1. Gradual roll-out of Eudamed, information obligation in case of interruption of supply and the transitional provisions for certain in vitro diagnostic medical devices ***I
Amendments 86=117, 81=85=119, §§ 3 (2nd and 3rd parts)
The Left:
Amendments 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
ID:
Amendments 6, 7, 84
Requests for separate votes
PPE:
§§ 13, 15
ID:
§§ 3, 17
Requests for split votes
ID:
Recital D
First part
‘whereas the Commission presented its proposal for the establishment of an interinstitutional ethics body on 8 June 2023, putting forward a standard-setting body;’
Second part
‘whereas that Commission proposal fell far short of the ambition put forward in Parliament’s resolutions, mainly lacking in capacity to examine individual cases and potential breaches of ethical rules as well as to recommend sanctions;’
PPE:
§ 3
First part
Text as a whole without the words: ‘before’ and ‘and after’
Second part
‘before’
Third part
‘and after’
Miscellaneous
Amendments 40 and 99 had been cancelled.
6. Estimates of revenue and expenditure for the financial year 2025 – Section I – European Parliament
‘Calls for a genuine commitment to achieving the principle of multilingualism;’
Second part
‘to this end, calls for an increase in funding for the European Parliament’s translation and interpretation services, ensuring that their staff members are recruited to established internal European Parliament posts;’
7. Draft amending budget No 1/2024: Amendments of the 2024 budget required due to the MFF revision
8. Draft Amending Budget 3/2024: Reinforcing the European Public Prosecutor's Office following the accession of Poland and the expected participation of Sweden
‘whereas Russia has systematically maintained contacts with far-right and far-left parties, and other personalities and movements to gain support from institutional actors within the Union in order to legitimise its illegal and criminal actions; whereas analysis of voting patterns and speeches in the European Parliament has shown these parties to have been the most sympathetic to Russia, including calls as extreme as those made in public in January 2024 by Member of the European Parliament (MEP) Miroslav Radačovský – who was also paid by Russian sources to observe the parliamentary elections in Russia in 2021 – for the destruction of Europe;’
Second part
‘whereas the Hungarian Fidesz party has been spreading pro-Kremlin messages and propaganda;’
Recital N
First part
‘whereas, according to media analyses, since August 2023, 16 far-right MEPs from Germany, France, the Netherlands, Italy, Slovakia, Estonia, Spain, Croatia, Denmark and Belgium participated in debates and interviews organised by ‘Voice of Europe’;’ without the words ‘far-right’
Second part
‘far-right’
Third part
‘whereas the vast majority of these politicians tend to normalise manifestations of hatred and intolerance based on race, national origin or sexual orientation and to project a vision of Russia as the authentic keeper of traditional family values;’
Fourth part
‘whereas the public discourse of those politicians is leading to dangerous divisions in society as a whole, and is a threat to democracy;’
Recital T
First part
‘whereas there is credible evidence that, in 2020, Peter Pelligrini, then Prime Minister of Slovakia, requested the help of the Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban to obtain support from the Kremlin ahead of Slovakia’s 2020 parliamentary election; whereas this resulted in a visit by Prime Minister Pelligrini to Russia in February 2020, three days before the elections were held;’
Second part
‘whereas the 2023 parliamentary elections were targeted by further Russian interference and disinformation campaigns; whereas Peter Pelligrini is now President-elect of Slovakia and due to take office in June 2024;’
§ 2
First part
‘Expresses its outrage at the participation of MEPs in a pro-Russian media outlet, ‘Voice of Europe’,’
Second part
‘while Russia is waging its illegal war of aggression against Ukraine; emphasises that most views propagated by MEPs on ‘Voice of Europe’ do not reflect the stance of the vast majority of MEPs, who overwhelmingly denounce Russia’s unlawful invasion of Ukraine, its employment of hybrid warfare tactics against European democracy, and its other aggressive and anti-democratic policy decisions in recent years;’
§ 20
First part
‘Calls for Parliament to introduce mandatory, effective and regular training on security, interference, ethical standards, compliance and integrity for all MEPs and their offices and for all Parliament staff,’
Second part
‘raising awareness that they are potential targets of foreign state and non-state actors;’
Third part
‘calls for Parliament’s services to put in place effective monitoring and surveillance systems to detect foreign interference while respecting MEPs’ freedom of mandate;’
§ 21
First part
Text as a whole without the words: ‘through a dedicated parliamentary body’
Second part
those words
§ 25
First part
Text as a whole without the words: ‘reiterates its call for the EU institutions and the Member States to ensure sufficient and sustainable funding for investigative journalism;’
Second part
those words
§ 27
First part
‘Insists on the need to do more to protect the European information environment and EU citizens’ right to access reliable information;’
Second part
‘recalls the need to establish, as stated in Parliament’s previous reports, ‘mirror clauses’ whereby the openness of the European information space to third countries would be proportionate to the access European media outlets have in these countries;’
Third part
‘underlines that the media outlets working for hostile and authoritarian regimes should not have access to European Parliament premises;’
Fourth part
‘insists that labelling on platforms should go beyond identifying deep fakes to also establish positive labelling using tools created by the media sector, such as the Journalism Trust Initiative;’
Fifth part
‘expresses, in this context, its general support for the New Deal for the Right to Information proposed by Reporters Without Borders;’
ID:
§ 18
First part
‘Believes that the recent allegations might constitute sanctionable behaviour under its Code of Conduct and if confirmed must be met with the firmest response;’
Second part
‘underlines the importance of immediately conducting a thorough internal investigation in order to assess all possible cases of foreign interference from Russia and other countries in the European Parliament;’
Third part
‘highlights that these revelations are part of a larger pattern of Russian interference, as highlighted in the final reports of INGE and ING2;’
14. Attempts to reintroduce a foreign agent law in Georgia and its restrictions on civil society
Text as a whole without the words: ‘the E3 (France, Germany, the UK) and its partners to consider imposing a deadline on Iran to comply with its obligations under the JCPOA and, in the event of non-compliance,’
Second part
those words
ID:
§ 19
First part
Text as a whole without the words: ‘to increase support for human rights defenders who need to leave Iran, including through rapid access to visas and asylum, and’