Article 1, § 1, after point 25 Directive 2010/75/EU; Article 73, § 3
313CP4
committee
RCV
↓
Annex II; Directive 2010/75/EU; Annex 1a
309-312
Members
RCV
↓
315-316D
ID
RCV
↓
313CP5
committee
↓
Commission proposal
RCV
↓
Requests for roll-call votes
S&D:
amendments 308, 309-312, 314, 315-316; request to vote on the amendments instead of the provisional agreement
ID:
amendments 309-312, 313CP4 (Directive 2010/75/EU, article 73, § 3), 314, 315-316; Request for amendments rather than the draft legislative act to be put to the vote
Requests for separate votes
ID:
amendment 313 CP 3 (to Article 1, § 1, point 25); Directive 2010/75/EU; Article 70 c, § 1, sub§ 1 – the words ‘Member States may use any similar pre-existing procedure for the registration of installations in order to avoid creating an administrative burden. Member States may apply a permitting procedure to the intensive rearing of poultry and pigs: (a) with more than 40 000 places for poultry; (b) with more than 2 000 places for production pigs over 30 kg; or (c) with more than 750 places for sows.’
Text as a whole without the words: ‘The new harmonised’ and ‘and international’
Second part
those words
amendment 13
First part
Text as a whole without the words: ‘fuel-cell and other hydrogen-powered’ and ‘Where electrification is not possible or less efficient and hydrogen fuelled vehicles are not appropriate or cost competitive, the principle of technological neutrality allows for ensuring a level playing field with other technologies that are more mature.’
Second part
those words
amendment 51
First part
Text as a whole without the words: ‘In the case of vehicle combinations including trailers or semi-trailers with zero-emission technology the maximum authorised weights provided for in Sub-section 2.2.1, 2.2.2, 2.2.3 and 2.2.4 shall be increased by 2 tonnes. When more than one of the increases for vehicle combinations set out above apply to a single vehicle combination, those increases shall apply cumulatively.’
Second part
those words
8. Use of railway infrastructure capacity in the single European railway area, amending Directive 2012/34/EU and repealing Regulation (EU) No 913/2010 ***I
‘Since Directive 2005/29/EC already applies to misleading environmental claims, it enables the national courts and administrative authorities to stop and prohibit such claims. For example, in order to comply with Directive 2005/29/EC, environmental claims should relate only to aspects that are significant in terms of the product’s or trader’s environmental impact. Environmental claims and labelling schemes should also be clear and unambiguous regarding which aspects of the product or trader they refer to and should not omit or hide important information about the environmental performance of the product that consumers need in order to make informed choices. The wording, imagery and overall product presentation, including the taglines, layout, choice of colours, images, pictures, sounds, symbols, trademark or labels, should provide a truthful and accurate representation of the scale of the environmental benefit achieved, and should not overstate the environmental benefit achieved.’
Second part
‘Where applicable, information about the exact amount of a product’s certified material content, a feature around which certain types of labelling schemes operate, should not be omitted, especially when the minimum certified content could be zero.’
Miscellaneous
Amendments 158, 163, 164 and 165 had been withdrawn.
16. Council decision inviting Member States to ratify the Violence and Harassment Convention, 2019 (No 190) of the International Labour Organization ***