306-322, 324, 326-327	committee		+
Amendments by the committee responsible – separate vote	27	committee	sep	+
	38	committee	split
			1	+
			2/RCV	+	466, 151, 11
	68	committee	split
			1	+
			2/RCV	+	472, 154, 4
	77	committee	sep/EV	+	326, 293, 9
	79	committee	sep	+
	80	committee	sep/EV	+	341, 232, 55
	81	committee	sep	+
	95	committee	sep	+
	103	committee	sep	+
	104	committee	sep	+
	105	committee	sep/EV	+	392, 224, 10
	110	committee	split
			1	+
			2/RCV	+	465, 160, 6
	116	committee	RCV	+	346, 281, 3
	127	committee	RCV	+	478, 147, 5
	203	committee	sep	+
	206	committee	sep	+
	212	committee	sep	+
	289	committee	sep	+
	323	committee	sep	+
Article 1, § 1, sub§ 1, point a	412	MEPs	RCV	-	184, 427, 20
	85	committee	split
			1	+
			2/RCV	+	469, 142, 22
	392	ID	RCV	↓
Article 2, § 1, introductory part	397	ECR	RCV	-	146, 469, 8
Article 2, § 1, point a	89	committee	EV	+	331, 290, 5
	420CP1	MEPs		↓
Article 2, § 1, point b	420CP2D	MEPs		-
	90-93	committee		+
Article 2, § 2, after point b	421	MEPs		-
Article 2, after § 2	393	ID	RCV	-	137, 488, 6
	398	ECR		-
Article 2, § 3	399	ECR	RCV	-	138, 486, 8
	96	committee		+
Article 3, § 1, point g	422CP1	MEPs		-
	114	committee	EV	+	376, 243, 12
	400	ECR	RCV	↓
	422CP2= 115=	MEPs committee		+
Article 3, § 1, point g, indent 1	413	MEPs		-
Article 3, § 1, point n	121	committee		+
	401	ECR		↓
Article 3, § 1, point o	387D	PPE	EV	-	313, 317, 3
Article 3, § 1, point p	388D	PPE	EV	-	310, 321, 3
After Article 3	132CP1	committee		+
	423	MEPs	EV	-	179, 442, 10
	132CP2	committee		+
Article 7, § 5, after sub§ 2	424	MEPs		-
Article 8, § 6, after sub§ 2	425	MEPs		-
Article 14, § 1	414	MEPs		-
	234	committee		+
Article 14, § 2	415	MEPs		-
	237	committee		+
Article 15	394D= 402D=	ID ECR	RCV	-	149, 480, 1
	426	MEPs		-
	247	committee	split
			1	+
			2/RCV	+	350, 277, 3
	248	committee	sep	+
	249	committee	sep	+
	250	committee	sep	+
	251-252	committee		+
	253	committee	sep/EV	+	337, 287, 5
	254	committee	sep	+
	255	committee		+
	389D	PPE		-
	256	committee		+
Article 22	403D	ECR		-
	298	committee		+
	427	MEPs		↓
	299	committee		+
	428	MEPs		↓
	300-301	committee		+
	302	committee	sep/EV	+	339, 291, 2
	303	committee	sep	+
	429	MEPs		-
	304	committee	sep	+
	305	committee		+
Article 25	390D= 404D=	PPE ECR		-
Article 26	391D= 405D=	PPE ECR	EV	+	312, 305, 9
Article 30, § 1, sub§ 2, introductory part	325	committee	split
			1	+
			2/EV	+	385, 230, 13
Annex I	406D	ECR		-
	328-381	committee		+
	407	ECR		-
	408	ECR		-
Recital 7	395D	ECR		-
	8	committee		+
Recital 10	382D	PPE	EV	-	295, 328, 9
Recital 11	383D	PPE		-
	11	committee		+
Recital 15	409	MEPs		-
	15	committee		+
Recital 18	416	MEPs		-
	19	committee		+
Recital 21	25	committee		+
	417	MEPs		↓
Recital 22	396	ECR		-
	26	committee		+
Recital 47	410	MEPs		-
	65	committee		+
Recital 48	411	MEPs		-
	66	committee		+
Recital 51	384D	PPE	EV	-	313, 313, 2
	69	committee	EV	+	357, 237, 6
Recital 56	418	MEPs		-
Recital 59	78	committee		+
	419	MEPs		↓
Recital 63	385D	PPE	EV	-	307, 317, 3
Recital 64	386D	PPE		-
Commission proposal			RCV	+	366, 225, 38

Requests for roll-call votes
ECR:	amendments 397, 399, 400, 402, 412
ID:	amendments 38 (2nd part), 68 (2nd part), 85 (2nd part), 110 (2nd part), 116, 127, 247 (2nd part), 392, 393, 394

Requests for separate votes
MEPs:	amendments 27, 77, 79, 80, 81, 95, 116, 302, 303, 304, 323
PPE:	amendments 103, 104, 105, 203
ECR:	amendment 116
ID:	amendments 96, 206, 212, 248, 249, 250, 253, 254, 256, 289

Requests for split votes
MEPs
amendment 325
First part	‘They shall apply those provisions from… [OJ to insert: 3 years from the entry into force of this Directive] as regards companies referred to in Article 2(1) which had more than 1000 employees on average and had a net worldwide turnover of more than EUR 150 million in the last financial year, or were the ultimate parent company of a group with such a number of employees and generating such a turnover, and Article 2(2) which generated a net turnover of more than EUR 150 million in the Union in the financial year preceding the last financial year, or were the ultimate parent company of a group generating such a turnover.’
Second part	‘They shall apply those provisions from… [OJ to insert: 4 years from the entry into force of this Directive] as regards companies referred to in Article 2(1), which had more than 500 employees on average and had a net worldwide turnover of more than EUR 150 million in the last financial year, or were the ultimate parent company of a group with such a number of employees and generating such a turnover. They shall apply those provisions from… [OJ to insert: 4 years from entry into force of this Directive] as regards companies referred to in Article 2(1) point (a), which had more than 250 employees on average and had a net worldwide turnover of more than EUR 40 million, and Article 2(2) which generated a net turnover of more than EUR 40 million in the Union and EUR 150 million worldwide in the financial year preceding the last financial year or were the ultimate parent company of a group generating such a turnover. By way of derogation from the fourth subparagraph of this paragraph, companies referred to in Article 2(1), point (a), which had more than 250 employees on average and had a net worldwide turnover of more than EUR 40 million but not more than EUR 150 million in the last financial year may decide not to fulfil the obligations under this Directive until [OJ to insert: 5 years from entry into force of this Directive]. In such cases, the company shall notify the supervisory authority, while providing a brief statement on why it is the case.’
ID
amendment 38
First part	‘The way a company can be involved in an adverse impact varies. A company can cause an adverse impact where its activities on their own are sufficient to result in an adverse impact. A company can contribute to an adverse impact where its own activities, in combination with the activities of other entities, cause an impact, or that the activities of the company cause, facilitate or incentivise another entity to cause an adverse impact. The contribution must be substantial, meaning that it does not include minor or trivial contributions. Assessing the substantial nature of the contribution and understanding when the actions of the company may have caused, facilitated or incentivised another entity to cause an adverse impact can involve the consideration of multiple factors. Several factors can be taken into account, including the extent to which a company may encourage or motivate an adverse impact by another entity, i.e. the degree to which the activity increased the risk of the impact occurring, the extent to which a company could or should have known about the adverse impact or potential for adverse impact, i.e. the degree of foreseeability, and the degree to which any of the company's activities actually mitigated the adverse impact or decreased the risk of the impact occurring. The mere existence of a business relationship or activities which create the general conditions in which it is possible for adverse impacts to occur should not in itself constitute a relationship of contribution. The activity in question should substantially increase the risk of adverse impact.’
Second part	‘Lastly, a company can be directly linked to an impact, where there is a relationship between the adverse impact and the company’s products, services or operations through another business relationship and where the company has neither caused nor contributed to the impact. Directly linked is not defined by a direct business relationship. Also, a direct linkage should not imply that the responsibility shifts from the business relationship causing an adverse impact to the company with which it has a linkage.’
amendment 68
First part	Text as a whole without the words: ‘in consultation with stakeholders’ and ‘as well as the objective of achieving climate neutrality by 2050 as established in Regulation (EU) 2021/1119 (European Climate Law), and the 2030 climate target. The plan should take into account the value chain and include time-bound targets related to their climate objectives for scope 1, 2 and, where relevant, 3 emissions, including, where appropriate, absolute emission reduction targets for greenhouse gas including, where relevant, methane emissions, for 2030 and in five-year steps up to 2050 based on conclusive scientific evidence, except where a company can demonstrate that its operations and value chain do not cause greenhouse gas emissions and that such emission reduction targets would therefore not be appropriate. The plans should develop implementing actions to achieve the company’s climate targets and be based on conclusive scientific evidence, meaning evidence with independent scientific validation that is consistent with the limiting of global warming to 1.5°C as defined by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and taking into account the recommendations of the European Scientific Advisory Board on Climate Change.’
Second part	those words
amendment 85
First part	Text as a whole without the words: ‘or are directly linked to’ and ‘in their value chain’
Second part	those words
amendment 110
First part	Text as a whole without the words: ‘or indirect’ and ‘in its value chain’
Second part	those words
amendment 247
First part	Text as a whole without the words: ‘and the objective of achieving climate neutrality as established in Regulation (EU) 2021/1119 (European Climate Law) as regards its operations in the Union, including its 2050 climate neutrality target and the 2030 climate target’
Second part	those words

Miscellaneous

Nicola Beer, Andreas Glück, Svenja Hahn, Moritz Körner and Jan-Christoph Oetjen had withdrawn their support from amendments 409-415.

Report: Paolo De Castro (A9-0173/2023)

Subject	Am No	Author	RCV etc.	Vote	RCV/EV – remarks
Amendments by the committee responsible – put to the vote collectively	1-77, 79-80, 83-152, 154- 182, 184, 186-263, 265, 268-271, 273-282	committee		+
Article 12, before § 1	284	The Left		-
	78	committee		+
Article 12, § 4	81	committee	sep	+
Article 12, § 5	82	committee	sep	+
Article 30, § 2	153	committee	RCV	+	536, 90, 1
Article 34, § 1	183	committee	split
			1	+
			2	+
Article 34, after § 2	185	committee	split
			1	+
			2	+
Article 81, § 1, point 1	264	committee	RCV	-	292, 326, 8
Article 81, § 1, after point 1 b	266	committee	RCV	-	278, 343, 9
Article 81, § 1, after point 1 c	267	committee	RCV	-	284, 336, 10
Article 81, § 1, after point 3 a	272	committee	RCV	+	518, 106, 3
After recital 12	285	Verts/ALE	EV	-	212, 396, 18
Annexe II, § 1, after point i a	283	committee	RCV	-	246, 307, 64
Commission proposal			RCV	+	603, 18, 8

Requests for roll-call votes
PPE:	amendments 153, 272
Verts/ALE:	amendments 264, 266, 267, 283
Renew:	amendments 264, 266, 267

Requests for separate votes
The Left:	amendments 81, 82

Requests for split votes
Verts/ALE
amendment 183
First part	Text as a whole without the words: ‘ex officio or’
Second part	those words
amendment 185
First part	Text as a whole without the words: ‘core platform services provided or offered by’
Second part	those words

Recommendation: Jeroen Lenaers (A9-0175/2023)

Subject	RCV etc.	Vote	RCV/EV – remarks
Draft Council decision	RCV	+	613, 15, 1

Report: Ryszard Czarnecki (A9-0197/2023) (Secret ballot (Rule 191(1)))

Subject	RCV etc.	Vote	RCV/EV – remarks
Nomination of Ildikó Gáll-Pelcz	SEC	+	303, 278, 52

Report: Monika Vana (A9-0195/2023)

Subject	RCV etc.	Vote	RCV/EV – remarks
Proposal for a decision	RCV	+	555, 28, 51

Report: Salvatore De Meo (A9-0158/2023)

Subject	RCV etc.	Vote	RCV/EV – remarks
Proposal for a decision	RCV	+	614, 15, 5

Report: Delara Burkhardt (A9-0176/2023)

Subject	RCV etc.	Vote	RCV/EV – remarks
Motion for a resolution	RCV	+	600, 17, 16

Motion for a resolution: B9-0257/2023

Subject	Am No	Author	RCV etc.	Vote	RCV/EV – remarks
Motion for a resolution B9-0257/2023 (PPE, S&D, Renew, Verts/ALE, The Left)
Before § 1	9	ID	RCV	-	145, 470, 8
§ 1	1	ECR	RCV	-	137, 470, 12
After § 1	13	ID	RCV	-	134, 481, 12
	14	ID	RCV	-	139, 471, 9
	16	ID	RCV	-	138, 477, 6
	17	ID		-
§ 2	2	ECR	RCV	-	147, 472, 11
§ 10	3	ECR	RCV	-	141, 467, 9
	12	ID		-
	§	original text	split
			1/RCV	+	456, 154, 18
			2	+
After §10	15	ID		-
§ 11	10	ID	RCV	-	144, 472, 7
	§	original text	split
			1/RCV	+	588, 18, 11
			2/RCV	+	431, 162, 23
§ 20	11	ID	RCV	-	139, 469, 15
Citation 1	5	ID		-
Citation 3	6D	ID		-
After recital B	7	ID		-
	8	ID		-
Recital K	4	S&D Verts/ALE The Left		+
Motion for a resolution (as a whole)			RCV	+	442, 144, 33

Requests for roll-call votes
ECR:	§ 11; amendments 1, 2, 3
ID:	amendments 9, 10, 11, 13, 14, 16; §§ 10 (1st part), 11
Verts/ALE:	final vote

Requests for split votes
ID
§ 10
First part	‘Strongly regrets the failure of the Council to make meaningful progress in the ongoing Article 7(1) TEU procedures; reiterates its call on the Council to address all new developments affecting the rule of law, democracy and fundamental rights; reiterates its call on the Council to address recommendations in the context of this procedure, underlining that any further delaying of such action would amount to a breach of the rule of law principle by the Council itself with long-lasting and potentially damaging consequences;’
Second part	‘insists that Parliament’s role and competences be respected;’
ECR
§ 11
First part	‘Underlines the important role of the presidency of the Council in driving forward the Council’s work on EU legislation, ensuring the continuity of the EU agenda and representing the Council in relations with the other EU institutions;’
Second part	‘questions how Hungary will be able to credibly fulfil this task in 2024, in view of its non-compliance with EU law and the values enshrined in Article 2 TEU, as well as the principle of sincere cooperation; asks the Council to find a proper solution as soon as possible; recalls that Parliament could take appropriate measures if such a solution is not found;’

Report: Michal Šimečka (A9-0178/2023)

Subject	RCV etc.	Vote	RCV/EV – remarks
Motion for a resolution	RCV	+	468, 17, 125

Motion for a resolution: B9-0259/2023

Subject	Am No	Author	RCV etc.	Vote	RCV/EV – remarks
Motion for a resolution B9-0259/2023 (EMPL Committee)
After § 3	3	PPE	RCV	+	371, 160, 91
§ 5	§	original text	split
			1/RCV	+	548, 39, 33
			2/RCV	+	411, 153, 52
§ 6	§	original text	split
			1/RCV	+	493, 20, 104
			2/RCV	+	459, 138, 19
§ 9	§	original text	split
			1/RCV	+	549, 52, 22
			2/RCV	+	417, 174, 28
§ 18	4	PPE	RCV	+	317, 287, 16
	§	original text	split
			1/RCV	↓
			2/RCV	↓
			3/RCV	↓
After § 18	5	PPE	RCV	+	399, 177, 47
§ 19	§	original text	split
			1/RCV	+	325, 243, 51
			2/RCV	-	255, 274, 90
§ 23	§	original text	split
			1/RCV	+	386, 122, 111
			2/RCV	+	533, 59, 19
§ 24	§	original text	split
			1/RCV	+	529, 51, 38
			2/RCV	+	379, 170, 62
			3/RCV	-	249, 274, 99
§ 26	§	original text	split
			1/RCV	+	543, 61, 17
			2/RCV	-	241, 349, 28
§ 27	§	original text	RCV	+	466, 63, 91
§ 31	§	original text	split
			1/RCV	+	543, 38, 36
			2/RCV	+	401, 114, 100
§ 32	§	original text	RCV	-	287, 306, 28
After recital B	1	PPE	RCV	+	356, 246, 20
After recital C	2	PPE	RCV	+	354, 246, 18
Recital F	§	original text	split
			1	+
			2	+
			3/EV	-	278, 323, 22
Motion for a resolution (as a whole)			RCV	+	483, 38, 100

Requests for roll-call votes
PPE:	§§ 18, 19, 23, 24, 26, 27, 31, 32; Amendments 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
S&D:	§§ 5, 6, 9, 18, 19, 24, 27, 31, 32; final vote
Renew:	§§ 5 (2nd part), 19 (2nd part)

Requests for separate votes
ECR:	§ 27

Requests for split votes
Renew
§ 5
First part	Text as a whole without the words: ‘and the difficulties caused when employers refuse to participate in collective bargaining’
Second part	those words
§ 19
First part	‘Reminds the Commission and the Member States of the urgent need for a social progress protocol’
Second part	‘that, in the event of conflicts between economic freedoms and fundamental social rights, give priority to the latter;’
ECR
§ 6
First part	Text as a whole without the words: ‘legislative and institutional’
Second part	those words
§ 9
First part	Text as a whole without the words: ‘by 2030’
Second part	those words
PPE
§ 18
First part	Text as a whole without the words: ‘and to exclude from tenders undertakings that have been sentenced for illegal activities related to workers’ and union rights infringements as well as infringement of environmental legislation;’ and ‘calls on the Commission to assess the possible revision of the European public procurement Directive in order to strengthen collective bargaining coverage;’
Second part	‘and to exclude from tenders undertakings that have been sentenced for illegal activities related to workers’ and union rights infringements as well as infringement of environmental legislation;’
Third part	‘calls on the Commission to assess the possible revision of the European public procurement Directive in order to strengthen collective bargaining coverage;’
§ 23
First part	‘Welcomes the Commission’s proposal for a corporate sustainability due diligence directive;’
Second part	‘calls on the Member States to ensure that companies’ respective corporate governance models take due account of environmental, social and economic developments through governance practices and market presence and promote corporate governance practices that contribute to company sustainability;’
§ 24
First part	Text as a whole without the words: ‘Calls on the Commission and the Member States to establish the necessary conditions and requirements to have at least 80 % of corporations covered by sustainable corporate governance agreements by 2030,’ and ‘the maximum CEO-to-worker pay ratio,’
Second part	‘Calls on the Commission and the Member States to establish the necessary conditions and requirements to have at least 80 % of corporations covered by sustainable corporate governance agreements by 2030,’
Third part	‘the maximum CEO-to-worker pay ratio,’
§ 31
First part	Text as a whole without the words: ‘board-level representation’ (first occurrence)
Second part	those words
Renew, ECR, PPE
§ 26
First part	‘Calls on the Commission to further promote the use of ESF+ for capacity-building of social partners with the aim of strengthening collective bargaining in Europe;’
Second part	‘highlights the need for an EU social dialogue fund for the development of strong, independent, and effective structures for social dialogue in the Member States, where necessary;’
ECR, PPE
recital F
First part	Text as a whole without the words: ‘stemming from long-standing social and environmental challenges such as poverty, social exclusion, rising inequalities, social crises, and the climate and biodiversity emergencies,’ and ‘profit-driven’
Second part	‘stemming from long-standing social and environmental challenges such as poverty, social exclusion, rising inequalities, social crises, and the climate and biodiversity emergencies,’
Third part	‘profit-driven’

Report: Sandra Kalniete (A9-0187/2023)

Subject	RCV etc.	Vote	RCV/EV – remarks
Motion for a resolution	RCV	+	469, 71, 75

Miscellaneous The reference to the Belgian national Olivier Vandecasteele was deleted from recital BY following his release from prison in Iran on 26 May 2023.

Motion for a resolution: B9-0258/2023

Subject	Am No	Author	RCV etc.	Vote	RCV/EV – remarks
Motion for a resolution B9-0258/2023 (PPE, S&D, Renew, Verts/ALE, ECR, The Left)
§ 2	§	original text	split
			1	+
			2	+
§ 6, before point a	5	ID	RCV	-	255, 315, 46
§ 10, introductory part	6	ID	RCV	-	82, 468, 61
§ 10, before point a	7	ID		-
§ 10, after point p	8	ID	RCV	-	107, 452, 51
§ 11	§	original text	sep/EV	+	338, 250, 29
§ 5, point e	9	ID		-
§ 36	10	ID	RCV	-	95, 462, 59
§ 50	§	original text	split
			1	+
			2	+
§ 52	§	original text	RCV	+	537, 62, 16
Recital N	1	ID		-
Recital W	2	ID	split
			1	-
			2	↓
Recital AG	3	ID		-
Recital AW	4	ID		-
Recital AZ	§	original text	split
			1	+
			2	+
Motion for a resolution (as a whole)			RCV	+	525, 2, 33

Requests for roll-call votes
S&D:	final vote
ID:	§ 52; amendments 5, 6, 8, 10

Requests for separate votes
PPE:	§ 11

Requests for split votes
PPE:
amendment 2
First part	Text as a whole without the word: ‘useless’
Second part	that word
ID:
§ 2
First part	‘Welcomes the Commission’s proposal for a Council recommendation on stepping up EU measures to combat antimicrobial resistance based on the One Health approach and calls on the Council to adopt a recommendation taking this resolution into account as a way to step up action’
Second part	‘in areas complementing legislation under the proposed pharmaceuticals package;’
§ 50
First part	Text as a whole without the words: ‘the inclusion of’ and ‘following a One Health approach in the context of negotiations on a potential WHO international agreement on pandemic prevention, preparedness and response;’
Second part	those words
recital AZ
First part	Text as a whole without the words: ‘including through the inclusion of concrete provisions on AMR in the context of the negotiation through the WHO of a potential international agreement on pandemic prevention,’
Second part	those words